Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 3/2016

01-06-2016 | Original Research

Assessment of the Readability of Genetic Counseling Patient Letters

Authors: Emily Brown, Megan Skinner, Stephanie Ashley, Kate Reed, Shannan DeLany Dixon

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Patient letters are a powerful tool that genetic counselors use to communicate with their patients. Patient letters are often sent to provide information on a new diagnosis, reiterate test results, and to serve as a permanent record of the visit. Patient letters, however, are only helpful if the patients can understand them. More than 50 % of the US population reads below a 9th grade reading level and over one-third of the population has low health literacy skills. In this study we evaluate the readability of genetic counseling patient letters by assessing reading level, image use, and terminology use. One hundred forty-nine genetic counselors participated in the survey and of these, 79 submitted a sample patient letter. Analyses of the letters revealed a mean reading level of 10.93. On average, 6 genetic terms were included in each letter, and only 25 % of these terms were defined. Analyses of survey responses revealed over 75 % of the genetic counselors did not include images in their patient letters. These results indicate there is room for improvement in order to make genetic counseling patient letters more accessible to the general population.
Literature
go back to reference Baker, D. L., Eash, T., Schuette, J. L., & Uhlmann, W. R. (2002). Guidelines for writing letters to patients. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(5), 399–418.CrossRefPubMed Baker, D. L., Eash, T., Schuette, J. L., & Uhlmann, W. R. (2002). Guidelines for writing letters to patients. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(5), 399–418.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Debanco, T., Walker, J., Bell, S. K., Darer, J. D., Elmore, J. G., Farag, N., et al. (2012). Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes: a quasi-experimental study and look ahead. Annuals of Internal Medicine, 157(7), 461.CrossRef Debanco, T., Walker, J., Bell, S. K., Darer, J. D., Elmore, J. G., Farag, N., et al. (2012). Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes: a quasi-experimental study and look ahead. Annuals of Internal Medicine, 157(7), 461.CrossRef
go back to reference Delp, C., & Jones, J. (1996). Communicating information to patients: the use of cartoon illustrations to improve comprehension of instructions. Academy of Emergency Medicine, 3(3), 264.CrossRef Delp, C., & Jones, J. (1996). Communicating information to patients: the use of cartoon illustrations to improve comprehension of instructions. Academy of Emergency Medicine, 3(3), 264.CrossRef
go back to reference Erby, L. H., Roter, D., Larson, S., & Cho, J. (2008). The rapid estimate of adult literacy in genetics (REAL‐G): a means to assess literacy deficits in the context of genetics. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 146(2), 174–181.CrossRef Erby, L. H., Roter, D., Larson, S., & Cho, J. (2008). The rapid estimate of adult literacy in genetics (REAL‐G): a means to assess literacy deficits in the context of genetics. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 146(2), 174–181.CrossRef
go back to reference Green, J., Richards, M., Murton, F., Statham, H., & Hallowell, N. (1997). Family communication and genetic counseling: the case of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6(1), 45.CrossRefPubMed Green, J., Richards, M., Murton, F., Statham, H., & Hallowell, N. (1997). Family communication and genetic counseling: the case of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6(1), 45.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hallowell, N., & Murton, F. (1998). The value of written summaries of genetic consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 35(1), 27–34.CrossRefPubMed Hallowell, N., & Murton, F. (1998). The value of written summaries of genetic consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 35(1), 27–34.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hurle, B., Citrin, T., Jenkins, J. F., Kaphingst, K. A., Lamb, N., Roseman, J. E., & Bonham, V. L. (2013). What does it mean to be genomically literate?: National Human Genome Research Institute meeting report. Genetics in Medicine, 15(8), 658–663.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hurle, B., Citrin, T., Jenkins, J. F., Kaphingst, K. A., Lamb, N., Roseman, J. E., & Bonham, V. L. (2013). What does it mean to be genomically literate?: National Human Genome Research Institute meeting report. Genetics in Medicine, 15(8), 658–663.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Irwin, J. W., & Davis, C. A. (1980). Assessing readability: the checklist approach. Journal of Reading, 24, 124–130. Irwin, J. W., & Davis, C. A. (1980). Assessing readability: the checklist approach. Journal of Reading, 24, 124–130.
go back to reference Karan, A., Campbell, D., & Mayer, H. (2011). The effect of a visual aid on the comprehension of cataract surgery in a rural, indigent south Indian population. Digital Journal of Ophthalmology, 17(3), 16–22.PubMedPubMedCentral Karan, A., Campbell, D., & Mayer, H. (2011). The effect of a visual aid on the comprehension of cataract surgery in a rural, indigent south Indian population. Digital Journal of Ophthalmology, 17(3), 16–22.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Kazemek, F. E. (1984). A brief discussion of readability formulas. The High School Journal, 248–251. Kazemek, F. E. (1984). A brief discussion of readability formulas. The High School Journal, 248–251.
go back to reference Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., & Paulsen, C. (2006). The health literacy of america’s adults: Results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. United States: National Center for Education Statistics. Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., & Paulsen, C. (2006). The health literacy of america’s adults: Results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. United States: National Center for Education Statistics.
go back to reference Ley, P. (2011). Satisfaction, compliance and communication. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(4), 241.CrossRef Ley, P. (2011). Satisfaction, compliance and communication. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(4), 241.CrossRef
go back to reference McClure, G. M. (1987). Readability formulas: useful or useless. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications, 30, 12–15.CrossRef McClure, G. M. (1987). Readability formulas: useful or useless. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications, 30, 12–15.CrossRef
go back to reference Meade, C. D., & Smith, C. F. (1991). Readability formulas: cautions and criteria. Patient Education and Counseling, 17(2), 153–158.CrossRef Meade, C. D., & Smith, C. F. (1991). Readability formulas: cautions and criteria. Patient Education and Counseling, 17(2), 153–158.CrossRef
go back to reference Mesters, I., Ausems, A., & De Vries, H. (2005). General public’s knowledge, interest and information needs related to genetic cancer: An exploratory study. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 14(1), 69–75.CrossRefPubMed Mesters, I., Ausems, A., & De Vries, H. (2005). General public’s knowledge, interest and information needs related to genetic cancer: An exploratory study. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 14(1), 69–75.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Molster, C., Charles, T., Samanek, A., & O’Leary, P. (2009). Australian study on public knowledge of human genetics and health. Public Health Genomics, 12, 84.CrossRefPubMed Molster, C., Charles, T., Samanek, A., & O’Leary, P. (2009). Australian study on public knowledge of human genetics and health. Public Health Genomics, 12, 84.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nielsen-Bohlman, L., Panzer, A., Kindig, D. A., & Hamlin, B. (2004). Health literacy: A prescription to end confusion. United States: National Academies Press. Nielsen-Bohlman, L., Panzer, A., Kindig, D. A., & Hamlin, B. (2004). Health literacy: A prescription to end confusion. United States: National Academies Press.
go back to reference Ownby, R. L. (2005). Influence of vocabulary and sentence complexity and passive voice on the readability of consumer-oriented mental health information on the internet. In AMIA annual symposium proceedings (Vol. 2005, p. 585). American Medical Informatics Association. Ownby, R. L. (2005). Influence of vocabulary and sentence complexity and passive voice on the readability of consumer-oriented mental health information on the internet. In AMIA annual symposium proceedings (Vol. 2005, p. 585). American Medical Informatics Association.
go back to reference Roggenbuck, J., Temme, R., Pond, D., Baker, J., Jarvis, K., Liu, M., Dugan, S., & Mendelsohn, N. J. (2014). The long and short of genetic counseling summary letters: a case–control study. Journal of genetic counseling, 1–9. Roggenbuck, J., Temme, R., Pond, D., Baker, J., Jarvis, K., Liu, M., Dugan, S., & Mendelsohn, N. J. (2014). The long and short of genetic counseling summary letters: a case–control study. Journal of genetic counseling, 1–9.
go back to reference Sandberg, E. H., Sharma, R., & Sandberg, W. S. (2012). Deficits in retention for verbally presented medical information. Anesthesiology, 117(4), 772.CrossRefPubMed Sandberg, E. H., Sharma, R., & Sandberg, W. S. (2012). Deficits in retention for verbally presented medical information. Anesthesiology, 117(4), 772.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Smith, A., & Pollin, T. (2007). Patient education. In W. Uhlmann, J. Schuette, & B. Yashar (Eds.), A guide to genetic counseling (2nd ed., p. 177). New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. Smith, A., & Pollin, T. (2007). Patient education. In W. Uhlmann, J. Schuette, & B. Yashar (Eds.), A guide to genetic counseling (2nd ed., p. 177). New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
go back to reference Treacy, K., Elborn, J. S., Rendall, J., & Bradley, J. M. (2008). Copying letters to patients with cystic fibrosis (CF): letter content and patient perceptions of benefit. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 7(6), 511.CrossRefPubMed Treacy, K., Elborn, J. S., Rendall, J., & Bradley, J. M. (2008). Copying letters to patients with cystic fibrosis (CF): letter content and patient perceptions of benefit. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 7(6), 511.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference White, P., Singleton, A., & Jones, R. (2004). Copying referral letters to patients: the views of patients, patient representatives and doctors. Patient Education and Counseling, 55(1), 94.CrossRefPubMed White, P., Singleton, A., & Jones, R. (2004). Copying referral letters to patients: the views of patients, patient representatives and doctors. Patient Education and Counseling, 55(1), 94.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessment of the Readability of Genetic Counseling Patient Letters
Authors
Emily Brown
Megan Skinner
Stephanie Ashley
Kate Reed
Shannan DeLany Dixon
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9890-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Journal of Genetic Counseling 3/2016 Go to the issue