Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Opinions

Micro-dose hCG as luteal phase support without exogenous progesterone administration: mathematical modelling of the hCG concentration in circulation and initial clinical experience

Authors: C. Yding Andersen, R. Fischer, V. Giorgione, Thomas W. Kelsey

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

For the last two decades, exogenous progesterone administration has been used as luteal phase support (LPS) in connection with controlled ovarian stimulation combined with use of the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger for the final maturation of follicles. The introduction of the GnRHa trigger to induce ovulation showed that exogenous progesterone administration without hCG supplementation was insufficient to obtain satisfactory pregnancy rates. This has prompted development of alternative strategies for LPS. Augmenting the local endogenous production of progesterone by the multiple corpora lutea has been one focus with emphasis on one hand to avoid development of ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome and, on the other hand, to provide adequate levels of progesterone to sustain implantation. The present study evaluates the use of micro-dose hCG for LPS support and examines the potential advances and disadvantages. Based on the pharmacokinetic characteristics of hCG, the mathematical modelling of the concentration profiles of hCG during the luteal phase has been evaluated in connection with several different approaches for hCG administration as LPS. It is suggested that the currently employed LPS provided in connection with the GnRHa trigger (i.e. 1.500 IU) is too strong, and that daily micro-dose hCG administration is likely to provide an optimised LPS with the current available drugs. Initial clinical results with the micro-dose hCG approach are presented.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mathur RS, Akande VA, Keay SD, Hunt LP, Jenkins JM. Distinction between early and late ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:901–9.CrossRefPubMed Mathur RS, Akande VA, Keay SD, Hunt LP, Jenkins JM. Distinction between early and late ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:901–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Papanikolaou EG, Pozzobon C, Kolibianakis EM. Incidence and prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:112–20.CrossRefPubMed Papanikolaou EG, Pozzobon C, Kolibianakis EM. Incidence and prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:112–20.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Aboulghar M. Symposium: update on prediction and management of OHSS. Prevention of OHSS. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19:33–42.CrossRefPubMed Aboulghar M. Symposium: update on prediction and management of OHSS. Prevention of OHSS. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19:33–42.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Papanikolaou EG, Humaidan P, Polyzos NP, Tarlatzis B. Identification of the high-risk patient for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28:458–62.CrossRefPubMed Papanikolaou EG, Humaidan P, Polyzos NP, Tarlatzis B. Identification of the high-risk patient for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28:458–62.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fauser BC, De Jong D, Loivennes F, Wramsby H, Tay C, et al. Endocrine profiles after triggering of final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist after cotreatment with the GnRH antagonist Ganirelix during ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:709–15.CrossRefPubMed Fauser BC, De Jong D, Loivennes F, Wramsby H, Tay C, et al. Endocrine profiles after triggering of final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist after cotreatment with the GnRH antagonist Ganirelix during ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:709–15.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Yding Andersen C, Elbaek HO, Alsbjerg B, Laursen RJ, Povlsen BB, et al. Daily low-dose hCG stimulation during the luteal phase combined with GnRHa triggered IVF cycles without exogenous progesterone: a proof of concept trial. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2387–95.CrossRef Yding Andersen C, Elbaek HO, Alsbjerg B, Laursen RJ, Povlsen BB, et al. Daily low-dose hCG stimulation during the luteal phase combined with GnRHa triggered IVF cycles without exogenous progesterone: a proof of concept trial. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2387–95.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Humaidan P, Bredkjaer HE, Bungum L, et al. GnRH agonist (buserelin) or hCG for ovulation induction in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1213–20.CrossRefPubMed Humaidan P, Bredkjaer HE, Bungum L, et al. GnRH agonist (buserelin) or hCG for ovulation induction in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1213–20.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Humaidan P, Bungum L, Bungum M, Yding AC. Rescue of corpus luteum function with peri-ovulatory HCG supplementation in IVF/ICSI GnRH antagonist cycles in which ovulation was triggered with a GnRH agonist: a pilot study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13:173–8.CrossRefPubMed Humaidan P, Bungum L, Bungum M, Yding AC. Rescue of corpus luteum function with peri-ovulatory HCG supplementation in IVF/ICSI GnRH antagonist cycles in which ovulation was triggered with a GnRH agonist: a pilot study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13:173–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Humaidan P, Polyzos NP, Alsbjerg B, et al. GnRHa trigger and individualized luteal phase hCG support according to ovarian response to stimulation: two prospective randomized controlled multi-centre studies in IVF patients. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2511–21.CrossRefPubMed Humaidan P, Polyzos NP, Alsbjerg B, et al. GnRHa trigger and individualized luteal phase hCG support according to ovarian response to stimulation: two prospective randomized controlled multi-centre studies in IVF patients. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2511–21.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Humaidan P, Kol S, Papanikolaou EG. Copenhagen GnRH Agonist Triggering Workshop Group. GnRH agonist for triggering of final oocyte maturation: time for a change of practice? Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:510–24.CrossRefPubMed Humaidan P, Kol S, Papanikolaou EG. Copenhagen GnRH Agonist Triggering Workshop Group. GnRH agonist for triggering of final oocyte maturation: time for a change of practice? Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:510–24.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kolibianakis EM, Schultze-Mosgau A, Schroer A, van Steirteghem A, Devroey P, et al. A lower ongoing pregnancy rate can be expected when GnRH agonist is used for triggering final oocyte maturation instead of HCG in patients undergoing IVF with GnRH antagonists. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2887–92.CrossRefPubMed Kolibianakis EM, Schultze-Mosgau A, Schroer A, van Steirteghem A, Devroey P, et al. A lower ongoing pregnancy rate can be expected when GnRH agonist is used for triggering final oocyte maturation instead of HCG in patients undergoing IVF with GnRH antagonists. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2887–92.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Liu HC, Pyrgiotis E, Davis O, Rosenwaks Z. Active corpus luteum function at pre-, peri- and postimplantation is essential for a viable pregnancy. Early Pregnancy. 1995;1:281–7.PubMed Liu HC, Pyrgiotis E, Davis O, Rosenwaks Z. Active corpus luteum function at pre-, peri- and postimplantation is essential for a viable pregnancy. Early Pregnancy. 1995;1:281–7.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Yovich JL, Conceicao JL, Stanger JD, Hinchliffe PM, Keane KN. Mid-luteal serum progesterone concentrations govern implantation rates for cryopreserved embryo transfers conducted under hormone replacement. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31:180–91.CrossRefPubMed Yovich JL, Conceicao JL, Stanger JD, Hinchliffe PM, Keane KN. Mid-luteal serum progesterone concentrations govern implantation rates for cryopreserved embryo transfers conducted under hormone replacement. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31:180–91.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Yding Andersen C, Vilbour AK. Improving the luteal phase after ovarian stimulation: reviewing new options. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28:552–9.CrossRefPubMed Yding Andersen C, Vilbour AK. Improving the luteal phase after ovarian stimulation: reviewing new options. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28:552–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference van der Linden M, Buckingham K, Farquhar C, Kremer JA, Metwally M. Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD009154.PubMed van der Linden M, Buckingham K, Farquhar C, Kremer JA, Metwally M. Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD009154.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Kupferminc MJ, Lessing JB, Amit A, Yovel I, David MP, et al. A prospective randomized trial of human chorionic gonadotrophin or dydrogesterone support following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:271–3.PubMed Kupferminc MJ, Lessing JB, Amit A, Yovel I, David MP, et al. A prospective randomized trial of human chorionic gonadotrophin or dydrogesterone support following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:271–3.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Trinchard-Lugan I, Khan A, Porchet HC, Munafo A. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin in healthy male and female volunteers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;4:106–15.CrossRefPubMed Trinchard-Lugan I, Khan A, Porchet HC, Munafo A. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin in healthy male and female volunteers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;4:106–15.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Evans J, Salamonsen LA. Too much of a good thing? Experimental evidence suggests prolonged exposure to hCG is detrimental to endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1610–9.CrossRefPubMed Evans J, Salamonsen LA. Too much of a good thing? Experimental evidence suggests prolonged exposure to hCG is detrimental to endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1610–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Fournier T, Guibourdenche J, Evain-Brion D. hCGs: different sources of production, different glycoforms and functions. Placenta. 2015;36:S60–5.CrossRefPubMed Fournier T, Guibourdenche J, Evain-Brion D. hCGs: different sources of production, different glycoforms and functions. Placenta. 2015;36:S60–5.CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
go back to reference Papanikolaou EG, Verpoest W, Fatemi H, Tarlatzis B, Devroey P, et al. A novel method of luteal supplementation with recombinant luteinizing hormone when a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist is used instead of human chorionic gonadotropin for ovulation triggering: a randomized prospective proof of concept study. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1174–7.CrossRefPubMed Papanikolaou EG, Verpoest W, Fatemi H, Tarlatzis B, Devroey P, et al. A novel method of luteal supplementation with recombinant luteinizing hormone when a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist is used instead of human chorionic gonadotropin for ovulation triggering: a randomized prospective proof of concept study. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1174–7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Abecia JA, Lozano JM, Forcada F, Zarazaga L. Effect of level of dietary energy and protein on embryo survival and progesterone production on day eight of pregnancy in Rasa Aragonesa ewes. Anim Reprod Sci. 1997;48:209–18.CrossRefPubMed Abecia JA, Lozano JM, Forcada F, Zarazaga L. Effect of level of dietary energy and protein on embryo survival and progesterone production on day eight of pregnancy in Rasa Aragonesa ewes. Anim Reprod Sci. 1997;48:209–18.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Levine H, Watson N. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of crinone 8 % administered vaginally versus prometrium administered orally in postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:516–21. Levine H, Watson N. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of crinone 8 % administered vaginally versus prometrium administered orally in postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:516–21.
26.
go back to reference Cicinelli E, de Ziegler D, Bulletti C, Matteo MG, Schonauer LM, et al. Direct transport of progesterone from vagina to uterus. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:403–6.PubMed Cicinelli E, de Ziegler D, Bulletti C, Matteo MG, Schonauer LM, et al. Direct transport of progesterone from vagina to uterus. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:403–6.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Filicori M, Butler JP, Crowley Jr WF. Neuroendocrine regulation of the corpus luteum in the human. Evidence for pulsatile progesterone secretion. J Clin Invest. 1984;73:1638–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Filicori M, Butler JP, Crowley Jr WF. Neuroendocrine regulation of the corpus luteum in the human. Evidence for pulsatile progesterone secretion. J Clin Invest. 1984;73:1638–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Thuesen LL, Loft A, Egeberg AN, Smitz J, Petersen JH, Andersen AN. A randomized controlled dose-response pilot study of addition of hCG to recombinant FSH during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:3074–84.CrossRefPubMed Thuesen LL, Loft A, Egeberg AN, Smitz J, Petersen JH, Andersen AN. A randomized controlled dose-response pilot study of addition of hCG to recombinant FSH during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:3074–84.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Castillo JC, Dolz M, Bienvenido E, Abad L, Casañ EM, et al. Cycles triggered with GnRH agonist: exploring low-dose HCG for luteal support. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:175–81.CrossRefPubMed Castillo JC, Dolz M, Bienvenido E, Abad L, Casañ EM, et al. Cycles triggered with GnRH agonist: exploring low-dose HCG for luteal support. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:175–81.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Micro-dose hCG as luteal phase support without exogenous progesterone administration: mathematical modelling of the hCG concentration in circulation and initial clinical experience
Authors
C. Yding Andersen
R. Fischer
V. Giorgione
Thomas W. Kelsey
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0764-7

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 10/2016 Go to the issue