Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 2/2017

01-04-2017 | Commentary

A Different Vantage Point: Commentary on “Theories for Psychotherapeutic Genetic Counseling: Fuzzy Trace Theory and Cognitive Behavior Theory”

Author: Krista Redlinger-Grosse

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

Raised in a psychosocial model of genetic counseling, I have long believed that understanding and addressing our patients’ psychological needs are critical to our role as genetic counselors. As such, I was pleased to see Biesecker et al.(2016) article, “Theories for psychotherapeutic genetic counseling: Fuzzy trace theory and Cognitive Behavior Theory” and their presented framework for how to apply psychological theories to genetic counseling practice. I wholeheartedly agree that the use of a counseling approach to guide our interactions will enrich our work - for both patients and also for genetic counselors as professionals. Where I disagree, however, is Biesecker et al.‘s argument for the adoption of a practice descriptor or “moniker” of “psychotherapeutic genetic counseling.” Having practiced in both worlds, psychotherapy and genetic counseling, I struggle with their assertion and find myself wondering, are we looking at the same end goal, but from a different vantage point? In this commentary, I offer an alternative perspective in hopes of continuing the conversation of how to best meet our patients’ psychological needs. …
Literature
go back to reference Biesecker, BB., Austin, J., & Caleshu, C. (2016). Theories of psychotherapeutic genetic counseling:Fuzzy trace theory and Cognitive Behavior Theory. Journal of Genetic Counseling, (in press). Biesecker, BB., Austin, J., & Caleshu, C. (2016). Theories of psychotherapeutic genetic counseling:Fuzzy trace theory and Cognitive Behavior Theory. Journal of Genetic Counseling, (in press).
go back to reference Borders, L. D., Eubanks, S., & Callanan, N. (2006). Supervision of psychosocial skills in genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(4), 211–223.CrossRefPubMed Borders, L. D., Eubanks, S., & Callanan, N. (2006). Supervision of psychosocial skills in genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(4), 211–223.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hartmann, J. E., Veach, P. M., MacFarlane, I. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2015). Genetic counselor perceptions of genetic counseling session goals: A validation study of the Reciprocal-Engagement Model. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24, 225–237. doi:10.1007/s10897-013-9647-6.CrossRefPubMed Hartmann, J. E., Veach, P. M., MacFarlane, I. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2015). Genetic counselor perceptions of genetic counseling session goals: A validation study of the Reciprocal-Engagement Model. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24, 225–237. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-013-9647-6.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2007). Coming full circle: A Reciprocal-Engagement Model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 713–728. doi:10.1007/s10897-007-9113-4.CrossRef McCarthy Veach, P., Bartels, D. M., & LeRoy, B. S. (2007). Coming full circle: A Reciprocal-Engagement Model of genetic counseling practice. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 713–728. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-007-9113-4.CrossRef
go back to reference Redlinger-Grosse, K. (2014). It is time: a commentary on “an exploration of genetic counselors’ needs and experiences with prenatal chromosomal microarray testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23, 933–934.CrossRefPubMed Redlinger-Grosse, K. (2014). It is time: a commentary on “an exploration of genetic counselors’ needs and experiences with prenatal chromosomal microarray testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23, 933–934.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Resta, R., Biesecker, B. B., Bennett, R. L., Blum, S., Estabrooks Hahn, S., Strecker, M. N., & Williams, J. L. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 77–83.CrossRefPubMed Resta, R., Biesecker, B. B., Bennett, R. L., Blum, S., Estabrooks Hahn, S., Strecker, M. N., & Williams, J. L. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 77–83.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A Different Vantage Point: Commentary on “Theories for Psychotherapeutic Genetic Counseling: Fuzzy Trace Theory and Cognitive Behavior Theory”
Author
Krista Redlinger-Grosse
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-0024-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Journal of Genetic Counseling 2/2017 Go to the issue