Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 3/2012

01-06-2012 | PHASE III STUDIES

Progression-free survival and time to progression as surrogate markers of overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer: analysis of 36 randomized trials

Authors: Kohei Shitara, Junko Ikeda, Tomoya Yokota, Daisuke Takahari, Takashi Ura, Kei Muro, Keitaro Matsuo

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Summary

Progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression (TTP) have been reported to correlate with overall survival (OS) in several types of cancers. To our knowledge, however, their use in the evaluation of new agents for AGC has not been investigated. We evaluated the potential of PFS and TTP to act as surrogates of OS in clinical trial settings. Randomized trials of systemic chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer were identified by comprehensive electronic and manual search. Correlations between PFS/TTP and OS were evaluated. Thirty-six trials with a total of 83 treatment arms and 10,484 patients were selected for analysis. The nonparametric Spearman rank correlation coefficient (ρ) between median PFS/TTP and OS was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.82) and the correlation coefficient between hazard ratios in PFS/TTP and OS was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.92). Correlation tended to be higher in trials reporting PFS (ρ = 0.85; 0.72–0.97) than in those reporting TTP (ρ = 0.60; 0.24–0.97), trials in Non-Asian countries (ρ = 0.80; 0.61–0.99) than Asia (ρ = 0.67; 0.39–0.94), trials in patients with measurable lesions only (ρ = 0.91; 0.77–1.00) than in those including non-measurable lesions (ρ = 0.71; 0.50–0.93), albeit that none of these differences was significant. Our results indicate that improvements in PFS/TTP in advanced gastric cancer strongly correlate with improvements in OS. Further research is needed to clarify the surrogacy of PFS/TTP for OS or the role of PFS as the true end point in future randomized clinical trials of chemotherapy for AGC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF (2006) Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 24:2137–2150PubMedCrossRef Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF (2006) Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 24:2137–2150PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, Majlis A, Constenla M, Boni C et al (2006) Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 24:4991–4997PubMedCrossRef Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, Majlis A, Constenla M, Boni C et al (2006) Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 24:4991–4997PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, Iveson T, Nicolson M, Coxon F et al (2008) Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med 358:36–46PubMedCrossRef Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, Iveson T, Nicolson M, Coxon F et al (2008) Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med 358:36–46PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, Takagane A, Akiya T, Takagi M et al (2008) S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9:215–221PubMedCrossRef Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, Takagane A, Akiya T, Takagi M et al (2008) S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9:215–221PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB, Chen J, Xiong J, Wang J et al (2009) Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol 20:666–673PubMedCrossRef Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB, Chen J, Xiong J, Wang J et al (2009) Capecitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol 20:666–673PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ajani JA, Rodriguez W, Bodoky G, Moiseyenko V, Lichinitser M, Gorbunova V et al (2010) Multicenter phase III comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma study: the FLAGS trial. J Clin Oncol 28:1547–1553PubMedCrossRef Ajani JA, Rodriguez W, Bodoky G, Moiseyenko V, Lichinitser M, Gorbunova V et al (2010) Multicenter phase III comparison of cisplatin/S-1 with cisplatin/infusional fluorouracil in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma study: the FLAGS trial. J Clin Oncol 28:1547–1553PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A et al (2010) Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 376:687–697PubMedCrossRef Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A et al (2010) Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 376:687–697PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Thuss-Patience PC, Kretzschmar A, Deist T, Hinke A, Bichev D, Lebedinzew B et al (2009) Irinotecan versus best supportive care (BSC) as second-line therapy in gastric cancer: a randomized phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO). J Clin Oncol 27:15s (suppl; abstr 4540)CrossRef Thuss-Patience PC, Kretzschmar A, Deist T, Hinke A, Bichev D, Lebedinzew B et al (2009) Irinotecan versus best supportive care (BSC) as second-line therapy in gastric cancer: a randomized phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO). J Clin Oncol 27:15s (suppl; abstr 4540)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Takiuchi H, Fukuda H, Boku N, Shimada Y, Nasu J, Hamamoto Y et al (2010) Randomized phase II study of best-available 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus weekly paclitaxel in gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal metastasis (PM) refractory to 5-FU-containing regimens (JCOG0407). J Clin Oncol 28:15s (suppl; abstr 4052) Takiuchi H, Fukuda H, Boku N, Shimada Y, Nasu J, Hamamoto Y et al (2010) Randomized phase II study of best-available 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus weekly paclitaxel in gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal metastasis (PM) refractory to 5-FU-containing regimens (JCOG0407). J Clin Oncol 28:15s (suppl; abstr 4052)
10.
go back to reference Takashima A, Boku N, Kato K, Mizusawa J, Nakamura K, Fukuda H et al (2010) Survival prolongation after treatment failure in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC): results from combined analysis of JCOG9205 and JCOG9912. J Clin Oncol 28:15s (suppl; abstr 4061) Takashima A, Boku N, Kato K, Mizusawa J, Nakamura K, Fukuda H et al (2010) Survival prolongation after treatment failure in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC): results from combined analysis of JCOG9205 and JCOG9912. J Clin Oncol 28:15s (suppl; abstr 4061)
11.
go back to reference Broglio KR, Berry DA (2009) Detecting an overall survival benefit that is derived from progression-free survival. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:1642–1649PubMedCrossRef Broglio KR, Berry DA (2009) Detecting an overall survival benefit that is derived from progression-free survival. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:1642–1649PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Johnson KR, Ringland C, Stokes BJ, Anthony DM, Freemantle N, Irs A et al (2006) Response rate or time to progression as predictors of survival in trials of metastatic colorectal cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 7:741–746PubMedCrossRef Johnson KR, Ringland C, Stokes BJ, Anthony DM, Freemantle N, Irs A et al (2006) Response rate or time to progression as predictors of survival in trials of metastatic colorectal cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 7:741–746PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tang PA, Bentzen SM, Chen EX, Siu LL (2007) Surrogate end points for median overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: literature-based analysis from 39 randomized controlled trials of first-line chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25:4562–4568PubMedCrossRef Tang PA, Bentzen SM, Chen EX, Siu LL (2007) Surrogate end points for median overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: literature-based analysis from 39 randomized controlled trials of first-line chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25:4562–4568PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hotta K, Fujiwara Y, Matsuo K, Kiura K, Takigawa N, Tabata M et al (2009) Time to progression as a surrogate marker for overall survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 4:311–317PubMedCrossRef Hotta K, Fujiwara Y, Matsuo K, Kiura K, Takigawa N, Tabata M et al (2009) Time to progression as a surrogate marker for overall survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 4:311–317PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hackshaw A, Knight A, Barrett-Lee P, Leonard R (2005) Surrogate markers and survival in women receiving first-line combination anthracycline chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 93:1215–1221PubMedCrossRef Hackshaw A, Knight A, Barrett-Lee P, Leonard R (2005) Surrogate markers and survival in women receiving first-line combination anthracycline chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 93:1215–1221PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Burzykowski T, Buyse M, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Sledge G, Carmichael J, Lück HJ et al (2008) Evaluation of tumor response, disease control, progression-free survival, and time to progression as potential surrogate end points in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:1987–1992PubMedCrossRef Burzykowski T, Buyse M, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Sledge G, Carmichael J, Lück HJ et al (2008) Evaluation of tumor response, disease control, progression-free survival, and time to progression as potential surrogate end points in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:1987–1992PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Saad ED, Katz A, Hoff PM, Buyse M (2010) Progression-free survival as surrogate and as true end point: insights from the breast and colorectal cancer literature. Ann Oncol 21:7–12PubMedCrossRef Saad ED, Katz A, Hoff PM, Buyse M (2010) Progression-free survival as surrogate and as true end point: insights from the breast and colorectal cancer literature. Ann Oncol 21:7–12PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, Wager E, Middleton P, Altman DG (2008) CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet 371:281–283PubMedCrossRef Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, Wager E, Middleton P, Altman DG (2008) CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet 371:281–283PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Parmar MB, Torri V, Stewart L (1998) Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med 17:2815–2834PubMedCrossRef Parmar MB, Torri V, Stewart L (1998) Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med 17:2815–2834PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7:1–26CrossRef Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7:1–26CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cullinan SA, Moertel CG, Fleming TR, Rubin JR, Krook JE, Everson LK et al (1985) A comparison of three chemotherapeutic regimens in the treatment of advanced pancreatic and gastric carcinoma: fluorouracil vs fluorouracil and doxorubicin vs fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin. JAMA 253:2061–2067PubMedCrossRef Cullinan SA, Moertel CG, Fleming TR, Rubin JR, Krook JE, Everson LK et al (1985) A comparison of three chemotherapeutic regimens in the treatment of advanced pancreatic and gastric carcinoma: fluorouracil vs fluorouracil and doxorubicin vs fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin. JAMA 253:2061–2067PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kim NK, Park YS, Heo DS, Suh C, Kim SY, Park KC et al (1993) A phase III randomized study of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin C versus 5-fluorouracil alone in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Cancer 71:3813–3818PubMedCrossRef Kim NK, Park YS, Heo DS, Suh C, Kim SY, Park KC et al (1993) A phase III randomized study of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin C versus 5-fluorouracil alone in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Cancer 71:3813–3818PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cullinan SA, Moertel CG, Wieand HS, O’Connell MJ, Poon MA, Krook JE et al (1994) Controlled evaluation of three drug combination regimens versus fluorouracil alone for the therapy of advanced gastric cancer. North Central Cancer Treatment Group. J Clin Oncol 12:412–416PubMed Cullinan SA, Moertel CG, Wieand HS, O’Connell MJ, Poon MA, Krook JE et al (1994) Controlled evaluation of three drug combination regimens versus fluorouracil alone for the therapy of advanced gastric cancer. North Central Cancer Treatment Group. J Clin Oncol 12:412–416PubMed
24.
go back to reference Loehrer PJ Sr, Harry D, Chlebowski RT (1994) 5-fluorouracil vs. epirubicin vs. 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin in advanced gastric carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 12:57–63PubMedCrossRef Loehrer PJ Sr, Harry D, Chlebowski RT (1994) 5-fluorouracil vs. epirubicin vs. 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin in advanced gastric carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 12:57–63PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pyrhonen S, Kuitunen T, Nyandoto P, Kouri M (1995) Randomised comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 71:587–591PubMedCrossRef Pyrhonen S, Kuitunen T, Nyandoto P, Kouri M (1995) Randomised comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 71:587–591PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kondo K, Sakamoto J, Nakazato H, Koike A, Kitoh T, Hachisuka K et al (2000) A phase III randomized study comparing doxifluridine and 5-fluorouracil as supportive chemotherapy in advanced and recurrent gastric cancer. Oncol Rep 7:485–490PubMed Kondo K, Sakamoto J, Nakazato H, Koike A, Kitoh T, Hachisuka K et al (2000) A phase III randomized study comparing doxifluridine and 5-fluorouracil as supportive chemotherapy in advanced and recurrent gastric cancer. Oncol Rep 7:485–490PubMed
27.
go back to reference Vanhoefer U, Rougier P, Wilke H, Ducreux MP, Lacave AJ, Van Cutsem E et al (2000) Final results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential high-dose methotrexate, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin versus etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil versus infusional fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 18:2648–2657PubMed Vanhoefer U, Rougier P, Wilke H, Ducreux MP, Lacave AJ, Van Cutsem E et al (2000) Final results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential high-dose methotrexate, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin versus etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil versus infusional fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 18:2648–2657PubMed
28.
go back to reference Ohtsu A, Shimada Y, Shirao K, Boku N, Hyodo I, Saito H et al (2003) Randomized phase III trial of fluorouracil alone versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus uracil and tegafur plus mitomycin in patients with unresectable, advanced gastric cancer: the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9205). J Clin Oncol 21:54–59PubMedCrossRef Ohtsu A, Shimada Y, Shirao K, Boku N, Hyodo I, Saito H et al (2003) Randomized phase III trial of fluorouracil alone versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus uracil and tegafur plus mitomycin in patients with unresectable, advanced gastric cancer: the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9205). J Clin Oncol 21:54–59PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ross P, Nicolson M, Cunningham D, Valle J, Seymour M, Harper P et al (2002) Prospective randomized trial comparing mitomycin, cisplatin, and protracted venous-infusion fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) with epirubicin, cisplatin, and PVI 5-FU in advanced esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:1996–2004PubMedCrossRef Ross P, Nicolson M, Cunningham D, Valle J, Seymour M, Harper P et al (2002) Prospective randomized trial comparing mitomycin, cisplatin, and protracted venous-infusion fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) with epirubicin, cisplatin, and PVI 5-FU in advanced esophagogastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:1996–2004PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Tebbutt NC, Norman A, Cunningham D, Iveson T, Seymour M, Hickish T et al (2002) A multicentre, randomised phase III trial comparing protracted venous infusion (PVI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin C in patients with inoperable oesophago-gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 13:1568–1575PubMedCrossRef Tebbutt NC, Norman A, Cunningham D, Iveson T, Seymour M, Hickish T et al (2002) A multicentre, randomised phase III trial comparing protracted venous infusion (PVI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin C in patients with inoperable oesophago-gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 13:1568–1575PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bouché O, Raoul JL, Bonnetain F, Giovannini M, Etienne PL, Lledo G et al (2004) Randomized multicenter phase II trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin, or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer: a Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive Group Study—FFCD 980. J Clin Oncol 22:4319–4328PubMedCrossRef Bouché O, Raoul JL, Bonnetain F, Giovannini M, Etienne PL, Lledo G et al (2004) Randomized multicenter phase II trial of a biweekly regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin (LV5FU2), LV5FU2 plus cisplatin, or LV5FU2 plus irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer: a Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive Group Study—FFCD 980. J Clin Oncol 22:4319–4328PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Pozzo C, Barone C, Szanto J, Padi E, Peschel C, Bükki J et al (2004) Irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid or with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric or esophageal-gastric junction adenocarcinoma: results of a randomized phase II study. Ann Oncol 15:1773–1781PubMedCrossRef Pozzo C, Barone C, Szanto J, Padi E, Peschel C, Bükki J et al (2004) Irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid or with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric or esophageal-gastric junction adenocarcinoma: results of a randomized phase II study. Ann Oncol 15:1773–1781PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Ajani JA, Fodor MB, Tjulandin SA, Moiseyenko VM, Chao Y, Cabral Filho S et al (2005) Phase II multi-institutional randomized trial of docetaxel plus cisplatin with or without fluorouracil in patients with untreated, advanced gastric, or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 23:5660–5667PubMedCrossRef Ajani JA, Fodor MB, Tjulandin SA, Moiseyenko VM, Chao Y, Cabral Filho S et al (2005) Phase II multi-institutional randomized trial of docetaxel plus cisplatin with or without fluorouracil in patients with untreated, advanced gastric, or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 23:5660–5667PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Moehler M, Eimermacher A, Siebler J, Hohler T, Wein A, Menges M et al (2005) Randomised phase II evaluation of irinotecan plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (ILF) vs 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and etoposide (ELF) in untreated metastatic gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 92:2122–2128PubMedCrossRef Moehler M, Eimermacher A, Siebler J, Hohler T, Wein A, Menges M et al (2005) Randomised phase II evaluation of irinotecan plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (ILF) vs 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and etoposide (ELF) in untreated metastatic gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 92:2122–2128PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Thuss-Patience PC, Kretzschmar A, Repp M, Kingreen D, Hennesser D, Micheel S et al (2005) Docetaxel and continuous-infusion fluorouracil versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol 23:494–501PubMedCrossRef Thuss-Patience PC, Kretzschmar A, Repp M, Kingreen D, Hennesser D, Micheel S et al (2005) Docetaxel and continuous-infusion fluorouracil versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase II study. J Clin Oncol 23:494–501PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Chin K, Iishi H, Imamura H, Kobayashi O, Imamoto H, Esaki T et al (2007) Irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) versus S-1 alone as first line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: preliminary results of a randomized phase III study (GC0301/TOP-002). J Clin Oncol 25:15s, suppl; abstr 4525CrossRef Chin K, Iishi H, Imamura H, Kobayashi O, Imamoto H, Esaki T et al (2007) Irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) versus S-1 alone as first line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: preliminary results of a randomized phase III study (GC0301/TOP-002). J Clin Oncol 25:15s, suppl; abstr 4525CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Al-Batran SE, Hartmann JT, Probst S, Schmalenberg H, Hollerbach S, Hofheinz R et al (2008) Phase III trial in metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with fluorouracil, leucovorin plus either oxaliplatin or cisplatin: a study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie. J Clin Oncol 26:1435–1442PubMedCrossRef Al-Batran SE, Hartmann JT, Probst S, Schmalenberg H, Hollerbach S, Hofheinz R et al (2008) Phase III trial in metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with fluorouracil, leucovorin plus either oxaliplatin or cisplatin: a study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie. J Clin Oncol 26:1435–1442PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Dank M, Zaluski J, Barone C, Valvere V, Yalcin S, Peschel C et al (2008) Randomized phase III study comparing irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid to cisplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil in chemotherapy naive patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction. Ann Oncol 19:1450–1457PubMedCrossRef Dank M, Zaluski J, Barone C, Valvere V, Yalcin S, Peschel C et al (2008) Randomized phase III study comparing irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid to cisplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil in chemotherapy naive patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction. Ann Oncol 19:1450–1457PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Ikeda R, Yoshida K, Satou Y, Takahashi M, Une Y, Yamamoto W et al (2009) Randomized phase II/III study of docetaxel/S-1 (DS-1) versus CDDP/5FU (FUP) in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer: updated phase II results. J Clin Oncol 27:15s (suppl; abstr 4595)CrossRef Ikeda R, Yoshida K, Satou Y, Takahashi M, Une Y, Yamamoto W et al (2009) Randomized phase II/III study of docetaxel/S-1 (DS-1) versus CDDP/5FU (FUP) in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer: updated phase II results. J Clin Oncol 27:15s (suppl; abstr 4595)CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Jeung H, Im C, Rha S, Ahn J, Shin S, Noh S et al (2008) A randomized phase II trial of docetaxel plus S-1 versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer as a first-line treatment. J Clin Oncol 26 (suppl; abstr 4534) Jeung H, Im C, Rha S, Ahn J, Shin S, Noh S et al (2008) A randomized phase II trial of docetaxel plus S-1 versus docetaxel plus cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer as a first-line treatment. J Clin Oncol 26 (suppl; abstr 4534)
41.
go back to reference Lee JL, Kang YK, Kang HJ, Lee KH, Zang DY, Ryoo BY et al (2008) A randomised multicentre phase II trial of capecitabine vs S-1 as first-line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent unresectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 99:584–590PubMedCrossRef Lee JL, Kang YK, Kang HJ, Lee KH, Zang DY, Ryoo BY et al (2008) A randomised multicentre phase II trial of capecitabine vs S-1 as first-line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent unresectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 99:584–590PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Park SH, Nam E, Park J, Cho EK, Shin DB, Lee JH et al (2008) Randomized phase II study of irinotecan, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (ILF) versus cisplatin plus ILF (PILF) combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 19:729–733PubMedCrossRef Park SH, Nam E, Park J, Cho EK, Shin DB, Lee JH et al (2008) Randomized phase II study of irinotecan, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (ILF) versus cisplatin plus ILF (PILF) combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 19:729–733PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Ridwelski K, Fahlke J, Kettner E, Schmidt C, Keilholz U, Quietzsch D et al (2008) Docetaxel-cisplatin (DC) versus 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin-cisplatin (FLC) as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: Preliminary results of a phase III study. J Clin Oncol 26 (suppl; abstr 4512) Ridwelski K, Fahlke J, Kettner E, Schmidt C, Keilholz U, Quietzsch D et al (2008) Docetaxel-cisplatin (DC) versus 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin-cisplatin (FLC) as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: Preliminary results of a phase III study. J Clin Oncol 26 (suppl; abstr 4512)
44.
go back to reference Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H, Shirao K, Doi T, Sawaki A et al (2009) Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 10:1063–1069PubMedCrossRef Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H, Shirao K, Doi T, Sawaki A et al (2009) Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 10:1063–1069PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Lee KH, Hyun MS, Kim HK, Jin HM, Yang J, Song HS et al (2009) Randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of heptaplatin 1-hour infusion and 5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy comparing with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Res Treat 41:12–18PubMedCrossRef Lee KH, Hyun MS, Kim HK, Jin HM, Yang J, Song HS et al (2009) Randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of heptaplatin 1-hour infusion and 5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy comparing with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Res Treat 41:12–18PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Kang Y, Ohtsu A, Van Cutsem E, Rha SY, Sawaki A, Park S et al (2010) AVAGAST: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of first-line capecitabine and cisplatin plus bevacizumab or placebo in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). J Clin Oncol 28:18s (suppl; abstr LBA4007)CrossRef Kang Y, Ohtsu A, Van Cutsem E, Rha SY, Sawaki A, Park S et al (2010) AVAGAST: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study of first-line capecitabine and cisplatin plus bevacizumab or placebo in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). J Clin Oncol 28:18s (suppl; abstr LBA4007)CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Kishimoto T, Imamura H, Uedou F, Fujitani K, Iijima S, Takiuchi H et al (2010) Randomized phase II trial of S-1 plus irinotecan versus S-1 plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (OGSG0402): final report. J Clin Oncol 28:15s (suppl; abstr 4015) Kishimoto T, Imamura H, Uedou F, Fujitani K, Iijima S, Takiuchi H et al (2010) Randomized phase II trial of S-1 plus irinotecan versus S-1 plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (OGSG0402): final report. J Clin Oncol 28:15s (suppl; abstr 4015)
48.
go back to reference Sawaki A, Yamaguchi K, Nabeya Y, Sakai Y, Osanai H, Denda T et al (2009) 5-FU/l-LV (RPMI) versus S1 as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomized phase III non-inferiority trial. (ISO-5FU10 Study Group trial). Eur J Cancer (Supplements 7)363 Sawaki A, Yamaguchi K, Nabeya Y, Sakai Y, Osanai H, Denda T et al (2009) 5-FU/l-LV (RPMI) versus S1 as first-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomized phase III non-inferiority trial. (ISO-5FU10 Study Group trial). Eur J Cancer (Supplements 7)363
49.
go back to reference Moehler M, Kanzler S, Geissler M, Raedle J, Ebert MP, Daum S et al (2010) A randomized multicenter phase II study comparing capecitabine with irinotecan or cisplatin in metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction. Ann Oncol 21:71–77PubMedCrossRef Moehler M, Kanzler S, Geissler M, Raedle J, Ebert MP, Daum S et al (2010) A randomized multicenter phase II study comparing capecitabine with irinotecan or cisplatin in metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction. Ann Oncol 21:71–77PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Tebbutt NC, Cummins MM, Sourjina T, Strickland A, Van Hazel G, Ganju V et al (2010) Randomised, non-comparative phase II study of weekly docetaxel with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil or with capecitabine in oesophagogastric cancer: the AGITG ATTAX trial. Br J Cancer 102:475–481PubMedCrossRef Tebbutt NC, Cummins MM, Sourjina T, Strickland A, Van Hazel G, Ganju V et al (2010) Randomised, non-comparative phase II study of weekly docetaxel with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil or with capecitabine in oesophagogastric cancer: the AGITG ATTAX trial. Br J Cancer 102:475–481PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Fleming TR (2005) Surrogate endpoints and FDA’s accelerated approval process. Health Aff (Millwood) 24:67–68CrossRef Fleming TR (2005) Surrogate endpoints and FDA’s accelerated approval process. Health Aff (Millwood) 24:67–68CrossRef
52.
53.
go back to reference Ohtsu A (2007) Diverse eastern and Western approaches to the management of gastric cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Res 1(2 Suppl):S10–S15PubMed Ohtsu A (2007) Diverse eastern and Western approaches to the management of gastric cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Res 1(2 Suppl):S10–S15PubMed
54.
go back to reference Buyse M, Molenberghs G, Burzykowski T, Renard D, Geys H (2000) The validation of surrogate endpoints in meta-analyses of randomized experiments. Biostatistics 1:49–67PubMedCrossRef Buyse M, Molenberghs G, Burzykowski T, Renard D, Geys H (2000) The validation of surrogate endpoints in meta-analyses of randomized experiments. Biostatistics 1:49–67PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Progression-free survival and time to progression as surrogate markers of overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer: analysis of 36 randomized trials
Authors
Kohei Shitara
Junko Ikeda
Tomoya Yokota
Daisuke Takahari
Takashi Ura
Kei Muro
Keitaro Matsuo
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-011-9648-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Investigational New Drugs 3/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine