Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 5/2020

01-10-2020 | Heart Surgery | Original Research

Zero-heat-flux core temperature monitoring system: an observational secondary analysis to evaluate agreement with naso-/oropharyngeal probe during anesthesia

Authors: Nicholas West, Erin Cooke, Dan Morse, Richard N. Merchant, Matthias Görges

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

General anesthesia impairs thermoregulation and contributes to perioperative hypothermia; core body temperature monitoring is recommended during surgical procedures lasting > 30 min. Zero-heat-flux core body temperature measurement systems enable continuous non-invasive perioperative monitoring. During a previous trial evaluating the benefits of preoperative forced-air warming, intraoperative temperatures were measured with both a zero-heat-flux sensor and a standard naso-/oropharyngeal temperature probe. The aim of this secondary analysis is to evaluate their agreement. ASA I–III patients, scheduled for elective, non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia, were enrolled. A zero-heat-flux sensor was placed on the participant’s forehead preoperatively. Following induction of anesthesia, a “clinical” temperature probe was placed in the nasopharynx or oropharynx at the anesthesiologist’s discretion. Temperature measurements from both sensors were recorded every 10 s. Agreement was analyzed using the Bland–Altman method, corrected for repeated measurements, and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient, and compared with existing studies. Data were collected in 194 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 60 (49–69) years, during surgical procedures lasting 120 (89–185) min. The zero-heat-flux measurements had a mean bias of − 0.05 °C (zero-heat-flux lower) with 95% limits of agreement within − 0.68 to + 0.58 °C. Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient was 0.823. The zero-heat-flux sensor demonstrated moderate agreement with the naso-/oropharyngeal temperature probe, which was not fully within the generally accepted ± 0.5 °C limit. This is consistent with previous studies. The zero-heat-flux system offers clinical utility for non-invasive and continuous core body temperature monitoring throughout the perioperative period using a single sensor.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sessler DI. Temperature monitoring and perioperative thermoregulation. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:318–38.CrossRef Sessler DI. Temperature monitoring and perioperative thermoregulation. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:318–38.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dobson G, Chong M, Chow L, Flexman A, Kurrek M, Laflamme C, et al. Guidelines to the practice of anesthesia—revised edition 2018. Can J Anesth (Can d’Anesthésie). 2018;65:76–104.CrossRef Dobson G, Chong M, Chow L, Flexman A, Kurrek M, Laflamme C, et al. Guidelines to the practice of anesthesia—revised edition 2018. Can J Anesth (Can d’Anesthésie). 2018;65:76–104.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Eshraghi Y, Nasr V, Parra-Sanchez I, Van Duren A, Botham M, Santoscoy T, et al. An evaluation of a zero-heat-flux cutaneous thermometer in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:543–9.CrossRef Eshraghi Y, Nasr V, Parra-Sanchez I, Van Duren A, Botham M, Santoscoy T, et al. An evaluation of a zero-heat-flux cutaneous thermometer in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:543–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pawley MDM, Martinsen P, Mitchell SJ, Cheeseman JF, Merry AF, Willcox T, et al. Brachial arterial temperature as an indicator of core temperature: proof of concept and potential applications. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013;45:86–93.PubMedPubMedCentral Pawley MDM, Martinsen P, Mitchell SJ, Cheeseman JF, Merry AF, Willcox T, et al. Brachial arterial temperature as an indicator of core temperature: proof of concept and potential applications. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013;45:86–93.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Selvaraj V, Gnanaprakasam PV. Evaluation of skin temperature over carotid artery for temperature monitoring in comparison to nasopharyngeal temperature in adults under general anesthesia. Anesth Essays Res. 2016;10:291–6.CrossRef Selvaraj V, Gnanaprakasam PV. Evaluation of skin temperature over carotid artery for temperature monitoring in comparison to nasopharyngeal temperature in adults under general anesthesia. Anesth Essays Res. 2016;10:291–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Evron S, Weissman A, Toivis V, Shahaf DB, You J, Sessler DI, et al. Evaluation of the temple touch pro, a novel noninvasive core-temperature monitoring system. Anesth Analg. 