Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 5/2021

Open Access 01-10-2021 | Original Research

Technical considerations when using the EEG export of the SEDLine Root device

Authors: Falk von Dincklage, Carlo Jurth, Gerhard Schneider, Paul S García, Matthias Kreuzer

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Electroencephalographic (EEG) patient monitoring during general anesthesia can help to assess the real-time neurophysiology of unconscious states. Some monitoring systems like the SEDLine Root allow export of the EEG to be used for retrospective analysis. We show that changes made to the SEDLine display during recording affected the recorded EEG. These changes can strongly impact retrospective analysis of EEG signals. Real-time changes of the feed speed in the SEDLine Root device display modifies the sampling rate of the exported EEG. We used a patient as well as a simulated EEG recording to highlight the effects of the display settings on the extracted EEG. Therefore, we changed EEG feed and amplitude resolution on the display in a systematic manner. To visualize the effects of these changes, we present raw EEG segments and the density spectral array of the recording. Changing the display’s amplitude resolution affects the amplitudes. If the amplitude resolution is too fine, the exported EEG contains clipped amplitudes. If the resolution is too coarse, the EEG resolution becomes too low leading to a low-quality signal making frequency analysis impossible. The proportion of clipped or zero-line data caused by the amplitude setting was > 60% in our sedated patient. Changing the display settings results in undocumented changes in EEG amplitude, sampling rate, and signal quality. The occult nature of these changes could make the analysis of data sets difficult if not invalid. We strongly suggest researchers adequately define and keep the EEG display settings to export good quality EEG and to ensure comparability among patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Prichep L, Gugino L, John E, Chabot R, Howard B, Merkin H, Tom M, Wolter S, Rausch L, Kox W. The Patient State Index as an indicator of the level of hypnosis under general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92(3):393–9.CrossRef Prichep L, Gugino L, John E, Chabot R, Howard B, Merkin H, Tom M, Wolter S, Rausch L, Kox W. The Patient State Index as an indicator of the level of hypnosis under general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92(3):393–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hesse S, Kreuzer M, Hight D, Gaskell A, Devari P, Singh D, Taylor N, Whalin M, Lee S, Sleigh J. Association of electroencephalogram trajectories during emergence from anaesthesia with delirium in the post-anaesthesia care unit: an early sign of postoperative complications. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(5):622–34.CrossRef Hesse S, Kreuzer M, Hight D, Gaskell A, Devari P, Singh D, Taylor N, Whalin M, Lee S, Sleigh J. Association of electroencephalogram trajectories during emergence from anaesthesia with delirium in the post-anaesthesia care unit: an early sign of postoperative complications. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(5):622–34.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Akeju O, Westover MB, Pavone KJ, Sampson AL, Hartnack KE, Brown EN, Purdon PL. Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on frontal electroencephalogram power and coherence. Anesthesiology. 2014;121(5):990–8.CrossRef Akeju O, Westover MB, Pavone KJ, Sampson AL, Hartnack KE, Brown EN, Purdon PL. Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on frontal electroencephalogram power and coherence. Anesthesiology. 2014;121(5):990–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kreuzer M, Kochs EF, Pilge S, Stockmanns G, Schneider G. Construction of the Electroencephalogram Player: A Device to Present Electroencephalogram Data to Electroencephalogram-Based Anesthesia Monitors. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(1):135–9.CrossRef Kreuzer M, Kochs EF, Pilge S, Stockmanns G, Schneider G. Construction of the Electroencephalogram Player: A Device to Present Electroencephalogram Data to Electroencephalogram-Based Anesthesia Monitors. Anesth Analg. 2007;104(1):135–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Aldecoa C, Bettelli G, Bilotta F, Sanders RD, Audisio R, Borozdina A, Cherubini A, Jones C, Kehlet H, MacLullich A. European Society of Anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34(4):192–214.CrossRef Aldecoa C, Bettelli G, Bilotta F, Sanders RD, Audisio R, Borozdina A, Cherubini A, Jones C, Kehlet H, MacLullich A. European Society of Anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34(4):192–214.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chan MTV, Hedrick TL, Egan TD, García PS, Koch S, Purdon PL, Ramsay MA, Miller TE, McEvoy MD, Gan TJ. American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on the Role of Neuromonitoring in Perioperative Outcomes: Electroencephalography. Anesth Analg. 2020;130(5):1278–91. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000004502.CrossRefPubMed Chan MTV, Hedrick TL, Egan TD, García PS, Koch S, Purdon PL, Ramsay MA, Miller TE, McEvoy MD, Gan TJ. American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on the Role of Neuromonitoring in Perioperative Outcomes: Electroencephalography. Anesth Analg. 2020;130(5):1278–91. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1213/​ane.​0000000000004502​.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rampil IJ. A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:980–1002.CrossRef Rampil IJ. A primer for EEG signal processing in anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:980–1002.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Herman ST, Abend NS, Bleck TP, Chapman KE, Drislane FW, Emerson RG, Gerard EE, Hahn CD, Husain AM, Kaplan PW, LaRoche SM, Nuwer MR, Quigg M, Riviello JJ, Schmitt SE, Simmons LA, Tsuchida TN, Hirsch LJ, Critical Care Continuous EEGTFotACNS. Consensus statement on continuous EEG in critically ill adults and children, part II: personnel, technical specifications, and clinical practice. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;32(2):96–108. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000165.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Herman ST, Abend NS, Bleck TP, Chapman KE, Drislane FW, Emerson RG, Gerard EE, Hahn CD, Husain AM, Kaplan PW, LaRoche SM, Nuwer MR, Quigg M, Riviello JJ, Schmitt SE, Simmons LA, Tsuchida TN, Hirsch LJ, Critical Care Continuous EEGTFotACNS. Consensus statement on continuous EEG in critically ill adults and children, part II: personnel, technical specifications, and clinical practice. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;32(2):96–108. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​WNP.​0000000000000165​.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Bennett WR. Spectra of quantized signals. The Bell System . Tech J. 1948;27(3):446–72. Bennett WR. Spectra of quantized signals. The Bell System . Tech J. 1948;27(3):446–72.
12.
go back to reference Weinstein AJ, Wakin MB. (2011) Recovering a clipped signal in sparseland. arXiv preprint arXiv:11105063. Weinstein AJ, Wakin MB. (2011) Recovering a clipped signal in sparseland. arXiv preprint arXiv:11105063.
13.
go back to reference Levitt H, Cudahy E, Hwang WH, Kennedy E, Link C. Towards a general measure of distortion. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1987;24(4):283–92.PubMed Levitt H, Cudahy E, Hwang WH, Kennedy E, Link C. Towards a general measure of distortion. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1987;24(4):283–92.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Technical considerations when using the EEG export of the SEDLine Root device
Authors
Falk von Dincklage
Carlo Jurth
Gerhard Schneider
Paul S García
Matthias Kreuzer
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00578-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 5/2021 Go to the issue