Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology 6/2017

01-06-2017 | META-ANALYSIS

Diagnostic performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: meta-analysis and modeling

Authors: Tobias Niedermaier, Korbinian Weigl, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner

Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), which reliably detects neoplasms in the distal colon and rectum but not in the proximal colon, has been shown to reduce incidence and mortality of distal colorectal cancer (CRC). Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) detect the majority of CRCs and some proportion of adenomas also in the proximal colon. We assessed the expected diagnostic performance of combined application of FS and FIT. We systematically reviewed screening studies conducted in an average risk population that reported specificities and site-specific sensitivities of FITs for detection of CRC or advanced adenoma (AA). Only studies that conducted colonoscopy in all subjects were included. PubMed and Web of Science were searched until May 13, 2016. Reference lists of eligible studies were also screened. Sensitivity of FS was derived from colonoscopy results, assuming the same sensitivity as colonoscopy for left-sided neoplasms and follow-up colonoscopy after detection of distal adenomas. Bivariate meta-analyses were used to derive summary estimates of overall sensitivity and specificity of individual and joint application of both tests. Ten eligible studies were identified. Summary estimates (95% confidence intervals) of overall sensitivity for detecting CRC and AA were 65% (56–74%) and 27% (23–31%) for FIT alone, 67% (58–75%) and 67% (59–75%) for FS alone, and 89% (83–92%) and 75% (68–80%), respectively, for the combination of both tests. The pooled specificity (95% CI) of FIT was 92% (90–95%). Adding a FIT to a once-only screening FS would substantially increase sensitivity of CRC screening at a modest loss in specificity.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Segnan N, Armaroli P, Bonelli L, et al. Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial–SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(17):1310–22. doi:10.1093/jnci/djr284.CrossRefPubMed Segnan N, Armaroli P, Bonelli L, et al. Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial–SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(17):1310–22. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djr284.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Brenner H, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ. 2014;348:g2467. doi:10.1136/bmj.g2467.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brenner H, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ. 2014;348:g2467. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​g2467.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Sovich JL, Sartor Z, Misra S. Developments in screening tests and strategies for colorectal cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:326728(326728). doi:10.1155/2015/326728. Sovich JL, Sartor Z, Misra S. Developments in screening tests and strategies for colorectal cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:326728(326728). doi:10.​1155/​2015/​326728.
9.
go back to reference Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Sturmer T, Hoffmeister M. Potential for colorectal cancer prevention of sigmoidoscopy versus colonoscopy: population-based case control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(3):494–9. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0460.CrossRefPubMed Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Sturmer T, Hoffmeister M. Potential for colorectal cancer prevention of sigmoidoscopy versus colonoscopy: population-based case control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(3):494–9. doi:10.​1158/​1055-9965.​EPI-06-0460.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Whitlock EP, Lin J, Liles E, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review. Evidence synthesis no. 65, Part 1. AHRQ publication no. 08-05124-EF-1. Rockville, Maryland, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, October 2008. Rockville, MD, 2008. Whitlock EP, Lin J, Liles E, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review. Evidence synthesis no. 65, Part 1. AHRQ publication no. 08-05124-EF-1. Rockville, Maryland, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, October 2008. Rockville, MD, 2008.
13.
go back to reference Nakazato MYH, Matsushita H, Sato K, Fujita K, Yamanaka Y, Imai Y. Immunologic fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening. Jpn Med Assoc J. 2006;49(5/6):203–7. Nakazato MYH, Matsushita H, Sato K, Fujita K, Yamanaka Y, Imai Y. Immunologic fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening. Jpn Med Assoc J. 2006;49(5/6):203–7.
14.
go back to reference Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut. 2009;58(2):241–8. doi:10.1136/gut.2008.156448.CrossRefPubMed Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut. 2009;58(2):241–8. doi:10.​1136/​gut.​2008.​156448.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Park DI, Ryu S, Kim YH, et al. Comparison of guaiac-based and quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood testing in a population at average risk undergoing colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(9):2017–25. doi:10.1038/ajg.2010.179.CrossRefPubMed Park DI, Ryu S, Kim YH, et al. Comparison of guaiac-based and quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood testing in a population at average risk undergoing colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(9):2017–25. doi:10.​1038/​ajg.​2010.​179.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Khalid-de Bakker CA, Jonkers DM, Sanduleanu S, et al. Test performance of immunologic fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy compared with primary colonoscopy screening for colorectal advanced adenomas. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011;4(10):1563–71. doi:10.1158/1940-6207.capr-11-0076.CrossRefPubMed Khalid-de Bakker CA, Jonkers DM, Sanduleanu S, et al. Test performance of immunologic fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy compared with primary colonoscopy screening for colorectal advanced adenomas. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011;4(10):1563–71. doi:10.​1158/​1940-6207.​capr-11-0076.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM, et al. Immunochemical fecal occult blood testing is equally sensitive for proximal and distal advanced neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(10):1570–8. doi:10.1038/ajg.2012.249.CrossRefPubMed de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM, et al. Immunochemical fecal occult blood testing is equally sensitive for proximal and distal advanced neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(10):1570–8. doi:10.​1038/​ajg.​2012.​249.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Chiu HM, Lee YC, Tu CH, et al. Association between early stage colon neoplasms and false-negative results from the fecal immunochemical test. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(7):832-8.e1-2. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.01.013. Chiu HM, Lee YC, Tu CH, et al. Association between early stage colon neoplasms and false-negative results from the fecal immunochemical test. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(7):832-8.e1-2. doi:10.​1016/​j.​cgh.​2013.​01.​013.
22.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​b2535.
25.
26.
go back to reference Nakama H, Zhang B, Abdul Fattah AS, Kamijo N. Does stool collection method affect outcomes in immunochemical fecal occult blood testing? Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(6):871–5.CrossRefPubMed Nakama H, Zhang B, Abdul Fattah AS, Kamijo N. Does stool collection method affect outcomes in immunochemical fecal occult blood testing? Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(6):871–5.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(5):352–9.CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(5):352–9.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Giorgi Rossi P, Vicentini M, Sacchettini C, et al. Impact of screening program on incidence of colorectal cancer: a cohort study in Italy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;. doi:10.1038/ajg.2015.240.PubMed Giorgi Rossi P, Vicentini M, Sacchettini C, et al. Impact of screening program on incidence of colorectal cancer: a cohort study in Italy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;. doi:10.​1038/​ajg.​2015.​240.PubMed
33.
34.
go back to reference Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Wilschut J, Knudsen AB, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM. AHRQ technology assessments. Cost-effectiveness of DNA stool testing to screen for colorectal cancer. rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2007. Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Wilschut J, Knudsen AB, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM. AHRQ technology assessments. Cost-effectiveness of DNA stool testing to screen for colorectal cancer. rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2007.
40.
go back to reference Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA. A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med. 2001;20(19):2865–84.CrossRefPubMed Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA. A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med. 2001;20(19):2865–84.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Cheng TI, Wong JM, Hong CF, et al. Colorectal cancer screening in asymptomaic adults: comparison of colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and fecal occult blood tests. J Formos Med Assoc. 2002;101(10):685–90.PubMed Cheng TI, Wong JM, Hong CF, et al. Colorectal cancer screening in asymptomaic adults: comparison of colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and fecal occult blood tests. J Formos Med Assoc. 2002;101(10):685–90.PubMed
46.
go back to reference Haug U, Knudsen AB, Brenner H, Kuntz KM. Is fecal occult blood testing more sensitive for left- versus right-sided colorectal neoplasia? A systematic literature review. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2011;11(6):605–16. doi:10.1586/erm.11.41.CrossRefPubMed Haug U, Knudsen AB, Brenner H, Kuntz KM. Is fecal occult blood testing more sensitive for left- versus right-sided colorectal neoplasia? A systematic literature review. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2011;11(6):605–16. doi:10.​1586/​erm.​11.​41.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Whitlock EP, Lin J, Liles E, et al. US Preventive Services Task Force evidence syntheses, formerly systematic evidence reviews. Screening for colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008. Whitlock EP, Lin J, Liles E, et al. US Preventive Services Task Force evidence syntheses, formerly systematic evidence reviews. Screening for colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008.
48.
49.
go back to reference Sajid MS, Caswell JF, Abbas MA, Baig MK, McFall MR. Improving the view during flexible sigmoidoscopy: a systematic review of published randomized, controlled trials comparing the use of oral bowel preparation versus enema bowel preparation. Updates Surg. 2015;67(3):247–56. doi:10.1007/s13304-015-0295-2.CrossRefPubMed Sajid MS, Caswell JF, Abbas MA, Baig MK, McFall MR. Improving the view during flexible sigmoidoscopy: a systematic review of published randomized, controlled trials comparing the use of oral bowel preparation versus enema bowel preparation. Updates Surg. 2015;67(3):247–56. doi:10.​1007/​s13304-015-0295-2.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Hirai HW, Tsoi KK, Chan JY, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: faecal occult blood tests show lower colorectal cancer detection rates in the proximal colon in colonoscopy-verified diagnostic studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;. doi:10.1111/apt.13556. Hirai HW, Tsoi KK, Chan JY, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: faecal occult blood tests show lower colorectal cancer detection rates in the proximal colon in colonoscopy-verified diagnostic studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;. doi:10.​1111/​apt.​13556.
52.
go back to reference Lin JS, Piper MA, Perdue LA, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence syntheses, no. 135. AHRQ publication no. 14-05203-EF-1: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016. Rockville (MD) 2016. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27441328. Lin JS, Piper MA, Perdue LA, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence syntheses, no. 135. AHRQ publication no. 14-05203-EF-1: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016. Rockville (MD) 2016. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​27441328.
53.
go back to reference Brenner H, Altenhofen L, Katalinic A, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Hoffmeister M. Sojourn time of preclinical colorectal cancer by sex and age: estimates from the German National Screening Colonoscopy Database. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(10):1140–6. doi:10.1093/aje/kwr188.CrossRefPubMed Brenner H, Altenhofen L, Katalinic A, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Hoffmeister M. Sojourn time of preclinical colorectal cancer by sex and age: estimates from the German National Screening Colonoscopy Database. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(10):1140–6. doi:10.​1093/​aje/​kwr188.CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Halloran SP, Launoy G, Zappa M, International Agency for Research on C. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition—faecal occult blood testing. Endoscopy. 2012;44(Suppl 3):SE65–87. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1309791.PubMed Halloran SP, Launoy G, Zappa M, International Agency for Research on C. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition—faecal occult blood testing. Endoscopy. 2012;44(Suppl 3):SE65–87. doi:10.​1055/​s-0032-1309791.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: meta-analysis and modeling
Authors
Tobias Niedermaier
Korbinian Weigl
Michael Hoffmeister
Hermann Brenner
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-017-0279-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

European Journal of Epidemiology 6/2017 Go to the issue