Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies 3/2011

01-09-2011 | Original Paper

Audience Influence on EGM Gambling: The Protective Effects of Having Others Watch You Play

Authors: Matthew J. Rockloff, Nancy Greer

Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

One component of social facilitation on gambling is the potential for an audience of people to observe the play of Electronic Gaming Machine (EGM) gamblers and influence their behaviour without participating directly in gambling themselves. An experiment was conducted with an audience of onlookers, purported to be students of research methods, taking notes while watching the participants play an EGM. Forty-three male and 82 female participants (N = 125), aged 18–79 (M = 49.2, SD = 15.6), played a laptop simulated 3-reel EGM using a $20 stake in three conditions: (1) alone, (2) watched by a simulated audience of six persons, or (3) watched by an audience of 26. Outcomes on the poker machine were rigged with a fixed sequence of five wins in the first 20 spins and indefinite losses thereafter. The results found smaller bet-sizes associated with larger audiences of onlookers, and this outcome is consistent with a hypothesized motivation to display more wins to the audience. Moreover, final payouts were greater in the audience conditions compared to the control, further suggesting that an audience may be a protective factor limiting player losses.
Literature
go back to reference Baron, R. S., Moore, D., & Sanders, G. S. (1978). Distraction as a source of drive in social facilitation research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 816–824.CrossRef Baron, R. S., Moore, D., & Sanders, G. S. (1978). Distraction as a source of drive in social facilitation research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 816–824.CrossRef
go back to reference Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). The self-attention-induced feedback loop and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17(6), 545–568.CrossRef Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). The self-attention-induced feedback loop and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17(6), 545–568.CrossRef
go back to reference Cottrell, N. B., Wack, D. L., Sekerak, G. J., & Rittle, R. H. (1968). Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(3), 245–250.PubMedCrossRef Cottrell, N. B., Wack, D. L., Sekerak, G. J., & Rittle, R. H. (1968). Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(3), 245–250.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
go back to reference Rockloff, M. J., Greer, N., & Fay, C. (2010). The social contagion of gambling: How venue size contributes to player losses. Australia: Central Queensland University. Rockloff, M. J., Greer, N., & Fay, C. (2010). The social contagion of gambling: How venue size contributes to player losses. Australia: Central Queensland University.
Metadata
Title
Audience Influence on EGM Gambling: The Protective Effects of Having Others Watch You Play
Authors
Matthew J. Rockloff
Nancy Greer
Publication date
01-09-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies / Issue 3/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3602
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-010-9213-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Journal of Gambling Studies 3/2011 Go to the issue