Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 4/2017

01-08-2017 | Original Paper

Scheimpflug camera combined with placido-disk corneal topography and optical biometry for intraocular lens power calculation

Authors: Ahmet Kirgiz, Kurşat Atalay, Havva Kaldirim, Kubra Serefoglu Cabuk, Mehmet Orcun Akdemir, Muhittin Taskapili

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the keratometry (K) values obtained by the Scheimpflug camera combined with placido-disk corneal topography (Sirius) and optical biometry (Lenstar) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation before the cataract surgery, and to evaluate the accuracy of postoperative refraction. 50 eyes of 40 patients were scheduled to have phacoemulsification with the implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. The IOL power was calculated using the SRK/T formula with Lenstar K and K readings from Sirius. Simulated K (SimK), K at 3-, 5-, and 7-mm zones from Sirius were compared with Lenstar K readings. The accuracy of these parameters was determined by calculating the mean absolute error (MAE). The mean Lenstar K value was 44.05 diopters (D) ±1.93 (SD) and SimK, K at 3-, 5-, and 7-mm zones were 43.85 ± 1.91, 43.88 ± 1.9, 43.84 ± 1.9, 43.66 ± 1.85 D, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the K readings (P = 0.901). When Lenstar was used for the corneal power measurements, MAE was 0.42 ± 0.33 D, but when simK of Sirius was used, it was 0.37 ± 0.32 D (the lowest MAE (0.36 ± 0.32 D) was achieved as a result of 5 mm K measurement), but it was not statistically significant (P = 0.892). Of all the K readings of Sirius and Lenstar, Sirius 5-mm zone K readings were the best in predicting a more precise IOL power. The corneal power measurements with the Scheimpflug camera combined with placido-disk corneal topography can be safely used for IOL power calculation.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Lopez de la Fuente C, Sanchez-Cano A, Segura F, Fuentes-Bruto L, Pinilla I (2014) Repeatability of ocular measurements with a dual-Scheimpflug analyzer in healthy eyes. Biomed Res Int. doi:10.1155/2014/808646 Lopez de la Fuente C, Sanchez-Cano A, Segura F, Fuentes-Bruto L, Pinilla I (2014) Repeatability of ocular measurements with a dual-Scheimpflug analyzer in healthy eyes. Biomed Res Int. doi:10.​1155/​2014/​808646
3.
go back to reference Wang L, Shirayama M, Koch DD (2010) Repeatability of corneal power and wavefront aberration measurements with a dual-Scheimpflug placido corneal topographer. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:425–430CrossRefPubMed Wang L, Shirayama M, Koch DD (2010) Repeatability of corneal power and wavefront aberration measurements with a dual-Scheimpflug placido corneal topographer. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:425–430CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Verhulst E, Vrijghem JC (2001) Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations using the Zeiss IOL master. A prospective study. Bull Soc Belge Ophthalmol 281:61–65 Verhulst E, Vrijghem JC (2001) Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations using the Zeiss IOL master. A prospective study. Bull Soc Belge Ophthalmol 281:61–65
5.
go back to reference Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ (2013) Comparison of methods to measure corneal power for intraocular lens power calculation using a rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:598–604CrossRefPubMed Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ (2013) Comparison of methods to measure corneal power for intraocular lens power calculation using a rotating Scheimpflug camera. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:598–604CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kawamorita T, Nakayama N, Uozato H (2009) Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal curvature measurements using the Pentacam and the Keratron topography systems. J Refract Surg 25:539–544CrossRefPubMed Kawamorita T, Nakayama N, Uozato H (2009) Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal curvature measurements using the Pentacam and the Keratron topography systems. J Refract Surg 25:539–544CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Saad E, Shammas MC, Shammas HJ (2013) Scheimpflug corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculation in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 156:460–467CrossRefPubMed Saad E, Shammas MC, Shammas HJ (2013) Scheimpflug corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculation in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 156:460–467CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Shirayama M, Wang L, Koch DD, Weikert MP (2010) Comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens calculations using automated keratometry, a placido-based corneal topographer, and a combined placido-based and dual Scheimpflug corneal topographer. Cornea 29:1136–1138CrossRefPubMed Shirayama M, Wang L, Koch DD, Weikert MP (2010) Comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens calculations using automated keratometry, a placido-based corneal topographer, and a combined placido-based and dual Scheimpflug corneal topographer. Cornea 29:1136–1138CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Norrby S (2008) Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:368–376CrossRefPubMed Norrby S (2008) Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:368–376CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Elbaz U, Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Avni I, Zadok D (2007) Comparison of different techniques of anterior chamber depth and keratometric measurements. Am J Ophthalmol 143:48–53CrossRefPubMed Elbaz U, Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Avni I, Zadok D (2007) Comparison of different techniques of anterior chamber depth and keratometric measurements. Am J Ophthalmol 143:48–53CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ (2009) Accuracy of Scheimpflug corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1193–1197CrossRefPubMed Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ (2009) Accuracy of Scheimpflug corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1193–1197CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Shammas