Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 1/2016

Open Access 01-02-2016 | Original Research

“Is It Worth Knowing?” Focus Group Participants’ Perceived Utility of Genomic Preconception Carrier Screening

Authors: Jennifer L. Schneider, Katrina A. B. Goddard, James Davis, Benjamin Wilfond, Tia L. Kauffman, Jacob A. Reiss, Marian Gilmore, Patricia Himes, Frances L. Lynch, Michael C. Leo, Carmit McMullen

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

As genome sequencing technology advances, research is needed to guide decision-making about what results can or should be offered to patients in different clinical settings. We conducted three focus groups with individuals who had prior preconception genetic testing experience to explore perceived advantages and disadvantages of genome sequencing for preconception carrier screening, compared to usual care. Using a discussion guide, a trained qualitative moderator facilitated the audio-recorded focus groups. Sixteen individuals participated. Thematic analysis of transcripts started with a grounded approach and subsequently focused on participants’ perceptions of the value of genetic information. Analysis uncovered two orientations toward genomic preconception carrier screening: “certain” individuals desiring all possible screening information; and “hesitant” individuals who were more cautious about its value. Participants revealed valuable information about barriers to screening: fear/anxiety about results; concerns about the method of returning results; concerns about screening necessity; and concerns about partner participation. All participants recommended offering choice to patients to enhance the value of screening and reduce barriers. Overall, two groups of likely users of genome sequencing for preconception carrier screening demonstrated different perceptions of the advantages or disadvantages of screening, suggesting tailored approaches to education, consent, and counseling may be warranted with each group.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference ACOG Committee on Genetics. (2009). ACOG Committee Opinion No. 442: Preconception and prenatal carrier screening for genetic diseases in individuals of Eastern European Jewish descent. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 114(4), 950–953.CrossRef ACOG Committee on Genetics. (2009). ACOG Committee Opinion No. 442: Preconception and prenatal carrier screening for genetic diseases in individuals of Eastern European Jewish descent. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 114(4), 950–953.CrossRef
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. (2011). ACOG Committee Opinion No. 486: Update on carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 117(4), 1028–1031.CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. (2011). ACOG Committee Opinion No. 486: Update on carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 117(4), 1028–1031.CrossRef
go back to reference Archibald, A. D., Jaques, A. M., Wake, S., Collins, V. R., Cohen, J., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2009). “It’s something I need to consider”: decisions about carrier screening for fragile X syndrome in a population of non-pregnant women. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 149A(12), 2731–2738.CrossRefPubMed Archibald, A. D., Jaques, A. M., Wake, S., Collins, V. R., Cohen, J., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2009). “It’s something I need to consider”: decisions about carrier screening for fragile X syndrome in a population of non-pregnant women. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 149A(12), 2731–2738.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Archibald, A. D., Hickerton, C. L., Jaques, A. M., Wake, S., Cohen, J., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2013). “It’s about having the choice”: stakeholder perceptions of population-based genetic carrier screening for fragile X syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 161A(1), 48–58.CrossRefPubMed Archibald, A. D., Hickerton, C. L., Jaques, A. M., Wake, S., Cohen, J., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2013). “It’s about having the choice”: stakeholder perceptions of population-based genetic carrier screening for fragile X syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 161A(1), 48–58.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bell, C. J., Dinwiddie, D. L., Miller, N. A., Hateley, S. L., Ganusova, E. E., Mudge, J., Langley, R. J., Zhang, L., Lee, C. C., Schilkey, F. D., Sheth, V., Woodward, J. E., Peckham, H. E., Schroth, G. P., Kim, R. W., & Kingsmore, S. F. (2011). Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next-generation sequencing. Science Translational Medicine, 3(65), 65ra4.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Bell, C. J., Dinwiddie, D. L., Miller, N. A., Hateley, S. L., Ganusova, E. E., Mudge, J., Langley, R. J., Zhang, L., Lee, C. C., Schilkey, F. D., Sheth, V., Woodward, J. E., Peckham, H. E., Schroth, G. P., Kim, R. W., & Kingsmore, S. F. (2011). Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next-generation sequencing. Science Translational Medicine, 3(65), 65ra4.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bennette, C. S., Trinidad, S. B., Fullerton, S. M., Patrick, D., Amendola, L., Burke, W., Hisama, F. M., Jarvik, G. P., Regier, D. A., & Veenstra, D. L. (2013). Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value–development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT). Genetics in Medicine, 15(11), 873–881.CrossRefPubMed Bennette, C. S., Trinidad, S. B., Fullerton, S. M., Patrick, D., Amendola, L., Burke, W., Hisama, F. M., Jarvik, G. P., Regier, D. A., & Veenstra, D. L. (2013). Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value–development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT). Genetics in Medicine, 15(11), 873–881.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bernard, R., & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: systematic approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc. Bernard, R., & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: systematic approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.
go back to reference Berry, R. J., Buehler, J. W., Strauss, L. T., Hogue, C. J., & Smith, J. C. (1987). Birth weight-specific infant mortality due to congenital anomalies, 1960 and 1980. Public Health Reports, 102(2), 171–181.PubMedCentralPubMed Berry, R. J., Buehler, J. W., Strauss, L. T., Hogue, C. J., & Smith, J. C. (1987). Birth weight-specific infant mortality due to congenital anomalies, 1960 and 1980. Public Health Reports, 102(2), 171–181.PubMedCentralPubMed
go back to reference Biesecker, L. G., & Green, R. C. (2014). Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing. The New England Journal of Medicine, 370(25), 2418–2425.CrossRefPubMed Biesecker, L. G., & Green, R. C. (2014). Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing. The New England Journal of Medicine, 370(25), 2418–2425.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bollinger, J. M., Scott, J., Dvoskin, R., & Kaufman, D. (2012). Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: findings from a qualitative focus group study. Genetics in Medicine, 14(4), 451–457.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Bollinger, J. M., Scott, J., Dvoskin, R., & Kaufman, D. (2012). Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: findings from a qualitative focus group study. Genetics in Medicine, 14(4), 451–457.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Borry, P., Henneman, L., Lakeman, P., ten Kate, L. P., Cornel, M. C., & Howard, H. C. (2011). Preconceptional genetic carrier testing and the commercial offer directly-to-consumers. Human Reproduction, 26(5), 972–977.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Borry, P., Henneman, L., Lakeman, P., ten Kate, L. P., Cornel, M. C., & Howard, H. C. (2011). Preconceptional genetic carrier testing and the commercial offer directly-to-consumers. Human Reproduction, 26(5), 972–977.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Burke, W., Pinsky, L. E., & Press, N. A. (2001). Categorizing genetic tests to identify their ethical, legal, and social implications. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 106(3), 233–240.CrossRefPubMed Burke, W., Pinsky, L. E., & Press, N. A. (2001). Categorizing genetic tests to identify their ethical, legal, and social implications. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 106(3), 233–240.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cao, A., Rosatelli, M. C., Monni, G., & Galanello, R. (2002). Screening for thalassemia: a model of success. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 29(2), 305–305vii.CrossRefPubMed Cao, A., Rosatelli, M. C., Monni, G., & Galanello, R. (2002). Screening for thalassemia: a model of success. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 29(2), 305–305vii.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Costa, T., Scriver, C. R., & Childs, B. (1985). The effect of Mendelian disease on human health: a measurement. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 21(2), 231–242.CrossRefPubMed Costa, T., Scriver, C. R., & Childs, B. (1985). The effect of Mendelian disease on human health: a measurement. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 21(2), 231–242.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cousens, N. E., Gaff, C. L., Metcalfe, S. A., & Delatycki, M. B. (2010). Carrier screening for beta-thalassaemia: a review of international practice. European Journal of Human Genetics, 18(10), 1077–1083.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Cousens, N. E., Gaff, C. L., Metcalfe, S. A., & Delatycki, M. B. (2010). Carrier screening for beta-thalassaemia: a review of international practice. European Journal of Human Genetics, 18(10), 1077–1083.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2011). The sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2011). The sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Green, R. C., Berg, J. S., Grody, W. W., Kalia, S. S., Korf, B. R., Martin, C. L., McGuire, A. L., Nussbaum, R. L., O’Daniel, J. M., Ormond, K. E., Rehm, H. L., Watson, M. S., Williams, M. S., & Biesecker, L. G. (2013). ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine, 15(7), 565–574.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Green, R. C., Berg, J. S., Grody, W. W., Kalia, S. S., Korf, B. R., Martin, C. L., McGuire, A. L., Nussbaum, R. L., O’Daniel, J. M., Ormond, K. E., Rehm, H. L., Watson, M. S., Williams, M. S., & Biesecker, L. G. (2013). ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine, 15(7), 565–574.