Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Familial Cancer 1/2012

01-03-2012 | Original Article

Uptake of a randomized breast cancer prevention trial comparing letrozole to placebo in BRCA1/2 mutations carriers: the LIBER trial

Authors: Pascal Pujol, Christine Lasset, Pascaline Berthet, Catherine Dugast, Suzette Delaloge, Jean-Pierre Fricker, Isabelle Tennevet, Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet, Pascale This, Karen Baudry, Jerome Lemonnier, Lise Roca, Sylvie Mijonnet, Paul Gesta, Jean Chiesa, Helene Dreyfus, Philippe Vennin, Capucine Delnatte, Yves Jean Bignon, Alain Lortholary, Fabienne Prieur, Laurence Gladieff, Anne Lesur, Krishna B. Clough, Catherine Nogues, Anne-Laure Martin, On behalf the French Federation of Cancer Centres (FNCLCC)

Published in: Familial Cancer | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Women with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations are considered as an extreme risk population for developing breast cancer. Prophylactic mastectomy provides a valid option to reduce such risk, impacting however, the quality of life. Medical prevention by aromatase inhibitor that has also recently shown to have preventive effect may thus be considered as an alternative. LIBER is an ongoing double-blind, randomized phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy of 5-year letrozole versus placebo to decrease breast cancer incidence in post-menopausal BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (NCT00673335). We present data on the uptake of this trial. We compared characteristics of women in the LIBER trial (n = 113) to those of women enrolled in the prospective ongoing national GENEPSO cohort (n = 1,505). Uptake was evaluated through a survey sent to all active centres, with responses obtained from 17 to the 20 (85%) centres. According to the characteristics of the women enrolled in the GENEPSO cohort and the survey, approximately one-third of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were eligible for the trial. Five hundred and thirty-four women eligible from chart review have been informed by mail about the prevention trial and were invited to an oral information by participating centres. Forty-four percentage of them came to the dedicated medical visit. Uptake of drug prevention trial was 32% among women informed orally and 15% of all the eligible women. The main reasons of refusal were: potential side effects, probability to receive the placebo and lack of support from their physicians. Additionally, we noticed that prior prophylactic oophorectomy and previous unilateral breast cancer were more frequent in women enrolled in the LIBER trial than in the French cohort (93% vs. 60% and 50% vs. 39%, respectively). Based on an overall 15% uptake among all eligible subjects, greater and wider information of the trial should be offered to women with BRCA1/2 mutation to improve recruitment. Women with previous unilateral breast cancer or prior prophylactic oophorectomy are more likely to enter a medical prevention trial.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Antoniou A et al (2003) Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1/2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 72(5):1117–1130PubMedCrossRef Antoniou A et al (2003) Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1/2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 72(5):1117–1130PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Robson M, Offit K (2007) Clinical practice. Management of an inherited predisposition to breast cancer. N Engl J Med 357(2):154–162PubMedCrossRef Robson M, Offit K (2007) Clinical practice. Management of an inherited predisposition to breast cancer. N Engl J Med 357(2):154–162PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB (2003) Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 302(5645):643–646PubMedCrossRef King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB (2003) Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 302(5645):643–646PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rebbeck TR et al (2004) Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE study group. J Clin Oncol 22(6):1055–1062PubMedCrossRef Rebbeck TR et al (2004) Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE study group. J Clin Oncol 22(6):1055–1062PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Klijn JEA (2004) Results of the extended series on prophylactic mastectomy versus surveillance in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in Rotterdam. Breast Cancer Res Treat 88(Suppl 1):10 Klijn JEA (2004) Results of the extended series on prophylactic mastectomy versus surveillance in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in Rotterdam. Breast Cancer Res Treat 88(Suppl 1):10
6.
go back to reference Meijers-Heijboer H et al (2001) Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1/2 mutation. N Engl J Med 345(3):159–164PubMedCrossRef Meijers-Heijboer H et al (2001) Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1/2 mutation. N Engl J Med 345(3):159–164PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Metcalfe KA, Semple JL, Narod SA (2005) Time to reconsider subcutaneous mastectomy for breast-cancer prevention. Lancet Oncol 6(6):431–434PubMedCrossRef Metcalfe KA, Semple JL, Narod SA (2005) Time to reconsider subcutaneous mastectomy for breast-cancer prevention. Lancet Oncol 6(6):431–434PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gahm J, Wickman M, Brandberg Y (2010) Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with inherited risk of breast cancer: prevalence of pain and discomfort, impact on sexuality, quality of life and feelings of regret 2 years after surgery. Breast 19(6):462–469PubMedCrossRef Gahm J, Wickman M, Brandberg Y (2010) Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with inherited risk of breast cancer: prevalence of pain and discomfort, impact on sexuality, quality of life and feelings of regret 2 years after surgery. Breast 19(6):462–469PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Brandberg Y et al (2008) Psychological reactions, quality of life, and body image after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer: a prospective 1-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 26(24):3943–3949PubMedCrossRef Brandberg Y et al (2008) Psychological reactions, quality of life, and body image after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer: a prospective 1-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 26(24):3943–3949PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Metcalfe KA et al (2008) International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Int J Cancer 122(9):2017–2022PubMedCrossRef Metcalfe KA et al (2008) International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Int J Cancer 122(9):2017–2022PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Habermann EB et al (2010) Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol 28(21):3437–3441PubMedCrossRef Habermann EB et al (2010) Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol 28(21):3437–3441PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tuttle TM et al (2010) The increasing use of prophylactic mastectomy in the prevention of breast cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 12(1):16–21PubMedCrossRef Tuttle TM et al (2010) The increasing use of prophylactic mastectomy in the prevention of breast cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 12(1):16–21PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference McLaughlin CC, Lillquist PP, Edge SB (2005) Surveillance of prophylactic mastectomy: trends in use from 1995 to 2005. Cancer 115(23):5404–5412CrossRef McLaughlin CC, Lillquist PP, Edge SB (2005) Surveillance of prophylactic mastectomy: trends in use from 1995 to 2005. Cancer 115(23):5404–5412CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wood WC (2009) Should the use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy be increasing as it is? Breast 18(Suppl 3):S93–S95PubMedCrossRef Wood WC (2009) Should the use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy be increasing as it is? Breast 18(Suppl 3):S93–S95PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference King MC et al (2001) Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project (NSABP-P1) breast cancer prevention trial. JAMA 286(18):2251–2256PubMedCrossRef King MC et al (2001) Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project (NSABP-P1) breast cancer prevention trial. JAMA 286(18):2251–2256PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Metcalfe KA (2009) Oophorectomy for breast cancer prevention in women with BRCA1/2 mutations. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 5(1):63–68CrossRef Metcalfe KA (2009) Oophorectomy for breast cancer prevention in women with BRCA1/2 mutations. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 5(1):63–68CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Domchek SM, Rebbeck TR (2007) Prophylactic oophorectomy in women at increased cancer risk. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19(1):27–30PubMedCrossRef Domchek SM, Rebbeck TR (2007) Prophylactic oophorectomy in women at increased cancer risk. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19(1):27–30PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kauff ND, Barakat RR (2007) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in patients with germline mutations in BRCA1/2. J Clin Oncol 25(20):2921–2927PubMedCrossRef Kauff ND, Barakat RR (2007) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in patients with germline mutations in BRCA1/2. J Clin Oncol 25(20):2921–2927PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Noruzinia M, Coupier I, Pujol P (2005) Is BRCA1/2-related breast carcinogenesis estrogen dependent? Cancer 104(8):1567–1574PubMedCrossRef Noruzinia M, Coupier I, Pujol P (2005) Is BRCA1/2-related breast carcinogenesis estrogen dependent? Cancer 104(8):1567–1574PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rebbeck TR, Kauff ND, Domchek SM (2009) Meta-analysis of risk reduction estimates associated with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 101(2):80–87PubMedCrossRef Rebbeck TR, Kauff ND, Domchek SM (2009) Meta-analysis of risk reduction estimates associated with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 101(2):80–87PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Jones LP et al (2008) Activation of estrogen signaling pathways collaborates with loss of BRCA1 to promote development of ER alpha-negative and ER alpha-positive mammary preneoplasia and cancer. Oncogene 27(6):794–802PubMedCrossRef Jones LP et al (2008) Activation of estrogen signaling pathways collaborates with loss of BRCA1 to promote development of ER alpha-negative and ER alpha-positive mammary preneoplasia and cancer. Oncogene 27(6):794–802PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fisher B et al (2005) Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: current status of the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(22):1652–1662PubMedCrossRef Fisher B et al (2005) Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: current status of the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(22):1652–1662PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Powles TJ et al (2007) Twenty-year follow-up of the royal Marsden randomized, double-blinded tamoxifen breast cancer prevention trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 9(4):283–290 Powles TJ et al (2007) Twenty-year follow-up of the royal Marsden randomized, double-blinded tamoxifen breast cancer prevention trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 9(4):283–290
24.
go back to reference Cummings SR et al (1999) The effect of raloxifene on risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: results from the MORE randomized trial. Multiple outcomes of raloxifene evaluation. JAMA 281(23):2189–2197PubMedCrossRef Cummings SR et al (1999) The effect of raloxifene on risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: results from the MORE randomized trial. Multiple outcomes of raloxifene evaluation. JAMA 281(23):2189–2197PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Vogel VG et al (2010) Update of the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project study of tamoxifen and raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial: preventing breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 3(6):696–706CrossRef Vogel VG et al (2010) Update of the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project study of tamoxifen and raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial: preventing breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 3(6):696–706CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Cuzick J et al (2007) Long-term results of tamoxifen prophylaxis for breast cancer: 96-month follow-up of the randomized IBIS-I trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(4):272–282PubMedCrossRef Cuzick J et al (2007) Long-term results of tamoxifen prophylaxis for breast cancer: 96-month follow-up of the randomized IBIS-I trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(4):272–282PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Jordan VC (2007) Chemoprevention of breast cancer with selective oestrogen-receptor modulators. Nat Rev Cancer 7(1):46–53PubMedCrossRef Jordan VC (2007) Chemoprevention of breast cancer with selective oestrogen-receptor modulators. Nat Rev Cancer 7(1):46–53PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Veronesi U et al (2007) Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: late results of the Italian randomized tamoxifen prevention trial among women with hysterectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(9):727–737PubMedCrossRef Veronesi U et al (2007) Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: late results of the Italian randomized tamoxifen prevention trial among women with hysterectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(9):727–737PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ropka ME, Keim J, Philbrick JT (2010) Patient decisions about breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 28:3090–3095PubMedCrossRef Ropka ME, Keim J, Philbrick JT (2010) Patient decisions about breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 28:3090–3095PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Waters WA, Cronin KA, Graubard BI, Han PK, Freedman AN (2010) Prevalence of tamoxifen use for breast cancer chemoprevention among US women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:443–446PubMedCrossRef Waters WA, Cronin KA, Graubard BI, Han PK, Freedman AN (2010) Prevalence of tamoxifen use for breast cancer chemoprevention among US women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:443–446PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Dowsett M et al (2010) Meta-analysis of breast cancer outcomes in adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen. J Clin Oncol 28(3):509–518PubMedCrossRef Dowsett M et al (2010) Meta-analysis of breast cancer outcomes in adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen. J Clin Oncol 28(3):509–518PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Goss PE et al (2007) National cancer institute of Canada clinical trials group MAP.3 trial: evaluation of exemestane to prevent breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Clin Breast Cancer 7(11):895–900PubMedCrossRef Goss PE et al (2007) National cancer institute of Canada clinical trials group MAP.3 trial: evaluation of exemestane to prevent breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Clin Breast Cancer 7(11):895–900PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Cuzick J (2008) IBIS II: a breast cancer prevention trial in postmenopausal women using the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 8(9):1377–1385PubMedCrossRef Cuzick J (2008) IBIS II: a breast cancer prevention trial in postmenopausal women using the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 8(9):1377–1385PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Goss PE, Ingle JN, Alés-Martínez JE, Cheung AM, Chlebowski RT, Wactawski-Wende J, McTiernan A, Robbins J, Johnson KC, Martin LW, Winquist E, Sarto GE, Garber JE, Fabian CJ, Pujol P, Maunsell E, Farmer P, Gelmon KA, Tu D, Richardson H, NCIC CTG MAP.3 Study Investigators (2011) Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 364(25):2381–2391PubMedCrossRef Goss PE, Ingle JN, Alés-Martínez JE, Cheung AM, Chlebowski RT, Wactawski-Wende J, McTiernan A, Robbins J, Johnson KC, Martin LW, Winquist E, Sarto GE, Garber JE, Fabian CJ, Pujol P, Maunsell E, Farmer P, Gelmon KA, Tu D, Richardson H, NCIC CTG MAP.3 Study Investigators (2011) Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 364(25):2381–2391PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Lecarpentier J, Noguès C, Mouret-Fourme E, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Lasset C, Caron O, Fricker JP, Gladieff L, Faivre L, Sobol H, Gesta P, Frenay M, Luporsi E, Coupier I (2011) Variation in breast cancer risk with mutation position, smoking, alcohol, and chest X-ray history, in the French national BRCA1/2 carrier cohort (GENEPSO). GENEPSO, Lidereau R, Andrieu N. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jul 15 (epub ahead of print) Lecarpentier J, Noguès C, Mouret-Fourme E, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Lasset C, Caron O, Fricker JP, Gladieff L, Faivre L, Sobol H, Gesta P, Frenay M, Luporsi E, Coupier I (2011) Variation in breast cancer risk with mutation position, smoking, alcohol, and chest X-ray history, in the French national BRCA1/2 carrier cohort (GENEPSO). GENEPSO, Lidereau R, Andrieu N. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jul 15 (epub ahead of print)
36.
go back to reference Cuzick J et al (2003) Overview of the main outcomes in breast-cancer prevention trials. Lancet 361(9354):296–300PubMedCrossRef Cuzick J et al (2003) Overview of the main outcomes in breast-cancer prevention trials. Lancet 361(9354):296–300PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Evans D et al (2001) Uptake of screening and prevention in women at very high risk of breast cancer. Lancet 358(9285):889–890PubMedCrossRef Evans D et al (2001) Uptake of screening and prevention in women at very high risk of breast cancer. Lancet 358(9285):889–890PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Evans DG, Harvie M, Bundred N, Howell A (2010) Uptake of breast cancer prevention and screening trials. J Med Genet 47(12):853–855. Epub 2010 Oct 23PubMedCrossRef Evans DG, Harvie M, Bundred N, Howell A (2010) Uptake of breast cancer prevention and screening trials. J Med Genet 47(12):853–855. Epub 2010 Oct 23PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Graeser MK et al (2009) Contralateral breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 27(35):5887–5892PubMedCrossRef Graeser MK et al (2009) Contralateral breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 27(35):5887–5892PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Geisler J, Lonning PE (2010) Impact of aromatase inhibitors on bone health in breast cancer patients. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 118(4–5):294–299PubMedCrossRef Geisler J, Lonning PE (2010) Impact of aromatase inhibitors on bone health in breast cancer patients. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 118(4–5):294–299PubMedCrossRef
41.
Metadata
Title
Uptake of a randomized breast cancer prevention trial comparing letrozole to placebo in BRCA1/2 mutations carriers: the LIBER trial
Authors
Pascal Pujol
Christine Lasset
Pascaline Berthet
Catherine Dugast
Suzette Delaloge
Jean-Pierre Fricker
Isabelle Tennevet
Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet
Pascale This
Karen Baudry
Jerome Lemonnier
Lise Roca
Sylvie Mijonnet
Paul Gesta
Jean Chiesa
Helene Dreyfus
Philippe Vennin
Capucine Delnatte
Yves Jean Bignon
Alain Lortholary
Fabienne Prieur
Laurence Gladieff
Anne Lesur
Krishna B. Clough
Catherine Nogues
Anne-Laure Martin
On behalf the French Federation of Cancer Centres (FNCLCC)
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Familial Cancer / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-011-9484-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Familial Cancer 1/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine