Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology 12/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Individually customised fetal weight charts derived from ultrasound measurements: the Generation R Study

Authors: Romy Gaillard, Maria A. J. de Ridder, Bero O. Verburg, Jacqueline C. M. Witteman, Johan P. Mackenbach, Henriëtte A. Moll, Albert Hofman, Eric A. P. Steegers, Vincent W. V. Jaddoe

Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Issue 12/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Maternal and fetal characteristics are important determinants of fetal growth potential, and should ideally be taken into consideration when evaluating fetal growth variation. We developed a model for individually customised growth charts for estimated fetal weight, which takes into account physiological maternal and fetal characteristics known at the start of pregnancy. We used fetal ultrasound data of 8,162 pregnant women participating in the Generation R Study, a prospective, population-based cohort study from early pregnancy onwards. A repeated measurements regression model was constructed, using backward selection procedures for identifying relevant maternal and fetal characteristics. The final model for estimating expected fetal weight included gestational age, fetal sex, parity, ethnicity, maternal age, height and weight. Using this model, we developed individually customised growth charts, and their corresponding standard deviations, for fetal weight from 18 weeks onwards. Of the total of 495 fetuses who were classified as small size for gestational age (<10th percentile) when fetal weight was evaluated using the normal population growth chart, 80 (16%) were in the normal range when individually customised growth charts were used. 550 fetuses were classified as small size for gestational age using individually customised growth charts, and 135 of them (25%) were classified as normal if the unadjusted reference chart was used. In conclusion, this is the first study using ultrasound measurements in a large population-based study to fit a model to construct individually customised growth charts, taking into account physiological maternal and fetal characteristics. These charts might be useful for use in epidemiological studies and in clinical practice.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fang S. Management of preterm infants with intrauterine growth restriction. Early Hum Dev. 2005;81:889–900.PubMedCrossRef Fang S. Management of preterm infants with intrauterine growth restriction. Early Hum Dev. 2005;81:889–900.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pallotto EK, Kilbride HW. Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49:257–69.PubMedCrossRef Pallotto EK, Kilbride HW. Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49:257–69.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Geelhoed JJ, Jaddoe VW. Early influences on cardiovascular and renal development. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:677–92.PubMedCrossRef Geelhoed JJ, Jaddoe VW. Early influences on cardiovascular and renal development. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:677–92.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Osler M, Lund R, Kriegbaum M, Andersen AM. The influence of birth weight and body mass in early adulthood on early coronary heart disease risk among Danish men born in 1953. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24:57–61.PubMedCrossRef Osler M, Lund R, Kriegbaum M, Andersen AM. The influence of birth weight and body mass in early adulthood on early coronary heart disease risk among Danish men born in 1953. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24:57–61.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Verburg BO, Steegers EA, De Ridder M, Snijders RJ, Smith E, Hofman A, et al. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:388–96.PubMedCrossRef Verburg BO, Steegers EA, De Ridder M, Snijders RJ, Smith E, Hofman A, et al. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:388–96.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gardosi J, Mongelli M, Wilcox M, Chang A. An adjustable fetal weight standard. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6:168–74.PubMedCrossRef Gardosi J, Mongelli M, Wilcox M, Chang A. An adjustable fetal weight standard. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6:168–74.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jacquemyn Y, Sys SU, Verdonk P. Fetal biometry in different ethnic groups. Early Hum Dev. 2000;57:1–13.PubMedCrossRef Jacquemyn Y, Sys SU, Verdonk P. Fetal biometry in different ethnic groups. Early Hum Dev. 2000;57:1–13.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mongelli M, Gardosi J. Longitudinal study of fetal growth in subgroups of a low-risk population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6:340–4.PubMedCrossRef Mongelli M, Gardosi J. Longitudinal study of fetal growth in subgroups of a low-risk population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6:340–4.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pang MW, Leung TN, Sahota DS, Lau TK, Chang AM. Customizing fetal biometric charts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:271–6.PubMedCrossRef Pang MW, Leung TN, Sahota DS, Lau TK, Chang AM. Customizing fetal biometric charts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:271–6.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schwarzler P, Bland JM, Holden D, Campbell S, Ville Y. Sex-specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15–40 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:23–9.PubMedCrossRef Schwarzler P, Bland JM, Holden D, Campbell S, Ville Y. Sex-specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15–40 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:23–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Johnsen SL, Rasmussen S, Wilsgaard T, Sollien R, Kiserud T. Longitudinal reference ranges for estimated fetal weight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:286–97.PubMedCrossRef Johnsen SL, Rasmussen S, Wilsgaard T, Sollien R, Kiserud T. Longitudinal reference ranges for estimated fetal weight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:286–97.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mongelli M, Gardosi J. Reduction of false-positive diagnosis of fetal growth restriction by application of customized fetal growth standards. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:844–8.PubMedCrossRef Mongelli M, Gardosi J. Reduction of false-positive diagnosis of fetal growth restriction by application of customized fetal growth standards. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:844–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jaddoe VW, van Duijn CM, van der Heijden AJ, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, Steegers EA, et al. The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2010. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:823–41.PubMedCrossRef Jaddoe VW, van Duijn CM, van der Heijden AJ, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, Steegers EA, et al. The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2010. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:823–41.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference World Medical Association Inc. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Indian Med Assoc. 2009;107:403–5. World Medical Association Inc. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Indian Med Assoc. 2009;107:403–5.
16.
go back to reference Campbell S, Warsof SL, Little D, Cooper DJ. Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65:613–20.PubMed Campbell S, Warsof SL, Little D, Cooper DJ. Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65:613–20.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:189–94.PubMedCrossRef Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:189–94.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tunon K, Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P. A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15, 000 examinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;8:178–85.PubMedCrossRef Tunon K, Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P. A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15, 000 examinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;8:178–85.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Fetal abdominal circumference as a predictor of menstrual age. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982;139:367–70.PubMed Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Fetal abdominal circumference as a predictor of menstrual age. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982;139:367–70.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Deter RL, Park SK. Fetal femur length as a predictor of menstrual age: sonographically measured. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982;138:875–8.PubMed Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Deter RL, Park SK. Fetal femur length as a predictor of menstrual age: sonographically measured. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982;138:875–8.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Shepard M, Filly RA. A standardized plane for biparietal diameter measurement. J Ultrasound Med. 1982;1:145–50.PubMed Shepard M, Filly RA. A standardized plane for biparietal diameter measurement. J Ultrasound Med. 1982;1:145–50.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements–a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:333–7.PubMed Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements–a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:333–7.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Statistics Netherlands. Allochtonen in Nederland. Voorburg/Heerlen2004. Statistics Netherlands. Allochtonen in Nederland. Voorburg/Heerlen2004.
24.
go back to reference Jaddoe VW, Verburg BO, de Ridder M, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, et al. Maternal smoking and fetal growth characteristics in different periods of pregnancy: the Generation R Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:1207–15.PubMedCrossRef Jaddoe VW, Verburg BO, de Ridder M, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, et al. Maternal smoking and fetal growth characteristics in different periods of pregnancy: the Generation R Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:1207–15.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bernstein IM, Plociennik K, Stahle S, Badger GJ, Secker-Walker R. Impact of maternal cigarette smoking on fetal growth and body composition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:883–6.PubMedCrossRef Bernstein IM, Plociennik K, Stahle S, Badger GJ, Secker-Walker R. Impact of maternal cigarette smoking on fetal growth and body composition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:883–6.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Royston P, Ambler G, Sauerbrei W. The use of fractional polynomials to model continuous risk variables in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:964–74.PubMedCrossRef Royston P, Ambler G, Sauerbrei W. The use of fractional polynomials to model continuous risk variables in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:964–74.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nohr EA, Frydenberg M, Henriksen TB, Olsen J. Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias? Epidemiology. 2006;17:413–8.PubMedCrossRef Nohr EA, Frydenberg M, Henriksen TB, Olsen J. Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias? Epidemiology. 2006;17:413–8.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bakker R, Steegers EA, Biharie AA, Mackenbach JP, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW. Explaining differences in birth outcomes in relation to maternal age: the Generation R Study. Bjog. 2011;118:500–9.PubMedCrossRef Bakker R, Steegers EA, Biharie AA, Mackenbach JP, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW. Explaining differences in birth outcomes in relation to maternal age: the Generation R Study. Bjog. 2011;118:500–9.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ay L, Kruithof CJ, Bakker R, Steegers EA, Witteman JC, Moll HA, et al. Maternal anthropometrics are associated with fetal size in different periods of pregnancy and at birth. The Generation R Study. Bjog. 2009;116:953–63.PubMedCrossRef Ay L, Kruithof CJ, Bakker R, Steegers EA, Witteman JC, Moll HA, et al. Maternal anthropometrics are associated with fetal size in different periods of pregnancy and at birth. The Generation R Study. Bjog. 2009;116:953–63.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Drooger JC, Troe JW, Borsboom GJ, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, et al. Ethnic differences in prenatal growth and the association with maternal and fetal characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:115–22.PubMedCrossRef Drooger JC, Troe JW, Borsboom GJ, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, et al. Ethnic differences in prenatal growth and the association with maternal and fetal characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:115–22.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Albouy-Llaty M, Thiebaugeorges O, Goua V, Magnin G, Schweitzer M, Forhan A et al. Influence of fetal and parental factors on intra-uterine growth measurements: results of the EDEN mother-child cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011. doi: 10.1002/uog.9006. Albouy-Llaty M, Thiebaugeorges O, Goua V, Magnin G, Schweitzer M, Forhan A et al. Influence of fetal and parental factors on intra-uterine growth measurements: results of the EDEN mother-child cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011. doi: 10.​1002/​uog.​9006.
33.
go back to reference Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Grewal J, Neta G, Klebanoff M. Prenatal application of the individualized fetal growth reference. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:539–43.PubMedCrossRef Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Grewal J, Neta G, Klebanoff M. Prenatal application of the individualized fetal growth reference. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:539–43.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hutcheon JA, Walker M, Platt RW. Assessing the value of customized birth weight percentiles. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:459–67.PubMedCrossRef Hutcheon JA, Walker M, Platt RW. Assessing the value of customized birth weight percentiles. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:459–67.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Individually customised fetal weight charts derived from ultrasound measurements: the Generation R Study
Authors
Romy Gaillard
Maria A. J. de Ridder
Bero O. Verburg
Jacqueline C. M. Witteman
Johan P. Mackenbach
Henriëtte A. Moll
Albert Hofman
Eric A. P. Steegers
Vincent W. V. Jaddoe
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Issue 12/2011
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-011-9629-7

Other articles of this Issue 12/2011

European Journal of Epidemiology 12/2011 Go to the issue