Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology 6/2017

01-06-2017 | NEW STUDY

A randomized trial of early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (ProScreen): study design and rationale

Authors: Anssi Auvinen, Antti Rannikko, Kimmo Taari, Paula Kujala, Tuomas Mirtti, Anu Kenttämies, Irina Rinta-Kiikka, Terho Lehtimäki, Niku Oksala, Kim Pettersson, Teuvo L. Tammela

Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The current evidence of PSA-based prostate cancer screening shows a reduction in cause-specific mortality, but with substantial overdiagnosis. Recently, new developments in detection of clinically relevant prostate cancer include multiple kallikreins as biomarkers besides PSA, and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for biopsy decision. They offer opportunities for improving the outcomes in screening, particularly reduction in overdiagnosis and higher specificity for potentially lethal cancer. A population-based randomized screening trial will be started, with 67,000 men aged 55–67 years at entry. A quarter of the men will be allocated to the intervention arm, and invited to screening. The control arm will receive no intervention. All men in the screening arm will be offered a serum PSA determination. Those with PSA of 3 ng/ml or higher will have an additional multi-kallikrein panel and those with indications of increased risk of clinically relevant prostate cancer will undergo mpMRI. Men with a malignancy-suspect finding in MRI are referred to targeted biopsies. Screening interval is 6 years for men with baseline PSA < 1.5 ng/ml, 4 years with PSA 1.5–3.0 and 2 years if initial PSA > 3. The main outcome of the trial is prostate cancer mortality, with analysis at 10 and 15 years. The statistical power is sufficient for detecting a 28% reduction at 10 years and 22% at 15 years. The proposed study has the potential to provide the evidence to justify screening as a public health policy if mortality benefit can be sustained with substantially reduced overdiagnosis.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC cancerbase no. 11 [Internet]. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed 17 Jan 2017. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC cancerbase no. 11 [Internet]. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013. http://​globocan.​iarc.​fr. Accessed 17 Jan 2017.
3.
go back to reference Poulsen MH, Dysager L, Gerke O, Lund L. Trends in prostate cancer in elderly in Denmark 1980–2012. Acta Oncol. 2016;55(Suppl 1):74–8.CrossRefPubMed Poulsen MH, Dysager L, Gerke O, Lund L. Trends in prostate cancer in elderly in Denmark 1980–2012. Acta Oncol. 2016;55(Suppl 1):74–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Seikkula HA, Kaipia AJ, Rantanen ME, et al. Stage-specific mortality and survival trends in prostate cancer patients in Finland before and after introduction of PSA. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:971–7.CrossRefPubMed Seikkula HA, Kaipia AJ, Rantanen ME, et al. Stage-specific mortality and survival trends in prostate cancer patients in Finland before and after introduction of PSA. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:971–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Wu GH, Auvinen A, Määttänen L, et al. Number of screens for overdetection as an indicator of absolute risk of overdetection in cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:1367–76.CrossRefPubMed Wu GH, Auvinen A, Määttänen L, et al. Number of screens for overdetection as an indicator of absolute risk of overdetection in cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:1367–76.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Heijnsdijk EA, der Kinderen A, Wever EM, et al. Overdetection, overtreatment and cost sin prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:1833–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heijnsdijk EA, der Kinderen A, Wever EM, et al. Overdetection, overtreatment and cost sin prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:1833–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Etzioni R, Gulati R, Mallinger L, Mandelblatt J. Influence of study features and methods on overdiagnosis estimates in breast and prostate cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:831–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Etzioni R, Gulati R, Mallinger L, Mandelblatt J. Influence of study features and methods on overdiagnosis estimates in breast and prostate cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:831–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European trial at 13 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2014;384:2027–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European trial at 13 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2014;384:2027–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Beral V, Alexander M, Duffy S, et al. The number of women who would need to be screened regularly to prevent one death from breast cancer. J Med Screen. 2011;18:210–2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beral V, Alexander M, Duffy S, et al. The number of women who would need to be screened regularly to prevent one death from breast cancer. J Med Screen. 2011;18:210–2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Lin JS, Piper MA, Perdue LA, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US PSTF. JAMA. 2016;315:2576–94.CrossRefPubMed Lin JS, Piper MA, Perdue LA, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US PSTF. JAMA. 2016;315:2576–94.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Heijnsdijk EA, de Carvalho TM, Auvinen A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;107:366.PubMed Heijnsdijk EA, de Carvalho TM, Auvinen A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;107:366.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Lao C, Brown C, Rouse P, et al. Economic evaluation of prostate cancer screening: a systematic review. Future Oncol. 2015;11:467–77.CrossRefPubMed Lao C, Brown C, Rouse P, et al. Economic evaluation of prostate cancer screening: a systematic review. Future Oncol. 2015;11:467–77.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Parekh DJ, Punne S, Sjöberg DD, et al. A multi-institutional prospective trial in the USA confirms that the 4Kscore accurately identifies men with high-grade prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68:464–70.CrossRefPubMed Parekh DJ, Punne S, Sjöberg DD, et al. A multi-institutional prospective trial in the USA confirms that the 4Kscore accurately identifies men with high-grade prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68:464–70.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Carlsson S, Maschino M, Schröder FH, et al. Predictive value of four kallikrein markers for pathologically insignificant compared with aggressive prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;64:693–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carlsson S, Maschino M, Schröder FH, et al. Predictive value of four kallikrein markers for pathologically insignificant compared with aggressive prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;64:693–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Bryant RJ, Sjöberg DD, Vickers AJ, et al. Predicting high-grade cancer at ten-core biopsy using a four-kallikrein panel markers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107:djv095.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bryant RJ, Sjöberg DD, Vickers AJ, et al. Predicting high-grade cancer at ten-core biopsy using a four-kallikrein panel markers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107:djv095.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Braun K, Sjöberg DD, Vickers AJ, et al. A four-kallikrein panel predicts high-grade cancer on biopsy. Eur Urol. 2016;69:505–11.CrossRefPubMed Braun K, Sjöberg DD, Vickers AJ, et al. A four-kallikrein panel predicts high-grade cancer on biopsy. Eur Urol. 2016;69:505–11.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Nordström T, Vickers AJ, Assel M, et al. Comparison between the four-kallikrein panel and prostate health index for predicting prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68:139–46.CrossRefPubMed Nordström T, Vickers AJ, Assel M, et al. Comparison between the four-kallikrein panel and prostate health index for predicting prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68:139–46.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Fossati N, Buffi NM, Haese A, et al. Preoperative prostate-specific antigen isoform p2PSA and its derivatives, %p2PSA and prostate health index, predict pathologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68:132–8.CrossRefPubMed Fossati N, Buffi NM, Haese A, et al. Preoperative prostate-specific antigen isoform p2PSA and its derivatives, %p2PSA and prostate health index, predict pathologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68:132–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Schoots IG, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection: systematic review. Eur Urol. 2015;68:438–50.CrossRefPubMed Schoots IG, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection: systematic review. Eur Urol. 2015;68:438–50.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Fütterer JJ, Briganti A, de Visschere P, et al. Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2016;68:1045–53.CrossRef Fütterer JJ, Briganti A, de Visschere P, et al. Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2016;68:1045–53.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ahmed H, Bosaily AE, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS). Lancet. 2017;389:815–22.CrossRefPubMed Ahmed H, Bosaily AE, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS). Lancet. 2017;389:815–22.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Haider MA, Yao X, Loblaw A, Finelli A. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Clin Oncol. 2016;28:550–67.CrossRef Haider MA, Yao X, Loblaw A, Finelli A. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Clin Oncol. 2016;28:550–67.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Osses DF, van Asten JJ, Kieft GJ, Tijsterman JD. Prostate cancer detection rates of MRI-guided prostate biopsy related to PIRADs. World J Urol. 2017;35:207–12.CrossRefPubMed Osses DF, van Asten JJ, Kieft GJ, Tijsterman JD. Prostate cancer detection rates of MRI-guided prostate biopsy related to PIRADs. World J Urol. 2017;35:207–12.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Van der Kwast T, Bubendorf L, Mazerolles C, et al. Guidelines on processing and reporting of prostate biopsies: the 2013 update of the pathology committee of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Virchows Arch. 2013;463:367–77.CrossRefPubMed Van der Kwast T, Bubendorf L, Mazerolles C, et al. Guidelines on processing and reporting of prostate biopsies: the 2013 update of the pathology committee of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Virchows Arch. 2013;463:367–77.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Mäkinen T, Karhunen P, Aro J, et al. Assessment of causes of death in prostate cancer screening trial. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:413–7.CrossRefPubMed Mäkinen T, Karhunen P, Aro J, et al. Assessment of causes of death in prostate cancer screening trial. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:413–7.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Kilpeläinen TP, Mäkinen T, Karhunen PJ, et al. Estimating bias in causes of death in the Finnish Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;45:1–5.CrossRefPubMed Kilpeläinen TP, Mäkinen T, Karhunen PJ, et al. Estimating bias in causes of death in the Finnish Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;45:1–5.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Hakama M, Auvinen A, Day NE, Miller AB. Sensitivity in cancer screening. J Med Screen. 2007;14:174–7.CrossRefPubMed Hakama M, Auvinen A, Day NE, Miller AB. Sensitivity in cancer screening. J Med Screen. 2007;14:174–7.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Preston MA, Batista JL, Wilosn KM, et al. Baseline PSA levels in midlife predict lethal prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2705–11.CrossRefPubMed Preston MA, Batista JL, Wilosn KM, et al. Baseline PSA levels in midlife predict lethal prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2705–11.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Vickers AJ, Ulmert D, Sjöberg DD, et al. Strategy for detection of prostate cancer based on relation between PSA at age 40–55 and long-term risk of metastasis. BMJ. 2013;346:f2023.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vickers AJ, Ulmert D, Sjöberg DD, et al. Strategy for detection of prostate cancer based on relation between PSA at age 40–55 and long-term risk of metastasis. BMJ. 2013;346:f2023.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Pinsky PF, Prorok PC, Yu K, et al. Extended mortality results for prostate cancer screening in the PLCO trial with median follow-up of 15 years. Cancer. 2017;123:592–9.CrossRefPubMed Pinsky PF, Prorok PC, Yu K, et al. Extended mortality results for prostate cancer screening in the PLCO trial with median follow-up of 15 years. Cancer. 2017;123:592–9.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Kilpeläinen TP, Pogodin-Hannolainen D, Kemppainen K, et al. Estimate of opportunistic prostate specific antigen testing in the Finnish Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. J Urol 2017 (in press, E-publication). Kilpeläinen TP, Pogodin-Hannolainen D, Kemppainen K, et al. Estimate of opportunistic prostate specific antigen testing in the Finnish Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. J Urol 2017 (in press, E-publication).
36.
go back to reference Thestrup KC, Logager V, Baslev I, et al. Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Acta Radiol Open. 2016;5:2058460116663046.PubMedPubMedCentral Thestrup KC, Logager V, Baslev I, et al. Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Acta Radiol Open. 2016;5:2058460116663046.PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Roine A, Tolvanen M, Sipiläinen M, et al. Detection of smell print differences between non-malignant and malignant prostate cells with an electronic nose. Future Oncol. 2012;8:1157–65.CrossRefPubMed Roine A, Tolvanen M, Sipiläinen M, et al. Detection of smell print differences between non-malignant and malignant prostate cells with an electronic nose. Future Oncol. 2012;8:1157–65.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Roine A, Veskimäe E, Tuokko A, et al. Detection of prostate cancer by an electronic nose: a proof of principle study. J Urol. 2014;192:230–4.CrossRefPubMed Roine A, Veskimäe E, Tuokko A, et al. Detection of prostate cancer by an electronic nose: a proof of principle study. J Urol. 2014;192:230–4.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Kekki H, Peltola M, van Vliet S, et al. Improved specificity in PSA assay using Aleuria aurantia lectin coated Eu-nanoparticles for detection. Clin Biochem. 2017;50:54–61.CrossRefPubMed Kekki H, Peltola M, van Vliet S, et al. Improved specificity in PSA assay using Aleuria aurantia lectin coated Eu-nanoparticles for detection. Clin Biochem. 2017;50:54–61.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A randomized trial of early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (ProScreen): study design and rationale
Authors
Anssi Auvinen
Antti Rannikko
Kimmo Taari
Paula Kujala
Tuomas Mirtti
Anu Kenttämies
Irina Rinta-Kiikka
Terho Lehtimäki
Niku Oksala
Kim Pettersson
Teuvo L. Tammela
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-017-0292-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

European Journal of Epidemiology 6/2017 Go to the issue