Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 3/2013

01-06-2013 | PHASE I STUDIES

A Phase 1 dose-escalation study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of once-daily oral foretinib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, in patients with solid tumors

Authors: Geoffrey I. Shapiro, Stewart McCallum, Laurel M. Adams, Laurie Sherman, Steve Weller, Suzanne Swann, Harold Keer, Dale Miles, Thomas Müller, Patricia LoRusso

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Summary

Foretinib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor targeting MET, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2, RON, KIT, and AXL kinases. In this Phase 1, open-label, non-randomized study, foretinib was administered once daily at doses of 60 mg, 80 mg, 100 mg, or 120 mg for 28 days. The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess the safety and tolerability of the daily oral administration schedule. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and assessment of tumor response. Patients had histologically confirmed metastatic or unresectable solid tumors for which no standard treatments existed and all received oral foretinib once daily. Dose escalation was planned as a conventional “3 + 3” design with an expansion at the MTD for collection of additional safety and pharmacokinetic information. Thirty-seven patients were treated across four dose levels. The MTD was established as 80 mg foretinib. Dose-limiting toxicities were hypertension, dehydration, and diarrhea. The most common adverse events included fatigue, hypertension, nausea, and diarrhea. Twenty-three of 31 patients (74 %) had a best response of stable disease. No patient had a confirmed partial or complete response. At the MTD, steady state was achieved by approximately 2 weeks, with average post-dose time to maximum concentration, peak concentration, and trough concentration of 4 h, 46 ng/mL, and 24 ng/mL, respectively. In patients treated at the MTD, soluble MET and VEGF-A plasma levels significantly increased (P < 0.003) and soluble VEGFR2 plasma levels significantly decreased from baseline (P < 0.03). The MTD of foretinib bisphosphate salt was determined to be 80 mg once daily.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Trusolino L, Comoglio PM (2002) Scatter-factor and semaphorin receptors: cell signalling for invasive growth. Nat Rev Cancer 2:289–300PubMedCrossRef Trusolino L, Comoglio PM (2002) Scatter-factor and semaphorin receptors: cell signalling for invasive growth. Nat Rev Cancer 2:289–300PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Thiery JP (2002) Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2:442–454PubMedCrossRef Thiery JP (2002) Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2:442–454PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Derksen PW, de Gorter HP, Meijer HP et al (2003) The hepatocyte growth factor/Met pathway controls proliferation and apoptosis in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 17:764–774PubMedCrossRef Derksen PW, de Gorter HP, Meijer HP et al (2003) The hepatocyte growth factor/Met pathway controls proliferation and apoptosis in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 17:764–774PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Zhang YW, Vande Woude GF (2003) HGF/SF-met signaling in the control of branching morphogenesis and invasion. J Cell Biochem 88:408–417PubMedCrossRef Zhang YW, Vande Woude GF (2003) HGF/SF-met signaling in the control of branching morphogenesis and invasion. J Cell Biochem 88:408–417PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zhang YW, Su Y, Volpert OV et al (2003) Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor mediates angiogenesis through positive VEGF and negative thrombospondin 1 regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:12718–12723PubMedCrossRef Zhang YW, Su Y, Volpert OV et al (2003) Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor mediates angiogenesis through positive VEGF and negative thrombospondin 1 regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:12718–12723PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Birchmeier C, Birchmeier W, Gherardi E et al (2003) Met, metastasis, motility and more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:915–925PubMedCrossRef Birchmeier C, Birchmeier W, Gherardi E et al (2003) Met, metastasis, motility and more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:915–925PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yamashita J, Ogawa M, Yamashita S et al (1994) Immunoreactive hepatocyte growth factor is a strong and independent predictor of recurrence and survival in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 54:1630–1633PubMed Yamashita J, Ogawa M, Yamashita S et al (1994) Immunoreactive hepatocyte growth factor is a strong and independent predictor of recurrence and survival in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 54:1630–1633PubMed
