Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Fertility Preservation

Antral follicle responsiveness to FSH, assessed by the follicular output rate (FORT), is altered in Hodgkin’s lymphoma when compared with breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation

Authors: Charlotte Sonigo, Marjorie Comtet, Solene Duros, Christophe Sifer, Nathalie Sermondade, Michaël Grynberg

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Oocyte and/or embryo cryopreservation after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) represents the most established method for female fertility preservation (FP) before cancer treatment. Whether patients suffering from malignancies, candidates for FP, have a normal ovarian capacity to respond to stimulation is controversial. Reduced responsiveness of antral follicle to exogenous FSH might be at play. The percentage of antral follicles that successfully respond to FSH administration may be estimated by the follicular output rate (FORT), which presumably reflects the health of granulosa cells. The present study aims at investigating whether the FORT differs between Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and breast cancer (BC) patients.

Methods

Forty-nine BC and 33 HL patient candidates for FP using oocyte vitrification following COH were prospectively studied. FORT was calculated by the ratio between the pre-ovulatory follicle count (16–22 mm) on the day of oocyte triggering × 100/antral follicle count before initiation of the stimulation.

Results

Overall, women in the HL group were younger in comparison with BC patients (26.4 ± 3.9 vs 33.6 ± 3.3 years, p < 0.0001, respectively). The FORT was significantly decreased in patients with HL when compared with BC group (27.0 ± 18.8 vs 39.8 ± 18.9%, p = 0.004, respectively), further leading to a comparable number of oocytes vitrified (10.8 ± 5.9 vs 10.2 ± 7.7 oocytes, p = 0.7, respectively).

Conclusion

The present findings indicate that the percentage of antral follicles that successfully respond to FSH administration is reduced in HL when compared to BC patients, supporting the hypothesis of a detrimental effect of hemopathy on follicular health. In vitro experimentations might provide additional data to confirm this hypothesis.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation in patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy or gonadectomy: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1214–23.CrossRef Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation in patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy or gonadectomy: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1214–23.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference ACOG. Committee opinion No. 584: oocyte cryopreservation. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:221–2.CrossRef ACOG. Committee opinion No. 584: oocyte cryopreservation. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:221–2.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Friedler S, Koc O, Gidoni Y, Raziel A, Ron-El R. Ovarian response to stimulation for fertility preservation in women with malignant disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:125–33.CrossRefPubMed Friedler S, Koc O, Gidoni Y, Raziel A, Ron-El R. Ovarian response to stimulation for fertility preservation in women with malignant disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:125–33.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Domingo J, Guillén V, Ayllón Y, Martínez M, Muñoz E, Pellicer A, et al. Ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in cancer patients is diminished even before oncological treatment. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:930–4.CrossRefPubMed Domingo J, Guillén V, Ayllón Y, Martínez M, Muñoz E, Pellicer A, et al. Ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in cancer patients is diminished even before oncological treatment. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:930–4.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cardozo ER, Thomson AP, Karmon AE, Dickinson KA, Wright DL, Sabatini ME. Ovarian stimulation and in-vitro fertilization outcomes of cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation compared to age matched controls: a 17-year experience. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:587–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cardozo ER, Thomson AP, Karmon AE, Dickinson KA, Wright DL, Sabatini ME. Ovarian stimulation and in-vitro fertilization outcomes of cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation compared to age matched controls: a 17-year experience. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:587–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Gallot V, Berwanger da Silva AL, Genro V, Grynberg M, Frydman N, Fanchin R. Antral follicle responsiveness to follicle-stimulating hormone administration assessed by the Follicular Output RaTe (FORT) may predict in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2012;27:1066–72.CrossRef Gallot V, Berwanger da Silva AL, Genro V, Grynberg M, Frydman N, Fanchin R. Antral follicle responsiveness to follicle-stimulating hormone administration assessed by the Follicular Output RaTe (FORT) may predict in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2012;27:1066–72.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Genro VK, Grynberg M, Scheffer JB, Roux I, Frydman R, Fanchin R. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels are negatively related to Follicular Output RaTe (FORT) in normo-cycling women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2011;26:671–7.CrossRef Genro VK, Grynberg M, Scheffer JB, Roux I, Frydman R, Fanchin R. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels are negatively related to Follicular Output RaTe (FORT) in normo-cycling women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2011;26:671–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cakmak H, Katz A, Cedars MI, Rosen MP. Effective method for emergency fertility preservation: random-start controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1673–80.CrossRefPubMed Cakmak H, Katz A, Cedars MI, Rosen MP. Effective method for emergency fertility preservation: random-start controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1673–80.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cobo A, Garcia-Velasco JA, Domingo J, Remohí J, Pellicer AI. vitrification of oocytes useful for fertility preservation for age-related fertility decline and in cancer patients? Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1485–95.CrossRefPubMed Cobo A, Garcia-Velasco JA, Domingo J, Remohí J, Pellicer AI. vitrification of oocytes useful for fertility preservation for age-related fertility decline and in cancer patients? Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1485–95.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Pal L, Leykin L, Schifren JL, Isaacson KB, Chang YC, Nikruil N, et al. Malignancy may adversely influence the quality and behaviour of oocytes. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 1998;13:1837–40.CrossRef Pal L, Leykin L, Schifren JL, Isaacson KB, Chang YC, Nikruil N, et al. Malignancy may adversely influence the quality and behaviour of oocytes. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 1998;13:1837–40.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Quintero RB, Helmer A, Huang JQ, Westphal LM. Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in patients with cancer. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:865–8.CrossRefPubMed Quintero RB, Helmer A, Huang JQ, Westphal LM. Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in patients with cancer. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:865–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Klock SC, Zhang JX, Kazer RR. Fertility preservation for female cancer patients: early clinical experience. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:149–55.CrossRefPubMed Klock SC, Zhang JX, Kazer RR. Fertility preservation for female cancer patients: early clinical experience. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:149–55.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Almog B, Azem F, Gordon D, Pauzner D, Amit A, Barkan G, et al. Effects of cancer on ovarian response in controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:957–60.CrossRefPubMed Almog B, Azem F, Gordon D, Pauzner D, Amit A, Barkan G, et al. Effects of cancer on ovarian response in controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:957–60.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Das M, Shehata F, Moria A, Holzer H, Son W-Y, Tulandi T. Ovarian reserve, response to gonadotropins, and oocyte maturity in women with malignancy. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:122–5.CrossRefPubMed Das M, Shehata F, Moria A, Holzer H, Son W-Y, Tulandi T. Ovarian reserve, response to gonadotropins, and oocyte maturity in women with malignancy. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:122–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Devesa M, Martínez F, Coroleu B, Rodríguez I, González C, Barri PN. Ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in women with cancer is as expected according to an age-specific nomogram. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:583–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Devesa M, Martínez F, Coroleu B, Rodríguez I, González C, Barri PN. Ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in women with cancer is as expected according to an age-specific nomogram. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:583–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Knopman JM, Noyes N, Talebian S, Krey LC, Grifo JA, Licciardi F. Women with cancer undergoing ART for fertility preservation: a cohort study of their response to exogenous gonadotropins. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1476–8.CrossRefPubMed Knopman JM, Noyes N, Talebian S, Krey LC, Grifo JA, Licciardi F. Women with cancer undergoing ART for fertility preservation: a cohort study of their response to exogenous gonadotropins. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1476–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Levin I, Almog B. Effect of cancer on ovarian function in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for fertility preservation: a reappraisal. Curr Oncol Tor Ont. 2013;20:e1–3. Levin I, Almog B. Effect of cancer on ovarian function in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for fertility preservation: a reappraisal. Curr Oncol Tor Ont. 2013;20:e1–3.
19.
go back to reference Michaan N, Ben-David G, Ben-Yosef D, Almog B, Many A, Pauzner D, et al. Ovarian stimulation and emergency in vitro fertilization for fertility preservation in cancer patients. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;149:175–7.CrossRefPubMed Michaan N, Ben-David G, Ben-Yosef D, Almog B, Many A, Pauzner D, et al. Ovarian stimulation and emergency in vitro fertilization for fertility preservation in cancer patients. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;149:175–7.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Quinn MM, Cakmak H, Letourneau JM, Cedars MI, Rosen MP. Response to ovarian stimulation is not impacted by a breast cancer diagnosis. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2017;32:568–74 Quinn MM, Cakmak H, Letourneau JM, Cedars MI, Rosen MP. Response to ovarian stimulation is not impacted by a breast cancer diagnosis. Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2017;32:568–74
21.
go back to reference Robertson AD, Missmer SA, Ginsburg ES. Embryo yield after in vitro fertilization in women undergoing embryo banking for fertility preservation before chemotherapy. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:588–91.CrossRefPubMed Robertson AD, Missmer SA, Ginsburg ES. Embryo yield after in vitro fertilization in women undergoing embryo banking for fertility preservation before chemotherapy. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:588–91.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Tulandi T, Holzer H. Effects of malignancies on the gonadal function. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:813–5.CrossRefPubMed Tulandi T, Holzer H. Effects of malignancies on the gonadal function. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:813–5.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Druckenmiller S, Goldman KN, Labella PA, Fino ME, Bazzocchi A, Noyes N. Successful oocyte cryopreservation in reproductive-aged cancer survivors. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127:474–80.CrossRefPubMed Druckenmiller S, Goldman KN, Labella PA, Fino ME, Bazzocchi A, Noyes N. Successful oocyte cryopreservation in reproductive-aged cancer survivors. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127:474–80.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pavone ME, Hirshfeld-Cytron J, Lawson AK, Smith K, Kazer R, Klock S. Fertility preservation outcomes may differ by cancer diagnosis. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2014;7:111–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pavone ME, Hirshfeld-Cytron J, Lawson AK, Smith K, Kazer R, Klock S. Fertility preservation outcomes may differ by cancer diagnosis. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2014;7:111–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Lawrenz B, Fehm T, von Wolff M, Soekler M, Huebner S, Henes J, et al. Reduced pretreatment ovarian reserve in premenopausal female patients with Hodgkin lymphoma or non-Hodgkin-lymphoma—evaluation by using antimüllerian hormone and retrieved oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:141–4.CrossRefPubMed Lawrenz B, Fehm T, von Wolff M, Soekler M, Huebner S, Henes J, et al. Reduced pretreatment ovarian reserve in premenopausal female patients with Hodgkin lymphoma or non-Hodgkin-lymphoma—evaluation by using antimüllerian hormone and retrieved oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:141–4.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Hamdine O, Eijkemans MJC, Lentjes EWG, Torrance HL, Macklon NS, Fauser BCJM, et al. Ovarian response prediction in GnRH antagonist treatment for IVF using anti-Müllerian hormone. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2015;30:170–8.CrossRef Hamdine O, Eijkemans MJC, Lentjes EWG, Torrance HL, Macklon NS, Fauser BCJM, et al. Ovarian response prediction in GnRH antagonist treatment for IVF using anti-Müllerian hormone. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2015;30:170–8.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Iliodromiti S, Nelson SM. Ovarian response biomarkers: physiology and performance. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27:182–6.CrossRefPubMed Iliodromiti S, Nelson SM. Ovarian response biomarkers: physiology and performance. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27:182–6.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Zhang N, Hao C-F, Zhuang L-L, Liu X-Y, HF G, Liu S, et al. Prediction of IVF/ICSI outcome based on the follicular output rate. Reprod BioMed Online. 2013;27:147–53.CrossRefPubMed Zhang N, Hao C-F, Zhuang L-L, Liu X-Y, HF G, Liu S, et al. Prediction of IVF/ICSI outcome based on the follicular output rate. Reprod BioMed Online. 2013;27:147–53.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Shima K, Kitayama S, Nakano R. Gonadotropin binding sites in human ovarian follicles and corpora lutea during the menstrual cycle. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:800–6.PubMed Shima K, Kitayama S, Nakano R. Gonadotropin binding sites in human ovarian follicles and corpora lutea during the menstrual cycle. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:800–6.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Gougeon A. Regulation of ovarian follicular development in primates: facts and hypotheses. Endocr Rev. 1996;17:121–55.CrossRefPubMed Gougeon A. Regulation of ovarian follicular development in primates: facts and hypotheses. Endocr Rev. 1996;17:121–55.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Nakamura K, Sheps S, Arck PC. Stress and reproductive failure: past notions, present insights and future directions. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25:47–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nakamura K, Sheps S, Arck PC. Stress and reproductive failure: past notions, present insights and future directions. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25:47–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Schenker JG, Meirow D, Schenker E. Stress and human reproduction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1992;45:1–8.CrossRefPubMed Schenker JG, Meirow D, Schenker E. Stress and human reproduction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1992;45:1–8.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Fanchin R, Schonäuer LM, Cunha-Filho JS, Méndez Lozano DH, Frydman R. Coordination of antral follicle growth: basis for innovative concepts of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Semin Reprod Med. 2005;23:354–62.CrossRefPubMed Fanchin R, Schonäuer LM, Cunha-Filho JS, Méndez Lozano DH, Frydman R. Coordination of antral follicle growth: basis for innovative concepts of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Semin Reprod Med. 2005;23:354–62.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Cakmak H, Rosen MP. Random-start ovarian stimulation in patients with cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27:215–21.CrossRefPubMed Cakmak H, Rosen MP. Random-start ovarian stimulation in patients with cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27:215–21.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Antral follicle responsiveness to FSH, assessed by the follicular output rate (FORT), is altered in Hodgkin’s lymphoma when compared with breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation
Authors
Charlotte Sonigo
Marjorie Comtet
Solene Duros
Christophe Sifer
Nathalie Sermondade
Michaël Grynberg
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1059-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1/2018 Go to the issue