HJ, Hoffer KJ, Shammas MC (2009) Scheimpflug photography keratometry readings for routine intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:330–334CrossRefPubMed Shammas HJ, Hoffer KJ, Shammas MC (2009) Scheimpflug photography keratometry readings for routine intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:330–334CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Akçay BIS, Ozgurhan EB, Bozkurt B, Kurt T, Yıldırım Y, Cosar MG et al (2014) Evaluation of pachymetric measurements with Scheimpflug photography-based system and optical coherence tomography pachymetry at different stages of keratoconus. J Ophthalmol 2014:719205. doi:10.1155/2014/719205 Akçay BIS, Ozgurhan EB, Bozkurt B, Kurt T, Yıldırım Y, Cosar MG et al (2014) Evaluation of pachymetric measurements with Scheimpflug photography-based system and optical coherence tomography pachymetry at different stages of keratoconus. J Ophthalmol 2014:719205. doi:10.​1155/​2014/​719205
14.
go back to reference Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ (2011) Accuracy of a dual Scheimpflug analyzer and a corneal topography system for intraocular lens power calculation in unoperated eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:72–76CrossRefPubMed Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ (2011) Accuracy of a dual Scheimpflug analyzer and a corneal topography system for intraocular lens power calculation in unoperated eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:72–76CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ (2012) Accuracy of corneal power measurements by a new Scheimpflug camera combined with placido-disc corneal topography for intraocular lens power calculation in unoperated eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:787–792CrossRefPubMed Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ (2012) Accuracy of corneal power measurements by a new Scheimpflug camera combined with placido-disc corneal topography for intraocular lens power calculation in unoperated eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:787–792CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Narvaez J, Zimmerman G, Stulting RD, Chang DH (2006) Accuracy of intraocular lens power prediction using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2 and SRK/T formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:2050–2053CrossRefPubMed Narvaez J, Zimmerman G, Stulting RD, Chang DH (2006) Accuracy of intraocular lens power prediction using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2 and SRK/T formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:2050–2053CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference BjelošRončević M, Bušić M, Cima I, KuzmanovićElabjer B, Bosnar D, Miletić D (2011) Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 249:69–75CrossRef BjelošRončević M, Bušić M, Cima I, KuzmanovićElabjer B, Bosnar D, Miletić D (2011) Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 249:69–75CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA (2002) Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations. Eye 16:552–556CrossRefPubMed Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA (2002) Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations. Eye 16:552–556CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Landers J, Goggin M (2009) Comparison of refractive outcomes using immersion ultrasound biometry and IOL master biometry. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 37:566–569CrossRefPubMed Landers J, Goggin M (2009) Comparison of refractive outcomes using immersion ultrasound biometry and IOL master biometry. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 37:566–569CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
go back to reference Cruysberg LPJ, Doors M, Verbakel F, Berendschot TT, De Brabander J, Nuijts RM (2010) Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 all-in-one non contact biometry meter. Br J Ophthalmol 94:106–110CrossRefPubMed Cruysberg LPJ, Doors M, Verbakel F, Berendschot TT, De Brabander J, Nuijts RM (2010) Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 all-in-one non contact biometry meter. Br J Ophthalmol 94:106–110CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC (1990) Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 16:333–340CrossRefPubMed Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC (1990) Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 16:333–340CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Aristodemou P, Knox Cartwright NE, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL (2011) Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry bypartial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:63–71CrossRefPubMed Aristodemou P, Knox Cartwright NE, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL (2011) Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry bypartial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:63–71CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wang JK, Chang SW (2013) Optical biometry intraocular lens power calculation using different formulas in patients with different axial lengths. Int J Opthalmol 6:150–154 Wang JK, Chang SW (2013) Optical biometry intraocular lens power calculation using different formulas in patients with different axial lengths. Int J Opthalmol 6:150–154
25.
go back to reference Miyata K, Otani S, Honbou N, Minami K (2013) Use of Scheimpflug corneal anterior–posterior imaging in ray-tracing intraocular lens power calculation. Acta Ophthalmol. 91:546–549CrossRef Miyata K, Otani S, Honbou N, Minami K (2013) Use of Scheimpflug corneal anterior–posterior imaging in ray-tracing intraocular lens power calculation. Acta Ophthalmol. 91:546–549CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Scheimpflug camera combined with placido-disk corneal topography and optical biometry for intraocular lens power calculation
Authors
Ahmet Kirgiz
Kurşat Atalay
Havva Kaldirim
Kubra Serefoglu Cabuk
Mehmet Orcun Akdemir
Muhittin Taskapili
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0330-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

International Ophthalmology 4/2017 Go to the issue