Top

Published in:

01-09-2010 | Original Article

The Ethics of Nonmedical Sex Selection

Authors: H. Strange, R. Chadwick

Published in: Health Care Analysis | Issue 3/2010

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that there are significant ethical problems with nonmedical sex selection, and that prohibitive legislation is justified. The central argument put forward is that nonmedical sex selection is a sexist practice which promotes socially restrictive conceptions of sex, gender and family. Several steps are taken to justify this position: background information on technology and legislation is provided, the neoliberal position that is supportive of nonmedical sex selection is described, and preliminary reasons for rejecting this approach are given. A detailed description of how a harm/benefit based analysis contributes to the argument against nonmedical sex selection, and how it successfully counters most criticism, is provided. The paper concludes by suggesting that virtue ethics further strengthens the moral argument against nonmedical sex selection.

Adoption and Children Act. (2002). Crown copyright. Available online at: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2002/ukpga_20020038_en_1.

Baruch, S., et al. (2008). Genetic testing of embryos: Practices and perspectives of US IVF clinics. Fertility and Sterility, 5(105), 3–58.

BBC News. (2008). Parents queue to select baby gender. Available online at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7696698.stm.

Beauchamp, T. L., et al. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Berkowitz, J., et al. (1998). Racism and sexism in medically assisted conception. Bioethics, 12(1), 25–44.CrossRefPubMed

Blackless, M., et al. (2000). How sexually diamorphic are we? Review and synthesis. American Journal of Human Biology, 12, 151–166.CrossRefPubMed

Civil Partnership Act. (2004). Crown copyright. Available online at: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2004/ukpga_20040033_en_1.

Ethics Committee of The American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (1999). Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertility and Sterility, 72(4), 595–598.CrossRef

Harris, J. (2003). Sex selection and regulated hatred. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 291–294.CrossRef

10.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2008). HFEA code of practice (7th ed.). Available online at: http://cop.hfea.gov.uk/cop/pdf/CodeOfPracticeVR_4.pdf.

11.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2007). PGD licensed conditions. Available online at: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/PGD_list.pdf.

12.

Holm, S. (2004). Like a frog in boiling water: The public, the HFEA and sex selection. Health Care Analysis, 12(1), 27–29.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Kant, I. (1797). The metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans. (1991)). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Karkazis, K. (2008). Fixing sex: Intersex, medical authority and lived experience. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

15.

McDougall, R. (2005). Acting parentally: An argument against sex selection. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 601–605.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Moazam, F. (2004). Feminist discourse on sex screening and selective abortion of female foetuses. Bioethics, 18(3), 205–220.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Parfit, D. (1986). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

18.

Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. (2003). Parliamentary office of science and technology postnote: Sex selection, parliamentary copyright, 198. Available online at: http://www.parliament.uk/post/pn198.pdf.

19.

Rogers, W., et al. (2007). Is sex selective abortion morally justified and should it be prohibited? Bioethics, 21(9), 520–524.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Savulescu, J. (1999). Sex selection: The case for. Medical Journal of Australia, 171, 402–405.

21.

Scully, J., et al. (2006). Chance, choice and control: Lay debate on prenatal social sex selection. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 21–31.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Wilkinson, S. (2008). Sexism, sex selection and ‘family balancing’. Medical Law Review, 16(3), 369–389.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Zilberberg, J. (2007). Sex selection and restricting abortion and sex determination. Bioethics, 21(9), 517–519.CrossRefPubMed

Title: The Ethics of Nonmedical Sex Selection
Authors: H. Strange
R. Chadwick
Publication date: 01-09-2010
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Health Care Analysis / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1065-3058
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3394
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-009-0135-y

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

The Ethics of Nonmedical Sex Selection

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Unjustified Discrimination: Is the Moratorium on the use of Genetic Test Results by Insurers a Contradiction in Terms?

On the Irreducible Individuality of the Person and the Fullness of Life: Simon Gray’s Smoking Diaries

Serve the People: Understanding Ideology and Professional Ethics of Medicine in China

Ethical Aspects of the Use of Stem Cell Derived Gametes for Reproduction

Health Promotion or Disease Prevention: A Real Difference for Public Health Practice?

Mental Health Care in the Aftermath of Deinstitutionalization: A Retrospective and Prospective View