8.
go back to reference Ghoussoub RA, Dillon DA, D’Aquila T et al (1998) Expression of c-met is a strong independent prognostic factor in breast carcinoma. Cancer 82:1513–1520PubMedCrossRef Ghoussoub RA, Dillon DA, D’Aquila T et al (1998) Expression of c-met is a strong independent prognostic factor in breast carcinoma. Cancer 82:1513–1520PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ueki T, Fujimoto J, Suzuki T et al (1997) Expression of hepatocyte growth factor and its receptor, the c-met proto-oncogene, in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 25:619–623PubMedCrossRef Ueki T, Fujimoto J, Suzuki T et al (1997) Expression of hepatocyte growth factor and its receptor, the c-met proto-oncogene, in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 25:619–623PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Daveau M, Scotte M, Francois A et al (2003) Hepatocyte growth factor, transforming growth factor alpha, and their receptors as combined markers of prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Carcinog 36:130–141PubMedCrossRef Daveau M, Scotte M, Francois A et al (2003) Hepatocyte growth factor, transforming growth factor alpha, and their receptors as combined markers of prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Carcinog 36:130–141PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Boccaccio C, Comoglio PM (2006) Invasive growth: a MET-driven genetic programme for cancer and stem cells. Nat Rev Cancer 6:637–645PubMedCrossRef Boccaccio C, Comoglio PM (2006) Invasive growth: a MET-driven genetic programme for cancer and stem cells. Nat Rev Cancer 6:637–645PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sennino B, Naylor RM, Tabruyn SP et al (2009) Reduction of tumor invasiveness and metastasis and prolongation of survival of RIP-TAG2 mice after inhibition of VEGFR plus C-MET by XL 184. Mol Cancer Ther 8: Abstract 13 Sennino B, Naylor RM, Tabruyn SP et al (2009) Reduction of tumor invasiveness and metastasis and prolongation of survival of RIP-TAG2 mice after inhibition of VEGFR plus C-MET by XL 184. Mol Cancer Ther 8: Abstract 13
13.
go back to reference Sennino B, Ishiguro-Oonuma T, Wei Y (2012) Suppression of tumor invasion and metastasis by concurrent inhibition of c-Met and VEGF signaling in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Discov 2:270–287PubMedCrossRef Sennino B, Ishiguro-Oonuma T, Wei Y (2012) Suppression of tumor invasion and metastasis by concurrent inhibition of c-Met and VEGF signaling in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Discov 2:270–287PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gerritsen ME, Tomlinson JE, Zlot C et al (2003) Using gene expression profiling to identify the molecular basis of the synergistic actions of hepatocyte growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor in human endothelial cells. Br J Pharmacol 140:595–610PubMedCrossRef Gerritsen ME, Tomlinson JE, Zlot C et al (2003) Using gene expression profiling to identify the molecular basis of the synergistic actions of hepatocyte growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor in human endothelial cells. Br J Pharmacol 140:595–610PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Xin X, Yang S, Ingle G et al (2001) Hepatocyte growth factor enhances vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Am J Pathol 158:1111–1120PubMedCrossRef Xin X, Yang S, Ingle G et al (2001) Hepatocyte growth factor enhances vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Am J Pathol 158:1111–1120PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pouyssegur J, Dayan F, Mazure NM (2006) Hypoxia signaling in cancer and approaches to enforce tumour regression. Nature 441:437–443PubMedCrossRef Pouyssegur J, Dayan F, Mazure NM (2006) Hypoxia signaling in cancer and approaches to enforce tumour regression. Nature 441:437–443PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Vaupel P (2008) Hypoxia and aggressive tumor phenotype: implications for therapy and prognosis. Oncologist 13(Suppl 3):21–26PubMedCrossRef Vaupel P (2008) Hypoxia and aggressive tumor phenotype: implications for therapy and prognosis. Oncologist 13(Suppl 3):21–26PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ye X, Li Y, Stawicki S et al (2010) An anti-Axl monoclonal antibody attenuates xenograft tumor growth and enhances the effect of multiple anticancer therapies. Oncogene 29:5254–5264PubMedCrossRef Ye X, Li Y, Stawicki S et al (2010) An anti-Axl monoclonal antibody attenuates xenograft tumor growth and enhances the effect of multiple anticancer therapies. Oncogene 29:5254–5264PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Qian F, Engst S, Yamaguchi K et al (2009) Inhibition of tumor cell growth, invasion, and metastasis by EXEL-2880 (XL880, GSK1363089), a novel inhibitor of HGF and VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases. Cancer Res 69:8009–8016PubMedCrossRef Qian F, Engst S, Yamaguchi K et al (2009) Inhibition of tumor cell growth, invasion, and metastasis by EXEL-2880 (XL880, GSK1363089), a novel inhibitor of HGF and VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases. Cancer Res 69:8009–8016PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Copeland RA, Pompliano DL, Meek TD (2006) Drug-target residence time and its implications for lead optimization. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5:730–739PubMedCrossRef Copeland RA, Pompliano DL, Meek TD (2006) Drug-target residence time and its implications for lead optimization. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5:730–739PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Eder JP, Shapiro GI, Appleman LJ et al (2010) A phase I study of foretinib, a multi-targeted inhibitor of c-Met and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. Clin Cancer Res 16:3507–3516PubMedCrossRef Eder JP, Shapiro GI, Appleman LJ et al (2010) A phase I study of foretinib, a multi-targeted inhibitor of c-Met and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. Clin Cancer Res 16:3507–3516PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference van Heeckeren WJ, Ortiz J, Cooney MM et al (2007) Hypertension, proteinuria, and antagonism of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling: clinical toxicity, therapeutic target, or novel biomarker? J Clin Oncol 25:2993–2995PubMedCrossRef van Heeckeren WJ, Ortiz J, Cooney MM et al (2007) Hypertension, proteinuria, and antagonism of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling: clinical toxicity, therapeutic target, or novel biomarker? J Clin Oncol 25:2993–2995PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Jhawer M, Kindler HL, Wainberg Z et al (2009) GSK1363089 (GSK089), a dual MET/VEGFR2 inhibitor, in metastatic gastric cancer (GC): Interim results of a multicenter Phase II study. ASCO (2009) American Society of Clinical Oncology 45th Annual Meeting. Abstract #4502 Jhawer M, Kindler HL, Wainberg Z et al (2009) GSK1363089 (GSK089), a dual MET/VEGFR2 inhibitor, in metastatic gastric cancer (GC): Interim results of a multicenter Phase II study. ASCO (2009) American Society of Clinical Oncology 45th Annual Meeting. Abstract #4502
26.
go back to reference Seiwert T, Swann S, Kurz H, Bonate P, McCallum S, Sarantopoulos J (2009) A Phase II study of the efficacy and safety of foretinib, a novel receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, given on an intermittent five days on nine days off (5/9) schedule in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN). Molec Cancer Ther 8 Suppl 1:Abstract #B6. Doi:10.1158/1535-7163. TARG-090B6. Seiwert T, Swann S, Kurz H, Bonate P, McCallum S, Sarantopoulos J (2009) A Phase II study of the efficacy and safety of foretinib, a novel receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, given on an intermittent five days on nine days off (5/9) schedule in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN). Molec Cancer Ther 8 Suppl 1:Abstract #B6. Doi:10.​1158/​1535-7163. TARG-090B6.
27.
go back to reference Srinivasan R, Linehan M, Vaishampayan U et al (2009) A Phase II Study of 2 dosing regimens of foretinib (GSK 1363089), a dual MET/VEGFR2 inhibitor, in patients (pts) with papillary renal carcinoma (PRC). J Clin Oncol 27 Suppl 15s: Abstract #5103. Srinivasan R, Linehan M, Vaishampayan U et al (2009) A Phase II Study of 2 dosing regimens of foretinib (GSK 1363089), a dual MET/VEGFR2 inhibitor, in patients (pts) with papillary renal carcinoma (PRC). J Clin Oncol 27 Suppl 15s: Abstract #5103.
28.
go back to reference Yau T, Sukeepaisarnjaroen W, Chao Y et al (2012) A phase I/II study of foretinib, an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting MET, RON, AXL, TIE-2, and VEGFR in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). J Clin Oncol 30 Suppl:Abstract #4108 Yau T, Sukeepaisarnjaroen W, Chao Y et al (2012) A phase I/II study of foretinib, an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting MET, RON, AXL, TIE-2, and VEGFR in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). J Clin Oncol 30 Suppl:Abstract #4108
Metadata
Title
A Phase 1 dose-escalation study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of once-daily oral foretinib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, in patients with solid tumors
Authors
Geoffrey I. Shapiro
Stewart McCallum
Laurel M. Adams
Laurie Sherman
Steve Weller
Suzanne Swann
Harold Keer
Dale Miles
Thomas Müller
Patricia LoRusso
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-012-9881-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Investigational New Drugs 3/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine