Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2019

01-04-2019 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Early detection of cryostorage tank failure using a weight-based monitoring system

Authors: Zahava P. Michaelson, Sai T. Bondalapati, Selma Amrane, Robert W. Prosser, Daniel M. Hill, Pallavi Gaur, Matt Recio, David E. Travassos, Mikaela D. Wolfkamp, Sasha Sadowy, Colin Thomas, Eric J. Forman, Zev Williams

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To study the relationship between liquid nitrogen loss and temperature in cryostorage dewars and develop an early-warning alarm for impending tank failure.

Methods

Cryostorage dewars were placed on custom-engineered scales, and weight and temperature data were continuously monitored in the setting of slow, medium, and fast rate-loss of LN2 to simulate three scenarios of tank failure.

Results

LN2 Tank weights and temperatures were continuously monitored and recorded, with a calculated alarm trigger set at 10% weight loss and temperature of − 185 °C. With an intact tank, a 10% loss in LN2 occurred in 4.2–4.9 days. Warming to − 185 °C occurred in 37.8–43.7 days, over 30 days after the weight-based alarm was triggered. Full evaporation of LN2 required ~ 36.8 days. For the medium rate-loss simulation, a 10% loss in LN2 occurred in 0.8 h. Warming to − 185 °C occurred in 3.7–4.8 h, approximately 3 h after the weight-based alarm was triggered. For the fast rate-loss simulation, a 10% weight loss occurred within 15 s, and tanks were depleted in under 3 min. Tank temperatures began to rise immediately and at a relatively constant rate of 43.9 °C/h and 51.6 °C/h. Temperature alarms would have sounded within 0.37 and 0.06 h after the breech.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that a weight-based alarm system can detect tank failures prior to a temperature-based system. Weight-based monitoring could serve as a redundant safety mechanism for added protection of cryopreserved reproductive tissues.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cohen J, Inge KL, Wiker SR, Wright G, Fehilly CB, Turner TGJ. Duration of storage of cryopreserved human embryos. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1988;5:301–3.CrossRefPubMed Cohen J, Inge KL, Wiker SR, Wright G, Fehilly CB, Turner TGJ. Duration of storage of cryopreserved human embryos. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1988;5:301–3.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Glenister PH, Whittingham DG, Lyon MF. Further studies on the effect of radiation during the storage of frozen 8-cell mouse embryos at -196 degrees C. J Reprod Fertil. 1984;70:229–34.CrossRefPubMed Glenister PH, Whittingham DG, Lyon MF. Further studies on the effect of radiation during the storage of frozen 8-cell mouse embryos at -196 degrees C. J Reprod Fertil. 1984;70:229–34.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Goldman KN, Kramer Y, Hodes-Wertz B, Noyes N, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. Long-term cryopreservation of human oocytes does not increase embryonic aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:662–8.CrossRefPubMed Goldman KN, Kramer Y, Hodes-Wertz B, Noyes N, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. Long-term cryopreservation of human oocytes does not increase embryonic aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:662–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ueno S, Uchiyama K, Kuroda T, Yabuuchi A, Ezoe K, Okimura T, et al. Cryostorage duration does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective single-centre cohort study of vitrified-warmed blastocysts. Reprod BioMed Online. 2018;36:614–9.CrossRefPubMed Ueno S, Uchiyama K, Kuroda T, Yabuuchi A, Ezoe K, Okimura T, et al. Cryostorage duration does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective single-centre cohort study of vitrified-warmed blastocysts. Reprod BioMed Online. 2018;36:614–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bulletin A. ASRM statement on second report of storage tank failure. In: ASRM Office of Public Affairs Vol 20, 2018. Bulletin A. ASRM statement on second report of storage tank failure. In: ASRM Office of Public Affairs Vol 20, 2018.
6.
go back to reference Tomlinson M, Morroll D. Risks associated with cryopreservation: a survey of assisted conception units in the UK and Ireland. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2008;11:33–42.CrossRef Tomlinson M, Morroll D. Risks associated with cryopreservation: a survey of assisted conception units in the UK and Ireland. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2008;11:33–42.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schiewe MC, Freeman M, Whitney JB, VerMilyea MD, Jones A, Aguirre M et al. Comprehensive assessment of cryogenic storage risk and quality management concerns: best practice guidelines for ART labs. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35(12):in press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1310-6. Schiewe MC, Freeman M, Whitney JB, VerMilyea MD, Jones A, Aguirre M et al. Comprehensive assessment of cryogenic storage risk and quality management concerns: best practice guidelines for ART labs. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35(12):in press. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10815-018-1310-6.
Metadata
Title
Early detection of cryostorage tank failure using a weight-based monitoring system
Authors
Zahava P. Michaelson
Sai T. Bondalapati
Selma Amrane
Robert W. Prosser
Daniel M. Hill
Pallavi Gaur
Matt Recio
David E. Travassos
Mikaela D. Wolfkamp
Sasha Sadowy
Colin Thomas
Eric J. Forman
Zev Williams
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01402-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2019 Go to the issue