Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 8/2019

01-08-2019 | Original Paper

Comparison of cumulative dispersed energy (CDE) in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification

Authors: Osamah J. Saeedi, Luke Y. Chang, Sharon R. Ong, Syed A. Karim, Danielle S. Abraham, Geoffrey L. Rosenthal, Andrew Hammer, Brad V. Spagnolo, Arturo E. Betancourt

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the amount of phacoemulsification ultrasound energy used between eyes undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification.

Methods

One eye of consecutive patients undergoing routine non-complicated phacoemulsification from January 2014 to December of 2015 was included in the analysis. FLACS was performed using the Alcon LenSx. Linear regression was used for analysis with type of surgery (FLACS versus conventional phacoemulsification) as the exposure and cumulative dispersed energy (CDE) as the outcome variable. Age, surgeon, eye side, and eye sequence (first versus second eye) were covariates.

Results

A total of 1159 surgeries met inclusion criteria. The average age of the cohort was 70.6 (SD 8.6) years, 590 cases (51%) were performed by surgeon 1, and 582 cases (50%) were right eyes. Overall, FLACS resulted in significantly lower CDE as compared to conventional phacoemulsification (β = 0.89, 95% CI 0.83, 0.95). When stratified by eye side and surgeon, FLACS performed on left eyes operated on by surgeon 1 resulted in lower CDE as compared to conventional phacoemulsification (β = 0.76, 95% CI 0.66, 0.87), but not for right eyes operated on by surgeon 1 (β = 0.92, 95% CI 0.79, 1.07) or for eyes operated on by surgeons 2 or 3.