2017;125:103–9.CrossRef Evron S, Weissman A, Toivis V, Shahaf DB, You J, Sessler DI, et al. Evaluation of the temple touch pro, a novel noninvasive core-temperature monitoring system. Anesth Analg. 2017;125:103–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fox RH, Solman AJ, Isaacs R, Fry AJ, MacDonald IC. A new method for monitoring deep body temperature from the skin surface. Clin Sci. 1973;44:81–6.CrossRef Fox RH, Solman AJ, Isaacs R, Fry AJ, MacDonald IC. A new method for monitoring deep body temperature from the skin surface. Clin Sci. 1973;44:81–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lees DE, Kim YD, Macnamara TE. Noninvasive determination of core temperature during anesthesia. South Med J. 1980;73:1322–4.CrossRef Lees DE, Kim YD, Macnamara TE. Noninvasive determination of core temperature during anesthesia. South Med J. 1980;73:1322–4.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sastre JA, Pascual MJ, López T. Evaluation of the novel non-invasive zero-heat-flux Tcore™ thermometer in cardiac surgical patients. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019;33:165–72.CrossRef Sastre JA, Pascual MJ, López T. Evaluation of the novel non-invasive zero-heat-flux Tcore™ thermometer in cardiac surgical patients. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019;33:165–72.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mäkinen M-T, Pesonen A, Jousela I, Päivärinta J, Poikajärvi S, Albäck A, et al. Novel cardiac zero-heat-flux deep body temperature measurement in lower extremity vascular and surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:973–8.CrossRef Mäkinen M-T, Pesonen A, Jousela I, Päivärinta J, Poikajärvi S, Albäck A, et al. Novel cardiac zero-heat-flux deep body temperature measurement in lower extremity vascular and surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:973–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Iden T, Horn E-P, Bein B, Böhm R, Beese J, Höcker J. Intraoperative temperature monitoring with zero heat flux technology (3M SpotOn sensor) in comparison with sublingual and nasopharyngeal temperature: an observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32:387–91.CrossRef Iden T, Horn E-P, Bein B, Böhm R, Beese J, Höcker J. Intraoperative temperature monitoring with zero heat flux technology (3M SpotOn sensor) in comparison with sublingual and nasopharyngeal temperature: an observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32:387–91.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kollmann Camaiora A, Brogly N, Alsina E, de Celis I, Huercio I, Gilsanz F. Validation of the Zero-Heat-Flux thermometer (SpotOn®) in major gynecological surgery to monitor intraoperative core temperature: a comparative study with esophageal core temperature. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85:351–7.CrossRef Kollmann Camaiora A, Brogly N, Alsina E, de Celis I, Huercio I, Gilsanz F. Validation of the Zero-Heat-Flux thermometer (SpotOn®) in major gynecological surgery to monitor intraoperative core temperature: a comparative study with esophageal core temperature. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85:351–7.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Boisson M, Alaux A, Kerforne T, Mimoz O, Debaene B, Dahyot-Fizelier C, et al. Intra-operative cutaneous temperature monitoring with zero-heat-flux technique (3M SpotOn) in comparison with oesophageal and arterial temperature: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;35:825–30.CrossRef Boisson M, Alaux A, Kerforne T, Mimoz O, Debaene B, Dahyot-Fizelier C, et al. Intra-operative cutaneous temperature monitoring with zero-heat-flux technique (3M SpotOn) in comparison with oesophageal and arterial temperature: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018;35:825–30.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lau A, Lowlaavar N, Cooke EM, West N, German A, Morse DJ, et al. Effect of preoperative warming on intraoperative hypothermia: a randomized-controlled trial. Can J Anesth. 2018;65:1029–40.CrossRef Lau A, Lowlaavar N, Cooke EM, West N, German A, Morse DJ, et al. Effect of preoperative warming on intraoperative hypothermia: a randomized-controlled trial. Can J Anesth. 2018;65:1029–40.CrossRef
19.
