Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Familial Cancer 3/2013

01-09-2013 | Original Article

Preparing individuals to communicate genetic test results to their relatives: report of a randomized control trial

Authors: Susan V. Montgomery, Andrea M. Barsevick, Brian L. Egleston, Ruth Bingler, Karen Ruth, Suzanne M. Miller, John Malick, Terrence P. Cescon, Mary B. Daly

Published in: Familial Cancer | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

This study reports a randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of an intervention to prepare individuals to communicate BRCA1/BRCA2 results to family members. Women aged 18 years and older, who had genetic testing, and who had adult first-degree relatives, were randomly assigned to a communication skills-building intervention or a wellness control session. Primary outcomes were the percentage of probands sharing test results, and the level of distress associated with sharing. The ability of the theory of planned behavior variables to predict the outcomes was explored. Four hundred twenty-two women were enrolled in the study, 219 (intervention) and 203 (control). Data from 137 in the intervention group and 112 in the control group were analyzed. Two hundred forty-nine probands shared test results with 838 relatives (80.1 %). There were no significant differences between study groups in the primary outcomes. Combining data from both arms revealed that perceived control and specific social influence were associated with sharing. Probands were more likely to share genetic test results with their children, female relatives and relatives who they perceived had a favorable opinion about learning the results. The communication skills intervention did not impact sharing of test results. The proband’s perception of her relative’s opinion of genetic testing and her sense of control in relaying this information influenced sharing. Communication of test results is selective, with male relatives and parents less likely to be informed. Prevalent psychosocial factors play a role in the communication of genetic test results within families.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Society of Clinical Oncology (2003) Policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 21:2397–2406CrossRef American Society of Clinical Oncology (2003) Policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 21:2397–2406CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Patenaude AF, Dorval M, DiGianni LS, Schneider KA, Chittenden A, Garber JE (2006) Sharing BRCA1/2 test results with first-degree relatives: factors predicting who women tell. J Clin Oncol 24:700–706PubMedCrossRef Patenaude AF, Dorval M, DiGianni LS, Schneider KA, Chittenden A, Garber JE (2006) Sharing BRCA1/2 test results with first-degree relatives: factors predicting who women tell. J Clin Oncol 24:700–706PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wilson BJ, Forrest K, van Teijlingen ER et al (2004) Family communication about genetic risk: the little that is known. Community Genet 7:15–24PubMedCrossRef Wilson BJ, Forrest K, van Teijlingen ER et al (2004) Family communication about genetic risk: the little that is known. Community Genet 7:15–24PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference McKinnon W, Naud S, Ashikaga T, Colletti R, Wood M (2007) Results of an intervention for individuals and families with BRCA mutations: a model for providing medical updates and psychosocial support following genetic testing. J Genet Couns 16:433–456PubMedCrossRef McKinnon W, Naud S, Ashikaga T, Colletti R, Wood M (2007) Results of an intervention for individuals and families with BRCA mutations: a model for providing medical updates and psychosocial support following genetic testing. J Genet Couns 16:433–456PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Smith KR, West JA, Croyle RT, Botkin JR (1999) Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: moderating effect of siblings’ test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:385–392PubMed Smith KR, West JA, Croyle RT, Botkin JR (1999) Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: moderating effect of siblings’ test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:385–392PubMed
6.
