Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 5/2018

01-10-2018 | Letter to the Editor

Philips Intellivue NMT module: variability of initial measurements

Authors: Alexandre Stouffs, Arni Ibsen, Jacques Jamart, Virginie Dubois, Philippe E. Dubois

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

When administering neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) during general anesthesia, it is recommended to monitor the neuromuscular transmission (NMT) quantitatively to manage the intraoperative depth of blockade and to rule out any residual paralysis before awakening the patient [1, 2]. Acceleromyography (AMG) has been demonstrated to be a valuable measurement tool in clinical practice [3]. Recently, Philips (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) has launched a new device that uses this principle: the Philips Intellivue NMT module. This is a well-manufactured monitor that is integrated with the anesthesia Intellivue monitor. The software allows the anesthetist to configure the nerve stimulation patterns and display the current results and their trends. The peripheral cables, the grabbers, and the piezoelectric sensor are robust and easy to set on the patient. The device may be used with standard cutaneous ECG electrodes. Unfortunately, the authors encountered difficulties in the daily use of this new device, and technical artifacts impaired the clinical management. Particularly, the first measurements carried out before inducing the neuromuscular block presented a surprising variability that could make reliance on the results difficult. Calibration of the initial stimulation is recommended to improve this issue [4]. We designed a prospective study in 200 consenting patients to determine and compare the initial baseline provided by the new device with or without calibration. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Viby-Mogensen J, Claudius C. Evidence-based management of neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1–2.CrossRefPubMed Viby-Mogensen J, Claudius C. Evidence-based management of neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1–2.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F, Marty J. Residual paralysis after emergence from anaesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2010;112:1013–22.CrossRefPubMed Plaud B, Debaene B, Donati F, Marty J. Residual paralysis after emergence from anaesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2010;112:1013–22.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Claudius C, Viby-Mogensen J. Acceleromyography for use in scientific and clinical practice. A systematic review of the evidence. Anesthesiology. 2008;108:1117–40.CrossRefPubMed Claudius C, Viby-Mogensen J. Acceleromyography for use in scientific and clinical practice. A systematic review of the evidence. Anesthesiology. 2008;108:1117–40.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51:789–808.CrossRefPubMed Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51:789–808.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Viby-Mogensen J, Jensen E, Werner M, Nielsen HK. Measurement of acceleration: a new method of monitoring neuromuscular function. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1988;32:45–8.CrossRefPubMed Viby-Mogensen J, Jensen E, Werner M, Nielsen HK. Measurement of acceleration: a new method of monitoring neuromuscular function. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1988;32:45–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Viby-Mogensen J. Is the performance of acceleromyography improved with preload and normalization ? A comparison with mechanomyography. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(6):1261–70.CrossRefPubMed Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Viby-Mogensen J. Is the performance of acceleromyography improved with preload and normalization ? A comparison with mechanomyography. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(6):1261–70.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dubois PE, De Bel M, Jamart J, Mitchell J, Gourdin M, Dransart C, dHollander A. Performance of acceleromyography with a short and light TOF-tube compared with mechanomyography. A clinical comparison. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2014;31:404–10.CrossRefPubMed Dubois PE, De Bel M, Jamart J, Mitchell J, Gourdin M, Dransart C, dHollander A. Performance of acceleromyography with a short and light TOF-tube compared with mechanomyography. A clinical comparison. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2014;31:404–10.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Philips Intellivue NMT module: variability of initial measurements
Authors
Alexandre Stouffs
Arni Ibsen
Jacques Jamart
Virginie Dubois
Philippe E. Dubois
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-017-0079-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 5/2018 Go to the issue