Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 6/2015

01-12-2015 | Original Paper

Aquaporin 4 antibody [NMO Ab] status in patients with severe optic neuritis in India

Authors: Selvakumar Ambika, Mahalakshmi Balasubramanian, Lily Theresa, Akila Veeraputhiran, Deepak Arjundas

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system that causes attacks of optic neuritis and transverse myelitis. The discovery of a specific serum marker for NMO-IgG antibody [aquaporin 4 antibody/AQP4 Ab] has revolutionised the treatment of demyelinating diseases. Severe vision loss can be seen in optic neuritis (ON) associated with both multiple sclerosis (MS) and NMO. Identifying this antibody in optic neuritis patients can help us to establish the likelihood of these patients developing NMO (Jarius et al. Neurol Sci 298:158–162, 2010). It is important to differentiate these two entities as the treatment strategies of MS and NMO are different. To the best of our knowledge, there is no published literature regarding the importance of identifying this antibody in severe optic neuritis in Indian patients. Hence we decided to screen our severe optic neuritis patients for this AQP4 Ab. To investigate the presence of aquaporin 4 antibody and determine its prognostic value for visual and neurological outcome, in patients with bilateral and recurrent [severe] ON without any previous neurological manifestations presenting to a neuro-ophthalmology clinic in India. Single centre, prospective study. 40 patients (27 female patients and 13 male) with severe optic neuritis [patients with no visual improvement by 4 weeks from onset of vision loss] who presented either as recurrent attacks or as bilateral and severe optic neuritis between January 2010 and June 2011 were enrolled. Clinical features, visual outcome and sequential neurological events were compared between the seropositive and the seronegative groups. Aquaporin 4 antibodies were detected from serum using ELISA technique and IIF technique. Presence of this antibody in the serum was considered to be seropositive status and patients who did not have this antibody were considered seronegatives. AQP4 antibodies were detected in 8 of the 40 patients with severe ON (20 %).The female to male ratio in the seropositive group was 8:0. The NMO antibody titer ranged from 0.3 to 760 U/ml. ANA positivity in seropositive patients was statistically significant (p = 0.043). All seropositive patients had significantly poorer visual outcome as compared with the seronegative patients (p = 0.04).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jarius S, Frederikson J, Waters P, Paul F, Akman-Demir G (2010) Frequency and prognostic impact of antibodies to aquaporin-4 in patients with optic neuritis. Neurol Sci 298:158–162CrossRef Jarius S, Frederikson J, Waters P, Paul F, Akman-Demir G (2010) Frequency and prognostic impact of antibodies to aquaporin-4 in patients with optic neuritis. Neurol Sci 298:158–162CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mandler RN, Davis LE, Jeffery DR, Kornfeld M (1993) Devic’s Neuromyelitis Optica, A clinicopathological study of 8 patients. Ann Neurol 34:162–168CrossRefPubMed Mandler RN, Davis LE, Jeffery DR, Kornfeld M (1993) Devic’s Neuromyelitis Optica, A clinicopathological study of 8 patients. Ann Neurol 34:162–168CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference O’Riordan JI, Gallagher HL, Thompson AJ (1996) Clinical, CSF and MRI findings in Devic’s neuromyelitis optica. J. Neurology Psychiatry 60:382–387CrossRef O’Riordan JI, Gallagher HL, Thompson AJ (1996) Clinical, CSF and MRI findings in Devic’s neuromyelitis optica. J. Neurology Psychiatry 60:382–387CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wingerchuck DM, Hogancamp WF, O’Brien PC, Weinshenker BG (1999) The Clinical course of neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 53:1107–1114CrossRef Wingerchuck DM, Hogancamp WF, O’Brien PC, Weinshenker BG (1999) The Clinical course of neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 53:1107–1114CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wingerchuck DM, Lennon VA, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG (2006) Revised diagnostic criteria for NMO. Neurology 66:1485–1489CrossRef Wingerchuck DM, Lennon VA, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG (2006) Revised diagnostic criteria for NMO. Neurology 66:1485–1489CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Waters P, Vincent A (2008) Detection of anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica: current status of the assays. Int MS J 15:99–105PubMed Waters P, Vincent A (2008) Detection of anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica: current status of the assays. Int MS J 15:99–105PubMed
7.
go back to reference Hayakawa S, Mori M, Okuta A, Kamegawa A, Fujiyoshi Y, Yoshiyama Y et al (2008) Neuromyelitis optica and anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Neuroimmunol 196:181–187CrossRefPubMed Hayakawa S, Mori M, Okuta A, Kamegawa A, Fujiyoshi Y, Yoshiyama Y et al (2008) Neuromyelitis optica and anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Neuroimmunol 196:181–187CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Takahashi T, Fujihara K, Nakashima I (2007) Anti-aquaporin 4 antibody is involved in the pathogenesis of NMO: a study on antibody titre. Brain 130:1235–1243CrossRefPubMed Takahashi T, Fujihara K, Nakashima I (2007) Anti-aquaporin 4 antibody is involved in the pathogenesis of NMO: a study on antibody titre. Brain 130:1235–1243CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Nakajima H, Hosokawa T (2010) Visual field defects of optic neuritis in neuromyelitis optica compared with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurology 10:10–45CrossRef Nakajima H, Hosokawa T (2010) Visual field defects of optic neuritis in neuromyelitis optica compared with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurology 10:10–45CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dastur DK, Singhal BS (1978) Two unusual neuropathologically proven cases of multiple sclerosis from Bombay. J Neurol Sci 20:397–414CrossRef Dastur DK, Singhal BS (1978) Two unusual neuropathologically proven cases of multiple sclerosis from Bombay. J Neurol Sci 20:397–414CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jacob A, Boggild M (2007) Neuromyelitis optica. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 10:231–290CrossRef Jacob A, Boggild M (2007) Neuromyelitis optica. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 10:231–290CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bansil S, Singhal BS, Ahuja GK (1996) Comparison between multiple sclerosis in India and the United States. A case control study. Neurology 46:385–387PubMed Bansil S, Singhal BS, Ahuja GK (1996) Comparison between multiple sclerosis in India and the United States. A case control study. Neurology 46:385–387PubMed
13.
go back to reference Pandit L, Shetty R, Bhat IG, Misri Z, Hegde S (2007) Spectrum of MS and other demyelinating CNS disorders in the background of revised criteria. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 10:44–45CrossRef Pandit L, Shetty R, Bhat IG, Misri Z, Hegde S (2007) Spectrum of MS and other demyelinating CNS disorders in the background of revised criteria. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 10:44–45CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pandit L (2008) Neuromyelitis optica antibody-NMO–Ig status in Indian patients with multiple sclerosis and allied demyelinating disorders. Neurol Asia 13:175–178 Pandit L (2008) Neuromyelitis optica antibody-NMO–Ig status in Indian patients with multiple sclerosis and allied demyelinating disorders. Neurol Asia 13:175–178
15.
go back to reference Pandit L (2009) NMO –IgG in Indian patients with Multiple sclerosis and allied idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating disorders. Mult Scler 15:131–132CrossRef Pandit L (2009) NMO –IgG in Indian patients with Multiple sclerosis and allied idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating disorders. Mult Scler 15:131–132CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lennon VA, Wingerchuck DM, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Fujihara K et al (2004) A serum antibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet 364:2106–2112CrossRefPubMed Lennon VA, Wingerchuck DM, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Fujihara K et al (2004) A serum antibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet 364:2106–2112CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Jain S, Maheshwari MC (1985) Multiple sclerosis: Indian experience in the last thirty years. Neuroepidemiology 4:96–107CrossRefPubMed Jain S, Maheshwari MC (1985) Multiple sclerosis: Indian experience in the last thirty years. Neuroepidemiology 4:96–107CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Pandit L, Shetty R, Bhat IG, Misri Z, Hedge S (2007) Spectrum of multiple sclerosis and related demyelinating disorders in India in the background of revised diagnostic criteria. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 10:44–45CrossRef Pandit L, Shetty R, Bhat IG, Misri Z, Hedge S (2007) Spectrum of multiple sclerosis and related demyelinating disorders in India in the background of revised diagnostic criteria. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 10:44–45CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wingerchuck DM, Lennon AL, Lucchinetti CF (2007) The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica. Lancet Neurol 6:805–815CrossRef Wingerchuck DM, Lennon AL, Lucchinetti CF (2007) The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica. Lancet Neurol 6:805–815CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Matiello M, Lennon VA, Jacob A, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Wingerchuk DM et al (2008) NMO-IgG predicts the outcome of recurrent optic neuritis. Neurology 70:2197–2200CrossRefPubMed Matiello M, Lennon VA, Jacob A, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Wingerchuk DM et al (2008) NMO-IgG predicts the outcome of recurrent optic neuritis. Neurology 70:2197–2200CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Jarius S, Ruprecht K, Wildemann B, Kuempfel T, Ringelstein M, Geis C et al (2012) Contrasting disease patterns in seropositive and seronegative neuromyelitis optica: a multicentre study of 175 patients. J Neuroinflammation 19:9–14 Jarius S, Ruprecht K, Wildemann B, Kuempfel T, Ringelstein M, Geis C et al (2012) Contrasting disease patterns in seropositive and seronegative neuromyelitis optica: a multicentre study of 175 patients. J Neuroinflammation 19:9–14
22.
go back to reference Lai C, Tian G, Takahashi T, Liu W, Yang L, s X (2011) Neuromyelitis optica antibodies in patients with severe optic neuritis in China. J Neuroophthalmol 31(1):16–19CrossRefPubMed Lai C, Tian G, Takahashi T, Liu W, Yang L, s X (2011) Neuromyelitis optica antibodies in patients with severe optic neuritis in China. J Neuroophthalmol 31(1):16–19CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference De Vidi I, Boursier G, Delouche N, Portalès P, Cadars E (2011) Strategy for anti-aquaporin-4 auto-antibody identification and quantification using a new cell-based assay. Clin Immunol 138:239–246CrossRefPubMed De Vidi I, Boursier G, Delouche N, Portalès P, Cadars E (2011) Strategy for anti-aquaporin-4 auto-antibody identification and quantification using a new cell-based assay. Clin Immunol 138:239–246CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Jarius S, Franciotta D, Paul F, Bergamaschi R, Rommer PS, Ruprecht K et al (2012) Testing for antibodies to human aquaporin-4 by ELISA: sensitivity, specificity, and direct comparison with immunohistochemistry. J Neurol Sci 320:32–37CrossRefPubMed Jarius S, Franciotta D, Paul F, Bergamaschi R, Rommer PS, Ruprecht K et al (2012) Testing for antibodies to human aquaporin-4 by ELISA: sensitivity, specificity, and direct comparison with immunohistochemistry. J Neurol Sci 320:32–37CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Petzold A, Pittock S, Lennon V, Maggiore C, Weinshenker BG, Plant GT et al (2010) Neuromyelitis optica-IgG (aquaporin-4) autoantibodies in immune mediated optic neuritis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81:109–111CrossRefPubMed Petzold A, Pittock S, Lennon V, Maggiore C, Weinshenker BG, Plant GT et al (2010) Neuromyelitis optica-IgG (aquaporin-4) autoantibodies in immune mediated optic neuritis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81:109–111CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Aquaporin 4 antibody [NMO Ab] status in patients with severe optic neuritis in India
Authors
Selvakumar Ambika
Mahalakshmi Balasubramanian
Lily Theresa
Akila Veeraputhiran
Deepak Arjundas
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-015-0048-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

International Ophthalmology 6/2015 Go to the issue