Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 4/2012

01-08-2012

Variations of the analgesia nociception index during general anaesthesia for laparoscopic abdominal surgery

Authors: M. Jeanne, C. Clément, J. De Jonckheere, R. Logier, B. Tavernier

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The analgesia nociception index (ANI) is an online heart rate variability analysis proposed for assessment of the antinociception/nociception balance. In this observational study, we compared ANI with heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) during various noxious stimuli in anaesthetized patients. 15 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy or cholecystectomy were studied. Patients received target controlled infusions of propofol (adjusted to maintain the Bispectral index in the range [40–60]) and remifentanil (with target increase in case of haemodynamic reactivity [increase in HR and/or SBP >20 % of baseline]), and cisatracurium. Medical staff was blind to the ANI monitor. ANI and haemodynamic data were recorded at predefined times before and during surgery, including tetanic stimulation of the ulnar nerve before start of surgery. Anaesthesia induction decreased HR and SBP, while high ANI values (88 [17]) were recorded, indicating parasympathetic predominance. In 10 out of 11 patients, tetanic stimulation led to a transient (<5 min) decrease in ANI to 48 (40) whereas HR and SBP did not change. After start of surgery, ANI decreased to 60 (39) and decreased further to 50 (15) after the pneumoperitoneum was inflated, while there was no significant change in HR or SBP. When haemodynamic reactivity occurred, ANI had further decreased to 40 (15). After completion of surgery, ANI returned to 90 (34). ANI seems more sensitive than HR and SBP to moderate nociceptive stimuli in propofol-anaesthetized patients. Whether ANI monitoring may allow preventing haemodynamic reactivity to noxious stimuli remains to be demonstrated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pomfrett C. Heart rate variability, BIS and ‘depth of anaesthesia’. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82:559–662.CrossRef Pomfrett C. Heart rate variability, BIS and ‘depth of anaesthesia’. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82:559–662.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ledowski T, Albus S, Stein J, MacDonald B. Skin conductance for monitoring of acute pain in adult postoperative patients: influence of electrode surface area and sampling time. J Clin Monit Comput. 2011;25:371–6.PubMedCrossRef Ledowski T, Albus S, Stein J, MacDonald B. Skin conductance for monitoring of acute pain in adult postoperative patients: influence of electrode surface area and sampling time. J Clin Monit Comput. 2011;25:371–6.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hans P, Verscheure S, Uutela K, Hans G, Bonhomme V. Effect of a fluid challenge on the Surgical Pleth Index during stable propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 [epub ahead of print]. Hans P, Verscheure S, Uutela K, Hans G, Bonhomme V. Effect of a fluid challenge on the Surgical Pleth Index during stable propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 [epub ahead of print].
4.
go back to reference Task_Force. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996;93:1043–65.CrossRef Task_Force. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996;93:1043–65.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pichot V, Buffiere S, Gaspoz JM, Costes F, Molliex S, Duverney D, et al. Wavelet transform of heart rate variability to assess autonomous system activity does not predict arousal from general anesthesia. Can J Anaesthesia. 2001;48:859–63.CrossRef Pichot V, Buffiere S, Gaspoz JM, Costes F, Molliex S, Duverney D, et al. Wavelet transform of heart rate variability to assess autonomous system activity does not predict arousal from general anesthesia. Can J Anaesthesia. 2001;48:859–63.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Latson TW, O’Flaherty D. Effects of surgical stimulation on autonomic reflex function: assessment of changes in heart rate variability. Br J Anaesth. 1993;70:301–5.PubMedCrossRef Latson TW, O’Flaherty D. Effects of surgical stimulation on autonomic reflex function: assessment of changes in heart rate variability. Br J Anaesth. 1993;70:301–5.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jeanne M, Logier R, De Jonckheere J, Tavernier B. Heart rate variability during total intravenous anesthesia: effects of nociception and analgesia. Auton Neurosci. 2009;147:91–6.PubMedCrossRef Jeanne M, Logier R, De Jonckheere J, Tavernier B. Heart rate variability during total intravenous anesthesia: effects of nociception and analgesia. Auton Neurosci. 2009;147:91–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jeanne M, Logier R, De Jonckheere J, Tavernier B. Validation of a graphic measurement of heart rate variability to assess analgesia/nociception balance during general anesthesia. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;1:1840–3. Jeanne M, Logier R, De Jonckheere J, Tavernier B. Validation of a graphic measurement of heart rate variability to assess analgesia/nociception balance during general anesthesia. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;1:1840–3.
9.
go back to reference Swinhoe CF, Peacock JE, Glen JB, Reilly CS. Evaluation of the predictive performance of a ‘Diprifusor’ TCI system. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:61–7.PubMedCrossRef Swinhoe CF, Peacock JE, Glen JB, Reilly CS. Evaluation of the predictive performance of a ‘Diprifusor’ TCI system. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:61–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Servin FS. TCI compared with manually controlled infusion of propofol: a multicentre study. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:82–6.PubMedCrossRef Servin FS. TCI compared with manually controlled infusion of propofol: a multicentre study. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:82–6.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Feiss P, Fompeyrine S, Banssillon V, Caramella P, Ecoffey C, Gateau O, et al. Indications de la curarisation en anesthésie. Ann Fr Anesth Réanim. 2000;19:337–472. Feiss P, Fompeyrine S, Banssillon V, Caramella P, Ecoffey C, Gateau O, et al. Indications de la curarisation en anesthésie. Ann Fr Anesth Réanim. 2000;19:337–472.
12.
go back to reference Logier R, Dejonckheere J, Dassonneville A. An efficient algorithm fo R–R interval series filtering. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society; 2004. Logier R, Dejonckheere J, Dassonneville A. An efficient algorithm fo R–R interval series filtering. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society; 2004.
13.
go back to reference Deutschman CS, Harris AP, Fleisher LA. Changes in heart rate variability under propofol anesthesia: a possible explanation for propofol-induced bradycardia. Anesth Analg. 1994;79:373–7.PubMed Deutschman CS, Harris AP, Fleisher LA. Changes in heart rate variability under propofol anesthesia: a possible explanation for propofol-induced bradycardia. Anesth Analg. 1994;79:373–7.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Ebert TJ, Muzi M, Berens R, Goff D, Kampine JP. Sympathetic responses to induction of anesthesia in humans with propofol or etomidate. Anesthesiology. 1992;76:725–33.PubMedCrossRef Ebert TJ, Muzi M, Berens R, Goff D, Kampine JP. Sympathetic responses to induction of anesthesia in humans with propofol or etomidate. Anesthesiology. 1992;76:725–33.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Win NN, Fukayama H, Kohase H, Umino M. The different effects of intravenous propofol and midazolam sedation on hemodynamic and heart rate variability. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:97–102.PubMedCrossRef Win NN, Fukayama H, Kohase H, Umino M. The different effects of intravenous propofol and midazolam sedation on hemodynamic and heart rate variability. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:97–102.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Komatsu T, Kimura T, Sanchala V, Shibutani K, Shimada Y. Effects of fentanyl-diazepam-pancuronium anesthesia on heart rate variability: a spectral analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1992;6:444–8.PubMedCrossRef Komatsu T, Kimura T, Sanchala V, Shibutani K, Shimada Y. Effects of fentanyl-diazepam-pancuronium anesthesia on heart rate variability: a spectral analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1992;6:444–8.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Latson TW, McCarrol SM, Mirhej MA, Hyndman VA, Whitten CW, Lipton JM. Effects of three anesthetic induction techniques on heart rate variability. J Clin Anesth. 1992;4:265–76.PubMedCrossRef Latson TW, McCarrol SM, Mirhej MA, Hyndman VA, Whitten CW, Lipton JM. Effects of three anesthetic induction techniques on heart rate variability. J Clin Anesth. 1992;4:265–76.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zickmann B, Hofmann HC, Pottkämper C, Knothe C, Boldt J, Hempelmann G. Changes in heart rate variability during induction of anesthesia with fentanyl and midazolam. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996;10:609–13.PubMedCrossRef Zickmann B, Hofmann HC, Pottkämper C, Knothe C, Boldt J, Hempelmann G. Changes in heart rate variability during induction of anesthesia with fentanyl and midazolam. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996;10:609–13.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Barvais L, Engelman E, Eba JM, Coussaert E, Cantraine F, Kenny GN. Effect site concentrations of remifentanil and pupil response to noxious stimulation. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:347–52.PubMedCrossRef Barvais L, Engelman E, Eba JM, Coussaert E, Cantraine F, Kenny GN. Effect site concentrations of remifentanil and pupil response to noxious stimulation. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:347–52.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wennervirta J, Hynynen M, Koivusalo AM, Uutela K, Huiku M, Vakkuri A. Surgical stress index as a measure of nociception/antinociception balance during general anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52:1038–45.PubMedCrossRef Wennervirta J, Hynynen M, Koivusalo AM, Uutela K, Huiku M, Vakkuri A. Surgical stress index as a measure of nociception/antinociception balance during general anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52:1038–45.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Luginbühl M, Ypparila-Wolters H, Rüfenacht M, Petersen-Felix S, Korhonen I. Heart rate variability does not discriminate between different levels of haemodynamic responsiveness during surgical anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98:728–36.PubMedCrossRef Luginbühl M, Ypparila-Wolters H, Rüfenacht M, Petersen-Felix S, Korhonen I. Heart rate variability does not discriminate between different levels of haemodynamic responsiveness during surgical anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98:728–36.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mäenpää M, Laitio T, Kuusela T, Penttilä J, Kaisti K, Aalto S, et al. Delta entropy of heart rate variability along with deepening anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:587–92.PubMedCrossRef Mäenpää M, Laitio T, Kuusela T, Penttilä J, Kaisti K, Aalto S, et al. Delta entropy of heart rate variability along with deepening anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:587–92.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Variations of the analgesia nociception index during general anaesthesia for laparoscopic abdominal surgery
Authors
M. Jeanne
C. Clément
J. De Jonckheere
R. Logier
B. Tavernier
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-012-9354-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 4/2012 Go to the issue