Conclusions

The use of FLACS on the Alcon LenSx platform results in a small decrease in phacoemulsification energy as compared to conventional phacoemulsification in certain cases. Further study assessing optimal laser settings and surgical technique is necessary.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dick HB, Kohen T, Jacobi FK, Jacobi KW (1996) Long-term endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification through a temporal clear corneal incision. J Cataract Refract Surg 22:63–71CrossRefPubMed Dick HB, Kohen T, Jacobi FK, Jacobi KW (1996) Long-term endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification through a temporal clear corneal incision. J Cataract Refract Surg 22:63–71CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ecsedy M, Mihaltz K, Kovacs I et al (2011) Effect of femtosecond laser cataract surgery on the macula. J Refract Surg 27:717–722CrossRef Ecsedy M, Mihaltz K, Kovacs I et al (2011) Effect of femtosecond laser cataract surgery on the macula. J Refract Surg 27:717–722CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Conrad-Hengerer I, Al Juburi M, Schultz T, Hengerer FH, Dick HB (2013) Corneal endothelial cell loss and corneal thickness in conventional compared with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: three-month follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 39(9):1307–1313CrossRefPubMed Conrad-Hengerer I, Al Juburi M, Schultz T, Hengerer FH, Dick HB (2013) Corneal endothelial cell loss and corneal thickness in conventional compared with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: three-month follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 39(9):1307–1313CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Conrad-Hengerer I, Hengerer FH, Al Juburi M, Schultz T, Dick HB (2014) Femtosecond laser induced macular changes and anterior segment inflammation in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg 30(4):222–226CrossRefPubMed Conrad-Hengerer I, Hengerer FH, Al Juburi M, Schultz T, Dick HB (2014) Femtosecond laser induced macular changes and anterior segment inflammation in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg 30(4):222–226CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Conrad-Hengerer I, Hengerer FH, Schultz T, Dick HB (2012) Effect of femtosecond laser fragmentation on effective phacoemulsification time in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg 28(12):879–883CrossRefPubMed Conrad-Hengerer I, Hengerer FH, Schultz T, Dick HB (2012) Effect of femtosecond laser fragmentation on effective phacoemulsification time in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg 28(12):879–883CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Abell RG, Kerr NM, Vote BJ (2013) Toward zero effective phacoemulsification time using femtosecond laser pretreatment. Ophthalmology 120(5):942–948CrossRef Abell RG, Kerr NM, Vote BJ (2013) Toward zero effective phacoemulsification time using femtosecond laser pretreatment. Ophthalmology 120(5):942–948CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Takács AI, Kovács I, Miháltz K, Filkorn T, Knorz MC, Nagy ZZ (2012) Central corneal volume and endothelial cell count following femtosecond laser-assisted refractive cataract surgery compared to conventional phacoemulsification. J Refract Surg 28(6):387–391CrossRefPubMed Takács AI, Kovács I, Miháltz K, Filkorn T, Knorz MC, Nagy ZZ (2012) Central corneal volume and endothelial cell count following femtosecond laser-assisted refractive cataract surgery compared to conventional phacoemulsification. J Refract Surg 28(6):387–391CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Mastropasqua A, Vecchiarino L, Mastropasqua R, Pedrotti E, Di Nicola M (2014) Femtosecond laser versus manual clear corneal incision in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg 30(1):27–33CrossRefPubMed Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Mastropasqua A, Vecchiarino L, Mastropasqua R, Pedrotti E, Di Nicola M (2014) Femtosecond laser versus manual clear corneal incision in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg 30(1):27–33CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hida WT, Tzelikis PF, Vilar C, Chaves MAPD, Motta AFP, Carricondo PC, Ventura BV, Junior Ambrosio R, Nosé W, Alves MR (2017) Outcomes study between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification surgery using an active fluidics system. Clin Ophthalmol 11:1735–1739CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hida WT, Tzelikis PF, Vilar C, Chaves MAPD, Motta AFP, Carricondo PC, Ventura BV, Junior Ambrosio R, Nosé W, Alves MR (2017) Outcomes study between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification surgery using an active fluidics system. Clin Ophthalmol 11:1735–1739CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Abell RG, Darian-Smith E, Kan JB, Allen PL, Ewe SY, Vote BJ (2015) Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard phacoemulsification cataract surgery: outcomes and safety in more than 4000 cases at a single center. J Cataract Refract Surg 41(1):47–52CrossRefPubMed Abell RG, Darian-Smith E, Kan JB, Allen PL, Ewe SY, Vote BJ (2015) Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard phacoemulsification cataract surgery: outcomes and safety in more than 4000 cases at a single center. J Cataract Refract Surg 41(1):47–52CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Yesilirmak N, Diakonis VF, Sise A, Waren DP, Yoo SH, Donaldson KE (2017) Differences in energy expenditure for conventional and femtosecond-assisted cataract surgery using 2 different phacoemulsification systems. J Cataract Refract Surg 43(1):16–21CrossRefPubMed Yesilirmak N, Diakonis VF, Sise A, Waren DP, Yoo SH, Donaldson KE (2017) Differences in energy expenditure for conventional and femtosecond-assisted cataract surgery using 2 different phacoemulsification systems. J Cataract Refract Surg 43(1):16–21CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Shah RD, Sullivan BR (2015) Resident training in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: national survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 41(7):1531–1533CrossRefPubMed Shah RD, Sullivan BR (2015) Resident training in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: national survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 41(7):1531–1533CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rivera RP, Hoopes PC Jr, Linn SH, Hoopes PC (2016) Comparative analysis of the performance of two different platforms for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol 10:2069–2078CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rivera RP, Hoopes PC Jr, Linn SH, Hoopes PC (2016) Comparative analysis of the performance of two different platforms for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol 10:2069–2078CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Chen M, Sweeney HW, Luke B, Chen M, Brown M (2009) A retrospective randomized study to compare the energy delivered using CDE with different techniques and OZil® settings by different surgeons in phacoemulsification. Clin Ophthalmol 3:401–403CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen M, Sweeney HW, Luke B, Chen M, Brown M (2009) A retrospective randomized study to compare the energy delivered using CDE with different techniques and OZil® settings by different surgeons in phacoemulsification. Clin Ophthalmol 3:401–403CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Doors M, Berendschot TT, Touwslager W, Webers CA, Nuijts RM (2013) Phacopower modulation and the risk for postoperative corneal decompensation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 131(11):1443–1450CrossRefPubMed Doors M, Berendschot TT, Touwslager W, Webers CA, Nuijts RM (2013) Phacopower modulation and the risk for postoperative corneal decompensation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 131(11):1443–1450CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of cumulative dispersed energy (CDE) in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification
Authors
Osamah J. Saeedi
Luke Y. Chang
Sharon R. Ong
Syed A. Karim
Danielle S. Abraham
Geoffrey L. Rosenthal
Andrew Hammer
Brad V. Spagnolo
Arturo E. Betancourt
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0996-x

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

International Ophthalmology 8/2019 Go to the issue