Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Community Health 3/2006

01-06-2006

EVALUATED COMMUNITY FIRE SAFETY INTERVENTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES: A REVIEW OF CURRENT LITERATURE

Authors: Van M. Ta, MPH, Shannon Frattaroli, PhD, MPH, Gwendolyn Bergen, PhD, MPH, Andrea Carlson Gielen, ScD, ScM, CHES

Published in: Journal of Community Health | Issue 3/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to assess the state of fire prevention research, provide an updated synthesis of evaluated fire prevention programs, and discuss the role of fire fighters and data systems in prevention efforts. The review included all evaluations of U.S. based fire prevention interventions published between January 1998 and September 2004 and any earlier articles about U.S. fire prevention interventions not included in two prior review articles. We retrieved information from each identified study including evaluation findings, involvement of fire service personnel and use of existing data systems. We identified twelve articles: seven reported on smoke alarm interventions, three on multi-faceted programs, and two other programs. Five programs involved fire service personnel in the design, implementation, and/or evaluation, and three used existing data systems. Studies reviewed suggest that canvassing and smoke alarm installations are the most effective means of distributing alarms and increasing the functional status of distributed alarms. The functionality of smoke alarms, an issue noted in earlier reviews, remains a problem. Programs involving partnerships with fire departments have indicated success in preventing fires and deaths, improving smoke alarm ownership and functional status, and improving children’s fire safety knowledge. Using existing data systems to target and to evaluate interventions was effective. In the years since prior reviews, some improvements in the rigor of evaluation designs have been made, but there is still a need for high quality evaluations that will inform fire injury prevention efforts.
Footnotes
1
The term, “significant” for study results is used in this review if the authors of the identified studies concluded significant results using their studies’ criteria.
 