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Grody, W. W., Cutting, G. R., Klinger, K. W., Richards, C. S., Watson, M. S., & Desnick, R. J. (2001). Laboratory standards and guidelines for population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening. Genetics in Medicine, 3(2), 149–154.CrossRefPubMed Grody, W. W., Cutting, G. R., Klinger, K. W., Richards, C. S., Watson, M. S., & Desnick, R. J. (2001). Laboratory standards and guidelines for population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening. Genetics in Medicine, 3(2), 149–154.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Grody, W. W., Thompson, B. H., Gregg, A. R., Bean, L. H., Monaghan, K. G., Schneider, A., & Lebo, R. V. (2013). ACMG position statement on prenatal/preconception expanded carrier screening. Genetics in Medicine, 15(6), 482–483.CrossRefPubMed Grody, W. W., Thompson, B. H., Gregg, A. R., Bean, L. H., Monaghan, K. G., Schneider, A., & Lebo, R. V. (2013). ACMG position statement on prenatal/preconception expanded carrier screening. Genetics in Medicine, 15(6), 482–483.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hosli, E. J., Elsinga, J., Buitendijk, S. E., Assendelft, W. J., & van der Pal-de Bruin, K. M. (2008). Women’s motives for not participating in preconception counseling: qualitative study. Community Genetics, 11(3), 166–170.CrossRefPubMed Hosli, E. J., Elsinga, J., Buitendijk, S. E., Assendelft, W. J., & van der Pal-de Bruin, K. M. (2008). Women’s motives for not participating in preconception counseling: qualitative study. Community Genetics, 11(3), 166–170.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ioannou, L., McClaren, B. J., Massie, J., Lewis, S., Metcalfe, S. A., Forrest, L., & Delatycki, M. B. (2014). Population-based carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: a systematic review of 23 years of research. Genetics in Medicine, 16(3), 207–216.CrossRefPubMed Ioannou, L., McClaren, B. J., Massie, J., Lewis, S., Metcalfe, S. A., Forrest, L., & Delatycki, M. B. (2014). Population-based carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: a systematic review of 23 years of research. Genetics in Medicine, 16(3), 207–216.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kaback, M. M. (2001). Screening and prevention in Tay-Sachs disease: origins, update, and impact. Advances in Genetics, 44, 253–265.CrossRefPubMed Kaback, M. M. (2001). Screening and prevention in Tay-Sachs disease: origins, update, and impact. Advances in Genetics, 44, 253–265.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kaphingst, K. A., Ivanovich, J., Biesecker, B. B., Dresser, R., Seo, J., Dressler, L. G., Goodfellow, P. J., & Goodman, M. S. (2015). Preferences for return of incidental findings from genome sequencing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age. Clinical Genetics. doi:10.1111/cge.12597.PubMed Kaphingst, K. A., Ivanovich, J., Biesecker, B. B., Dresser, R., Seo, J., Dressler, L. G., Goodfellow, P. J., & Goodman, M. S. (2015). Preferences for return of incidental findings from genome sequencing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age. Clinical Genetics. doi:10.​1111/​cge.​12597.PubMed
go back to reference Kumar, P., Radhakrishnan, J., Chowdhary, M. A., & Giampietro, P. F. (2001). Prevalence and patterns of presentation of genetic disorders in a pediatric emergency department. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 76(8), 777–783.CrossRefPubMed Kumar, P., Radhakrishnan, J., Chowdhary, M. A., & Giampietro, P. F. (2001). Prevalence and patterns of presentation of genetic disorders in a pediatric emergency department. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 76(8), 777–783.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lazarin, G. A., Haque, I. S., Nazareth, S., Iori, K., Patterson, A. S., Jacobson, J. L., Marshall, J. R., Seltzer, W. K., Patrizio, P., Evans, E. A., & Srinivasan, B. S. (2013). An empirical estimate of carrier frequencies for 400+ causal Mendelian variants: results from an ethnically diverse clinical sample of 23,453 individuals. Genetics in Medicine, 15(3), 178–186.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lazarin, G. A., Haque, I. S., Nazareth, S., Iori, K., Patterson, A. S., Jacobson, J. L., Marshall, J. R., Seltzer, W. K., Patrizio, P., Evans, E. A., & Srinivasan, B. S. (2013). An empirical estimate of carrier frequencies for 400+ causal Mendelian variants: results from an ethnically diverse clinical sample of 23,453 individuals. Genetics in Medicine, 15(3), 178–186.