Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 11/2020

01-11-2020 | Cataract | Original Paper

Regional comparison of preoperative biometry for cataract surgery between two domestic institutions

Authors: Kazutaka Kamiya, Fusako Fujimura, Kei Iijima, Shoji Nobuyuki, Yosai Mori, Kazunori Miyata

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 11/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Regional variations of the preoperative biometry can affect the refractive accuracy of cataract surgery. We aimed to compare the preoperative biometric data for cataract surgery between two domestic institutions.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative biometric data of 673 consecutive eyes undergoing standard cataract surgery at Miyata Eye Hospital (Miyazaki; M group) and Kitasato University Hospital (Kanagawa; K group), and compared these data between the two groups.

Results

We found significant differences in the mean keratometric readings (44.39 ± 1.56 D vs. 44.09 ± 1.74 D) (unpaired t test, p = 0.034), the anterior chamber depth (3.14 ± 0.43 mm vs. 3.46 ± 0.62 mm) (p < 0.001), the axial length (23.98 ± 1.62 mm vs. 24.59 ± 1.82 mm) (p < 0.001), and the lens thickness (4.64 ± 0.48 mm vs. 4.37 ± 0.62 mm) (p < 0.001), in the M and K groups, respectively. Otherwise, we found no significant differences in corneal astigmatism (p = 0.104), or central corneal thickness (p = 0.480) between the two groups. For subgroup analysis, the prediction error (0.06 ± 0.47 D) in the M group was significantly more hyperopic than that (− 0.09 ± 0.54 D) in the K group (p = 0.006).

Conclusions

There were significant differences in the mean keratometric readings, the anterior chamber depth, the axial length, and the lens thickness, by approximately 0.3 D, 0.3 mm, 0.6 mm, and 0.3 mm, respectively. Regional variations of the preoperative biometry did exist to some extent, and were not clinically negligible, in consideration of the precise IOL power calculation and the subsequent refractive accuracy of cataract surgery.

Trial registration

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (000037994).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wang J, Yuwen M (1993) Comparison between the Kazakh and the Han nationality for the diameter and thickness of senile cataractous lens in Tacheng. Yan Ke Xue Bao 9:190–192 (in Chinese)PubMed Wang J, Yuwen M (1993) Comparison between the Kazakh and the Han nationality for the diameter and thickness of senile cataractous lens in Tacheng. Yan Ke Xue Bao 9:190–192 (in Chinese)PubMed
2.
go back to reference Trivedi RH, Wilson ME (2007) Biometry data from caucasian and african-american cataractous pediatric eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:4671–4678CrossRef Trivedi RH, Wilson ME (2007) Biometry data from caucasian and african-american cataractous pediatric eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:4671–4678CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yoon JJ, Misra SL, McGhee CN, Patel DV (2016) Demographics and ocular biometric characteristics of patients undergoing cataract surgery in Auckland, New Zealand. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 44:106–113CrossRef Yoon JJ, Misra SL, McGhee CN, Patel DV (2016) Demographics and ocular biometric characteristics of patients undergoing cataract surgery in Auckland, New Zealand. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 44:106–113CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wang D, Amoozgar B, Porco T, Wang Z, Lin SC (2017) Ethnic differences in lens parameters measured by ocular biometry in a cataract surgery population. PLoS ONE 12:e0179836CrossRef Wang D, Amoozgar B, Porco T, Wang Z, Lin SC (2017) Ethnic differences in lens parameters measured by ocular biometry in a cataract surgery population. PLoS ONE 12:e0179836CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC (1990) Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 16:333–340CrossRef Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC (1990) Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 16:333–340CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Goebels S, Pattmöller M, Eppig T, Cayless A, Seitz B, Langenbucher A (2015) Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:2387–2393CrossRef Goebels S, Pattmöller M, Eppig T, Cayless A, Seitz B, Langenbucher A (2015) Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:2387–2393CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sato M, Kamiya K, Kojima T, Goto N, Tabuchi H, Hatsusaka N, Hayashi K (2019) 2019 Clinical survey of the Japanese Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. IOL&RS 33:453–473 (in Japanese) Sato M, Kamiya K, Kojima T, Goto N, Tabuchi H, Hatsusaka N, Hayashi K (2019) 2019 Clinical survey of the Japanese Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. IOL&RS 33:453–473 (in Japanese)
8.
go back to reference Olsen T, Hoffmann P (2014) C constant: new concept for ray tracing-assisted intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:764–773CrossRef Olsen T, Hoffmann P (2014) C constant: new concept for ray tracing-assisted intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:764–773CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Abulafia A, Barrett GD, Rotenberg M, Kleinmann G, Levy A, Reitblat O, Koch DD, Wang L, Assia EI (2015) Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:548–556CrossRef Abulafia A, Barrett GD, Rotenberg M, Kleinmann G, Levy A, Reitblat O, Koch DD, Wang L, Assia EI (2015) Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:548–556CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Reitblat O, Levy A, Kleinmann G, Lerman TT, Assia EI (2017) Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with high and low average keratometry readings: comparison between various formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 43:1149–1156CrossRef Reitblat O, Levy A, Kleinmann G, Lerman TT, Assia EI (2017) Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with high and low average keratometry readings: comparison between various formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 43:1149–1156CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ (2018) Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas. Ophthalmology 125:169–178CrossRef Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ (2018) Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas. Ophthalmology 125:169–178CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Barrett GD (1993) An improved universal theoretical formula for intraocular lens power prediction. J Cataract Refract Surg 19:713–720CrossRef Barrett GD (1993) An improved universal theoretical formula for intraocular lens power prediction. J Cataract Refract Surg 19:713–720CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wan KH, Lam TC, Yu MC, Chan TC (2019) Accuracy and precision of intraocular lens calculations using the new Hill-RBF version 2.0 in eyes with high axial myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 205:66–73CrossRef Wan KH, Lam TC, Yu MC, Chan TC (2019) Accuracy and precision of intraocular lens calculations using the new Hill-RBF version 2.0 in eyes with high axial myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 205:66–73CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Regional comparison of preoperative biometry for cataract surgery between two domestic institutions
Authors
Kazutaka Kamiya
Fusako Fujimura
Kei Iijima
Shoji Nobuyuki
Yosai Mori
Kazunori Miyata
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Keyword
Cataract
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01476-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

International Ophthalmology 11/2020 Go to the issue