Literature
3.
go back to reference Frattaroli S, Gielen A, Ta V, Bergen G. Fire Prevention in Delaware: a case study of state and local prevention efforts, 2006, in preparation Frattaroli S, Gielen A, Ta V, Bergen G. Fire Prevention in Delaware: a case study of state and local prevention efforts, 2006, in preparation
4.
go back to reference DiGuiseppi C, Higgins JP. (2000). Systematic review of controlled trials of interventions to promote smoke alarms. Arch Dis Child 82:341–348CrossRefPubMed DiGuiseppi C, Higgins JP. (2000). Systematic review of controlled trials of interventions to promote smoke alarms. Arch Dis Child 82:341–348CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Warda L, Tenenbein M, Moffatt ME. (1999). House fire injury prevention update. Part II. A review of the effectiveness of preventive interventions. Inj Prev 5:217–225PubMedCrossRef Warda L, Tenenbein M, Moffatt ME. (1999). House fire injury prevention update. Part II. A review of the effectiveness of preventive interventions. Inj Prev 5:217–225PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jones AR, Thompson CJ, Davis MK. (2001). Smoke Alarm Ownership and Installation: a Comparison of a Rural and a Suburban Community in Georgia. J Comm Health 26:307–29CrossRef Jones AR, Thompson CJ, Davis MK. (2001). Smoke Alarm Ownership and Installation: a Comparison of a Rural and a Suburban Community in Georgia. J Comm Health 26:307–29CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Douglas MR, Mallonee S, Istre GR. (1998). Comparison of community based smoke detector distribution methods in an urban community. Inj Prev 4:28–32PubMed Douglas MR, Mallonee S, Istre GR. (1998). Comparison of community based smoke detector distribution methods in an urban community. Inj Prev 4:28–32PubMed
9.
go back to reference Shults RA, Sacks JJ, Briske LA, Dickey PH, Kinde MR, Mallonee S, Douglas MR. (1998). Evaluation of three smoke detector promotion programs. Am J Prev Med 15:165–71CrossRefPubMed Shults RA, Sacks JJ, Briske LA, Dickey PH, Kinde MR, Mallonee S, Douglas MR. (1998). Evaluation of three smoke detector promotion programs. Am J Prev Med 15:165–71CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Thompson CJ, Jones AR, Davis MK, Caplan LS. (2004). Do smoke alarms still function a year after installation? A follow-up of the get-alarmed campaign. J Commun Health 29:171–181CrossRef Thompson CJ, Jones AR, Davis MK, Caplan LS. (2004). Do smoke alarms still function a year after installation? A follow-up of the get-alarmed campaign. J Commun Health 29:171–181CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mallonee S. (2000). Evaluating injury prevention programs: the Oklahoma City smoke alarm project. Future Child 10:164–174CrossRefPubMed Mallonee S. (2000). Evaluating injury prevention programs: the Oklahoma City smoke alarm project. Future Child 10:164–174CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mickalide A, Validzic A. (1999). Smoke alarm maintenance in low-income families. Am J Public Health 89:1584–1585PubMed Mickalide A, Validzic A. (1999). Smoke alarm maintenance in low-income families. Am J Public Health 89:1584–1585PubMed
13.
go back to reference Urban community intervention to prevent Halloween Arson–Detroit, Michigan, 1985–1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997; 46:299–304 Urban community intervention to prevent Halloween Arson–Detroit, Michigan, 1985–1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997; 46:299–304
14.
go back to reference Azeredo R, Stephens-Stidham S. (2003). Design and implementation of injury prevention curricula for elementary schools: lessons learned. Inj Prev 9:274–278CrossRefPubMed Azeredo R, Stephens-Stidham S. (2003). Design and implementation of injury prevention curricula for elementary schools: lessons learned. Inj Prev 9:274–278CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gielen AC, Wilson ME, McDonald EM, Serwint JR, Andrews JS, Hwang WT, Wang MC. (2001). Randomized Trial of Enhanced Anticipatory Guidance for Injury Prevention. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 155:42–49PubMed Gielen AC, Wilson ME, McDonald EM, Serwint JR, Andrews JS, Hwang WT, Wang MC. (2001). Randomized Trial of Enhanced Anticipatory Guidance for Injury Prevention. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 155:42–49PubMed
16.
go back to reference Gielen AC, McDonald EM, Wilson ME, Hwang WT, Serwint JR, Andrews JS, Wang MC. (2002). Effects of improved access to safety counseling, products, and home visits on parents’ safety practices: results of a randomized trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 156:33–40PubMed Gielen AC, McDonald EM, Wilson ME, Hwang WT, Serwint JR, Andrews JS, Wang MC. (2002). Effects of improved access to safety counseling, products, and home visits on parents’ safety practices: results of a randomized trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 156:33–40PubMed
17.
go back to reference Clark DE, Dainiak CN, Reeder S. (2000). Decreasing incidence of burn injury in a rural state. Inj Prev 6:259–262CrossRefPubMed Clark DE, Dainiak CN, Reeder S. (2000). Decreasing incidence of burn injury in a rural state. Inj Prev 6:259–262CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Haddix AC, Mallonee S, Waxweiler R, Douglas MR. (2001). Cost Effectiveness analysis of a smoke alarm giveaway program in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Inj Prev 7:276–281CrossRefPubMed Haddix AC, Mallonee S, Waxweiler R, Douglas MR. (2001). Cost Effectiveness analysis of a smoke alarm giveaway program in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Inj Prev 7:276–281CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Campbell D, Stanley J. (1966). Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Chicago, Rand McNally Campbell D, Stanley J. (1966). Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Chicago, Rand McNally
20.
go back to reference Warda L, Tenenbein M, Moffatt ME. (1999) House fire injury prevention update. Part I. A review of risk factors for fatal and non-fatal house fire injury. Inj Prev 5:145–150PubMed Warda L, Tenenbein M, Moffatt ME. (1999) House fire injury prevention update. Part I. A review of risk factors for fatal and non-fatal house fire injury. Inj Prev 5:145–150PubMed
21.
go back to reference Lewis MA, DeVellis BM, Sleath B. Social influence and interpersonal communication in health behavior. In K Glanz, BK Rimer and MA Lewis (eds) Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, pp. 240–264 Lewis MA, DeVellis BM, Sleath B. Social influence and interpersonal communication in health behavior. In K Glanz, BK Rimer and MA Lewis (eds) Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, pp. 240–264
Metadata
Title
EVALUATED COMMUNITY FIRE SAFETY INTERVENTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES: A REVIEW OF CURRENT LITERATURE
Authors
Van M. Ta, MPH
Shannon Frattaroli, PhD, MPH
Gwendolyn Bergen, PhD, MPH
Andrea Carlson Gielen, ScD, ScM, CHES
Publication date
01-06-2006
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Community Health / Issue 3/2006
Print ISSN: 0094-5145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3610
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-005-9007-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2006

Journal of Community Health 3/2006 Go to the issue