Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 8/2011

01-08-2011 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

A meta-analysis of the impact of IVF and ICSI on major malformations after adjusting for the effect of subfertility

Authors: Alfred A. Rimm, Alyce C. Katayama, K. Paul Katayama

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 8/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To estimate the effect of assisted reproductive technology (ART) on major malformation (MM) rate in ART offspring independent of the effect of subfertility on MM.

Design

Meta-analysis.

Methods

This meta-analysis is based on our previously published meta-analysis of observational studies evaluating the relationship between ART treatment and MM rates, as well as recent research by Zhu et al. to estimate the impact of subfertility alone on MM in subfertile couples conceiving spontaneously.

Results

The overall odds ratio for MM in our original meta-analysis, in which all studies used apparently inappropriate control groups of “normal” populations, was 1.29 (95% CI 1.01–1.67). Here we attempted to estimate the risk of subfertility and used this estimate to perform an adjusted meta-analysis. Zhu et al. found that about 40% of the odds of MM was due to subfertility. When we took Zhu’s finding into account, the adjusted odds ratio in the meta-analysis was 1.01 (95% CI 0.82–1.23).

Conclusions

Our study suggests ART does not increase the risk of MM as much as previously reported. More research is needed to quantify the underlying risk of subfertility and separate it from the risk associated with ART. Physicians who counsel subfertile couples should recognize that previous studies of MM rates in ART patients probably overestimated the risk.
Literature
1.
Rimm AA, Katayama AC, Diaz M, Katayama KP. A meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF and ICSI infants with naturally conceived children. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004;21(12):437–43.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Bowen JR, Gibson FL, Leslie GI, Saunders DM. Medical and developmental outcome at 1 year for children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Lancet. 1998;351:1529–34.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Sutcliffe AG, Taylor B, Saunders K, Thornton S, Lieberman BA, Grudzinskas JG. Outcome in the second year of life after in-vitro fertilisation by intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a UK case-control study. Lancet. 2001;357:2080–4.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Palermo GD, Neri QV, Hariprashad JJ, Davis OK, Veeck LL, Rosenwaks Z. ICSI and its outcome. Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18:161–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Wennerholm UB, Bergh C, Hamberger L, Lundin K, Nilsson L, Wikland M, et al. Incidence of congenital malformations in children born after ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:944–8.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Ericson A, Källén B. Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: a population-based study. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:504–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Anthony S, Buitendijk SE, Dorrepaal CA, Lindner K, Braat DDM, den Ouden AL. Congenital malformations in 4224 children conceived after IVF. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2089–95.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:725–30.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Isaksson R, Gissler M, Tiitinen A. Obstetric outcome among women with unexplained infertility after IVF: a matched case-control study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1755–61.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Ludwig M, Katalinic A. Pregnancy course and health of children born after ICSI depending on parameters of male factor infertility. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:351–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Merlob P, Fisch B. Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after IVF. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:3004–5.PubMedCrossRef
12.
MRC Working Party, Rose G, Beral V, Davis JA, Edwards RG, Harper PS, et al. Births in Great Britain resulting from assisted conception. BMJ. 1990;300:1229–33.CrossRef
13.
Westergaard HB, Johansen AMT, Erb K, Andersen AN. Danish National In-Vitro Fertilization Registry 1994 and 1995: a controlled study of births, malformations and cytogenetic findings. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1896–902.PubMedCrossRef
14.
De Souza SW, Rivlin E, Cadman J, Richards B, Buck P, Lieberman BA. Children conceived by in vitro fertilisation after fresh embryo transfer. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997;76(2):F70–4.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Verlaenen H, Cammu H, Derde MP, Amy JJ. Singleton pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: expectations and outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:906–10.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Sutcliffe AG, De Souza SW, Cadman J, Richards B, McKinlay IA, Lieberman B. Minor congenital anomalies, major congenital malformations and development in children conceived from cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:3332–7.PubMed
17.
Zádori J, Kozinszky Z, Orvos H, Katona M, Kaáli SG, Pál A. The incidence of major birth defects following in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20:131–2.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Pinborg A, Loft A, Rasmussen S, et al. Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 3438 IVF/ICSI and 10362 non-IVF/ICSI twins born between 1995 and 2000. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:435–41.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Place I, Englert Y. A prospective longitudinal study of the physical, psychomotor and intellectual development of singleton children up to 5 years who were conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with children conceived spontaneously and by in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:1388–97.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Wennerholm UB, Albertsson-Wikland K, Bergh C, et al. Postnatal growth and health in children born after cryopreservation as embryos. Lancet. 1998;351:1085–90.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Reefhuis J, Honein MA, Schieve LA, Correa A, Hobbs CA, Rasmussen SA. Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States. The National Birth Defects Preventive Study. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:360–6.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Rimm AA, Katayama AC, Katayama KP. ART and major structural birth defects in the United States. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1765.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Saunders DM, Mathews M, Lancaster PAL. The Australian Register: current research and future role. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1988;541:7–21.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Bhalla AK, Sarala G, Dhaliwal L. Pregnancy following infertility. Aust NZ Obstet Gynecol. 1992;32:249–51.CrossRef
25.
Joffe M, Li Z. Association of time to pregnancy and the outcome of pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1994;62:71–5.PubMed
26.
Henriksen TB, Baird DD, Olsen J, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ, Wilcox AF. Time to pregnancy and preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:594–9.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Kovalevsky G, Rinaudo P, Coutifaris C. Do assisted reproductive technologies cause adverse fetal outcomes? Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1270–2.PubMedCrossRef
28.
29.
Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouson J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary of ART Terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1520–4.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Draper ES, Kurinczuk JJ, Abrams KR, Clarke M. Assessment of separate contributions to perinatal mortality of infertility history and treatment: a case-control analysis. Lancet. 1999;353:1746–9.PubMedCrossRef
31.
32.
Basso O, Baird DD. Infertility and preterm delivery, birthweight, and Caesarean section: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2478–84.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Park S, Mathur R, Smith GCS. Congenital anomalies after treatment for infertility. BMJ. 2006;333:665–6.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Barid DD, Wilcox AJ, Kramer MS. Why might infertile couples have problem pregnancies. Lancet. 1999;353:1724–5.CrossRef
35.
Poikkeus P, Unkila-Kallio L, Vilska S, Repokari L, et al. Impact of infertility characteristics and treatment modalities on singleton pregnancies after assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13(1):135–44.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Kupka MS, Dorn C, Richter O, Felberbaum R, van der Ven H. Impact of reproductive history on in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome: evidence form the German IVF Registry. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(3):508–16.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Thum MY, Gafar A, Wren M, Faris R, Ogunyemi B, et al. Does egg-sharing compromise the chance of donors or recipients achieving a live birth? Hum Reprod. 2003;18(11):2363–7.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Boivin J, Schmidt L. Infertility—related stress in men and women predicts treatment outcome 1 year later. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1745–52.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Croen LA, Shaw GM. Young maternal age and congenital malformations: A population-based study. Am J Pub Health. 1995;85:710–3.CrossRef
40.
Pellestor F, Anahory T, Hamamah S. Effect of maternal age on the frequency of cytogenetic abnormalities in human oocytes. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;111(3–4):206–12.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Sun Y, Vestergaard M, Christensen J, Zhu JL, Bech BH, Olsen J. Epilepsy and febrile seizures in children of treated and untreated subfertile couples. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:215–20.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Reefhuis J, Honein MA, Schieve LA, Correa A, Hobbs CA, Rasmussen SA. Reply: ART and major structural birth defects in the USA. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1766.CrossRef
43.
CDC. Update on overall prevalence of major birth defects—Atlanta, Georgia, 1978–2005. MMWR. 2008;57(1):1–5.
Metadata
Title
A meta-analysis of the impact of IVF and ICSI on major malformations after adjusting for the effect of subfertility
Authors
Alfred A. Rimm
Alyce C. Katayama
K. Paul Katayama
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 8/2011
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-011-9583-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2011

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 8/2011 Go to the issue

Genetics

Study of GT-repeat expansion in Heme oxygenase-1 gene promoter as genetic cause of male infertility

EDITOR'S COMMENTARY

A feeding frenzy for embryos and stem cells: meeting the media frontally!

Opinion

“Premature luteinization” in the era of GnRH analogue protocols: time to reconsider

Genetics

Single nucleotide polymorphism in the UBR2 gene may be a genetic risk factor for Japanese patients with azoospermia by meiotic arrest

Stem cell biology

Derivation of buffalo embryonic stem-like cells from in vitro-produced blastocysts on homologous and heterologous feeder cells

Stem cell biology

Umbilical cord blood banking: an update