20.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17:571–82.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17:571–82.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45:255–68.CrossRef Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45:255–68.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schell-Chaple HM, Liu KD, Matthay MA, Puntillo KA. Rectal and bladder temperatures vs forehead core temperatures measured with SpotOn monitoring system. Am J Crit Care. 2018;27:43–50.CrossRef Schell-Chaple HM, Liu KD, Matthay MA, Puntillo KA. Rectal and bladder temperatures vs forehead core temperatures measured with SpotOn monitoring system. Am J Crit Care. 2018;27:43–50.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kimberger O, Thell R, Schuh M, Koch J, Sessler DI, Kurz A. Accuracy and precision of a novel non-invasive core thermometer. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:226–31.CrossRef Kimberger O, Thell R, Schuh M, Koch J, Sessler DI, Kurz A. Accuracy and precision of a novel non-invasive core thermometer. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:226–31.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Zeiner A, Klewer J, Sterz F, Haugk M, Krizanac D, Testori C, et al. Non-invasive continuous cerebral temperature monitoring in patients treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia: an observational pilot study. Resuscitation. 2010;81:861–6.CrossRef Zeiner A, Klewer J, Sterz F, Haugk M, Krizanac D, Testori C, et al. Non-invasive continuous cerebral temperature monitoring in patients treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia: an observational pilot study. Resuscitation. 2010;81:861–6.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sinha PK, Kaushik S, Neema PK. Massive epistaxis after nasopharyngeal temperature probe insertion after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18:123–4.CrossRef Sinha PK, Kaushik S, Neema PK. Massive epistaxis after nasopharyngeal temperature probe insertion after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18:123–4.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wang M, Singh A, Qureshi H, Leone A, Mascha EJ, Sessler DI. Optimal depth for nasopharyngeal temperature probe positioning. Anesth Analg. 2016;122:1434–8.CrossRef Wang M, Singh A, Qureshi H, Leone A, Mascha EJ, Sessler DI. Optimal depth for nasopharyngeal temperature probe positioning. Anesth Analg. 2016;122:1434–8.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Cork RC, Vaughan RW, Humphrey LS. Precision and accuracy of intraoperative temperature monitoring. Anesth Analg. 1983;62:211–4.CrossRef Cork RC, Vaughan RW, Humphrey LS. Precision and accuracy of intraoperative temperature monitoring. Anesth Analg. 1983;62:211–4.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Roth JV, Braitman LE. Nasal temperature can be used as a reliable surrogate measure of core temperature. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008;22:309–14.CrossRef Roth JV, Braitman LE. Nasal temperature can be used as a reliable surrogate measure of core temperature. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008;22:309–14.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Lim H, Kim B, Kim D-C, Lee S-K, Ko S. A comparison of the temperature difference according to the placement of a nasopharyngeal temperature probe. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016;69:357–61.CrossRef Lim H, Kim B, Kim D-C, Lee S-K, Ko S. A comparison of the temperature difference according to the placement of a nasopharyngeal temperature probe. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016;69:357–61.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Lee J, Lim H, Son K-G, Ko S. Optimal nasopharyngeal temperature probe placement. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:875–9.CrossRef Lee J, Lim H, Son K-G, Ko S. Optimal nasopharyngeal temperature probe placement. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:875–9.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference van Zundert A, Wyssusek K, Vivian V. Verification of nasopharyngeal temperature probes-they are not always where you think they are! Anesth Analg. 2016;123:1338–9.CrossRef van Zundert A, Wyssusek K, Vivian V. Verification of nasopharyngeal temperature probes-they are not always where you think they are! Anesth Analg. 2016;123:1338–9.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Taylor NAS, Tipton MJ, Kenny GP. Considerations for the measurement of core, skin and mean body temperatures. J Therm Biol. 2014;46:72–101.CrossRef Taylor NAS, Tipton MJ, Kenny GP. Considerations for the measurement of core, skin and mean body temperatures. J Therm Biol. 2014;46:72–101.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Zero-heat-flux core temperature monitoring system: an observational secondary analysis to evaluate agreement with naso-/oropharyngeal probe during anesthesia
Authors
Nicholas West
Erin Cooke
Dan Morse
Richard N. Merchant
Matthias Görges
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00411-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 5/2020 Go to the issue