go back to reference Green J, Richards M, Murton F, Statham H, Hallowell N (1997) Family communication and genetic counseling: the case of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. J Genet Couns 6:45–60CrossRef Green J, Richards M, Murton F, Statham H, Hallowell N (1997) Family communication and genetic counseling: the case of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. J Genet Couns 6:45–60CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Landsbergen K, Verhaak C, Kraaimaat F, Hoogerbrugge N (2005) Genetic uptake in BRCA-mutation families is related to emotional and behavioral communication characteristics of index patients. Fam Cancer 4:115–119PubMedCrossRef Landsbergen K, Verhaak C, Kraaimaat F, Hoogerbrugge N (2005) Genetic uptake in BRCA-mutation families is related to emotional and behavioral communication characteristics of index patients. Fam Cancer 4:115–119PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hughes C, Lerman C, Schwartz M et al (2002) All in the family: evaluation of the process and content of sisters’ communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results. Am J Med Genet 107:143–150PubMedCrossRef Hughes C, Lerman C, Schwartz M et al (2002) All in the family: evaluation of the process and content of sisters’ communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results. Am J Med Genet 107:143–150PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Julian-Reynier C, Eisinger F, Chabal F et al (2000) Disclosure to the family of breast/ovarian cancer genetic test results: patient’s willingness and associated factors. Am J Med Genet 94:13–18PubMedCrossRef Julian-Reynier C, Eisinger F, Chabal F et al (2000) Disclosure to the family of breast/ovarian cancer genetic test results: patient’s willingness and associated factors. Am J Med Genet 94:13–18PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tercyak KP, Lerman C, Peshkin BN et al (2001) Effects of coping style and BRCA1 and BRCA2 test results on anxiety among women participating in genetic counseling and testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk. Health Psychol 20:217–222PubMedCrossRef Tercyak KP, Lerman C, Peshkin BN et al (2001) Effects of coping style and BRCA1 and BRCA2 test results on anxiety among women participating in genetic counseling and testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk. Health Psychol 20:217–222PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kodl MM, Lee JW, Matthews AK, Cummings SA, Olopade OI (2006) Correlates of depressive symptoms among women seeking cancer genetic counseling and risk assessment at a high-risk cancer clinic. J Genet Couns 15:267–276PubMedCrossRef Kodl MM, Lee JW, Matthews AK, Cummings SA, Olopade OI (2006) Correlates of depressive symptoms among women seeking cancer genetic counseling and risk assessment at a high-risk cancer clinic. J Genet Couns 15:267–276PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Koehly LM, Peterson SK, Watts BG, Kempf KK, Vernon SW, Gritz ER (2003) A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:304–313PubMed Koehly LM, Peterson SK, Watts BG, Kempf KK, Vernon SW, Gritz ER (2003) A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:304–313PubMed
13.
go back to reference Peterson SK (2005) The role of the family in genetic testing: theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions. Health Educ Behav 32:627–639PubMedCrossRef Peterson SK (2005) The role of the family in genetic testing: theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions. Health Educ Behav 32:627–639PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference MacDonald DJ, Sarna L, Uman GC, Grant M, Weitzel JN (2006) Cancer screening and risk-reducing behaviors of women seeking genetic cancer risk assessment for breast and ovarian cancers. Oncol Nurs Forum 33:E27–E35PubMedCrossRef MacDonald DJ, Sarna L, Uman GC, Grant M, Weitzel JN (2006) Cancer screening and risk-reducing behaviors of women seeking genetic cancer risk assessment for breast and ovarian cancers. Oncol Nurs Forum 33:E27–E35PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Barsevick AM, Montgomery SV, Ruth K et al (2008) Intention to communicate BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic test results to the family. J Fam Psychol 22:303–312PubMedCrossRef Barsevick AM, Montgomery SV, Ruth K et al (2008) Intention to communicate BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic test results to the family. J Fam Psychol 22:303–312PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Buckman R (1992) How to break bad news, a guide for health care professionals. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore Buckman R (1992) How to break bad news, a guide for health care professionals. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
17.
go back to reference Daly MB, Barsevick A, Miller SM et al (2001) Communicating genetic test results to the family: a six-step, skills-building strategy. Fam Community Health 24:13–26PubMedCrossRef Daly MB, Barsevick A, Miller SM et al (2001) Communicating genetic test results to the family: a six-step, skills-building strategy. Fam Community Health 24:13–26PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ajzen A, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs Ajzen A, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
19.
go back to reference Ajzen I (2002) Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, focus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 32:665–683CrossRef Ajzen I (2002) Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, focus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 32:665–683CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lierman LM, Young HM, Kasprzyk D, Benoliel JQ (1990) Predicting breast self-examination using the theory of reasoned action. Nurs Res 39:97–101PubMedCrossRef Lierman LM, Young HM, Kasprzyk D, Benoliel JQ (1990) Predicting breast self-examination using the theory of reasoned action. Nurs Res 39:97–101PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Park HS, Smith SW (2007) Distinctiveness and influence of subjective norms, personal descriptive and injunctive norms, and societal descriptive and injunctive norms on behavioral intent: a case of two behaviors critical to organ donation. Hum Commun Res 33:194–218 Park HS, Smith SW (2007) Distinctiveness and influence of subjective norms, personal descriptive and injunctive norms, and societal descriptive and injunctive norms on behavioral intent: a case of two behaviors critical to organ donation. Hum Commun Res 33:194–218
22.
go back to reference Weiss D, Marmar C (1997) Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD—the impact of event scale-revised. Guildford, New York Weiss D, Marmar C (1997) Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD—the impact of event scale-revised. Guildford, New York
23.
go back to reference Miller SM (1987) Monitoring and blunting: validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. J Pers Soc Psychol 52:345–353PubMedCrossRef Miller SM (1987) Monitoring and blunting: validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. J Pers Soc Psychol 52:345–353PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Eaton W, Smith C, Ybarra M, Muntaner C, Tien A (2004) The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah Eaton W, Smith C, Ybarra M, Muntaner C, Tien A (2004) The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah
25.
go back to reference Finlay E, Stopfer JE, Burlingame E et al (2008) Factors determining dissemination of results and uptake of genetic testing in families with known BRCA1/2 mutations. Genet Test 12:81–91PubMedCrossRef Finlay E, Stopfer JE, Burlingame E et al (2008) Factors determining dissemination of results and uptake of genetic testing in families with known BRCA1/2 mutations. Genet Test 12:81–91PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference McGivern B, Everett J, Yager GG, Baumiller RC, Hafertepen A, Saal HM (2004) Family communication about positive BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results. Genet Med 6:503–509PubMedCrossRef McGivern B, Everett J, Yager GG, Baumiller RC, Hafertepen A, Saal HM (2004) Family communication about positive BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results. Genet Med 6:503–509PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Roshanai AH, Rosenquist R, Lampic C, Nordin K (2009) Does enhanced information at cancer genetic counseling improve counselees’ knowledge, risk percetion, satisfaction and negotiation of information to at-risk relatives? Acta Oncol 48:999–1009PubMedCrossRef Roshanai AH, Rosenquist R, Lampic C, Nordin K (2009) Does enhanced information at cancer genetic counseling improve counselees’ knowledge, risk percetion, satisfaction and negotiation of information to at-risk relatives? Acta Oncol 48:999–1009PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Forrest LE, Curnow L, Delatycki MB, Skene L, Aitken MA (2008) Health first, genetics second: exploring families’ experiences of communicating genetic information. Eur J Hum Genet 16:1329–1335PubMedCrossRef Forrest LE, Curnow L, Delatycki MB, Skene L, Aitken MA (2008) Health first, genetics second: exploring families’ experiences of communicating genetic information. Eur J Hum Genet 16:1329–1335PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Nycum G, Avard D, Knoppers BM (2009) Factors influencing intrafamilial communication of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic information. Eur J Hum Genet 17(7):872–880PubMedCrossRef Nycum G, Avard D, Knoppers BM (2009) Factors influencing intrafamilial communication of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genetic information. Eur J Hum Genet 17(7):872–880PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Afifi WA, Morgan SE, Stephenson MT et al (2006) Examining the decision to talk with family about organ donation: applying theory of motivated information management. Commun Monogr 73:188–215CrossRef Afifi WA, Morgan SE, Stephenson MT et al (2006) Examining the decision to talk with family about organ donation: applying theory of motivated information management. Commun Monogr 73:188–215CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Jennings-Dozier K (1999) Predicting intentions to obtain a pap smear among African American and Latina women: testing the theory of planned behavior. Nurs Res 48:198–205PubMedCrossRef Jennings-Dozier K (1999) Predicting intentions to obtain a pap smear among African American and Latina women: testing the theory of planned behavior. Nurs Res 48:198–205PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Jemmott LS, Jemmott JB 3rd (1991) Applying the theory of reasoned action to AIDS risk behavior: condom use among black women. Nurs Res 40:228–234PubMedCrossRef Jemmott LS, Jemmott JB 3rd (1991) Applying the theory of reasoned action to AIDS risk behavior: condom use among black women. Nurs Res 40:228–234PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Nordin K, Bjork J, Berglund G (2004) Factors influencing intention to obtain a genetic test for a hereditary disease in an affected group and in the general public. Prev Med 39:1107–1114PubMedCrossRef Nordin K, Bjork J, Berglund G (2004) Factors influencing intention to obtain a genetic test for a hereditary disease in an affected group and in the general public. Prev Med 39:1107–1114PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Johnston DW, Johnston M, Pollard B, Kinmonth AL, Mant D (2004) Motivation is not enough: prediction of risk behavior following diagnosis of coronary heart disease from the theory of planned behavior. Health Psychol 23:533–538PubMedCrossRef Johnston DW, Johnston M, Pollard B, Kinmonth AL, Mant D (2004) Motivation is not enough: prediction of risk behavior following diagnosis of coronary heart disease from the theory of planned behavior. Health Psychol 23:533–538PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Tolma EL, Reininger BM, Ureda J, Evans A (2003) Cognitive motivations associated with screening mammography in Cyprus. Prev Med 36:363–373PubMedCrossRef Tolma EL, Reininger BM, Ureda J, Evans A (2003) Cognitive motivations associated with screening mammography in Cyprus. Prev Med 36:363–373PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Sheeran P, Conner M, Norman P (2001) Can the theory of planned behavior explain patterns of health behavior change? Health Psychol 20:12–19PubMedCrossRef Sheeran P, Conner M, Norman P (2001) Can the theory of planned behavior explain patterns of health behavior change? Health Psychol 20:12–19PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Armitage CJ, Norman P, Conner M (2002) Can the theory of planned behaviour mediate the effects of age, gender and multidimensional health locus of control? Br J Health Psychol 7:299–316PubMedCrossRef Armitage CJ, Norman P, Conner M (2002) Can the theory of planned behaviour mediate the effects of age, gender and multidimensional health locus of control? Br J Health Psychol 7:299–316PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Fishbein M, Ajzen I (2005) Theory-based behavior change interventions: comments on Hobbis and Sutton. J Health Psychol 10:27–31; discussion 7–43 Fishbein M, Ajzen I (2005) Theory-based behavior change interventions: comments on Hobbis and Sutton. J Health Psychol 10:27–31; discussion 7–43
39.
go back to reference Kuwabara SA, Van Voorhees BW, Gollan JK, Alexander GC (2007) A qualitative exploration of depression in emerging adulthood: disorder, development, and social context. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 29:317–324PubMedCrossRef Kuwabara SA, Van Voorhees BW, Gollan JK, Alexander GC (2007) A qualitative exploration of depression in emerging adulthood: disorder, development, and social context. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 29:317–324PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Smith M, Calam R, Bolton C (2009) Psychological factors linked to self-reported depression symptoms in late adolescence. Behav Cogn Psychother 37:73–85PubMedCrossRef Smith M, Calam R, Bolton C (2009) Psychological factors linked to self-reported depression symptoms in late adolescence. Behav Cogn Psychother 37:73–85PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Daly MB (2009) The impact of social roles on the experience of men in BRCA1/2 families: implications for counseling. J Genet Couns 18:42–48PubMedCrossRef Daly MB (2009) The impact of social roles on the experience of men in BRCA1/2 families: implications for counseling. J Genet Couns 18:42–48PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Cheung EL, Olson AD, Yu TM, Han PZ, Beattie MS (2010) Communication of BRCA results and family testing in 1,103 high-risk women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19(9):2211–2219PubMedCrossRef Cheung EL, Olson AD, Yu TM, Han PZ, Beattie MS (2010) Communication of BRCA results and family testing in 1,103 high-risk women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19(9):2211–2219PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Finlay E, Stopfer JE, Burlingame E (2008) Factors determining dissemination of results and uptake of genetic testing in families with known BRCA1/2 mutations. Genet Test 12(1):91–92CrossRef Finlay E, Stopfer JE, Burlingame E (2008) Factors determining dissemination of results and uptake of genetic testing in families with known BRCA1/2 mutations. Genet Test 12(1):91–92CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Vos J, Jansen AM, Menko F, van Asperen CJ, Stiggelbout AM, Tibben A (2011) Family communication matters: the impact of telling relatives about unclassified variants and uninformative DNA-test results. Genet Med 13(4):333–341PubMedCrossRef Vos J, Jansen AM, Menko F, van Asperen CJ, Stiggelbout AM, Tibben A (2011) Family communication matters: the impact of telling relatives about unclassified variants and uninformative DNA-test results. Genet Med 13(4):333–341PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preparing individuals to communicate genetic test results to their relatives: report of a randomized control trial
Authors
Susan V. Montgomery
Andrea M. Barsevick
Brian L. Egleston
Ruth Bingler
Karen Ruth
Suzanne M. Miller
John Malick
Terrence P. Cescon
Mary B. Daly
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Familial Cancer / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-013-9609-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Familial Cancer 3/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine