Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 10/2020

01-10-2020 | Fertility | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Self-reported quality of life scales in women undergoing oocyte freezing versus in vitro fertilization

Authors: Sarah S. Lee, Megan Sutter, Shelley Lee, Mindy R. Schiffman, Yael G. Kramer, David H. McCulloh, Frederick Licciardi

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 10/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study was to investigate stress levels among women undergoing elective oocyte cryopreservation by comparing their self-reported quality of life measures with women undergoing in vitro fertilization during the fertility treatment cycle.

Methods

Patients undergoing oocyte retrieval at a single institution were offered a voluntary, anonymous, and written questionnaire. The survey was adapted and validated from the Fertility Quality of Life tool to assess self-reported fertility treatment-related problems and was tested for construct validity and reliability. Based on exploratory factor analyses, three subscales were created as follows: fertility treatment-related stress, tolerability, and environment. Relationships between patient characteristics and fertility treatment-related measures were examined with Fisher’s exact test, ANOVA, and multivariate regression with significance p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 461 patients (331 IVF, 130 egg freeze) were included in the analysis. Medically indicated egg freezing patients were excluded. Overall, both IVF and egg freeze patients reported stress during the current fertility cycle and there were no significant differences between IVF and egg freeze patients for any subscale scores. Three sets of generalized linear models were run and found age to be associated with fertility treatment-related stress and tolerability scores, with younger patients experiencing greater difficulties. Additionally, patients who underwent repeat cycles reported more fertility treatment-related stress.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing egg freezing have similar responses to quality of life questions as patients undergoing IVF. Repeat cycles and younger age contribute to perceptions of stress. This information supports developing stress reduction strategies for all women undergoing egg freezing.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Klonoff-Cohen H, Chu E, Natarajan L, Sieber W. A prospective study of stress among women undergoing in vitro fertilization or gamete intrafallopian transfer. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(4):675–87.CrossRef Klonoff-Cohen H, Chu E, Natarajan L, Sieber W. A prospective study of stress among women undergoing in vitro fertilization or gamete intrafallopian transfer. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(4):675–87.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Domar AD, Broome A, Zuttermeister PC, Seibel M, Friedman R. The prevalence and predictability of depression in infertile women. Fertil Steril. 1992;58(6):1158–63.CrossRef Domar AD, Broome A, Zuttermeister PC, Seibel M, Friedman R. The prevalence and predictability of depression in infertile women. Fertil Steril. 1992;58(6):1158–63.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schaller MA, Griesinger G, Banz-Jansen C. Women show a higher level of anxiety during IVF treatment than men and hold different concerns: a cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;293(5):1137–45.CrossRef Schaller MA, Griesinger G, Banz-Jansen C. Women show a higher level of anxiety during IVF treatment than men and hold different concerns: a cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;293(5):1137–45.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Prevention CfDCa. 2017 Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report. United States Department of Health and Human Services: Atlanta; 2019. Prevention CfDCa. 2017 Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report. United States Department of Health and Human Services: Atlanta; 2019.
5.
go back to reference Cil AP, Seli E. Current trends and progress in clinical applications of oocyte cryopreservation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;25(3):247–54.CrossRef Cil AP, Seli E. Current trends and progress in clinical applications of oocyte cryopreservation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;25(3):247–54.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Argyle CE, Harper JC, Davies MC. Oocyte cryopreservation: where are we now? Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(4):440–9.CrossRef Argyle CE, Harper JC, Davies MC. Oocyte cryopreservation: where are we now? Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(4):440–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lewis EI, Missmer SA, Farland LV, Ginsburg ES. Public support in the United States for elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(5):1183–9. Lewis EI, Missmer SA, Farland LV, Ginsburg ES. Public support in the United States for elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(5):1183–9.
8.
go back to reference Baldwin K, Culley L, Hudson N, Mitchell H. Running out of time: exploring women's motivations for social egg freezing. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;40(2):166–73.CrossRef Baldwin K, Culley L, Hudson N, Mitchell H. Running out of time: exploring women's motivations for social egg freezing. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;40(2):166–73.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Greenwood EA, Pasch LA, Hastie J, Cedars MI, Huddleston HG. To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(6):1097–104 e1.CrossRef Greenwood EA, Pasch LA, Hastie J, Cedars MI, Huddleston HG. To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(6):1097–104 e1.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):409–15 e3.CrossRef Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):409–15 e3.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Osborne JWC, AB KJT. In: Osborne J, editor. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2008. p. 86–99. Osborne JWC, AB KJT. In: Osborne J, editor. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2008. p. 86–99.
12.
go back to reference Rando TA. Grief, dying, and death : clinical interventions for caregivers, vol. xii. Champaign: Research Press Co; 1984. p. 477. Rando TA. Grief, dying, and death : clinical interventions for caregivers, vol. xii. Champaign: Research Press Co; 1984. p. 477.
13.
go back to reference Hodes-Wertz B, Druckenmiller S, Smith M, Noyes N. What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility? Fertil Steril. 2013;100(5):1343–9.CrossRef Hodes-Wertz B, Druckenmiller S, Smith M, Noyes N. What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility? Fertil Steril. 2013;100(5):1343–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rich CW, Domar AD. Addressing the emotional barriers to access to reproductive care. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(5):1124–7.CrossRef Rich CW, Domar AD. Addressing the emotional barriers to access to reproductive care. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(5):1124–7.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ying L, Wu LH, Loke AY. The effects of psychosocial interventions on the mental health, pregnancy rates, and marital function of infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(6):689–701.CrossRef Ying L, Wu LH, Loke AY. The effects of psychosocial interventions on the mental health, pregnancy rates, and marital function of infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(6):689–701.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Frederiksen Y, Farver-Vestergaard I, Skovgard NG, Ingerslev HJ, Zachariae R. Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for psychological and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2015;5(1):e006592.CrossRef Frederiksen Y, Farver-Vestergaard I, Skovgard NG, Ingerslev HJ, Zachariae R. Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for psychological and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2015;5(1):e006592.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Boivin J. A review of psychosocial interventions in infertility. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(12):2325–41.CrossRef Boivin J. A review of psychosocial interventions in infertility. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(12):2325–41.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Self-reported quality of life scales in women undergoing oocyte freezing versus in vitro fertilization
Authors
Sarah S. Lee
Megan Sutter
Shelley Lee
Mindy R. Schiffman
Yael G. Kramer
David H. McCulloh
Frederick Licciardi
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01916-1

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 10/2020 Go to the issue