Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 4/2020

Open Access 01-08-2020 | Thrombosis | SHORT REPORT

Risk factors for cancer-associated thrombosis in patients undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Authors: Yosuke Ando, Takahiro Hayashi, Reiko Sugimoto, Seira Nishibe, Kaori Ito, Kenji Kawada, Yoshiaki Ikeda, Shigeki Yamada, Kazuyoshi Imaizumi

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Summary

Purpose Anticancer agents are known to increase cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) onset. CAT onset rate is reported to be 1.92% in cisplatin-based therapy, 6.1% in paclitaxel plus ramucirumab combination therapy, and 11.9% in bevacizumab monotherapy. Because immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) cause a sudden increase in T cell number, an association between administration of these drugs and increase in CAT incidence is likely. However, the extent to which ICI administration affects CAT incidence remains unclear. Further, risk factors for CAT incidence have not yet been identified. The present study investigated CAT incidence and associated risk factors in patients receiving ICI. Methods Patients administered nivolumab or pembrolizumab at Fujita Health University Hospital from April 2017 to March 2018 were enrolled. We collected retrospective data regarding age, sex, cancer type, BMI, medical history, laboratory data at treatment initiation, medications, and computed tomography (CT) interpretations from electronic medical records. Results We identified 122 eligible participants from 135 patients receiving nivolumab or pembrolizumab. Ten patients (8.2%) developed CAT. A history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or arterial thromboembolism (ATE) was a risk factor for CAT incidence (odds ratio: 6.36, P = 0.039). A history of heart disease may be a risk factor for CAT incidence (odds ratio 6.56, P = 0.052). Significantly higher usage of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy was noted in patients who developed CAT (60%) than in those who did not (13.4%, p < 0.01). Conclusion High (8.2%) CAT incidence during ICI administration suggested that ICI is not associated with a lower blood clot risk than other anticancer agents investigated in previous studies. For patients with VTE, ATE, or heart disease history, it is crucial to consider the possibility of CAT even with antiplatelet therapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference AACR 103rd Annual Meeting 2012-Mar 31-Apr 4, 2012; Chicago, IL AACR 103rd Annual Meeting 2012-Mar 31-Apr 4, 2012; Chicago, IL
2.
go back to reference Khorana AA (2010) Venous thromboembolism and prognosis in cancer. Thromb Res 125:490–493CrossRef Khorana AA (2010) Venous thromboembolism and prognosis in cancer. Thromb Res 125:490–493CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Blom JW, Doggen CJ, Osanto S et al (2005) Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA 293:715–722CrossRef Blom JW, Doggen CJ, Osanto S et al (2005) Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA 293:715–722CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Navi BB, Reiner AS, Kamel H et al (2017) Risk of arterial thromboembolism in patients with cancer. J Am Coll Cardiol 70:926–938CrossRef Navi BB, Reiner AS, Kamel H et al (2017) Risk of arterial thromboembolism in patients with cancer. J Am Coll Cardiol 70:926–938CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Khorana AA, Connolly GC (2009) Assessing risk of venous thromboembolism in the patient with cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:4839–4847CrossRef Khorana AA, Connolly GC (2009) Assessing risk of venous thromboembolism in the patient with cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:4839–4847CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Seng S, Liu Z, Chiu SK et al (2012) Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer treated with Cisplatin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 30:4416–44126CrossRef Seng S, Liu Z, Chiu SK et al (2012) Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer treated with Cisplatin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 30:4416–44126CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fuchs CS, Tomasek J, Yong CJ et al (2014) Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD) an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 383:31–39CrossRef Fuchs CS, Tomasek J, Yong CJ et al (2014) Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD) an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 383:31–39CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zhu AX, Kang YK, Yen CJ et al (2019) Ramucirumab after sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increasedαfetoprotein concentrations (REACH-2):a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20:282–296CrossRef Zhu AX, Kang YK, Yen CJ et al (2019) Ramucirumab after sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increasedαfetoprotein concentrations (REACH-2):a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20:282–296CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E et al (2014) Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placeboplus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1224–1235CrossRef Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E et al (2014) Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placeboplus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1224–1235CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tabernero J, Yoshino T, Cohn AL et al (2015) Ramucirumab versus placebo in combination with second-line FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that progressed during or after firstline therapy with bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine (RAISE): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 16:499–508CrossRef Tabernero J, Yoshino T, Cohn AL et al (2015) Ramucirumab versus placebo in combination with second-line FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that progressed during or after firstline therapy with bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine (RAISE): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 16:499–508CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Garon EB, Ciuleanu TE, Arrieta O et al (2014) Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel for second-line treatment of stage IVnon-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based therapy (REVEL): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 384:665–673CrossRef Garon EB, Ciuleanu TE, Arrieta O et al (2014) Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel for second-line treatment of stage IVnon-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based therapy (REVEL): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 384:665–673CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nalluri SR, Chu D, Keresztes R et al (2008) Risk of venous thromboembolism with the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. JAMA 300:2277–2285CrossRef Nalluri SR, Chu D, Keresztes R et al (2008) Risk of venous thromboembolism with the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. JAMA 300:2277–2285CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M et al (2017) Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma. N Engl J Med 377:1824–1835CrossRef Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M et al (2017) Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma. N Engl J Med 377:1824–1835CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr, Fayette J et al (2016) Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 375:1856–1867CrossRef Ferris RL, Blumenschein G Jr, Fayette J et al (2016) Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 375:1856–1867CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kang YK, Boku N, Satoh T et al (2017) Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric orgastro-oesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 390:2461–2471CrossRef Kang YK, Boku N, Satoh T et al (2017) Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric orgastro-oesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 390:2461–2471CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tomita Y, Fukasawa S, Shinohara N et al (2019) Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: Japanese subgroup 3-year follow-up analysis from the phase III CheckMate 025 study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 49:506–514CrossRef Tomita Y, Fukasawa S, Shinohara N et al (2019) Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: Japanese subgroup 3-year follow-up analysis from the phase III CheckMate 025 study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 49:506–514CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Yamazaki N, Kiyohara Y, Uhara H et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of nivolumab in Japanese patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma: a phase II study. Cancer Sci 108:1223–1230CrossRef Yamazaki N, Kiyohara Y, Uhara H et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of nivolumab in Japanese patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma: a phase II study. Cancer Sci 108:1223–1230CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hida T, Nishio M, Nogami N et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of nivolumab in Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci 108:1000–1006CrossRef Hida T, Nishio M, Nogami N et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of nivolumab in Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci 108:1000–1006CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nishio M, Hida T, Atagi S et al (2017) Multicentre phase II study of nivolumab in Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. ESMO Open 1:e000108CrossRef Nishio M, Hida T, Atagi S et al (2017) Multicentre phase II study of nivolumab in Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. ESMO Open 1:e000108CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Maruyama D, Hatake K, Kinoshita T et al (2017) Multicenter phase II study of nivolumabin Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Sci 108:1007–1012CrossRef Maruyama D, Hatake K, Kinoshita T et al (2017) Multicenter phase II study of nivolumabin Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Sci 108:1007–1012CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Varki (2007) A Trousseau's syndrome: multiple definitions and multiple mechanisms. Blood 110:1723–1729 Varki (2007) A Trousseau's syndrome: multiple definitions and multiple mechanisms. Blood 110:1723–1729
22.
go back to reference Kunimasa K, Nishino K, Kimura M et al (2018) Pembrolizumab-induced acute thrombosis: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e10772CrossRef Kunimasa K, Nishino K, Kimura M et al (2018) Pembrolizumab-induced acute thrombosis: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e10772CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Johnson DB, Balko JM, Compton ML et al (2018) Fulminant myocarditis with combination immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med 375:1749–1755CrossRef Johnson DB, Balko JM, Compton ML et al (2018) Fulminant myocarditis with combination immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med 375:1749–1755CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wang DY, Salem JE, Cohen JV et al (2018) Fatal toxic effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 4:1721–1728CrossRef Wang DY, Salem JE, Cohen JV et al (2018) Fatal toxic effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 4:1721–1728CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Vasan SK, Rostgaard K, Majeed A et al (2016) ABO blood group and risk of thromboembolic and arterial disease: a study of 1.5 million blood donors. Circulation 133:1449–1457CrossRef Vasan SK, Rostgaard K, Majeed A et al (2016) ABO blood group and risk of thromboembolic and arterial disease: a study of 1.5 million blood donors. Circulation 133:1449–1457CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Pulivarthi S, Gurram MK (2014) Effectiveness of d-dimer as a screening test for venous thromboembolism: an update. N Am J Med Sci 6:491–499CrossRef Pulivarthi S, Gurram MK (2014) Effectiveness of d-dimer as a screening test for venous thromboembolism: an update. N Am J Med Sci 6:491–499CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Pabinger I, Thaler J, Ay C (2013) Biomarkers for prediction of venous thromboembolism in cancer. Blood 122:2011–2018CrossRef Pabinger I, Thaler J, Ay C (2013) Biomarkers for prediction of venous thromboembolism in cancer. Blood 122:2011–2018CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC et al (2004) D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 140:589–602CrossRef Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC et al (2004) D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 140:589–602CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Scappaticci FA, Skillings JR, Holden SN et al (2007) Arterial thromboembolicevents in patients with metastatic carcinoma treated with chemotherapy and bevacizumab. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1232–1239CrossRef Scappaticci FA, Skillings JR, Holden SN et al (2007) Arterial thromboembolicevents in patients with metastatic carcinoma treated with chemotherapy and bevacizumab. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1232–1239CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Khorana AA, Kuderer NM, Culakova E et al (2008) Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. Blood 111:4902–4907CrossRef Khorana AA, Kuderer NM, Culakova E et al (2008) Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. Blood 111:4902–4907CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ay C, Dunkler D, Marosi C et al (2010) Prediction of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. Blood 116:5377–5382CrossRef Ay C, Dunkler D, Marosi C et al (2010) Prediction of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. Blood 116:5377–5382CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Thaler J, Ay C, Pabinger I (2012) Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients-risk scores and recent randomised controlled trials. Thromb Haemost 108:1042–1048CrossRef Thaler J, Ay C, Pabinger I (2012) Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients-risk scores and recent randomised controlled trials. Thromb Haemost 108:1042–1048CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Zamorano JL, Lancellotti P, Rodriguez Muñoz D et al (2016) ESC position paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for practice guidelines. (2016) the task force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 37:2768–2801CrossRef Zamorano JL, Lancellotti P, Rodriguez Muñoz D et al (2016) ESC position paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for practice guidelines. (2016) the task force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 37:2768–2801CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Risk factors for cancer-associated thrombosis in patients undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Authors
Yosuke Ando
Takahiro Hayashi
Reiko Sugimoto
Seira Nishibe
Kaori Ito
Kenji Kawada
Yoshiaki Ikeda
Shigeki Yamada
Kazuyoshi Imaizumi
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-019-00881-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Investigational New Drugs 4/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine