Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2017

01-06-2017 | Original Research Article

Test–retest reliability of scotopic full-field electroretinograms in rabbits

Authors: Jan Luebke, Alexandra Anton, Michael Bach

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To explore test–retest reliability of standard scotopic full-field ERG measurements in New Zealand White rabbits. The ERG is widely used for testing of retinal integrity after any ocular treatment. We here present detailed stimulus–response dependencies for single healthy and untreated animals, concentrating on test–retest reproducibility.

Materials and methods

Five New Zealand White rabbits (aged 8–10 weeks, weight about 2.0–2.5 kg) underwent binocular ERG measurements after intramuscular anesthesia and pharmaceutical pupillary dilatation at a baseline day and 10 days later. Eleven scotopic flash strengths (0.0001–10 cd s/m2) were presented. Variability was quantified via the 95% limits of agreement (LOA).

Results

The a-waves displayed the typical monotonic sigmoid amplitude increase with flash strength, and the b-waves peaked at 0.01 cd s/m2, followed by a marked dip at 0.1–0.3 cd s/m2. LOA of both waves went through a maximum in the dip region. LOA divided by mean amplitudes (relative LOA) was fairly flat over flash strength, around 20% beyond the dip. Intraindividual interocular variability was markedly lower, around 10%.

Conclusions

Scotopic ERG responses in rabbits display a region of high variability at 0.1–0.3 cd s/m2; beyond that region the amplitude-LOA is 20%, the interocular LOA being half that value. The use of intraindividual control eyes for testing any toxicity of ocular agents thus appears markedly more sensitive. As a rule of thumb, we found the relative 95% LOA as 33% between individuals, 20% across sessions and 10% between eyes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
“V-log-I” is a common abbreviation for “Voltage vs. log(Intensity),” a term we will continue to use although it should properly be called “Amplitude vs. log(flash strength).”
 
Literature
3.
go back to reference Lachapelle P, Benoit J, Guité P et al (1990) The effect of iodoacetic acid on the electroretinogram and oscillatory potentials in rabbits. Doc Ophthalmol 75:7–14CrossRefPubMed Lachapelle P, Benoit J, Guité P et al (1990) The effect of iodoacetic acid on the electroretinogram and oscillatory potentials in rabbits. Doc Ophthalmol 75:7–14CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bush RA, Lei B, Tao W et al (2004) Encapsulated cell-based intraocular delivery of ciliary neurotrophic factor in normal rabbit: dose-dependent effects on erg and retinal histology. Investig Opthalmol Vis Sci 45:2420. doi:10.1167/iovs.03-1342 CrossRef Bush RA, Lei B, Tao W et al (2004) Encapsulated cell-based intraocular delivery of ciliary neurotrophic factor in normal rabbit: dose-dependent effects on erg and retinal histology. Investig Opthalmol Vis Sci 45:2420. doi:10.​1167/​iovs.​03-1342 CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ofri R (2002) Clinical electrophysiology in veterinary ophthalmology—the past, present and future. Doc Ophthalmol 104:5–16CrossRefPubMed Ofri R (2002) Clinical electrophysiology in veterinary ophthalmology—the past, present and future. Doc Ophthalmol 104:5–16CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gjörloff K, Andréasson S, Ehinger B (2004) Standardized full-field electroretinography in rabbits. Doc Ophthalmol 109:163–168CrossRefPubMed Gjörloff K, Andréasson S, Ehinger B (2004) Standardized full-field electroretinography in rabbits. Doc Ophthalmol 109:163–168CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rosolen SG, Rigaudière F, LeGargasson J-F et al (2004) Comparing the photopic ERG i-wave in different species. Vet Ophthalmol 7:189–192CrossRefPubMed Rosolen SG, Rigaudière F, LeGargasson J-F et al (2004) Comparing the photopic ERG i-wave in different species. Vet Ophthalmol 7:189–192CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gorfinkel J, Lachapelle P, Molotchnikoff S (1988) Maturation of the electroretinogram of the neonatal rabbit. Doc Ophthalmol 69:237–245CrossRefPubMed Gorfinkel J, Lachapelle P, Molotchnikoff S (1988) Maturation of the electroretinogram of the neonatal rabbit. Doc Ophthalmol 69:237–245CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Damico FM, Scolari MR, Ioshimoto GL et al (2012) Vitreous pharmacokinetics and electroretinographic findings after intravitreal injection of acyclovir in rabbits. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 67:931–937. doi:10.6061/clinics/2012(08)13 CrossRef Damico FM, Scolari MR, Ioshimoto GL et al (2012) Vitreous pharmacokinetics and electroretinographic findings after intravitreal injection of acyclovir in rabbits. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 67:931–937. doi:10.​6061/​clinics/​2012(08)13 CrossRef
13.
16.
go back to reference Bach M (2007) What a good electrophysiology system should look like, IMHO. ISCEV@ARVO Bach M (2007) What a good electrophysiology system should look like, IMHO. ISCEV@ARVO
20.
go back to reference Jaffe MJ, Hommer DW, Caruso RC et al (1989) Attenuating effects of diazepam on the electroretinogram of normal humans. Retina (Philadelphia, PA) 9:216–225CrossRef Jaffe MJ, Hommer DW, Caruso RC et al (1989) Attenuating effects of diazepam on the electroretinogram of normal humans. Retina (Philadelphia, PA) 9:216–225CrossRef
26.
27.
Metadata
Title
Test–retest reliability of scotopic full-field electroretinograms in rabbits
Authors
Jan Luebke
Alexandra Anton
Michael Bach
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-017-9582-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2017 Go to the issue