Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 3/2016

01-06-2016 | Original Paper

Intraocular pressure control after the implantation of a second Ahmed glaucoma valve

Authors: Jesús Jiménez-Román, Félix Gil-Carrasco, Vital Paulino Costa, Rui Barroso Schimiti, Fabián Lerner, Priscila Rezende Santana, Jose Paulo Cabral Vascocellos, Armando Castillejos-Chévez, Mauricio Turati, Karina Fabre-Miranda

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a second Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) in eyes with refractory glaucoma that had undergone prior Ahmed device implantation. This multicenter, retrospective study evaluated 58 eyes (58 patients) that underwent a second AGV (model S2-n = 50, model FP7-n = 8) due to uncontrolled IOP under maximal medical therapy. Outcome measures included IOP, visual acuity, number of glaucoma medications, and postoperative complications. Success was defined as IOP <21 mmHg (criterion 1) or 30 % reduction of IOP (criterion 2) with or without hypotensive medications. Persistent hypotony (IOP <5 mmHg after 3 months of follow-up), loss of light perception, and reintervention for IOP control were defined as failure. Mean preoperative IOP and mean IOPs at 12 and 30 months were 27.55 ± 1.16 mmHg (n = 58), 14.45 ± 0.83 mmHg (n = 42), and 14.81 ± 0.87 mmHg (n = 16), respectively. The mean numbers of glaucoma medications preoperatively at 12 and 30 months were 3.17 ± 0.16 (n = 58), 1.81 ± 0.2 (n = 42), and 1.83 ± 0.35 (n = 18), respectively. The reductions in mean IOP and number of medications were statistically significant at all time intervals (P < 0.001). According to criterion 1, Kaplan–Meier survival curves disclosed success rates of 62.9 % at 12 months and 56.6 % at 30 months. According to criterion 2, Kaplan–Meier survival curves disclosed success rates of 43.9 % at 12 months and 32.9 % at 30 months. The most frequent early complication was hypertensive phase (10.3 %) and the most frequent late complication was corneal edema (17.2 %). Second AGV implantation may effectively reduce IOP in eyes with uncontrolled glaucoma, and is associated with relatively few complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Coleman AL, Hill R, Wilson MR, Choplin N, Kotas-Neumann R, Tam M, Bacharach J, Panek WC (1995) Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol 120(1):23–31CrossRefPubMed Coleman AL, Hill R, Wilson MR, Choplin N, Kotas-Neumann R, Tam M, Bacharach J, Panek WC (1995) Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol 120(1):23–31CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ayyala RS, Zurakowsk D, Smith JA, Monshizadeh R, Netland PA, Richards DW, Layden WE (1998) A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma. Ophthalmology 105(10):1968–1976CrossRefPubMed Ayyala RS, Zurakowsk D, Smith JA, Monshizadeh R, Netland PA, Richards DW, Layden WE (1998) A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma. Ophthalmology 105(10):1968–1976CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Gil-Carrasco F, Salinas-VanOrman E, Recillas-Gispert C, Paczka JA, Gilbert ME, Arellanes-García L (1998) Ahmed valve implant for uncontrolled uveitic glaucoma. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 6(1):27–37CrossRefPubMed Gil-Carrasco F, Salinas-VanOrman E, Recillas-Gispert C, Paczka JA, Gilbert ME, Arellanes-García L (1998) Ahmed valve implant for uncontrolled uveitic glaucoma. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 6(1):27–37CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Huang MC, Netland PA, Coleman AL, Siegner SW, Moster MR, Hill RA (1999) Intermediate-term clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol 127(1):27–33CrossRefPubMed Huang MC, Netland PA, Coleman AL, Siegner SW, Moster MR, Hill RA (1999) Intermediate-term clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol 127(1):27–33CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Topouzis F, Coleman AL, Choplin N, Bethlem MM, Hill R, Yu F, Panek WC, Wilson MR (1999) Follow-up of the original cohort with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol 128(2):198–204CrossRefPubMed Topouzis F, Coleman AL, Choplin N, Bethlem MM, Hill R, Yu F, Panek WC, Wilson MR (1999) Follow-up of the original cohort with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol 128(2):198–204CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Gedde SJ, Singh K, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ (2012) Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study: interpretation of results and application to clinical practice. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 23(2):118–126CrossRefPubMed Gedde SJ, Singh K, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ (2012) Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study: interpretation of results and application to clinical practice. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 23(2):118–126CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gedde SJ, Schiffman J, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL (2012) Tube versus Trabeculectomy Study Group, Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 153(5):789–803CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gedde SJ, Schiffman J, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL (2012) Tube versus Trabeculectomy Study Group, Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 153(5):789–803CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Ramulu PY, Corcoran KJ, Corcoran SL, Robin AL (2007) Utilization of various glaucoma surgeries and procedures in medicare beneficiaries from 1995 to 2004. Ophthalmology 114:2265–2270CrossRefPubMed Ramulu PY, Corcoran KJ, Corcoran SL, Robin AL (2007) Utilization of various glaucoma surgeries and procedures in medicare beneficiaries from 1995 to 2004. Ophthalmology 114:2265–2270CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Burgoyne JK, WuDunn D, Lakhani V, Cantor LB (2000) Outcomes of sequential tube shunts in complicated glaucoma. Ophthalmology 107(2):309–314CrossRefPubMed Burgoyne JK, WuDunn D, Lakhani V, Cantor LB (2000) Outcomes of sequential tube shunts in complicated glaucoma. Ophthalmology 107(2):309–314CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Shah AA, WuDunn D, Cantor LB (2000) Shunt revision versus additional tube shunt implantation after failed tube shunt surgery in refractory glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 129(4):455–460CrossRefPubMed Shah AA, WuDunn D, Cantor LB (2000) Shunt revision versus additional tube shunt implantation after failed tube shunt surgery in refractory glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 129(4):455–460CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Anand A, Tello C, Sidoti PA, Ritch R, Liebmann JM (2010) Sequential glaucoma implants in refractory glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 149(1):95–101CrossRefPubMed Anand A, Tello C, Sidoti PA, Ritch R, Liebmann JM (2010) Sequential glaucoma implants in refractory glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 149(1):95–101CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Smith M, Buys YM, Trope GE (2009) Second Ahmed valve insertion in the same eye. J Glaucoma 18:336–340CrossRefPubMed Smith M, Buys YM, Trope GE (2009) Second Ahmed valve insertion in the same eye. J Glaucoma 18:336–340CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ishida K, Netland PA, Costa VP, Shirmoa L, Khan B, Ahmed II (2006) Comparison of polypropylene and silicone Ahmed glaucoma valves. Ophahtlmology 113:1320–1326CrossRef Ishida K, Netland PA, Costa VP, Shirmoa L, Khan B, Ahmed II (2006) Comparison of polypropylene and silicone Ahmed glaucoma valves. Ophahtlmology 113:1320–1326CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lee EK, Yun YJ, Lee JE, Yim JH, Kim CS (2009) Changes in corneal endothelial cells after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: 2-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 148(3):361–367CrossRefPubMed Lee EK, Yun YJ, Lee JE, Yim JH, Kim CS (2009) Changes in corneal endothelial cells after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: 2-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 148(3):361–367CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Intraocular pressure control after the implantation of a second Ahmed glaucoma valve
Authors
Jesús Jiménez-Román
Félix Gil-Carrasco
Vital Paulino Costa
Rui Barroso Schimiti
Fabián Lerner
Priscila Rezende Santana
Jose Paulo Cabral Vascocellos
Armando Castillejos-Chévez
Mauricio Turati
Karina Fabre-Miranda
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-015-0125-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

International Ophthalmology 3/2016 Go to the issue