Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Anonymous sperm donors’ attitude towards donation and the release of identifying information

Authors: F. Mahieu, W. Decleer, K. Osmanagaoglu, V. Provoost

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Belgian legislation allows only strictly anonymous gamete donation and known donation (donation to a recipient known by the donor). Recently, an amendment of the legislation was proposed to grant donor offspring, as of 18 years old, the right to claim identifying information about their donor.

Purpose

The aim is to explore the attitude of actual sperm donors towards donation and the release of identifying information and to investigate which donors would be willing to donate when anonymity would be prohibited by law.

Methods

All men who were accepted as sperm donors (n = 242) by AZ Jan Palfijn Hospital (Ghent, Belgium) were invited to complete an anonymous online survey. The response rate was 65.5%.

Results

One in five (20.1%; n = 30) would continue sperm donation upon a legislation change towards identifiable donation. Three in four donors (75.2%) would agree to provide basic non-identifiable information about themselves and one in three (32.9%) would provide extra non-identifiable information such as a baby photo or a personal letter. Almost half of the donors (45.6%) would agree to donate in a system where the hospital can trace the donor at the child’s request and contact the donor, leaving it to the donor to decide whether or not to have contact with the requesting donor child.

Conclusion

These findings show that only one in five current donors would continue to donate when identifiable. The study also demonstrates that current donors think more positive about alternative options and that nearly half of them are willing to be contacted by the hospital at the donor child’s request, providing the donor can decide at that time whether or not to release his identity.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Blyth E, Frith L. Access to genetic and biographical history in donorconception: an analysis of provisions permitting disclosure of donor identity. Mol Hum Reprod. 2009;24:i50. Blyth E, Frith L. Access to genetic and biographical history in donorconception: an analysis of provisions permitting disclosure of donor identity. Mol Hum Reprod. 2009;24:i50.
7.
go back to reference Daniels KR, Lewis GM, Curson R. Information sharing in semen donation: the views of donors. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):673–80.PubMedCrossRef Daniels KR, Lewis GM, Curson R. Information sharing in semen donation: the views of donors. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):673–80.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Frith L. Gamete donation and anonymity: the ethical and legal debate. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(5):818–24.PubMedCrossRef Frith L. Gamete donation and anonymity: the ethical and legal debate. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(5):818–24.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ide L, Verheecke T, Decleer W, Osmanagaoglu K. Public opinion survey among potential sperm donors for the possible future behavior of such donors in case the Belgian legislature would abolish the donor anonymity. Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;71(19):1229–31. Ide L, Verheecke T, Decleer W, Osmanagaoglu K. Public opinion survey among potential sperm donors for the possible future behavior of such donors in case the Belgian legislature would abolish the donor anonymity. Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2015;71(19):1229–31.
14.
go back to reference Janssens PMW, Simons AHM, van Kooij RJ, Blokzijl E, Dunselman GAJ. A new Dutch law regulating provision of identifying information of donors to offspring: background, content and impact. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(4):852–6.PubMedCrossRef Janssens PMW, Simons AHM, van Kooij RJ, Blokzijl E, Dunselman GAJ. A new Dutch law regulating provision of identifying information of donors to offspring: background, content and impact. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(4):852–6.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lui SC, Weaver SM. Attitudes and motives of semen donors and non-donors. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(9):2061–6.PubMedCrossRef Lui SC, Weaver SM. Attitudes and motives of semen donors and non-donors. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(9):2061–6.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lui SC, Weaver SM, Robinson J, Debono M, Nieland M, Killick SR, et al. A survey of semen donor attitudes. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(1):234–8.PubMedCrossRef Lui SC, Weaver SM, Robinson J, Debono M, Nieland M, Killick SR, et al. A survey of semen donor attitudes. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(1):234–8.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pedersen B, Nielsen AF, Lauritsen JG. Psychosocial aspects of donor insemination. Sperm donors--their motivations and attitudes to artificial insemination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994;73(9):701–5.PubMedCrossRef Pedersen B, Nielsen AF, Lauritsen JG. Psychosocial aspects of donor insemination. Sperm donors--their motivations and attitudes to artificial insemination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994;73(9):701–5.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pennings G. The rough guide to insemination: cross-border travelling for donor semen due to different regulations. Facts Views and Vision in Obgyn, Monograph, 55–60; 2010. Pennings G. The rough guide to insemination: cross-border travelling for donor semen due to different regulations. Facts Views and Vision in Obgyn, Monograph, 55–60; 2010.
22.
go back to reference Sekhon L, Said T, Del Valle A. The opinions and concerns of current sperm donors regarding donor identity disclosure in Canada. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2):e7.CrossRef Sekhon L, Said T, Del Valle A. The opinions and concerns of current sperm donors regarding donor identity disclosure in Canada. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2):e7.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Thijssen A, Dhont N, Vandormael E, Cox A, Klerkx E, Creemers E, et al. Artificial insemination with donor sperm (AID): heterogeneity in sperm banking facilities in a single country (Belgium). Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2014;6(2):57–67.PubMedPubMedCentral Thijssen A, Dhont N, Vandormael E, Cox A, Klerkx E, Creemers E, et al. Artificial insemination with donor sperm (AID): heterogeneity in sperm banking facilities in a single country (Belgium). Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2014;6(2):57–67.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Anonymous sperm donors’ attitude towards donation and the release of identifying information
Authors
F. Mahieu
W. Decleer
K. Osmanagaoglu
V. Provoost
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01569-9

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 10/2019 Go to the issue