Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology 2/2011

01-02-2011 | Clinical Epidemiology

Nationwide rates of conversion from laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy to open abdominal hysterectomy in Germany

Authors: Andreas Stang, Ray M. Merrill, Oliver Kuss

Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to provide population-based German-wide hysterectomy rates based on the national hospitalization file and to estimate the rate of conversion from laparoscopical or vaginal hysterectomy to open abdominal hysterectomy. Nationwide population-based DRG (diagnosis related groups) data of the years 2005 and 2006 were used to calculate hysterectomy rates by indication group and type of surgical approach. Overall 305,015 hysterectomies were performed during the study period (4.5 out of 1,000 women aged 20 years or more). The hysterectomy rate for benign diseases of the genital tract among women aged 20 years or more (3.6 out of 1,000 women) is higher than in Sweden but lower than in the US or Australia. Only 6 and 5% of all hysterectomies were performed by laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy, respectively. Twenty-six percent of hysterectomies for benign diseases among women aged 50 years or more included bilateral oophorectomy. 10% of laparoscopical hysterectomies and 1% of vaginal hysterectomies necessitated a conversion to an abdominal hysterectomy. For both types of hysterectomies, the conversion rates were highest for primary malignant genital tract cancer and other cancers compared to the other indication groups. Whereas the conversion rate for laparoscopical hysterectomies increased by age, this rate did not change by age for vaginal hysterectomies. Conversion from laparoscopically or vaginal hysterectomy to open abdominal hysterectomy is associated with the indication and type of hysterectomy started with and is considerably higher for laparoscopic than vaginal hysterectomies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lefebvre G, Allaire C, Jeffrey J, Vilos G, Arneja J, Birch C, et al. SOGC clinical guidelines. Hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002;24(1):37–61.PubMed Lefebvre G, Allaire C, Jeffrey J, Vilos G, Arneja J, Birch C, et al. SOGC clinical guidelines. Hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002;24(1):37–61.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Morrow B, Podgornik MN, Brett KM, et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000–2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(1):34–7.CrossRefPubMed Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Morrow B, Podgornik MN, Brett KM, et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000–2004. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(1):34–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Merrill RM. Hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 1997 through. Med Sci Monit. 2008;4(1):CR24–31. Merrill RM. Hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 1997 through. Med Sci Monit. 2008;4(1):CR24–31.
4.
go back to reference Roos NP. Hysterectomy: variations in rates across small areas and across physicians’ practices. Am J Public Health. 1984;74(4):327–35.CrossRefPubMed Roos NP. Hysterectomy: variations in rates across small areas and across physicians’ practices. Am J Public Health. 1984;74(4):327–35.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference McPherson K, Wennberg JE, Hovind OB, Clifford P. Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. N Engl J Med. 1982;307(21):1310–4.CrossRefPubMed McPherson K, Wennberg JE, Hovind OB, Clifford P. Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. N Engl J Med. 1982;307(21):1310–4.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Keskimaki I, Aro S, Teperi J. Regional variation in surgical procedure rates in Finland. Scand J Soc Med. 1994;22(2):132–8.PubMed Keskimaki I, Aro S, Teperi J. Regional variation in surgical procedure rates in Finland. Scand J Soc Med. 1994;22(2):132–8.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Spilsbury K, Semmens JB, Hammond I, Bolck A. Persistent high rates of hysterectomy in Western Australia: a population-based study of 83,000 procedures over 23 years. BJOG. 2006;113(7):804–9.CrossRefPubMed Spilsbury K, Semmens JB, Hammond I, Bolck A. Persistent high rates of hysterectomy in Western Australia: a population-based study of 83,000 procedures over 23 years. BJOG. 2006;113(7):804–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Vuorma S, Teperi J, Hurskainen R, Keskimaki I, Kujansuu E. Hysterectomy trends in Finland in 1987–1995—a register based analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77(7):770–6.CrossRefPubMed Vuorma S, Teperi J, Hurskainen R, Keskimaki I, Kujansuu E. Hysterectomy trends in Finland in 1987–1995—a register based analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77(7):770–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lundholm C, Forsgren C, Johansson AL, Cnattingius S, Altman D. Hysterectomy on benign indications in Sweden 1987–2003: a nationwide trend analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(1):52–8.CrossRefPubMed Lundholm C, Forsgren C, Johansson AL, Cnattingius S, Altman D. Hysterectomy on benign indications in Sweden 1987–2003: a nationwide trend analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(1):52–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Domenighetti G, Luraschi P, Marazzi A. Hysterectomy and sex of the gynecologist. N Engl J Med. 1985;313(23):1482.PubMed Domenighetti G, Luraschi P, Marazzi A. Hysterectomy and sex of the gynecologist. N Engl J Med. 1985;313(23):1482.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Domenighetti G, Casabianca A. Rate of hysterectomy is lower among female doctors and lawyers’ wives. BMJ. 1997;314(7091):1417.PubMed Domenighetti G, Casabianca A. Rate of hysterectomy is lower among female doctors and lawyers’ wives. BMJ. 1997;314(7091):1417.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Domenighetti G, Luraschi P, Casabianca A, Gutzwiller F, Spinelli A, Pedrinis E, et al. Effect of information campaign by the mass media on hysterectomy rates. Lancet. 1988;2(8626–8627):1470–3.CrossRefPubMed Domenighetti G, Luraschi P, Casabianca A, Gutzwiller F, Spinelli A, Pedrinis E, et al. Effect of information campaign by the mass media on hysterectomy rates. Lancet. 1988;2(8626–8627):1470–3.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gimbel H, Settnes A, Tabor A. Hysterectomy on benign indication in Denmark 1988–1998. A register based trend analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(3):267–72.PubMed Gimbel H, Settnes A, Tabor A. Hysterectomy on benign indication in Denmark 1988–1998. A register based trend analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(3):267–72.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Settnes A, Jorgensen T, Lange AP. Hysterectomy in Danish women: weight-related factors, psychologic factors, and life-style variables. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88(1):99–105.CrossRefPubMed Settnes A, Jorgensen T, Lange AP. Hysterectomy in Danish women: weight-related factors, psychologic factors, and life-style variables. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88(1):99–105.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Stang A, Stausberg J. Inpatient management of patients with skin cancer in Germany: an analysis of the nationwide DRG-statistic 2005–2006. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161(Suppl 3):99–106.CrossRefPubMed Stang A, Stausberg J. Inpatient management of patients with skin cancer in Germany: an analysis of the nationwide DRG-statistic 2005–2006. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161(Suppl 3):99–106.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Stang A, Katalinic A, Dieckmann KP, Pritzkuleit R, Stabenow R. A novel approach to estimate the German-wide incidence of testicular cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2010;34:13–9.CrossRefPubMed Stang A, Katalinic A, Dieckmann KP, Pritzkuleit R, Stabenow R. A novel approach to estimate the German-wide incidence of testicular cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2010;34:13–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Stang A, Weichenthal M. Micrographic surgery of skin cancer in German hospitals 2005–2006. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010. Stang A, Weichenthal M. Micrographic surgery of skin cancer in German hospitals 2005–2006. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010.
18.
go back to reference ICD-10-GM 2005 Systematisches Verzeichnis: Internationale statistische Klassifikation der Krankheiten und verwandter Gesundheitsprobleme, 10. Revision—German Modification. Köln: Deutscher Ärzteverlag; 2004. ICD-10-GM 2005 Systematisches Verzeichnis: Internationale statistische Klassifikation der Krankheiten und verwandter Gesundheitsprobleme, 10. Revision—German Modification. Köln: Deutscher Ärzteverlag; 2004.
19.
go back to reference ICD-10-GM 2006 Systematisches Verzeichnis: Internationale statistische Klassifikation der Krankheiten und verwandter Gesundheitsprobleme. Köln: Deutscher Ärzteverlag; 2006. ICD-10-GM 2006 Systematisches Verzeichnis: Internationale statistische Klassifikation der Krankheiten und verwandter Gesundheitsprobleme. Köln: Deutscher Ärzteverlag; 2006.
20.
go back to reference OPS 2005 Systematisches Verzeichnis. Köln: Deutscher Ärzteverlag; 2005. OPS 2005 Systematisches Verzeichnis. Köln: Deutscher Ärzteverlag; 2005.
21.
go back to reference OPS 2006 Systematisches Verzeichnis. Köln: Deutscher Ärzteverlag; 2006. OPS 2006 Systematisches Verzeichnis. Köln: Deutscher Ärzteverlag; 2006.
22.
go back to reference Keshavarz H, Hillis SD, Kieke BA. Hysterectomy surveillance—United States, 1994–1999. MMWR. 2002;51(SS05):1–8. Keshavarz H, Hillis SD, Kieke BA. Hysterectomy surveillance—United States, 1994–1999. MMWR. 2002;51(SS05):1–8.
23.
go back to reference Senator für Arbeit FGJuS. Frauengesundheitsbericht Bremen 2001. Bremen: Media Meter; 2001. Senator für Arbeit FGJuS. Frauengesundheitsbericht Bremen 2001. Bremen: Media Meter; 2001.
24.
go back to reference Merrill RM, Lyon JL, Wiggins C. Comparison of two methods based on cross-sectional data for correcting corpus uterine cancer incidence and probabilities. BMC Cancer. 2001;1:13.CrossRefPubMed Merrill RM, Lyon JL, Wiggins C. Comparison of two methods based on cross-sectional data for correcting corpus uterine cancer incidence and probabilities. BMC Cancer. 2001;1:13.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Greenland S. Introduction to regression models. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, editors. Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 381–417. Greenland S. Introduction to regression models. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, editors. Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 381–417.
26.
