Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 2/2018

01-04-2018 | PROFESSIONAL ISSUES

How Might the Genetics Profession Better Utilize Social Media

Authors: Rebekah A. Moore, Anne L. Matthews, Leslie Cohen

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Social media is a common method of communication in people’s personal lives and professional settings. Gallagher et al. (2016) recommended, “it is time for genetic counselors to embrace social media as a means of communicating with patients or other healthcare professionals.” Full members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) in the USA and Canada and genetics patients in Cleveland, OH, were surveyed to determine interest in using social media for patient-provider interactions. Both cohorts indicated that patient privacy and confidentiality would be a concern; however, survey results indicated patients would be interested in using social media to receive general information about genetic counseling and to learn about genetics services. Genetic counselors indicated privacy issues were not concerning if social media were to be used in this capacity. The majority of genetic counselor participants (88.7%) indicated they would welcome national guidelines for patient-provider social media use. Data from this study demonstrated that sharing what to expect at a genetic counseling appointment, defining genetic counseling, and announcing community outreach events are possible ways genetic counselors could utilize social media to communicate with and educate patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Boucher, J. L. (2010). Technology and patient–provider interactions: improving quality of care, but is it improving communication and collaboration? Diabetes Spectrum, 23(23), 142–144.CrossRef Boucher, J. L. (2010). Technology and patient–provider interactions: improving quality of care, but is it improving communication and collaboration? Diabetes Spectrum, 23(23), 142–144.CrossRef
go back to reference O’Keeffe, G. S., Clarke-Pearson, K., & Council on Communications and Media. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800–804.CrossRefPubMed O’Keeffe, G. S., Clarke-Pearson, K., & Council on Communications and Media. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800–804.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Prasad, B. (2013). Social media, health care, and social networking. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 77(3), 492–495.CrossRefPubMed Prasad, B. (2013). Social media, health care, and social networking. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 77(3), 492–495.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Steele, R. (2011). Social media, mobile devices and sensors: Categorizing new techniques for health communication. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Sensing Technology. Palmerston North: Massey University. Steele, R. (2011). Social media, mobile devices and sensors: Categorizing new techniques for health communication. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Sensing Technology. Palmerston North: Massey University.
Metadata
Title
How Might the Genetics Profession Better Utilize Social Media
Authors
Rebekah A. Moore
Anne L. Matthews
Leslie Cohen
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0215-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Journal of Genetic Counseling 2/2018 Go to the issue