Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Care Analysis 4/2008

Open Access 01-12-2008 | Original Article

How Health Care Complexity Leads to Cooperation and Affects the Autonomy of Health Care Professionals

Authors: Eric Molleman, Manda Broekhuis, Renee Stoffels, Frans Jaspers

Published in: Health Care Analysis | Issue 4/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Health professionals increasingly face patients with complex health problems and this pressurizes them to cooperate. The authors have analyzed how the complexity of health care problems relates to two types of cooperation: consultation and multidisciplinary teamwork (MTW). Moreover, they have analyzed the impact of these two types of cooperation on perceived professional autonomy. Two teams were studied, one team dealing with geriatric patients and another treating oncology patients. The authors conducted semi-structured interviews, studied written documents, held informal discussions and observed the teams at work. Consultation was most likely to take place when a patient had multiple problems. However, if these problems were interrelated, i.e. the solution for one problem interfered with solving another, then MTW was favored. The same was true when the available information was equivocal such that there were conflicting interpretations of a problem. How the professionals perceived the relationship between complexity and the need to cooperate depended on their expertise, their occupational background, and their work orientation. Consultation did not affect the professional autonomy of the health care professionals. MTW however did decrease the perceived level of professional autonomy. The extent to which this occurred seemed to depend on the quality of the interpersonal relations within the team. The findings can help in selecting the most appropriate and efficient type of cooperation based on the complexity of a patient’s problems. They can also help team leaders to stimulate reflection and feedback processes, and medical trainers to develop competencies among students related to such teamwork behaviors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Allison, A., & Ewens, A. (1998). Tensions in sharing client confidences while respecting autonomy: Implications for inter-professional practice. Nursing Ethics, 5, 441–450.PubMed Allison, A., & Ewens, A. (1998). Tensions in sharing client confidences while respecting autonomy: Implications for inter-professional practice. Nursing Ethics, 5, 441–450.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38, 551–570.CrossRef Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38, 551–570.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brown, T. M., & Miller, C. E. (2000). Communication networks in task-performing groups. Effects of task complexity, time pressure, and interpersonal dominance. Small Group Research, 31, 131–157.CrossRef Brown, T. M., & Miller, C. E. (2000). Communication networks in task-performing groups. Effects of task complexity, time pressure, and interpersonal dominance. Small Group Research, 31, 131–157.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cott, C. (1997). ‘We decide, you carry it out’: A social network analysis of multidisciplinary long-term care teams. Social Science & Medicine, 45, 1411–1421.CrossRef Cott, C. (1997). ‘We decide, you carry it out’: A social network analysis of multidisciplinary long-term care teams. Social Science & Medicine, 45, 1411–1421.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Doherty, W. J. (1995). The whys and the levels of collaboration. Family Systems Medicine, 13, 275–281.CrossRef Doherty, W. J. (1995). The whys and the levels of collaboration. Family Systems Medicine, 13, 275–281.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., Wood, M., & Hawkins, C. (2005). The nonspread of innovations: The mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 117–134.CrossRef Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., Wood, M., & Hawkins, C. (2005). The nonspread of innovations: The mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 117–134.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Frink, D. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (1998). Toward a theory of accountability in organizations and human resource management. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 16, pp. 39–52). Greenwich: JAI Press. Frink, D. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (1998). Toward a theory of accountability in organizations and human resource management. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 16, pp. 39–52). Greenwich: JAI Press.
9.
go back to reference Harrison, S., & Ahmad, W. I. U. (2000). Medical autonomy and the UK state 1975 to 2025. Sociology, 34, 129–146. Harrison, S., & Ahmad, W. I. U. (2000). Medical autonomy and the UK state 1975 to 2025. Sociology, 34, 129–146.
10.
go back to reference Heinemann, G. D., & Zeiss, A. M. (Eds.). (2002). Team performance in health care. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Heinemann, G. D., & Zeiss, A. M. (Eds.). (2002). Team performance in health care. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11.
go back to reference Hudson, B. (2002). Interprofessionality in health and social care: The Achilles’ heel of partnership? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 16, 7–17.PubMedCrossRef Hudson, B. (2002). Interprofessionality in health and social care: The Achilles’ heel of partnership? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 16, 7–17.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Leipzig, R. M., Hyer, K., Ek, K., et al. (2002). Attitudes toward working on interdisciplinary healthcare teams: A comparison by discipline. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50, 1141–1148.PubMedCrossRef Leipzig, R. M., Hyer, K., Ek, K., et al. (2002). Attitudes toward working on interdisciplinary healthcare teams: A comparison by discipline. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50, 1141–1148.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rafferty, A. M., Ball, J., & Aiken, L. H. (2001). Are teamwork and professional autonomy compatible, and do they result in improved hospital care? Quality in Health care, 10, 32–37. Rafferty, A. M., Ball, J., & Aiken, L. H. (2001). Are teamwork and professional autonomy compatible, and do they result in improved hospital care? Quality in Health care, 10, 32–37.
14.
go back to reference Ruhstaller, T., Roe, H., Thurlimann, B., & Nicoll, J. J. (2006). The multidisciplinary meeting: an indispensable aid to communication between different specialties. European Journal of Cancer, 42, 2459–2462.PubMedCrossRef Ruhstaller, T., Roe, H., Thurlimann, B., & Nicoll, J. J. (2006). The multidisciplinary meeting: an indispensable aid to communication between different specialties. European Journal of Cancer, 42, 2459–2462.PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
go back to reference Wood, R. E. (1986). Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decisions Processes, 37, 60–82.CrossRef Wood, R. E. (1986). Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decisions Processes, 37, 60–82.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
How Health Care Complexity Leads to Cooperation and Affects the Autonomy of Health Care Professionals
Authors
Eric Molleman
Manda Broekhuis
Renee Stoffels
Frans Jaspers
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Health Care Analysis / Issue 4/2008
Print ISSN: 1065-3058
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3394
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-007-0080-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2008

Health Care Analysis 4/2008 Go to the issue