Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2015

01-08-2015 | Original Research

The Long and Short of Genetic Counseling Summary Letters: A Case–control Study

Authors: J. Roggenbuck, R. Temme, D. Pond, J. Baker, K. Jarvis, M. Liu, S. Dugan, N. J. Mendelsohn

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Genetic counseling summary letters are intended to reinforce information received during genetic counseling, but little information is available on patient/family responses to these letters. We conducted a case–control study to assess the effectiveness of two different letter formats. Parents of children receiving a new diagnosis were enrolled. The control group (n = 85) received a genetic counseling summary letter in a narrative format, 4–5 pages in length. After the control enrollment period, genetic counselors were trained by a professional medical writer to develop a concise letter format. The case group (n = 64) received a concise letter, approximately 1.5 pages in length, utilizing simple sentences, lay terms, and lists/bullet points. Parents completed a survey 4 weeks after the visit to rate the letter’s format, usefulness, and their emotional reaction. Results show that parents in the case group rated the letter more highly (p = 0.023), particularly in the emotional response dimension (rating changes in anxiety, depression, fear, ability to cope, and confidence in response to the letter). Parents in the case group also rated the genetic counseling session more highly (p = 0.039). In the control group, parents without a college degree were more likely to rate the letter as too long and the level of medical detail as too high. In the case group, no significant differences were seen between parents with or without a college degree. These data suggest that a short genetic counseling summary letter is rated higher by parents, and is particularly associated with a more positive emotional reaction. A short letter format highlighting the basic facts related to the genetic condition may be more useful to parents of diverse educational backgrounds, and may support a positive emotional adaptation at the time of a new diagnosis. Genetic counselors may benefit from specific instruction in medical and educational writing.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Aspinwall, L. G., Taber, J. M., Kolman, W., Leaf, S. L., & Leachman, S. A. (2014). Peceived risk following melanoma genetic testing: a 2-year prospective study distinguishing subjective estimates from recall. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(3), 421–37.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Aspinwall, L. G., Taber, J. M., Kolman, W., Leaf, S. L., & Leachman, S. A. (2014). Peceived risk following melanoma genetic testing: a 2-year prospective study distinguishing subjective estimates from recall. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(3), 421–37.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Baker, D. L., Eash, T., Schuette, J. L., & Uhlmann, W. R. (2002). Guidelines for writing letters to patients. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(5), 399–418.CrossRefPubMed Baker, D. L., Eash, T., Schuette, J. L., & Uhlmann, W. R. (2002). Guidelines for writing letters to patients. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(5), 399–418.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cassini, C., Thauvin-Robinet, C., Binquet, C., Coron, F., Masurel-Paulet, A., Boniton-Kopp, C., Mercier, S., Joly, L., Huet, F., & Faivre, L. (2011). Written information to patients in clinical genetics: what’s the impact? European Journal of Medical Genetics, 54, 277–280.CrossRefPubMed Cassini, C., Thauvin-Robinet, C., Binquet, C., Coron, F., Masurel-Paulet, A., Boniton-Kopp, C., Mercier, S., Joly, L., Huet, F., & Faivre, L. (2011). Written information to patients in clinical genetics: what’s the impact? European Journal of Medical Genetics, 54, 277–280.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Clarke, A., Parsons, E., & Williams, A. (1996). Outcomes and processes in genetic counseling. Clinical Genetics, 50, 462–469.CrossRefPubMed Clarke, A., Parsons, E., & Williams, A. (1996). Outcomes and processes in genetic counseling. Clinical Genetics, 50, 462–469.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hallowell, N., & Murton, F. (1998). The value of written summaries of genetic consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 35, 27–34.CrossRefPubMed Hallowell, N., & Murton, F. (1998). The value of written summaries of genetic consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 35, 27–34.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Halowell, N., & Richards, M. (1997). Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 31–43.CrossRef Halowell, N., & Richards, M. (1997). Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 31–43.CrossRef
go back to reference Jacobs, C., Dancyger, C., Smith, J. A., Michie, S. (2014). Accuracy of recall of information about a cancer predisposing BRCA1/2 gene mutation amongst patients and relatives. European Journal of Human Genetics. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.84. Jacobs, C., Dancyger, C., Smith, J. A., Michie, S. (2014). Accuracy of recall of information about a cancer predisposing BRCA1/2 gene mutation amongst patients and relatives. European Journal of Human Genetics. doi:10.​1038/​ejhg.​2014.​84.
