Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Familial Cancer 3/2020

01-07-2020 | Ovarian Cancer | Short Communication

Analysis of 3297 individuals suggests that the pathogenic germline 5′-UTR variant BRCA1 c.-107A > T is not common in south-east Germany

Authors: A. Laner, A. Benet-Pages, B. Neitzel, E. Holinski-Feder

Published in: Familial Cancer | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

In this study we aim to determine the prevalence of the recently identified pathogenic BRCA1 variant c.-107A > T in the south-east German population. This variant causes the epigenetic silencing of the BRCA1 promotor and has been detected in two independent families from the UK without a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant. A total of 3297 individuals with suspicion of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and fulfilling the clinical criteria necessary for genetic testing in Germany were analyzed for presence of the variant by a Kompetitive Allele-Specific PCR (KASP) assay or direct Sanger sequencing. Since we did not detect an individual carrying the variant we conclude that BRCA1 c.-107A > T is not a common variant in the south-east German population.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2013) Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 63:11–30CrossRef Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2013) Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 63:11–30CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Eccles SA, Aboagye EO, Ali S, Anderson AS et al (2013) Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 15:R92CrossRef Eccles SA, Aboagye EO, Ali S, Anderson AS et al (2013) Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 15:R92CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mavaddat N, Michailidou K, Dennis J et al (2019) Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer and breast cancer subtypes. Am J Hum Genet 104(1):21–34CrossRef Mavaddat N, Michailidou K, Dennis J et al (2019) Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer and breast cancer subtypes. Am J Hum Genet 104(1):21–34CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Turnbull C, Rahman N (2008) Genetic predisposition to breast cancer: past, present, and future. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet 9:321–345CrossRef Turnbull C, Rahman N (2008) Genetic predisposition to breast cancer: past, present, and future. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet 9:321–345CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tutt A, Robson M, Garber JE, Domchek SM, Audeh MW, Weitzel JN, Friedlander M, Arun B, Loman N, Schmutzler RK et al (2010) Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: A proof-of-concept trial. Lancet 376:235–244CrossRef Tutt A, Robson M, Garber JE, Domchek SM, Audeh MW, Weitzel JN, Friedlander M, Arun B, Loman N, Schmutzler RK et al (2010) Oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: A proof-of-concept trial. Lancet 376:235–244CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Byers H, Wallis Y, van Veen EM, Lalloo F, Reay K, Smith P, Wallace AJ, Bowers N, Newman WG, Evans DG (2016) Sensitivity of BRCA1/2 testing in high-risk breast/ovarian/male breast cancer families: little contribution of comprehensive RNA/NGS panel testing. Eur J Hum Genet 24:1591–1597CrossRef Byers H, Wallis Y, van Veen EM, Lalloo F, Reay K, Smith P, Wallace AJ, Bowers N, Newman WG, Evans DG (2016) Sensitivity of BRCA1/2 testing in high-risk breast/ovarian/male breast cancer families: little contribution of comprehensive RNA/NGS panel testing. Eur J Hum Genet 24:1591–1597CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Palma MD, Domchek SM, Stopfer J, Erlichman J, Siegfried JD, Tigges-Cardwell J, Mason BA, Rebbeck TR, Nathanson KL (2008) The relative contribution of point mutations and genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in high-risk breast cancer families. Cancer Res 68:7006–7014CrossRef Palma MD, Domchek SM, Stopfer J, Erlichman J, Siegfried JD, Tigges-Cardwell J, Mason BA, Rebbeck TR, Nathanson KL (2008) The relative contribution of point mutations and genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in high-risk breast cancer families. Cancer Res 68:7006–7014CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Evans DGR, van Veen EM, Byers HJ, Wallace AJ, Ellingford JM, Beaman G, Santoyo-Lopez J, Aitman TJ, Eccles DM, Lalloo FI, Smith MJ, Newman WG (2018) A dominantly inherited 5′ UTR variant causing methylation-associated silencing of BRCA1 as a cause of breast and ovarian cancer. Am J Hum Genet 103(2):213–220CrossRef Evans DGR, van Veen EM, Byers HJ, Wallace AJ, Ellingford JM, Beaman G, Santoyo-Lopez J, Aitman TJ, Eccles DM, Lalloo FI, Smith MJ, Newman WG (2018) A dominantly inherited 5′ UTR variant causing methylation-associated silencing of BRCA1 as a cause of breast and ovarian cancer. Am J Hum Genet 103(2):213–220CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kast K, Rhiem K, Wappenschmidt B et al (2016) Prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline mutations in 21 401 families with breast and ovarian cancer. J Med Genet 53:465–471CrossRef Kast K, Rhiem K, Wappenschmidt B et al (2016) Prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline mutations in 21 401 families with breast and ovarian cancer. J Med Genet 53:465–471CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Grabowski M, Mueller-Koch Y, Grasbon-Frodl E, Koehler U et al (2005) Deletions account for 17% of pathogenic germline alterations in MLH1 and MSH2 in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families. Genet Test 9(2):138–146CrossRef Grabowski M, Mueller-Koch Y, Grasbon-Frodl E, Koehler U et al (2005) Deletions account for 17% of pathogenic germline alterations in MLH1 and MSH2 in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families. Genet Test 9(2):138–146CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Analysis of 3297 individuals suggests that the pathogenic germline 5′-UTR variant BRCA1 c.-107A > T is not common in south-east Germany
Authors
A. Laner
A. Benet-Pages
B. Neitzel
E. Holinski-Feder
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Familial Cancer / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-020-00175-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Familial Cancer 3/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine