Top

Published in:

01-04-2019 | Original Article

Family Court Survivor-Centered Practice: A Qualitative Study of Advocate-IPV Survivor Safety Planning Interactions

Author: Amanda M. Stylianou

Published in: Journal of Family Violence | Issue 3/2019

Abstract

In supporting survivors of intimate partner violence navigate the criminal justice system, many agencies offer legal and/or court programs guided by an empowerment-based, survivor-centered approach. However, there is limited research examining survivor-centered practice in the context of court services. The goal of this study was to explore the specific skills and strategies used by one sample of family court advocates to conduct survivor-centered safety planning with survivors. Twenty-two recorded family court advocate-survivor sessions were qualitatively explored and survivor-centered strategies for safety planning were identified. Such strategies included open-ended exploration of risks and safety options, paraphrasing survivor-identified risks and safety plans, prioritizing immediate risks, understanding safety strategies and resources, exploring support systems, providing survivor-centered information, and discussing the pros and cons of safety options. Understanding specific skills and strategies that may be utilized by family court advocates can support the field in developing, implementing, training on, supervising, and evaluating survivor-centered approaches.

Bell, M. E. (2007). Empowerment and disempowerment for victims of intimate partner violence: An overview of the effects of criminal justice system practices. In K. Kendall-Tackett & S. M. Giacomoni (Eds.), Intimate partner violence (pp. 1–23). Kingston: Civic Research Institute.

Bell, M. E., & Goodman, L. A. (2001). Supporting battered women involved with the court system: An evaluation of a law school-based advocacy intervention. Violence Against Women, 7, 1377–1404.CrossRef

Bell, M. E., Perez, S., Goodman, L. A., & Dutton, M. A. (2011). Perceptions of civil and criminal court helpfulness: The role of court outcome and process. Violence Against Women, 17(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210393924.CrossRefPubMed

Bennett Cattaneo, L., & Goodman, L. A. (2005). Risk factors for reabuse in intimate partner violence: A cross-disciplinary critical review. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 6, 141–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838005275088.CrossRef

Breiding, M. J., Chen, J., & Black, M. C. (2014). Intimate partner violence in the United States — 2010. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Campbell, J., & Glass, N. (2009). Safety planning, danger, and lethality assessment. In C. Mitchell & D. Anglin (Eds.), Intimate partner violence: A health-based perspective (pp. 319–334). New York: Oxford University Press.

Cattaneo, L. B., & Goodman, L. A. (2010). Empowerment in the court system and well-being for intimate partner violence victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(3), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509334282.CrossRefPubMed

Davies, J., & Lyon, E. (2014). Domestic violence advocacy: Complex lives/difficult choices. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.CrossRef

DeVoe, E. R., & Smith, E. L. (2003). Don't take my kids: Barriers to service delivery for battered mothers and their young children. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 3(3–4), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1300/J135v03n03_06.CrossRef

Fleury-Steiner, R. E., Bybee, D. I., Sullivan, C. M., Belknap, J., & Melton, H. C. (2006). Contextual factors impacting battered women’s intentions to reuse the criminal legal system. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20102.CrossRef

Gillis, J. R., Diamond, S. L., Jebely, P., Orekhovsky, V., Ostovich, E. M., MacIsaac, K., Sagrati, S., & Mandell, D. (2006). Systemic obstacles to battered women’s participation in the judicial system: When will the status quo change? Violence Against Women, 12, 1150–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206293500.CrossRefPubMed

Goodman, L., & Epstein, D. (2008). Listening to battered women: A survivor-centered approach to advocacy, mental health, and justice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef

Goodman, L. A., Thomas, K., Bennett Cattaneo, L., Heimel, D., Woulfe, J., & Chong, S. K. (2014). Practice in domestic violence work: Measure development and preliminary evidence of link to empowerment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514555131.CrossRefPubMed

Grossmann, J., Shor, R., Schaefer, K., & Bennett Cattaneo, L. (2018). Development of a tool to assess client-centered practice on a domestic violence hotline. Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017318757395.

Hardesty, J. L., & Campbell, J. C. (2004). Safety planning for abused women and their children. In P. G. Jaffe, L. L. Baker, & A. J. Cunningham (Eds.), Protecting children from domestic violence: Strategies for community intervention. New York: Guilford.

Kress, V. E., Protivnak, J. J., & Sadlak, L. (2008). Counseling clients involved with violent intimate partners: The mental health counselor’s role in promoting client safety. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 30(3), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.30.3.e0r87734721l6016.CrossRef

Lazarus, R. S. (2000). Evolution of a model of stress, coping, and discrete emotions. In V. H. Rice (Ed.), Handbook of stress, coping, and health: Implications for nursing research, theory, and practice (pp. 195–222). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Levy, F., Ross, T., & Guthrie, P. (2008). Enhancing safety and justice for victims of domesticviolence: Voices of women in the Queens integrated domestic violence court. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.CrossRef

Lindhorst, T., Nurius, P., & Macy, R. J. (2005). Contextualized assessment with battered women: Strategic safety planning to cope with multiple harms. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(2), 331–352.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2009). Civil protective order outcomes: Violations and perceptions of effectiveness. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(4), 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508317186.CrossRefPubMed

Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2010). Civil protective order effectiveness: Justice or just a piece of paper? Violence and Victims, 25(3), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.25.3.332.CrossRefPubMed

Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2018). Looking into the day-to-day process of victim safety planning. Journal of Family Violence, 33, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9951-x.CrossRef

Macy, R. J., Giattina, M., Sangster, T. H., Crosby, C., & Montijo, N. J. (2009). Domestic violence and sexual assault services: Inside the blackbox. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.06.002.CrossRef

Melbin, A. (2010). Voluntary services model. Washington, DC: The Office on Violence Against Women.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from “case study research in education”. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Murray, C. E., & Graves, K. N. (2012). Responding to family violence: A comprehensive, research-based guide for therapists. New York: Routledge.

Murray, C., Horton, E., Johnson, G. H., Notestine, C., Garr, L., Pow, B. M., Flasch, A. P., & Doom, E. (2015). Domestic violence service providers’ perceptions of safety planning: A focus group study. Journal of Family Violence, 30, 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9674-1.CrossRef

Nichols, A. J. (2013). Survivor-defined practices to mitigate revictimization of battered women in the protective order process. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(7), 1403–1423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512468243.CrossRefPubMed

Nurius, P. S. (2000). Coping. In P. Allen-Meares & C. Garvin (Eds.), Handbook of social work direct practice (pp. 349–372). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Römkens, R. (2006). Protecting prosecution: Exploring the powers of law in an intervention program for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12, 160–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801205284922.CrossRefPubMed

Russell, B. (2012). Effectiveness, victim safety, characteristics, and enforcement of protective orders. Partner Abuse, 3(4), 531–552. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.3.4.531.CrossRef

Steen, J. A. (2009). The perceived impact of a child maltreatment report from the perspective of the domestic violence shelter worker. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(11), 1906–1918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508325495.CrossRefPubMed

Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Sullivan, C. M., & Bybee, D. I. (1999). Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(1), 43–53.CrossRefPubMed

Tirado-Muñoz, J., Gilchrist, G., Farré, M., Hegarty, K., & Torrens, M. (2014). The efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy and advocacy interventions for women who have experienced intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Medicine, 46(8), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890.2014.941918.CrossRefPubMed

Waugh, F., & Bonner, M. (2002). Domestic violence and child protection: Issues in safety planning. Child Abuse Review, 11, 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.758.CrossRef

Title: Family Court Survivor-Centered Practice: A Qualitative Study of Advocate-IPV Survivor Safety Planning Interactions
Author: Amanda M. Stylianou
Publication date: 01-04-2019
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Family Violence / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0885-7482
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2851
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-0020-2

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Family Court Survivor-Centered Practice: A Qualitative Study of Advocate-IPV Survivor Safety Planning Interactions

Abstract

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Rethinking Campus Sexual Assault: We must Be Leaders in Anti-Bias Practices, Civil Rights and Human Rights

Preventing Sexual Violence on Campus in the U.S.: Four Thought Experiments

Spousal Violence and Evaluations of Police Performance in Canada: Does Police Contact Matter?

Civil Protection Orders and their Courtroom Context: the Impact of Gatekeepers on Legal Decisions

Bystander Program Effectiveness to Reduce Violence Acceptance: RCT in High Schools

“She Is his Girlfriend—I Believe this Is a Different Situation”: Gender Differences in Perceptions of the Legality of Intimate Partner Rape