Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 5/2018

01-10-2018 | Original Research

Somatosensory evoked potentials after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury

Authors: Allison Bethune, Nadia Scantlebury, Ekaterina Potapova, Nicole Dinn, Victor Yang, Todd Mainprize, Mahmood Fazl, Farhad Pirouzmand, Leodante da Costa, Martin Chapman, Nicolas Phan

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) are used for neuroprognosis after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). However decompressive craniectomy (DC), involving removal of a portion of the skull to alleviate elevated intracranial pressure, is associated with an increase in SSEP amplitude. Accordingly, SSEPs are not available for neuroprognosis over the hemisphere with DC. We aim to determine the degree to which SSEP amplitudes are increased in the absence of cranial bone. This will serve as a precursor for translation to clinically prognostic ranges. Intra-operative SSEPs were performed before and after bone flap replacement in 22 patients with severe TBI. SSEP measurements were also performed in a comparison non-traumatic group undergoing craniotomy for tumor resection. N20/P25 amplitudes and central conduction time were measured with the bone flap in (BI) and out (BO). Linear regressions, adjusting for skull thickness and study arm, were performed to evaluate the contribution of bone presence to SSEP amplitudes. Latencies were not different between BO or BI trials in either group. Mean N20/P25 amplitudes recorded with BO were statistically different (p = 0.0001) from BI in both cohorts, showing an approximate doubling in BO amplitudes. For contralateral–ipsilateral montages r2 was 0.28 and for frontal pole montages r2 was 0.62. Cortical SSEP amplitudes are influenced by the presence of cortical bone as is particularly evident in frontal pole montages. Larger, longitudinal trials to assess feasibility of neuroprognosis over the hemisphere with DC in severe TBI patients are warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Conrado VG. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002–2006. Atlanta: Center for Disease Control and Preventions, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2010. pp. 1–72.CrossRef Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Conrado VG. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002–2006. Atlanta: Center for Disease Control and Preventions, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2010. pp. 1–72.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Maas AI, Hukkelhoven CW, Marshall LF, Steyerberg EW. Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:1173–82. (discussion 1182).CrossRefPubMed Maas AI, Hukkelhoven CW, Marshall LF, Steyerberg EW. Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:1173–82. (discussion 1182).CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, Van Berkum Clark M, Eisenberg H, Jane JA, et al. The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography. J Neurotrauma. 1992;9(Suppl 1):S287–92.PubMed Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, Van Berkum Clark M, Eisenberg H, Jane JA, et al. The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography. J Neurotrauma. 1992;9(Suppl 1):S287–92.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Carter BG, Butt W. Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:765–75.CrossRefPubMed Carter BG, Butt W. Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:765–75.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Houlden DA, Li C, Schwartz ML, Katic M. Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials and the Glasgow Coma Scale as predictors of outcome in comatose patients with head injuries. Neurosurgery. 1990;27:701–7 (discussion 707–8).CrossRefPubMed Houlden DA, Li C, Schwartz ML, Katic M. Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials and the Glasgow Coma Scale as predictors of outcome in comatose patients with head injuries. Neurosurgery. 1990;27:701–7 (discussion 707–8).CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Moulton RJ, Brown JI, Konasiewicz SJ. Monitoring severe head injury: a comparison of EEG and somatosensory evoked potentials. Can J Neurol Sci Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques. 1998;25:S7–11.CrossRef Moulton RJ, Brown JI, Konasiewicz SJ. Monitoring severe head injury: a comparison of EEG and somatosensory evoked potentials. Can J Neurol Sci Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques. 1998;25:S7–11.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Narayan RK, Greenberg RP, Miller JD, Enas GG, Choi SC, Kishore PR, et al. Improved confidence of outcome prediction in severe head injury. A comparative analysis of the clinical examination, multimodality evoked potentials, CT scanning, and intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg. 1981;54:751–62.CrossRefPubMed Narayan RK, Greenberg RP, Miller JD, Enas GG, Choi SC, Kishore PR, et al. Improved confidence of outcome prediction in severe head injury. A comparative analysis of the clinical examination, multimodality evoked potentials, CT scanning, and intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg. 1981;54:751–62.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, Arabi YM, Davies AR, D’Urso P, et al. Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1493–502.CrossRefPubMed Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, Arabi YM, Davies AR, D’Urso P, et al. Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1493–502.