Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology 2/2020

01-02-2020 | CORRESPONDENCE

On the relationship of machine learning with causal inference

Authors: Sheng-Hsuan Lin, Mohammad Arfan Ikram

Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

There is rapid emergence of increasingly sophisticated informatics being applied in biomedical research. Machine learning is a collection of algorithms (including deep neural network learning, support vector machine, random forest, and super learning which integrates all above algorithms) often used in informatics and has been successfully applied in clinical decision making, diagnosis, and image identification [1, 2]. Given its success in these areas, there is great anticipation that a similarly impressive impact is to be expected in explanatory research, the area of research focused on identifying and understanding causes of disease. However, application of machine learning in explanatory research is not straightforward and might lead to misinterpretations [3]. Efforts are ongoing to develop an appropriate theoretical context for integrating machine learning with explanatory research [4]. In this Letter, we outline the fundamental differences between predictive research and explanatory research and summarize challenges and possibilities of applying machine learning in explanatory research. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Naimi AI, Balzer LB. Stacked generalization: an introduction to super learning. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(5):459–64.CrossRef Naimi AI, Balzer LB. Stacked generalization: an introduction to super learning. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(5):459–64.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Breiman L. Stacked regressions. Mach Learn. 1996;24(1):49–64. Breiman L. Stacked regressions. Mach Learn. 1996;24(1):49–64.
3.
go back to reference Keil AP, Edwards JK. You are smarter than you think: (super) machine learning in context. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(5):437–40.CrossRef Keil AP, Edwards JK. You are smarter than you think: (super) machine learning in context. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(5):437–40.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Van der Laan MJ, Rose S. Targeted learning: causal inference for observational and experimental data. Berlin: Springer; 2011.CrossRef Van der Laan MJ, Rose S. Targeted learning: causal inference for observational and experimental data. Berlin: Springer; 2011.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference VanderWeele TJ. Principles of confounder selection. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34(3):211–9.CrossRef VanderWeele TJ. Principles of confounder selection. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34(3):211–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ikram MA. The disjunctive cause criterion by VanderWeele: an easy solution to a complex problem? Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34(3):223–4.CrossRef Ikram MA. The disjunctive cause criterion by VanderWeele: an easy solution to a complex problem? Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34(3):223–4.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schneeweiss S. Theory meets practice: a commentary on VanderWeele’s ‘principles of confounder selection’. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34(3):221–2.CrossRef Schneeweiss S. Theory meets practice: a commentary on VanderWeele’s ‘principles of confounder selection’. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34(3):221–2.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
On the relationship of machine learning with causal inference
Authors
Sheng-Hsuan Lin
Mohammad Arfan Ikram
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00564-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

European Journal of Epidemiology 2/2020 Go to the issue