Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 8/2020

01-08-2020 | Glaucoma | Original Paper

Effect of trabeculectomy and Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation surgery on corneal biomechanical changes

Authors: Ahmet Kaderli, Gülizar Demirok, Sema Tamer Kaderli, Çağlar Öktem, Ali Karnaz, Doğukan Özen, Ümit Ekşioğlu

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate alterations in corneal biomechanical properties before and 6 months after conventional trabeculectomy (TRAB) and Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation.

Methods

Thirty-nine eyes of 39 patients were evaluated retrospectively. Complete ophthalmological examinations including evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using the Ocular Response Analyzer were performed before and after 6 months postoperatively. A mean of four measurements for corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) was recorded. The participants had undergone trabeculectomy or shunt surgery as the first surgical procedure for glaucoma treatment of uncontrolled IOP with maximum antiglaucoma eyedrops.

Results

There were 20 eyes of 20 patients in trabeculectomy group and 19 eyes of 19 patients in AGV implantation group. There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of sex, age, eye laterality, lens status, antiglaucoma drug usage, preoperatively measured Mean Deviation of Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer, CH, CRF, IOPcc, and IOPg (p > 0.05). CH and CRF increased significantly after shunt surgery (p < 0.001). CH increased in trabeculectomy group postoperatively (p < 0.001); however, CRF showed a small amount of decrease, but this reduction was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CH and CRF showed higher increase after AGV surgery than trabeculectomy surgery (p < 0.05). There was no significant correlation between IOP changes and CH–CRF changes in both TRAB and AGV groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

According to our results, surgical technique differences may have an impact on postoperative corneal biomechanical outcomes. AGV surgery offers better corneal biomechanical results than standard trabeculectomy in 6-month follow-up.
Literature
7.
go back to reference Sedaghat MR, Momeni-Moghaddam H, Yekta A, Elsheikh A, Khabazkhoob M, Ambrosio R Jr, Maddah N, Danesh Z (2019) Biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure compared to pressure measured with commonly used tonometers in normal subjects. Clin Optom (Auckl) 11:127–133. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S220776 CrossRef Sedaghat MR, Momeni-Moghaddam H, Yekta A, Elsheikh A, Khabazkhoob M, Ambrosio R Jr, Maddah N, Danesh Z (2019) Biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure compared to pressure measured with commonly used tonometers in normal subjects. Clin Optom (Auckl) 11:127–133. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2147/​OPTO.​S220776 CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hjortdal JO (1998) On the biomechanical properties of the cornea with particular reference to refractive surgery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 225:1–23 Hjortdal JO (1998) On the biomechanical properties of the cornea with particular reference to refractive surgery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 225:1–23
12.
go back to reference Pakravan M, Afroozifar M, Yazdani S (2014) Corneal biomechanical changes following trabeculectomy, phaco-trabeculectomy, ahmed glaucoma valve implantation and phacoemulsification. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 9(1):7–13PubMedPubMedCentral Pakravan M, Afroozifar M, Yazdani S (2014) Corneal biomechanical changes following trabeculectomy, phaco-trabeculectomy, ahmed glaucoma valve implantation and phacoemulsification. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 9(1):7–13PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Effect of trabeculectomy and Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation surgery on corneal biomechanical changes
Authors
Ahmet Kaderli
Gülizar Demirok
Sema Tamer Kaderli
Çağlar Öktem
Ali Karnaz
Doğukan Özen
Ümit Ekşioğlu
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01367-8

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

International Ophthalmology 8/2020 Go to the issue