Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2016

01-12-2016 | Technical Note

Imitating the effect of amblyopia on VEP-based acuity estimates

Authors: Sven P. Heinrich, Celia M. Bock, Michael Bach

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Acuity testing based on visual evoked potentials (VEPs) overestimates acuity in patients with amblyopia. We hypothesized that distortion and fragmentation of the stimulus in amblyopia impede recognition of optotypes, while it leaves the pattern onset response in the VEP mostly unaffected, resulting in overestimation of acuity.

Methods

Acuity VEPs were recorded in visually normal participants with the stimulus degraded by patterned polymethyl methacrylate panes, which induce distortion and fragmentation. For comparison, frosted panes were used to induce blur through wide-angle scattering. Standard psychophysical optotype acuity was recorded under the same conditions.

Results

With the distorted and fragmented stimuli, the VEP consistently overestimated acuity relative to psychophysical optotype acuity. With blurred stimuli, both measures were in good agreement.

Conclusions

The data support the assumption that stimulus distortion and fragmentation leave VEP-based measures of acuity relatively unaffected, resulting in a discrepancy between measures of acuity that are based on checkerboard VEPs on one hand and psychophysical optotype recognition on the other hand. The technique of stimulus degradation described here provides a simple and efficient way of imitating effects that are known from amblyopia and may thus serve as a tool in the evaluation of vision tests.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Towle VL, Harter MR (1977) Objective determination of human visual acuity: pattern evoked potentials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 16(11):1073–1076PubMed Towle VL, Harter MR (1977) Objective determination of human visual acuity: pattern evoked potentials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 16(11):1073–1076PubMed
5.
go back to reference Nakamura A, Akio T, Matsuda E, Wakami Y (2001) Pattern visual evoked potentials in malingering. J Neuroophthalmol 21(1):42–45CrossRefPubMed Nakamura A, Akio T, Matsuda E, Wakami Y (2001) Pattern visual evoked potentials in malingering. J Neuroophthalmol 21(1):42–45CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference McBain VA, Robson AG, Hogg CR, Holder GE (2007) Assessment of patients with suspected non-organic visual loss using pattern appearance visual evoked potentials. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245(4):502–510. doi:10.1007/s00417-006-0431-2 CrossRefPubMed McBain VA, Robson AG, Hogg CR, Holder GE (2007) Assessment of patients with suspected non-organic visual loss using pattern appearance visual evoked potentials. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245(4):502–510. doi:10.​1007/​s00417-006-0431-2 CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mackay AM, Bradnam MS, Hamilton R, Elliot AT, Dutton GN (2008) Real-time rapid acuity assessment using VEPs: development and validation of the step VEP technique. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49(1):438–441. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0944 CrossRefPubMed Mackay AM, Bradnam MS, Hamilton R, Elliot AT, Dutton GN (2008) Real-time rapid acuity assessment using VEPs: development and validation of the step VEP technique. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49(1):438–441. doi:10.​1167/​iovs.​06-0944 CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hess RF, Campbell FW, Greenhalgh T (1978) On the nature of the neural abnormality in human amblyopia; neural aberrations and neural sensitivity loss. Pflügers Arch 377:201–207. doi:10.1007/BF00584273 CrossRefPubMed Hess RF, Campbell FW, Greenhalgh T (1978) On the nature of the neural abnormality in human amblyopia; neural aberrations and neural sensitivity loss. Pflügers Arch 377:201–207. doi:10.​1007/​BF00584273 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Thibos LN, Bradley A (1993) New methods for discriminating neural and optical losses of vision. Optom Vis Sci 70:279–287CrossRefPubMed Thibos LN, Bradley A (1993) New methods for discriminating neural and optical losses of vision. Optom Vis Sci 70:279–287CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Riemslag FCC, Spekreijse H (1990) Electrodiagnosis by luminance and pattern stimulation. In: Colon EJ, Visser SL (eds) Evoked potential manual: a practical guide to clinical applications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 117–159. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2059-0_4 CrossRef Riemslag FCC, Spekreijse H (1990) Electrodiagnosis by luminance and pattern stimulation. In: Colon EJ, Visser SL (eds) Evoked potential manual: a practical guide to clinical applications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 117–159. doi:10.​1007/​978-94-009-2059-0_​4 CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Bach M (1996) The “Freiburg Visual Acuity Test”—automatic measurement of the visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 73:49–53CrossRefPubMed Bach M (1996) The “Freiburg Visual Acuity Test”—automatic measurement of the visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 73:49–53CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Imitating the effect of amblyopia on VEP-based acuity estimates
Authors
Sven P. Heinrich
Celia M. Bock
Michael Bach
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-016-9565-7