go back to reference Elandt-Johnson RC. Definition of rates: some remarks on their use and misuse. Am J Epidemiol. 1975;102(4):267–71.PubMed Elandt-Johnson RC. Definition of rates: some remarks on their use and misuse. Am J Epidemiol. 1975;102(4):267–71.PubMed
27.
go back to reference SAS for windows [computer program]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2002. SAS for windows [computer program]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2002.
28.
go back to reference Jacobson GF, Shaber RE, Armstrong MA, Hung YY. Hysterectomy rates for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1278–83.CrossRefPubMed Jacobson GF, Shaber RE, Armstrong MA, Hung YY. Hysterectomy rates for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1278–83.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Julian TM. Vaginal hysterectomy: an apparent exception to evidence-based decision making. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(4):812–3.CrossRefPubMed Julian TM. Vaginal hysterectomy: an apparent exception to evidence-based decision making. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(4):812–3.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Leonard F, Chopin N, Borghese B, Fotso A, Foulot H, Coste J, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: preoperative risk factors for conversion to laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(4):312–7.CrossRefPubMed Leonard F, Chopin N, Borghese B, Fotso A, Foulot H, Coste J, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: preoperative risk factors for conversion to laparotomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(4):312–7.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Ng CC, Chern BS, Siow AY. Retrospective study of the success rates and complications associated with total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007;33(4):512–8.CrossRefPubMed Ng CC, Chern BS, Siow AY. Retrospective study of the success rates and complications associated with total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007;33(4):512–8.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Tohic AL, Dhainaut C, Yazbeck C, Hallais C, Levin I, Madelenat P. Hysterectomy for benign uterine pathology among women without previous vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(4):829–37.CrossRefPubMed Tohic AL, Dhainaut C, Yazbeck C, Hallais C, Levin I, Madelenat P. Hysterectomy for benign uterine pathology among women without previous vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(4):829–37.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Eisenkop SM. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with pelvic/aortic lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer—a consecutive series without case selection and comparison to laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;117(2):216–23.CrossRefPubMed Eisenkop SM. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with pelvic/aortic lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer—a consecutive series without case selection and comparison to laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;117(2):216–23.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Tunitsky E, Citil A, Ayaz R, Esin S, Knee A, Harmanli O. Does surgical volume influence short-term outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(1):24–6.CrossRefPubMed Tunitsky E, Citil A, Ayaz R, Esin S, Knee A, Harmanli O. Does surgical volume influence short-term outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(1):24–6.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Camanni M, Mistrangelo E, Febo G, Ferrero B, Deltetto F. Prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy during vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280(1):87–90.CrossRefPubMed Camanni M, Mistrangelo E, Febo G, Ferrero B, Deltetto F. Prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy during vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280(1):87–90.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference National Center for Health Statistics, Pokras R, Hufnagel V. Hysterectomies in the United States 1965–84. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1987. National Center for Health Statistics, Pokras R, Hufnagel V. Hysterectomies in the United States 1965–84. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1987.
37.
go back to reference Lepine LA, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Koonin LM, Morrow B, Kieke BA, et al. Hysterectomy surveillance—United States. 1980–1993. MMWR. 1997;46(SS-4):1–15.PubMed Lepine LA, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Koonin LM, Morrow B, Kieke BA, et al. Hysterectomy surveillance—United States. 1980–1993. MMWR. 1997;46(SS-4):1–15.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Brett KM, Marsh JV, Madans JH. Epidemiology of hysterectomy in the United States: demographic and reproductive factors in a nationally representative sample. J Womens Health. 1997;6(3):309–16.CrossRefPubMed Brett KM, Marsh JV, Madans JH. Epidemiology of hysterectomy in the United States: demographic and reproductive factors in a nationally representative sample. J Womens Health. 1997;6(3):309–16.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Nationwide rates of conversion from laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy to open abdominal hysterectomy in Germany
Authors
Andreas Stang
Ray M. Merrill
Oliver Kuss
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9543-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

European Journal of Epidemiology 2/2011 Go to the issue