Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 7/2020

01-07-2020 | Coma | Original Paper

Early diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus by wavefront parameters using Scheimpflug, Placido and Hartmann–Shack based devices

Authors: Zahra Heidari, Mehrdad Mohammadpour, Hassan Hashemi, Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur, Alireza Moghaddasi, Mehdi Yaseri, Akbar Fotouhi

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 7/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the accuracy of three devices (Pentacam, Sirius and OPD-Scan III) to differentiate subclinical keratoconus from normal corneas by wavefront parameters.

Methods

Two hundred and seventeen patients were enrolled in three groups [68 normal, 79 subclinical keratoconus (SKCN) and 70 KCN eyes] in this prospective diagnostic test study. Wavefront indices were evaluated between the groups using Pentacam, Sirius and OPD-Scan III. The accuracy of the parameters was determined by measuring the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each group.

Results

Front Baiocchi-Calossi-Versaci (BCV) index with Sirius (sensitivity = 87.7%, specificity = 83%, AUC = 0.887), front Vertical Coma (Z3−1) with Pentacam (sensitivity = 75%, specificity = 100%, AUC = 0.857) and Corneal Z3−1 with OPD-Scan III (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 78.6%, AUC = 0.857) had the highest AUC values for the diagnosis of subclinical KCN. In the KCN group, the highest AUC values were obtained for front higher-order aberration (HOA), front/back Z3−1 and front Secondary Vertical Coma (Z5−1) with Pentacam (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 100%, AUC = 1.00 for all three), front root mean square values per unit area (RMS/A), HOA, Residual HOA, BCV, RMS Trefoil and RMS Coma with Sirius (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 100%, AUC = 1.00 for all) and Corneal HOA, RMS total Coma and Z3−1 with OPD-Scan III (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 93%, AUC = 0.96 for all three).

Conclusion

Corneal wavefront indices generated from different devices have acceptable validity for differentiating normal cornea from the early form of KCN, and this can be very useful for preoperative screening before refractive surgery. The front BCV with Sirius was the most accurate parameter for diagnosis of SKCN followed by Z3−1 with Pentacam and OPD-Scan III.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Applegate RA, Hilmantel G, Howland HC, Tu EY, Starck T, Zayac EJ (2000) Corneal first surface optical aberrations and visual performance. J Refract Surg 16:507–514CrossRef Applegate RA, Hilmantel G, Howland HC, Tu EY, Starck T, Zayac EJ (2000) Corneal first surface optical aberrations and visual performance. J Refract Surg 16:507–514CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mohammadpour M, Heidari Z, Mohammad-Rabei H, Jafarzadehpur E, Jabbarvand M, Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M (2016) Correlation of higher order aberrations and components of astigmatism in myopic refractive surgery candidates. J Curr Ophthalmol 28:112–116CrossRef Mohammadpour M, Heidari Z, Mohammad-Rabei H, Jafarzadehpur E, Jabbarvand M, Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M (2016) Correlation of higher order aberrations and components of astigmatism in myopic refractive surgery candidates. J Curr Ophthalmol 28:112–116CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rabinowitz YS, Nesburn AB, McDonnell PJ (1993) Videokeratography of the fellow eye in unilateral keratoconus. Ophthalmology 100:181–186CrossRef Rabinowitz YS, Nesburn AB, McDonnell PJ (1993) Videokeratography of the fellow eye in unilateral keratoconus. Ophthalmology 100:181–186CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Seiler T, Quurke AW (1998) Iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK in a case of forme fruste keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:1007–1009CrossRef Seiler T, Quurke AW (1998) Iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK in a case of forme fruste keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:1007–1009CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chen M, Yoon G (2008) Posterior corneal aberrations and their compensation effects on anterior corneal aberrations in keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:5645–5652CrossRef Chen M, Yoon G (2008) Posterior corneal aberrations and their compensation effects on anterior corneal aberrations in keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:5645–5652CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Naderan M, Shoar S, Naderan M, Kamaleddin MA, Rajabi MT (2015) Comparison of corneal measurements in keratoconic eyes using rotating Scheimpflug camera and scanning-slit topography. Int J Ophthalmol 8:275–280PubMedPubMedCentral Naderan M, Shoar S, Naderan M, Kamaleddin MA, Rajabi MT (2015) Comparison of corneal measurements in keratoconic eyes using rotating Scheimpflug camera and scanning-slit topography. Int J Ophthalmol 8:275–280PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Alio JL, Shabayek MH (2006) Corneal higher order aberrations: a method to grade keratoconus. J Refract Surg 22:539–545CrossRef Alio JL, Shabayek MH (2006) Corneal higher order aberrations: a method to grade keratoconus. J Refract Surg 22:539–545CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Buhren J, Kuhne C, Kohnen T (2007) Defining subclinical keratoconus using corneal first-surface higher-order aberrations. Am J Ophthalmol 143:381–389CrossRef Buhren J, Kuhne C, Kohnen T (2007) Defining subclinical keratoconus using corneal first-surface higher-order aberrations. Am J Ophthalmol 143:381–389CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kosaki R, Maeda N, Bessho K, Hori Y, Nishida K, Suzaki A, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, Fujikado T, Tano Y (2007) Magnitude and orientation of Zernike terms in patients with keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:3062–3068CrossRef Kosaki R, Maeda N, Bessho K, Hori Y, Nishida K, Suzaki A, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, Fujikado T, Tano Y (2007) Magnitude and orientation of Zernike terms in patients with keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:3062–3068CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nakagawa T, Maeda N, Kosaki R, Hori Y, Inoue T, Saika M, Mihashi T, Fujikado T, Tano Y (2009) Higher-order aberrations due to the posterior corneal surface in patients with keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:2660–2665CrossRef Nakagawa T, Maeda N, Kosaki R, Hori Y, Inoue T, Saika M, Mihashi T, Fujikado T, Tano Y (2009) Higher-order aberrations due to the posterior corneal surface in patients with keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:2660–2665CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Barbero S, Marcos S, Merayo-Lloves J, Moreno-Barriuso E (2002) Validation of the estimation of corneal aberrations from videokeratography in keratoconus. J Refract Surg 18:263–270PubMed Barbero S, Marcos S, Merayo-Lloves J, Moreno-Barriuso E (2002) Validation of the estimation of corneal aberrations from videokeratography in keratoconus. J Refract Surg 18:263–270PubMed
13.
go back to reference Pinero DP, Saenz Gonzalez C, Alio JL (2009) Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of curvature and aberrometric measurements of the posterior corneal surface in normal eyes using Scheimpflug photography. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:113–120CrossRef Pinero DP, Saenz Gonzalez C, Alio JL (2009) Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of curvature and aberrometric measurements of the posterior corneal surface in normal eyes using Scheimpflug photography. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:113–120CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shankar H, Taranath D, Santhirathelagan CT, Pesudovs K (2008) Repeatability of corneal first-surface wavefront aberrations measured with Pentacam corneal topography. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:727–734CrossRef Shankar H, Taranath D, Santhirathelagan CT, Pesudovs K (2008) Repeatability of corneal first-surface wavefront aberrations measured with Pentacam corneal topography. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:727–734CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pinero DP, Alio JL, Aleson A, Escaf M, Miranda M (2009) Pentacam posterior and anterior corneal aberrations in normal and keratoconic eyes. Clin Exp Optom 92:297–303CrossRef Pinero DP, Alio JL, Aleson A, Escaf M, Miranda M (2009) Pentacam posterior and anterior corneal aberrations in normal and keratoconic eyes. Clin Exp Optom 92:297–303CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Buhren J, Kook D, Yoon G, Kohnen T (2010) Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:3424–3432CrossRef Buhren J, Kook D, Yoon G, Kohnen T (2010) Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:3424–3432CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Xu Z, Li W, Jiang J, Zhuang X, Chen W, Peng M, Wang J, Lu F, Shen M, Wang Y (2017) Characteristic of entire corneal topography and tomography for the detection of sub-clinical keratoconus with Zernike polynomials using Pentacam. Sci Rep 7:16486CrossRef Xu Z, Li W, Jiang J, Zhuang X, Chen W, Peng M, Wang J, Lu F, Shen M, Wang Y (2017) Characteristic of entire corneal topography and tomography for the detection of sub-clinical keratoconus with Zernike polynomials using Pentacam. Sci Rep 7:16486CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hashemi H, Beiranvand A, Yekta A, Maleki A, Yazdani N, Khabazkhoob M (2016) Pentacam top indices for diagnosing subclinical and definite keratoconus. J Curr Ophthalmol 28:21–22CrossRef Hashemi H, Beiranvand A, Yekta A, Maleki A, Yazdani N, Khabazkhoob M (2016) Pentacam top indices for diagnosing subclinical and definite keratoconus. J Curr Ophthalmol 28:21–22CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Colak HN, Kantarci FA, Yildirim A, Tatar MG, Goker H, Uslu H, Gurler B (2016) Comparison of corneal topographic measurements and high order aberrations in keratoconus and normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 39:380–384CrossRef Colak HN, Kantarci FA, Yildirim A, Tatar MG, Goker H, Uslu H, Gurler B (2016) Comparison of corneal topographic measurements and high order aberrations in keratoconus and normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 39:380–384CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Prakash G, Suhail M, Srivastava D (2016) Predictive analysis between topographic, pachymetric and wavefront parameters in keratoconus, suspects and normal eyes: creating unified equations to evaluate keratoconus. Curr Eye Res 41:334–342PubMed Prakash G, Suhail M, Srivastava D (2016) Predictive analysis between topographic, pachymetric and wavefront parameters in keratoconus, suspects and normal eyes: creating unified equations to evaluate keratoconus. Curr Eye Res 41:334–342PubMed
21.
go back to reference Safarzadeh M, Nasiri N (2016) Anterior segment characteristics in normal and keratoconus eyes evaluated with a combined Scheimpflug/Placido corneal imaging device. J Curr Ophthalmol 28:106–111CrossRef Safarzadeh M, Nasiri N (2016) Anterior segment characteristics in normal and keratoconus eyes evaluated with a combined Scheimpflug/Placido corneal imaging device. J Curr Ophthalmol 28:106–111CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Naderan M, Jahanrad A, Farjadnia M (2018) Ocular, corneal, and internal aberrations in eyes with keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and healthy eyes. Int Ophthalmol 38:1565–1573CrossRef Naderan M, Jahanrad A, Farjadnia M (2018) Ocular, corneal, and internal aberrations in eyes with keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and healthy eyes. Int Ophthalmol 38:1565–1573CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Saad A, Gatinel D (2012) Evaluation of total and corneal wavefront high order aberrations for the detection of forme fruste keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:2978–2992CrossRef Saad A, Gatinel D (2012) Evaluation of total and corneal wavefront high order aberrations for the detection of forme fruste keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:2978–2992CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK, Thompson HW (1994) Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:2749–2757PubMed Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK, Thompson HW (1994) Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:2749–2757PubMed
25.
go back to reference Rabinowitz YS, McDonnell PJ (1989) Computer-assisted corneal topography in keratoconus. Refract corneal surg 5:400–408PubMed Rabinowitz YS, McDonnell PJ (1989) Computer-assisted corneal topography in keratoconus. Refract corneal surg 5:400–408PubMed
26.
go back to reference Wang Q, Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Xu Z, Feng Y, Wen D, Hua Y, Yang F, Pan C, Huang J (2012) A comprehensive assessment of the precision and agreement of anterior corneal power measurements obtained using 8 different devices. PLoS ONE 7:e45607CrossRef Wang Q, Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Xu Z, Feng Y, Wen D, Hua Y, Yang F, Pan C, Huang J (2012) A comprehensive assessment of the precision and agreement of anterior corneal power measurements obtained using 8 different devices. PLoS ONE 7:e45607CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bayhan HA, Aslan Bayhan S, Muhafiz E, Can I (2014) Repeatability of aberrometric measurements in normal and keratoconus eyes using a new Scheimpflug-Placido topographer. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:269–275CrossRef Bayhan HA, Aslan Bayhan S, Muhafiz E, Can I (2014) Repeatability of aberrometric measurements in normal and keratoconus eyes using a new Scheimpflug-Placido topographer. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:269–275CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Asgari S, Hashemi H, Jafarzadehpur E, Mohamadi A, Rezvan F, Fotouhi A (2016) OPD-Scan III: a repeatability and inter-device agreement study of a multifunctional device in emmetropia, ametropia, and keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol 36:697–705CrossRef Asgari S, Hashemi H, Jafarzadehpur E, Mohamadi A, Rezvan F, Fotouhi A (2016) OPD-Scan III: a repeatability and inter-device agreement study of a multifunctional device in emmetropia, ametropia, and keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol 36:697–705CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gordon-Shaag A, Millodot M, Ifrah R, Shneor E (2012) Aberrations and topography in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and keratoconic eyes. Optom Vis Sci 89:411–418CrossRef Gordon-Shaag A, Millodot M, Ifrah R, Shneor E (2012) Aberrations and topography in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and keratoconic eyes. Optom Vis Sci 89:411–418CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Maeda N, Fujikado T, Kuroda T, Mihashi T, Hirohara Y, Nishida K, Watanabe H, Tano Y (2002) Wavefront aberrations measured with Hartmann–Shack sensor in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology 109:1996–2003CrossRef Maeda N, Fujikado T, Kuroda T, Mihashi T, Hirohara Y, Nishida K, Watanabe H, Tano Y (2002) Wavefront aberrations measured with Hartmann–Shack sensor in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology 109:1996–2003CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bantis LE, Nakas CT, Reiser B (2014) Construction of confidence regions in the ROC space after the estimation of the optimal Youden index-based cut-off point. Biometrics 70:212–223CrossRef Bantis LE, Nakas CT, Reiser B (2014) Construction of confidence regions in the ROC space after the estimation of the optimal Youden index-based cut-off point. Biometrics 70:212–223CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Shetty R, Rao H, Khamar P, Sainani K, Vunnava K, Jayadev C, Kaweri L (2017) Keratoconus screening indices and their diagnostic ability to distinguish normal from ectatic corneas. Am J Ophthalmol 181:140–148CrossRef Shetty R, Rao H, Khamar P, Sainani K, Vunnava K, Jayadev C, Kaweri L (2017) Keratoconus screening indices and their diagnostic ability to distinguish normal from ectatic corneas. Am J Ophthalmol 181:140–148CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Jafarinasab MR, Shirzadeh E, Feizi S, Karimian F, Akaberi A, Hasanpour H (2015) Sensitivity and specificity of posterior and anterior corneal elevation measured by orbscan in diagnosis of clinical and subclinical keratoconus. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 10:10–15CrossRef Jafarinasab MR, Shirzadeh E, Feizi S, Karimian F, Akaberi A, Hasanpour H (2015) Sensitivity and specificity of posterior and anterior corneal elevation measured by orbscan in diagnosis of clinical and subclinical keratoconus. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 10:10–15CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Early diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus by wavefront parameters using Scheimpflug, Placido and Hartmann–Shack based devices
Authors
Zahra Heidari
Mehrdad Mohammadpour
Hassan Hashemi
Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur
Alireza Moghaddasi
Mehdi Yaseri
Akbar Fotouhi
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Keyword
Coma
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01334-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2020

International Ophthalmology 7/2020 Go to the issue