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Carter BG, Butt W. Review of the use of somatosensory evoked potentials in the prediction of outcome after severe brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:178–86.CrossRefPubMed Carter BG, Butt W. Review of the use of somatosensory evoked potentials in the prediction of outcome after severe brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:178–86.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Houlden DA, Taylor AB, Feinstein A, Midha R, Bethune AJ, Stewart CP, et al. Early somatosensory evoked potential grades in comatose traumatic brain injury patients predict cognitive and functional outcome. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:167–74.CrossRefPubMed Houlden DA, Taylor AB, Feinstein A, Midha R, Bethune AJ, Stewart CP, et al. Early somatosensory evoked potential grades in comatose traumatic brain injury patients predict cognitive and functional outcome. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:167–74.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Robinson LR, Micklesen PJ, Tirschwell DL, Lew HL. Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potentials for awakening from coma. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:960–7.CrossRefPubMed Robinson LR, Micklesen PJ, Tirschwell DL, Lew HL. Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potentials for awakening from coma. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:960–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Klem GH, Luders HO, Jasper HH, Elger C. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999;52:3–6. Klem GH, Luders HO, Jasper HH, Elger C. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999;52:3–6.
13.
go back to reference Becker KJ, Baxter AB, Cohen WA, Bybee HM, Tirschwell DL, Newell DW, et al. Withdrawal of support in intracerebral hemorrhage may lead to self-fulfilling prophecies. Neurology. 2001;56:766–72.CrossRefPubMed Becker KJ, Baxter AB, Cohen WA, Bybee HM, Tirschwell DL, Newell DW, et al. Withdrawal of support in intracerebral hemorrhage may lead to self-fulfilling prophecies. Neurology. 2001;56:766–72.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mayer SA, Kossoff SB. Withdrawal of life support in the neurological intensive care unit. Neurology. 1999;52:1602–9.CrossRefPubMed Mayer SA, Kossoff SB. Withdrawal of life support in the neurological intensive care unit. Neurology. 1999;52:1602–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Turgeon AF, Lauzier F, Simard JF, Scales DC, Burns KE, Moore L, et al. Mortality associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a Canadian multicentre cohort study. CMAJ: Can Med Assoc J = journal de l’Association medicale canadienne. 2011;183:1581–8.CrossRef Turgeon AF, Lauzier F, Simard JF, Scales DC, Burns KE, Moore L, et al. Mortality associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a Canadian multicentre cohort study. CMAJ: Can Med Assoc J = journal de l’Association medicale canadienne. 2011;183:1581–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hume AL, Cant BR, Shaw NA, Cowan JC. Central somatosensory conduction time from 10 to 79 years. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1982;54:49–54.CrossRefPubMed Hume AL, Cant BR, Shaw NA, Cowan JC. Central somatosensory conduction time from 10 to 79 years. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1982;54:49–54.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Beca J, Cox PN, Taylor MJ, Bohn D, Butt W, Logan WJ, et al. Somatosensory evoked potentials for prediction of outcome in acute severe brain injury. J Pediatr. 1995;126:44–9.CrossRefPubMed Beca J, Cox PN, Taylor MJ, Bohn D, Butt W, Logan WJ, et al. Somatosensory evoked potentials for prediction of outcome in acute severe brain injury. J Pediatr. 1995;126:44–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference De Meirleir LJ, Taylor MJ. Prognostic utility of SEPs in comatose children. Pediatr Neurol. 1987;3:78–82.CrossRefPubMed De Meirleir LJ, Taylor MJ. Prognostic utility of SEPs in comatose children. Pediatr Neurol. 1987;3:78–82.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Judson JA, Cant BR, Shaw NA. Early prediction of outcome from cerebral trauma by somatosensory evoked potentials. Crit Care Med. 1990;18:363–8.CrossRefPubMed Judson JA, Cant BR, Shaw NA. Early prediction of outcome from cerebral trauma by somatosensory evoked potentials. Crit Care Med. 1990;18:363–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Allison T. Scalp and cortical recordings of initial somatosensory cortex activity to median nerve stimulation in man. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1982;388:671–8.CrossRefPubMed Allison T. Scalp and cortical recordings of initial somatosensory cortex activity to median nerve stimulation in man. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1982;388:671–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Rothstein TL. The role of evoked potentials in anoxic-ischemic coma and severe brain trauma. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;17:486–97.CrossRefPubMed Rothstein TL. The role of evoked potentials in anoxic-ischemic coma and severe brain trauma. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;17:486–97.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Somatosensory evoked potentials after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury
Authors
Allison Bethune
Nadia Scantlebury
Ekaterina Potapova
Nicole Dinn
Victor Yang
Todd Mainprize
Mahmood Fazl
Farhad Pirouzmand
Leodante da Costa
Martin Chapman
Nicolas Phan
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-017-0083-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 5/2018 Go to the issue