Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology 8/2016

01-08-2016 | CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

Impact of incident diabetes on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease according to statin use history among postmenopausal women

Authors: Yunsheng Ma, Gioia M. Persuitte, Christopher Andrews, Kathleen M. Hovey, Michael J. LaMonte, Annie L. Culver, JoAnn E. Manson, Lawrence S. Phillips, Simin Liu, Charles Eaton, Lisa W. Martin, Barbara V. Howard, Raji Balasubramanian, Chloe E. Bird, Ira S. Ockene, Susan R. Sturgeon, Judith K. Ockene, Lesley Tinker, Rami Nassir, Jacques Rossouw

Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Issue 8/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

To compare impact of incident diabetes on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk among postmenopausal women according to statin use. Prospective data from 120,499 postmenopausal women without prevalent diabetes or cardiovascular disease at baseline from the Women’s Health Initiative were used. Incident diabetes was self-reported annually and defined as treatment with pills or injectable medication for diabetes. Current statin use was determined at enrollment and years 1, 3, 6, 9 and 13.5 in the three clinical trial arms, and at baseline, year 3, and 13.5 for the observational study. The primary outcome was incident ASCVD events, self-reported annually and adjudicated by blinded local and central physicians. Incident diabetes and statin use status were fitted as time-varying covariates in Cox regression models to assess ASCVD risk during an average follow-up of 13.6 years. For those not on statins at the time of diabetes diagnosis, there was a 42 % increased risk of ASCVD [hazard ratio (HR) 1.42, 95 % CI 1.28–1.58] among women with incident diabetes versus those without diabetes. Among women on statins, there was a 39 % increased risk of ASCVD (HR 1.39, 95 % CI 1.12–1.74) in women with incident diabetes versus those without diabetes. The increased ASCVD risk due to diabetes was similar between women before or after initiating statins (P = 0.89). Whether diabetes was diagnosed before or after statin use did not alter the increased risk of ASCVD associated with diabetes. Mitigating the increased incidence of diabetes in statin users could increase the ASCVD benefit-to-risk ratio of statins.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Ma Y, Hebert J, Ebbeling C, Ockene I. International aspects of coronary heart disease epidemiology. In: Becker RC, Alpert JS, editors. Cardiovascular medicine-practice and management. London: Arnold; 2001. Ma Y, Hebert J, Ebbeling C, Ockene I. International aspects of coronary heart disease epidemiology. In: Becker RC, Alpert JS, editors. Cardiovascular medicine-practice and management. London: Arnold; 2001.
3.
go back to reference Ma Y, Hebert JR, Balasubramanian R, et al. All-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality rates in postmenopausal white, black, hispanic, and asian women with and without diabetes in the United States: the women’s health initiative, 1993–2009. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178:1533–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ma Y, Hebert JR, Balasubramanian R, et al. All-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality rates in postmenopausal white, black, hispanic, and asian women with and without diabetes in the United States: the women’s health initiative, 1993–2009. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178:1533–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:S1–45.CrossRefPubMed Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:S1–45.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference American Diabetes A (8). Cardiovascular disease and risk management. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(Suppl):49–57.CrossRef American Diabetes A (8). Cardiovascular disease and risk management. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(Suppl):49–57.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sattar N, Preiss D, Murray HM, et al. Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials. Lancet. 2010;375:735–42.CrossRefPubMed Sattar N, Preiss D, Murray HM, et al. Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials. Lancet. 2010;375:735–42.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Preiss D, Seshasai SR, Welsh P, et al. Risk of incident diabetes with intensive-dose compared with moderate-dose statin therapy: a meta-analysis. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2011;305:2556–64.CrossRef Preiss D, Seshasai SR, Welsh P, et al. Risk of incident diabetes with intensive-dose compared with moderate-dose statin therapy: a meta-analysis. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2011;305:2556–64.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Waters DD, Ho JE, DeMicco DA, et al. Predictors of new-onset diabetes in patients treated with atorvastatin: results from 3 large randomized clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1535–45.CrossRefPubMed Waters DD, Ho JE, DeMicco DA, et al. Predictors of new-onset diabetes in patients treated with atorvastatin: results from 3 large randomized clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1535–45.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Swerdlow DI, Preiss D, Kuchenbaecker KB et al. HMG-coenzyme A reductase inhibition, type 2 diabetes, and bodyweight: evidence from genetic analysis and randomised trials. Lancet 2014;385:351–61. Swerdlow DI, Preiss D, Kuchenbaecker KB et al. HMG-coenzyme A reductase inhibition, type 2 diabetes, and bodyweight: evidence from genetic analysis and randomised trials. Lancet 2014;385:351–61.
10.
go back to reference Navarese EP, Buffon A, Andreotti F, et al. Meta-analysis of impact of different types and doses of statins on new-onset diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:1123–30.CrossRefPubMed Navarese EP, Buffon A, Andreotti F, et al. Meta-analysis of impact of different types and doses of statins on new-onset diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:1123–30.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mora S, Glynn RJ, Hsia J, MacFadyen JG, Genest J, Ridker PM. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in women with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein or dyslipidemia: results from the Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) and meta-analysis of women from primary prevention trials. Circulation. 2010;121:1069–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mora S, Glynn RJ, Hsia J, MacFadyen JG, Genest J, Ridker PM. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in women with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein or dyslipidemia: results from the Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) and meta-analysis of women from primary prevention trials. Circulation. 2010;121:1069–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Ridker PM, Pradhan A, MacFadyen JG, Libby P, Glynn RJ. Cardiovascular benefits and diabetes risks of statin therapy in primary prevention: an analysis from the JUPITER trial. Lancet. 2012;380:565–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ridker PM, Pradhan A, MacFadyen JG, Libby P, Glynn RJ. Cardiovascular benefits and diabetes risks of statin therapy in primary prevention: an analysis from the JUPITER trial. Lancet. 2012;380:565–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference The Women’s Health Initiative Study Group. Design of the women’s health initiative clinical trial and observational study. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:61–109.CrossRef The Women’s Health Initiative Study Group. Design of the women’s health initiative clinical trial and observational study. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:61–109.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Margolis K, Qi L, Brzyski R, et al. Validity of diabetes self-reports in the women’s health initiative: comparison with medication inventories and fasting glucose measurements. Clin Trials. 2008;5(3):240–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Margolis K, Qi L, Brzyski R, et al. Validity of diabetes self-reports in the women’s health initiative: comparison with medication inventories and fasting glucose measurements. Clin Trials. 2008;5(3):240–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Patterson RE, Kristal AR, Tinker LF, Carter RA, Bolton MP, Agurs-Collins T. Measurement characteristics of the Women’s Health Initiative food frequency questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol. 1999;9:178–87.CrossRefPubMed Patterson RE, Kristal AR, Tinker LF, Carter RA, Bolton MP, Agurs-Collins T. Measurement characteristics of the Women’s Health Initiative food frequency questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol. 1999;9:178–87.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kennedy ET, Ohls J, Carlson S, Fleming K. The Healthy Eating Index: design and applications. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995;95:1103–8.CrossRefPubMed Kennedy ET, Ohls J, Carlson S, Fleming K. The Healthy Eating Index: design and applications. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995;95:1103–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference McCullough ML, Willett WC. Evaluating adherence to recommended diets in adults: the Alternate Healthy Eating Index. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9:152–7.CrossRefPubMed McCullough ML, Willett WC. Evaluating adherence to recommended diets in adults: the Alternate Healthy Eating Index. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9:152–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference McCullough ML, Feskanich D, Stampfer MJ, et al. Diet quality and major chronic disease risk in men and women: moving toward improved dietary guidance. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:1261–71.PubMed McCullough ML, Feskanich D, Stampfer MJ, et al. Diet quality and major chronic disease risk in men and women: moving toward improved dietary guidance. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:1261–71.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Belin RJ, Greenland P, Allison M, et al. Diet quality and the risk of cardiovascular disease: the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI). Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:49–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Belin RJ, Greenland P, Allison M, et al. Diet quality and the risk of cardiovascular disease: the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI). Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94:49–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Qiao Y, Tinker L, Olendzki BC, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in association between dietary quality and incident diabetes in postmenopausal women in the United States: the Women’s Health Initiative 1993–2005. Ethn Health 2013;19:328–47. Qiao Y, Tinker L, Olendzki BC, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in association between dietary quality and incident diabetes in postmenopausal women in the United States: the Women’s Health Initiative 1993–2005. Ethn Health 2013;19:328–47.
22.
go back to reference Cox D. Regression models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc. 1972;34:187–220. Cox D. Regression models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc. 1972;34:187–220.
23.
go back to reference Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, May S. Applied survival analysis: regression modeling of time to event data. New York: Wiley; 2008.CrossRef Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, May S. Applied survival analysis: regression modeling of time to event data. New York: Wiley; 2008.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005;112:2735–52.CrossRefPubMed Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005;112:2735–52.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ford ES, Li C, Zhao G. Prevalence and correlates of metabolic syndrome based on a harmonious definition among adults in the US. J Diabetes. 2010;2:180–93.CrossRefPubMed Ford ES, Li C, Zhao G. Prevalence and correlates of metabolic syndrome based on a harmonious definition among adults in the US. J Diabetes. 2010;2:180–93.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ CTT C. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet 2012;380:581–90. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ CTT C. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet 2012;380:581–90.
27.
go back to reference Kostis WJ, Cheng JQ, Dobrzynski JM, Cabrera J, Kostis JB. Meta-analysis of statin effects in women versus men. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:572–82.CrossRefPubMed Kostis WJ, Cheng JQ, Dobrzynski JM, Cabrera J, Kostis JB. Meta-analysis of statin effects in women versus men. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:572–82.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Cholesterol Treatment Trialists C. Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174000 participants in 27 randomised trials. Lancet 2015;385:1397–1405. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists C. Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174000 participants in 27 randomised trials. Lancet 2015;385:1397–1405.
Metadata
Title
Impact of incident diabetes on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease according to statin use history among postmenopausal women
Authors
Yunsheng Ma
Gioia M. Persuitte
Christopher Andrews
Kathleen M. Hovey
Michael J. LaMonte
Annie L. Culver
JoAnn E. Manson
Lawrence S. Phillips
Simin Liu
Charles Eaton
Lisa W. Martin
Barbara V. Howard
Raji Balasubramanian
Chloe E. Bird
Ira S. Ockene
Susan R. Sturgeon
Judith K. Ockene
Lesley Tinker
Rami Nassir
Jacques Rossouw
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-016-0153-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

European Journal of Epidemiology 8/2016 Go to the issue