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Metcalfe, S., Jacques, A., Archibald, A., Burgess, T., Collins, V., Henry, A., McNamee, K., Sheffield, L., Slater, H., Wake, S., & Cohen, J. (2008). A model for offering carrier screening for fragile X syndrome to nonpregnant women: results from a pilot study. Genetics in Medicine, 10(7), 525–535.CrossRefPubMed Metcalfe, S., Jacques, A., Archibald, A., Burgess, T., Collins, V., Henry, A., McNamee, K., Sheffield, L., Slater, H., Wake, S., & Cohen, J. (2008). A model for offering carrier screening for fragile X syndrome to nonpregnant women: results from a pilot study. Genetics in Medicine, 10(7), 525–535.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Modra, L. J., Massie, R. J., & Delatycki, M. B. (2010). Ethical considerations in choosing a model for population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening. The Medical Journal of Australia, 193(3), 157–160.PubMed Modra, L. J., Massie, R. J., & Delatycki, M. B. (2010). Ethical considerations in choosing a model for population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening. The Medical Journal of Australia, 193(3), 157–160.PubMed
go back to reference Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
go back to reference Ravitsky, V., & Wilfond, B. S. (2006). Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. The American Journal of Bioethics, 6(6), 8–17.CrossRefPubMed Ravitsky, V., & Wilfond, B. S. (2006). Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. The American Journal of Bioethics, 6(6), 8–17.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Regier, D. A., Peacock, S. J., Pataky, R., van der Hoek, K., Jarvik, G. P., Hoch, J., & Veenstra, D. (2015). Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment. CMAJ, 187(6), E190–E197.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Regier, D. A., Peacock, S. J., Pataky, R., van der Hoek, K., Jarvik, G. P., Hoch, J., & Veenstra, D. (2015). Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment. CMAJ, 187(6), E190–E197.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Remennick, L. (2006). The quest for the perfect baby: why do Israeli women seek prenatal genetic testing? Sociology of Health & Illness, 28(1), 21–53. Remennick, L. (2006). The quest for the perfect baby: why do Israeli women seek prenatal genetic testing? Sociology of Health & Illness, 28(1), 21–53.
go back to reference Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Wade, C. H., Tarini, B. A., & Wilfond, B. S. (2013). Growing up in the genomic era: implications of whole-genome sequencing for children, families, and pediatric practice. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 14, 535–555.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Wade, C. H., Tarini, B. A., & Wilfond, B. S. (2013). Growing up in the genomic era: implications of whole-genome sequencing for children, families, and pediatric practice. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 14, 535–555.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wilfond, B., & Goddard, K. A. B. (2015). It’s complicated: Criteria for policy decisions for the clinical integration of genome scale sequencing for reproductive decision-making. MGGM. Wilfond, B., & Goddard, K. A. B. (2015). It’s complicated: Criteria for policy decisions for the clinical integration of genome scale sequencing for reproductive decision-making. MGGM.
go back to reference Wilfond, B. S., & Thomson, E. (2000). Models of public health genetic policy development. In M. J. Khoury, W. Burke, & E. Thomson (Eds.), Genetics and public health in the 21st Century: Using genetic information to improve health and prevent disease (pp. 61–81). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Wilfond, B. S., & Thomson, E. (2000). Models of public health genetic policy development. In M. J. Khoury, W. Burke, & E. Thomson (Eds.), Genetics and public health in the 21st Century: Using genetic information to improve health and prevent disease (pp. 61–81). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Wolcott, H. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: description, analysis and interpretation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Wolcott, H. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: description, analysis and interpretation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Metadata
Title
“Is It Worth Knowing?” Focus Group Participants’ Perceived Utility of Genomic Preconception Carrier Screening
Authors
Jennifer L. Schneider
Katrina A. B. Goddard
James Davis
Benjamin Wilfond
Tia L. Kauffman
Jacob A. Reiss
Marian Gilmore
Patricia Himes
Frances L. Lynch
Michael C. Leo
Carmit McMullen
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9851-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Genetic Counseling 1/2016 Go to the issue