go back to reference Kausmeyer, D., Lengrich, E., Kluhsman, B., Morrone, D., Harper, G., & Baker, M. (2006). A survey of Patients’ experiences with the cancer genetic counseling process: recommendations for cancer genetics programs. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 409–431.CrossRefPubMed Kausmeyer, D., Lengrich, E., Kluhsman, B., Morrone, D., Harper, G., & Baker, M. (2006). A survey of Patients’ experiences with the cancer genetic counseling process: recommendations for cancer genetics programs. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 409–431.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kelly, P. (1977). Dealing with dilemma: a manual for genetic counselors. New York: Springer.CrossRef Kelly, P. (1977). Dealing with dilemma: a manual for genetic counselors. New York: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Kessler, S. (1990). Current issues in genetic counseling. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11, 5–18. Kessler, S. (1990). Current issues in genetic counseling. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11, 5–18.
go back to reference Lobb, E. A., Butow, P. N., Barratt, A., Meiser, B., Gaff, C., Young, M. A., Haan, E., Suthers, G., Gattas, M., & Tucker, K. (2004). Communication and information-giving in high-risk breast cancer consultations: influence on patient outcomes. British Journal of Cancer, 90(2), 321–7. 26.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lobb, E. A., Butow, P. N., Barratt, A., Meiser, B., Gaff, C., Young, M. A., Haan, E., Suthers, G., Gattas, M., & Tucker, K. (2004). Communication and information-giving in high-risk breast cancer consultations: influence on patient outcomes. British Journal of Cancer, 90(2), 321–7. 26.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference McAllister, M., Payne, K., Nicholls, S., MacLeod, R., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. (2007). Improving service evaluation in clinical genetics: identifying effects of genetic diseases on individuals and families. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(1), 71–83.CrossRefPubMed McAllister, M., Payne, K., Nicholls, S., MacLeod, R., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. (2007). Improving service evaluation in clinical genetics: identifying effects of genetic diseases on individuals and families. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(1), 71–83.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Meiser, B., Irle, J., Lobb, E., & Barlow-Stewart, K. (2008). Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17, 434–451.CrossRefPubMed Meiser, B., Irle, J., Lobb, E., & Barlow-Stewart, K. (2008). Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17, 434–451.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Resta, R., Biesecker, B., Bennet, R., Blum, S., Estabrooks Hahn, S., Strecker, M., et al. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: national society of genetic Counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(2), 77–83.CrossRefPubMed Resta, R., Biesecker, B., Bennet, R., Blum, S., Estabrooks Hahn, S., Strecker, M., et al. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: national society of genetic Counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(2), 77–83.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shiloh, S. (1996). Decision-making in the context of risk. In T. Marteau & M. Richards (Eds.), The troubled helix: social and psychological implications of the new human genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Shiloh, S. (1996). Decision-making in the context of risk. In T. Marteau & M. Richards (Eds.), The troubled helix: social and psychological implications of the new human genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Vos, J., Oosterwijk, J. C., Gomez-Garcia, E., Menko, F. H., Jansen, A. M., Stoel, R. D., van Asperen, C. J., Tiben, A., & Stiggelbout, A. M. (2011). Perceiving cancer-risks and heredity-likelihood in genetic counseling: how counselees recall and interpret BRCA1/2-test results. Clinical Genetics, 79, 207–218.CrossRefPubMed Vos, J., Oosterwijk, J. C., Gomez-Garcia, E., Menko, F. H., Jansen, A. M., Stoel, R. D., van Asperen, C. J., Tiben, A., & Stiggelbout, A. M. (2011). Perceiving cancer-risks and heredity-likelihood in genetic counseling: how counselees recall and interpret BRCA1/2-test results. Clinical Genetics, 79, 207–218.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Watson, M., Duvivier, M., Wade Walsh, M., Ashley, S., Davidson, J., Papaikonomou, M., Murday, V., Sacks, N., & Eles, R. (1998). Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk? Journal of Medical Genetics, 35, 731–738.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Watson, M., Duvivier, M., Wade Walsh, M., Ashley, S., Davidson, J., Papaikonomou, M., Murday, V., Sacks, N., & Eles, R. (1998). Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk? Journal of Medical Genetics, 35, 731–738.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Long and Short of Genetic Counseling Summary Letters: A Case–control Study
Authors
J. Roggenbuck
R. Temme
D. Pond
J. Baker
K. Jarvis
M. Liu
S. Dugan
N. J. Mendelsohn
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9792-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2015 Go to the issue