Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 5/2018

01-10-2018 | Original Paper

Evaluation of the learning curve of non-penetrating glaucoma surgery

Authors: Fatih Aslan, Berna Yuce, Zafer Oztas, Halil Ates

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the learning curve of non-penetrating glaucoma surgery (NPGS).

Methods

The study included 32 eyes of 27 patients’ (20 male and 7 female) with medically uncontrolled glaucoma. Non-penetrating glaucoma surgeries performed by trainees under control of an experienced surgeon between 2005 and 2007 at our tertiary referral hospital were evaluated. Residents were separated into two groups. Humanistic training model applied to the one in the first group, he studied with experimental models before performing NPGS. Two residents in the second group performed NPGS after a conventional training model. Surgeries of the residents were recorded on video and intraoperative parameters were scored by the experienced surgeon at the end of the study. Postoperative intraocular pressure, absolute and total success rates were analyzed.

Results

In the first group 19 eyes of 16 patients and in the second group 13 eyes of 11 patients had been operated by residents. Intraoperative parameters and complication rates were not statistically significant between groups (p > 0.05, Chi-square). The duration of surgery was 32.7 ± 5.6 min in the first group and 45 ± 3.8 min in the second group. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001, Student’s t test). Absolute and total success was 68.8 and 93.8% in the first group and 62.5 and 87.5% in the second group, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Humanistic and conventional training models under control of an experienced surgeon are safe and effective for senior residents who manage phacoemulsification surgery in routine cataract cases. Senior residents can practice these surgical techniques with reasonable complication rates.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Cheng JW, Cheng SW, Cai JP, Li Y, Wei RL (2011) Systematic overview of the efficacy of nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery in the treatment of open angle glaucoma. Med Sci Monit 17:155–163CrossRef Cheng JW, Cheng SW, Cai JP, Li Y, Wei RL (2011) Systematic overview of the efficacy of nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery in the treatment of open angle glaucoma. Med Sci Monit 17:155–163CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Welsh NH, DeLange J, Wasserman P, Ziémba SL (1998) The “deroofing” of Schlemm’s canal in patients with open-angle glaucoma through placement of a collagen drainage device. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 29:216–226PubMed Welsh NH, DeLange J, Wasserman P, Ziémba SL (1998) The “deroofing” of Schlemm’s canal in patients with open-angle glaucoma through placement of a collagen drainage device. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 29:216–226PubMed
4.
go back to reference Mermoud A, Schnyder CC, Sickenberg M, Chiou AG, Hédiguer SE, Faggioni R (1999) Comparison of deep sclerectomy with collagen implant and trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:323–331CrossRefPubMed Mermoud A, Schnyder CC, Sickenberg M, Chiou AG, Hédiguer SE, Faggioni R (1999) Comparison of deep sclerectomy with collagen implant and trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:323–331CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sanchez E, Schnyder CC, Mermoud A (1997) Comparative results of deep sclerectomy transformed to trabeculectomy and classical trabeculectomy. Klin Mon Augenheilkd 210:261–264CrossRef Sanchez E, Schnyder CC, Mermoud A (1997) Comparative results of deep sclerectomy transformed to trabeculectomy and classical trabeculectomy. Klin Mon Augenheilkd 210:261–264CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gibson A, Boulton MG, Watson MP, Moseley MJ, Murray PI, Fielder AR (2005) The first cut is the deepest: basic surgical training in ophthalmology. Eye 19:1264–1270CrossRefPubMed Gibson A, Boulton MG, Watson MP, Moseley MJ, Murray PI, Fielder AR (2005) The first cut is the deepest: basic surgical training in ophthalmology. Eye 19:1264–1270CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cohen MN, Intili A, Ni N, Blecher MH (2015) Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in residency training. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 26(1):56–60CrossRefPubMed Cohen MN, Intili A, Ni N, Blecher MH (2015) Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in residency training. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 26(1):56–60CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dooley IJ, O’Brien PD (2006) Subjective difficulty of each stage of phacoemulsification cataract surgery performed by basic surgical trainees. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:604–608CrossRefPubMed Dooley IJ, O’Brien PD (2006) Subjective difficulty of each stage of phacoemulsification cataract surgery performed by basic surgical trainees. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:604–608CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Corey RP, Olson RJ (1998) Surgical outcomes of cataract extractions performed by residents using phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:66–72CrossRefPubMed Corey RP, Olson RJ (1998) Surgical outcomes of cataract extractions performed by residents using phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:66–72CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Zimmer DV, Harrison JC, Carriere VM (1994) Cataract extraction with lens implantation at Biloxi Veterans Affairs Medical Center: experience of ophthalmology residents. Ann Ophthalmol 26:47–49PubMed Zimmer DV, Harrison JC, Carriere VM (1994) Cataract extraction with lens implantation at Biloxi Veterans Affairs Medical Center: experience of ophthalmology residents. Ann Ophthalmol 26:47–49PubMed
12.
go back to reference Cruz OA, Wallace GW, Gay CA, Matoba AY, Koch DD (1992) Visual results and complications of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation performed by ophthalmology residents. Ophthalmology 99:448–452CrossRefPubMed Cruz OA, Wallace GW, Gay CA, Matoba AY, Koch DD (1992) Visual results and complications of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation performed by ophthalmology residents. Ophthalmology 99:448–452CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pingree MF, Crandall AS, Olson RJ (1999) Cataract surgery complications in 1 year at an academic institution. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:705–708CrossRefPubMed Pingree MF, Crandall AS, Olson RJ (1999) Cataract surgery complications in 1 year at an academic institution. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:705–708CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gimbel HV, Sun R, Ferensowicz M, Anderson Penno E, Kamal A (2001) Intraoperative management of posterior capsule tears in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 108:2186–2189CrossRefPubMed Gimbel HV, Sun R, Ferensowicz M, Anderson Penno E, Kamal A (2001) Intraoperative management of posterior capsule tears in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 108:2186–2189CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ang GS, Whyte IF (2006) Effect and outcomes of posterior capsule rupture in a district general hospital setting. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:623–627CrossRefPubMed Ang GS, Whyte IF (2006) Effect and outcomes of posterior capsule rupture in a district general hospital setting. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:623–627CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Torres-Suarez E, Rebolleda G, Munoz Negrete FJ, Cabarga C, Rivas L (2007) Influence of deep scleral flap size on intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy. Eur J Ophthalmol 17:350–356CrossRefPubMed Torres-Suarez E, Rebolleda G, Munoz Negrete FJ, Cabarga C, Rivas L (2007) Influence of deep scleral flap size on intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy. Eur J Ophthalmol 17:350–356CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sourdille P (1999) Nonpenetrating trabecular surgery: it’s worth the change. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:298–300CrossRefPubMed Sourdille P (1999) Nonpenetrating trabecular surgery: it’s worth the change. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:298–300CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Detry-Morel M, Detry MB (2006) Five-year experience with non penetrating deep sclerectomy. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 299:83–94 Detry-Morel M, Detry MB (2006) Five-year experience with non penetrating deep sclerectomy. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 299:83–94
19.
go back to reference Dahan E, Drusedau MU (2000) Nonpenetrating filtration surgery for glaucoma: control by surgery only. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:695–701CrossRefPubMed Dahan E, Drusedau MU (2000) Nonpenetrating filtration surgery for glaucoma: control by surgery only. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:695–701CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Drolsum L (2003) Conversion from trabeculectomy to deep sclerectomy: prospective study of the first 44 cases. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1378–1384CrossRefPubMed Drolsum L (2003) Conversion from trabeculectomy to deep sclerectomy: prospective study of the first 44 cases. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1378–1384CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bas JM, Goethals MJ (1999) Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy preliminary results. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 272:55–59PubMed Bas JM, Goethals MJ (1999) Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy preliminary results. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 272:55–59PubMed
22.
go back to reference Lüke C, Dietlein TS, Jacobi PC, Konen W, Krieglstein GK (2003) A prospective randomised trial of viscocanalostomy with and without implantation of a reticulated hyaluronic acid implant (SKGEL) in open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 87:599–603CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Lüke C, Dietlein TS, Jacobi PC, Konen W, Krieglstein GK (2003) A prospective randomised trial of viscocanalostomy with and without implantation of a reticulated hyaluronic acid implant (SKGEL) in open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 87:599–603CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
23.
24.
go back to reference Ambresin A, Shaarawy T, Mermoud A (2002) Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant in one eye compared with trabeculectomy in the other eye of the same patient. J Glaucoma 11:214–220CrossRefPubMed Ambresin A, Shaarawy T, Mermoud A (2002) Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant in one eye compared with trabeculectomy in the other eye of the same patient. J Glaucoma 11:214–220CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Cillino S, Di Pace F, Casuccio A, Calvaruso L, Morreale D, Vadalà M, Lodato G (2004) Deep sclerectomy versus punch trabeculectomy with and without phacoemulsification: a randomised clinical trial. J Glaucoma 13:500–506CrossRefPubMed Cillino S, Di Pace F, Casuccio A, Calvaruso L, Morreale D, Vadalà M, Lodato G (2004) Deep sclerectomy versus punch trabeculectomy with and without phacoemulsification: a randomised clinical trial. J Glaucoma 13:500–506CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Chiselita D (2001) Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma surgery. Eye 15:197–201CrossRefPubMed Chiselita D (2001) Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma surgery. Eye 15:197–201CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Suominen SM, Harju MP, Vesti ET (2016) Deep sclerectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma and exfoliative glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 26:568–574CrossRefPubMed Suominen SM, Harju MP, Vesti ET (2016) Deep sclerectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma and exfoliative glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 26:568–574CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Rękas M, Byszewska A, Petz K, Wierzbowska J, Jünemann A (2015) Canaloplasty versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy—a prospective, randomised study of the safety and efficacy of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery; 12-month follow-up. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253:591–599CrossRefPubMed Rękas M, Byszewska A, Petz K, Wierzbowska J, Jünemann A (2015) Canaloplasty versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy—a prospective, randomised study of the safety and efficacy of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery; 12-month follow-up. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253:591–599CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Bilgin G, Karakurt A, Saricaoglu MS (2014) Combined non-penetrating deep sclerectomy with phacoemulsification versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy alone. Semin Ophthalmol 29:146–150CrossRefPubMed Bilgin G, Karakurt A, Saricaoglu MS (2014) Combined non-penetrating deep sclerectomy with phacoemulsification versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy alone. Semin Ophthalmol 29:146–150CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Gesser C, Wiermann A, Keserü M, Richard G, Klemm M (2014) Long-term follow-up after deep sclerectomy. Klin Mon Augenheilkd 231:535–539CrossRef Gesser C, Wiermann A, Keserü M, Richard G, Klemm M (2014) Long-term follow-up after deep sclerectomy. Klin Mon Augenheilkd 231:535–539CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Suominen S, Harju M, Kurvinen L, Vesti E (2014) Deep sclerectomy in normal-tension glaucoma with and without mitomycin-C. Acta Ophthalmol 92:701–706CrossRefPubMed Suominen S, Harju M, Kurvinen L, Vesti E (2014) Deep sclerectomy in normal-tension glaucoma with and without mitomycin-C. Acta Ophthalmol 92:701–706CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Anand N, Kumar A, Gupta A (2011) Primary phakic deep sclerectomy augmented with mitomycin C: long-term outcomes. J Glaucoma 20:21–27CrossRefPubMed Anand N, Kumar A, Gupta A (2011) Primary phakic deep sclerectomy augmented with mitomycin C: long-term outcomes. J Glaucoma 20:21–27CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Ateş H, Uretmen O, Andaç K, Azarsiz SS (2003) Deep sclerectomy with a nonabsorbable implant (T-Flux): preliminary results. Can J Ophthalmol 38:482–488CrossRefPubMed Ateş H, Uretmen O, Andaç K, Azarsiz SS (2003) Deep sclerectomy with a nonabsorbable implant (T-Flux): preliminary results. Can J Ophthalmol 38:482–488CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of the learning curve of non-penetrating glaucoma surgery
Authors
Fatih Aslan
Berna Yuce
Zafer Oztas
Halil Ates
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0691-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

International Ophthalmology 5/2018 Go to the issue