Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology 12/2008

01-12-2008 | Commentary

Appropriate epidemiologic methods as a prerequisite for valid study results

Author: Andreas Stang

Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Issue 12/2008

Login to get access

Excerpt

As in every research field, valid scientific results are a product of clear thinking and excellent methodology. The domain of observational studies in contrast to experimental studies is especially prone to systematic errors because many factors cannot be controlled by the investigator. Therefore, observational studies frequently suffer from confounding, nonresponse bias, misclassification, and mismeasurement bias that threaten the validity of study results. In contrast to other biomedical research fields, epidemiology is a quite young discipline [1] and the methodology of epidemiology to address these potential errors by either preventing them by design or controlling them by analysis is still evolving nowadays [2]. It is therefore good news to observe that the European Journal of Epidemiology published several articles that were explicitly dedicated to epidemiologic methods in recent years. The aim of this commentary is to highlight some of the methodological articles published in this journal. For this purpose, I give for each highlighted article a little introduction, thereafter summarize the authors’ study (indented text), and finally comment on the implications of the authors’ findings. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Morabia A. History of epidemiologic methods and concepts. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag; 2004. Morabia A. History of epidemiologic methods and concepts. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag; 2004.
2.
go back to reference Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
4.
go back to reference Orsini N, Bellocco R, Bottai M, Pagano M, Wolk A. Reproducibility of the past year and historical self-administered total physical activity questionnaire among older women. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22:363–8. doi:10.1007/s10654-006-9102-1.PubMedCrossRef Orsini N, Bellocco R, Bottai M, Pagano M, Wolk A. Reproducibility of the past year and historical self-administered total physical activity questionnaire among older women. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22:363–8. doi:10.​1007/​s10654-006-9102-1.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Robins JM, Greenland S. The role of model selection in causal inference from nonexperimental data. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;123:392–402.PubMed Robins JM, Greenland S. The role of model selection in causal inference from nonexperimental data. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;123:392–402.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Lash TL, Fink AK. Semi-automated sensitivity analysis to assess systematic errors in observational data. Epidemiology. 2003;14:451–8.PubMed Lash TL, Fink AK. Semi-automated sensitivity analysis to assess systematic errors in observational data. Epidemiology. 2003;14:451–8.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Tolonen H, Helakorpi S, Talala K, Helasoja V, Martelin T, Prattala R. 25-year trends and socio-demographic differences in response rates: Finnish adult health behaviour survey. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:409–15. doi:10.1007/s10654-006-9019-8.PubMedCrossRef Tolonen H, Helakorpi S, Talala K, Helasoja V, Martelin T, Prattala R. 25-year trends and socio-demographic differences in response rates: Finnish adult health behaviour survey. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:409–15. doi:10.​1007/​s10654-006-9019-8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
12.
go back to reference Boffetta P, McLaughlin JK, La Vecchia C, Tarone RE, Lipworth L, Blot WJ. False-positive results in cancer epidemiology: a plea for epistemological modesty. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:988–95. doi:10.1093/jnci/djn191.PubMedCrossRef Boffetta P, McLaughlin JK, La Vecchia C, Tarone RE, Lipworth L, Blot WJ. False-positive results in cancer epidemiology: a plea for epistemological modesty. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:988–95. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djn191.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology. 2007;18:805–35.PubMedCrossRef Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology. 2007;18:805–35.PubMedCrossRef
18.
20.
go back to reference Rothman KJ. Modern epidemiology. 1st ed. Boston: Little, Brown and Company; 1986. Rothman KJ. Modern epidemiology. 1st ed. Boston: Little, Brown and Company; 1986.
Metadata
Title
Appropriate epidemiologic methods as a prerequisite for valid study results
Author
Andreas Stang
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Issue 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-008-9299-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2008

European Journal of Epidemiology 12/2008 Go to the issue