Skip to main content
Top

01-08-2020 | Angiography | Clinical Case Report

Multimodal imaging in a family with Cockayne syndrome with a novel pathogenic mutation in the ERCC8 gene, and significant phenotypic variability

Authors: Soungmin Cho, Elias I. Traboulsi, John Chiang, David Sierpina

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cockayne syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder caused by mutations of either the ERCC6/CSB or ERCC8/CSA genes. Here, we describe two sisters with Cockayne syndrome caused by compound heterozygous mutations in the ERCC8 gene using multimodal imaging. Significant ophthalmic and systemic phenotypic variability is discussed.

Materials and methods

Multimodal imaging was performed in two affected sisters and included electroretinography, optical coherence tomography, ultra-wide-field confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, fundus autofluorescence and fluorescein angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Genetic analyses were performed on the affected sisters, both parents, and three unaffected siblings.

Results

The older sister (Patient 1) had mental retardation, bilateral hearing loss, ataxia, and decreased visual acuity with retinal dystrophy. Radiographic studies revealed microcephaly, cerebral and cerebellar atrophy, ventriculomegaly, and a diffusely thickened skull. Full-field electroretinography waveforms were severely diminished with attenuation of cone and rod responses. The younger sister (Patient 2) had similar clinical features, including ataxia, bilateral hearing loss, and decreased visual acuity with retinal dystrophy. She also had paranoid schizophrenia. Wide-field fundus autofluorescence showed scattered areas of retinal pigment epithelium atrophy, which was different from her sister. Genetic analysis revealed two mutations in the ERCC8 gene shared by the sisters. These include an unreported missense point mutation: p.Thr328Ser:c.983C > G, and another previously reported pathogenic missense mutation: p.Ala205Pro:c.613G > C. Familial testing showed in trans segregation of these mutations with unaffected siblings inheriting one or neither mutation, but not both.

Conclusion

The clinical presentation and genetic studies confirmed a diagnosis of Cockayne syndrome in both sisters caused by compound heterozygous mutations in the ERCC8 gene on chromosome 10. Multimodal ocular imaging and systemic findings revealed wide phenotypic variability between the affected siblings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cleaver J, Lam E, Revet I (2009) Disorders of nucleotide excision repair: the genetic and molecular basis of heterogeneity. Nat Rev Genet 10:756–768CrossRef Cleaver J, Lam E, Revet I (2009) Disorders of nucleotide excision repair: the genetic and molecular basis of heterogeneity. Nat Rev Genet 10:756–768CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Traboulsi E, De Becker I, Maumenee I (1992) Ocular findings in Cockayne syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 114:579–583CrossRef Traboulsi E, De Becker I, Maumenee I (1992) Ocular findings in Cockayne syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 114:579–583CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nance M, Berry A (1993) Cockayne syndrome: review of 140 cases. Am J Med Genet 42:68–84CrossRef Nance M, Berry A (1993) Cockayne syndrome: review of 140 cases. Am J Med Genet 42:68–84CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kubota M, Ohta S, Ando A et al (2015) Nationwide survey of Cockayne syndrome in Japan: incidence, clinical course and prognosis. Pediatr Int 57(3):339–347CrossRef Kubota M, Ohta S, Ando A et al (2015) Nationwide survey of Cockayne syndrome in Japan: incidence, clinical course and prognosis. Pediatr Int 57(3):339–347CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Laugel V (2013) Cockayne syndrome: the expanding clinical and mutational spectrum. Mech Ageing Dev 134(5–6):161–170CrossRef Laugel V (2013) Cockayne syndrome: the expanding clinical and mutational spectrum. Mech Ageing Dev 134(5–6):161–170CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fousteri M, Vermeulen W, Zeeland A et al (2006) Cockayne syndrome A and B proteins differentially regulate recruitment of chromatin remodeling and repair factors to stalled RNA polymerase II in vivo. Mol Cell 23(4):461–482CrossRef Fousteri M, Vermeulen W, Zeeland A et al (2006) Cockayne syndrome A and B proteins differentially regulate recruitment of chromatin remodeling and repair factors to stalled RNA polymerase II in vivo. Mol Cell 23(4):461–482CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Marteijn J, Lans H, Vermeulen W et al (2014) Understanding nucleotide excision repair and its roles in cancer and ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15(7):465–481CrossRef Marteijn J, Lans H, Vermeulen W et al (2014) Understanding nucleotide excision repair and its roles in cancer and ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15(7):465–481CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cao H, Williams C, Carter M et al (2004) CKN1 (MIM 216400): mutations in Cockayne syndrome type A and a new common polymorphism. J Hum Genet 49:61–63CrossRef Cao H, Williams C, Carter M et al (2004) CKN1 (MIM 216400): mutations in Cockayne syndrome type A and a new common polymorphism. J Hum Genet 49:61–63CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Henning K, Li L, Iyer N et al (1995) The Cockayne syndrome group A gene encodes a WD repeat protein that interacts with CSB protein and a subunit of RNA polymerase II TFIIH. Cell 82(4):555–564CrossRef Henning K, Li L, Iyer N et al (1995) The Cockayne syndrome group A gene encodes a WD repeat protein that interacts with CSB protein and a subunit of RNA polymerase II TFIIH. Cell 82(4):555–564CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ridley A, Colley J, Wynford-Thomas D et al (2005) Characterisation of novel mutations in Cockayne syndrome type A and xeroderma pigmentosum group C subjects. J Hum Genet 50(3):151–154CrossRef Ridley A, Colley J, Wynford-Thomas D et al (2005) Characterisation of novel mutations in Cockayne syndrome type A and xeroderma pigmentosum group C subjects. J Hum Genet 50(3):151–154CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Karikkineth A, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Fivenson E et al (2017) Cockayne syndrome: clinical features, model systems and pathways. Ageing Res Rev 33:3–17CrossRef Karikkineth A, Scheibye-Knudsen M, Fivenson E et al (2017) Cockayne syndrome: clinical features, model systems and pathways. Ageing Res Rev 33:3–17CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Levin PS, Green WR, Victor DI, MacLean AL (1983) Histopathology of the eye in Cockayne’s syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 101:1093–1097CrossRef Levin PS, Green WR, Victor DI, MacLean AL (1983) Histopathology of the eye in Cockayne’s syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 101:1093–1097CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Trese MG, Nudleman ED, Besirli CG (2017) Peripheral retinal vasculopathy in Cockayne syndrome. Retina Cases Brief Rep 11(3):232–235CrossRef Trese MG, Nudleman ED, Besirli CG (2017) Peripheral retinal vasculopathy in Cockayne syndrome. Retina Cases Brief Rep 11(3):232–235CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wu Y, Zheng Y, Yan X et al (2017) Ocular findings in a patient with Cockayne syndrome with two mutations in the ERCC gene. Ophthalmic Genet 38(2):175–177CrossRef Wu Y, Zheng Y, Yan X et al (2017) Ocular findings in a patient with Cockayne syndrome with two mutations in the ERCC gene. Ophthalmic Genet 38(2):175–177CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Figueras-Roca M, Budi V, Morato M et al (2019) Cockayne syndrome in adults: complete retinal dysfunction exploration of two case reports. Doc Ophthalmol 138:241–246CrossRef Figueras-Roca M, Budi V, Morato M et al (2019) Cockayne syndrome in adults: complete retinal dysfunction exploration of two case reports. Doc Ophthalmol 138:241–246CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multimodal imaging in a family with Cockayne syndrome with a novel pathogenic mutation in the ERCC8 gene, and significant phenotypic variability
Authors
Soungmin Cho
Elias I. Traboulsi
John Chiang
David Sierpina
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-020-09754-3