Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 2/2016

01-04-2016 | Clinical Case Report

Maculopathy following exposure to visible and infrared radiation from a laser pointer: a clinical case study

Authors: James V. M. Hanson, Julian Sromicki, Mario Mangold, Matthias Golling, Christina Gerth-Kahlert

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Laser pointer devices have become increasingly available in recent years, and their misuse has caused a number of ocular injuries. Online distribution channels permit trade in devices which may not conform to international standards in terms of their output power and spectral content. We present a case study of ocular injury caused by one such device.

Methods

The patient was examined approximately 9 months following laser exposure using full-field and multifocal electroretinography (ERG and MF-ERG), electrooculography (EOG), and optical coherence tomography (OCT), in addition to a full ophthalmological examination. MF-ERG, OCT, and the ophthalmological examination were repeated 7 months after the first examination. The output of the laser pointer was measured.

Results

Despite severe focal damage to the central retina visible fundoscopically and with OCT, all electrophysiological examinations were quantitatively normal; however, qualitatively the central responses of the MF-ERG appeared slightly reduced. When the MF-ERG was repeated 7 months later, all findings were normal. The laser pointer was found to emit both visible and infrared radiation in dangerous amounts.

Conclusion

Loss of retinal function following laser pointer injury may not always be detectable using standard electrophysiological tests. Exposure to non-visible radiation should be considered as a possible aggravating factor when assessing cases of alleged laser pointer injury.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ham WT Jr, Ruffolo JJ Jr, Mueller HA, Guerry D 3rd (1980) The nature of retinal radiation damage: dependence on wavelength, power level and exposure time. Vis Res 20(12):1105–1111CrossRefPubMed Ham WT Jr, Ruffolo JJ Jr, Mueller HA, Guerry D 3rd (1980) The nature of retinal radiation damage: dependence on wavelength, power level and exposure time. Vis Res 20(12):1105–1111CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference International Electrotechnical Commission (2014) Safety of laser products: Part 1—Equipment classification and requirements. Vol IEC 60825-1 International Electrotechnical Commission (2014) Safety of laser products: Part 1—Equipment classification and requirements. Vol IEC 60825-1
3.
go back to reference United States Food and Drug Administration (2015) Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. Chapter I: Food and Drug Administration, Subchapter: J—Radiological Health, Part 1040—Performance standards for light-emitting products United States Food and Drug Administration (2015) Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. Chapter I: Food and Drug Administration, Subchapter: J—Radiological Health, Part 1040—Performance standards for light-emitting products
4.
go back to reference Laser Institute of America (2007) American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers. Vol ANSI Z136.1. Orlando, FL Laser Institute of America (2007) American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers. Vol ANSI Z136.1. Orlando, FL
8.
go back to reference Luttrull JK, Hallisey J (1999) Laser pointer-induced macular injury. Am J Ophthalmol 127(1):95–96CrossRefPubMed Luttrull JK, Hallisey J (1999) Laser pointer-induced macular injury. Am J Ophthalmol 127(1):95–96CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Galang J, Restelli A, Hagley EW, Clark CW (2010) A green laser pointer hazard. NIST Technical Note 1668. National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce Galang J, Restelli A, Hagley EW, Clark CW (2010) A green laser pointer hazard. NIST Technical Note 1668. National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce
14.
go back to reference Hood DC, Bach M, Brigell M, Keating D, Kondo M, Lyons JS, Marmor MF, McCulloch DL, Palmowski-Wolfe AM, International Society For Clinical Electrophysiology of V (2012) ISCEV standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) (2011 edition). Doc Ophthalmol 124(1):1–13. doi:10.1007/s10633-011-9296-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hood DC, Bach M, Brigell M, Keating D, Kondo M, Lyons JS, Marmor MF, McCulloch DL, Palmowski-Wolfe AM, International Society For Clinical Electrophysiology of V (2012) ISCEV standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) (2011 edition). Doc Ophthalmol 124(1):1–13. doi:10.​1007/​s10633-011-9296-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Marmor MF, Brigell MG, McCulloch DL, Westall CA, Bach M, International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of V (2011) ISCEV standard for clinical electro-oculography (2010 update). Doc Ophthalmol 122(1):1–7. doi:10.1007/s10633-011-9259-0 CrossRefPubMed Marmor MF, Brigell MG, McCulloch DL, Westall CA, Bach M, International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of V (2011) ISCEV standard for clinical electro-oculography (2010 update). Doc Ophthalmol 122(1):1–7. doi:10.​1007/​s10633-011-9259-0 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Marmor MF, Fulton AB, Holder GE, Miyake Y, Brigell M, Bach M, International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of V (2009) ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2008 update). Doc Ophthalmol 118(1):69–77. doi:10.1007/s10633-008-9155-4 CrossRefPubMed Marmor MF, Fulton AB, Holder GE, Miyake Y, Brigell M, Bach M, International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of V (2009) ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2008 update). Doc Ophthalmol 118(1):69–77. doi:10.​1007/​s10633-008-9155-4 CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mohidin N, Yap MK, Jacobs RJ (1997) The repeatability and variability of the multifocal electroretinogram for four different electrodes. Ophthal Physiol Opt 17(6):530–535CrossRef Mohidin N, Yap MK, Jacobs RJ (1997) The repeatability and variability of the multifocal electroretinogram for four different electrodes. Ophthal Physiol Opt 17(6):530–535CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Zuclich JA, Schuschereba ST, Zwick H, Boppart SA, Fujimoto JG, Cheney FE, Stuck BE (1997) A comparison of laser-induced retinal damage from infrared wavelengths to that from visible wavelengths. Lasers Light Ophthalmol 8(1):15–29 Zuclich JA, Schuschereba ST, Zwick H, Boppart SA, Fujimoto JG, Cheney FE, Stuck BE (1997) A comparison of laser-induced retinal damage from infrared wavelengths to that from visible wavelengths. Lasers Light Ophthalmol 8(1):15–29
20.
go back to reference Vogel A, Birngruber R (1992) Temperature profiles in human retina and choroid during laser coagulation with different wavelengths ranging from 514 to 810 nm. Lasers Light Ophthalmol 5(1):9–16 Vogel A, Birngruber R (1992) Temperature profiles in human retina and choroid during laser coagulation with different wavelengths ranging from 514 to 810 nm. Lasers Light Ophthalmol 5(1):9–16
21.
go back to reference Allen RD, Brown J Jr, Zwick H, Schuschereba ST, Lund DJ, Stuck BE (2004) Laser-induced macular holes demonstrate impaired choroidal perfusion. Retina 24(1):92–97CrossRefPubMed Allen RD, Brown J Jr, Zwick H, Schuschereba ST, Lund DJ, Stuck BE (2004) Laser-induced macular holes demonstrate impaired choroidal perfusion. Retina 24(1):92–97CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Roider J, Buesgen P, Hoerauf H, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Laqua H, Birngruber R (1999) Macular injury by a military range finder. Retina 19(6):531–535CrossRefPubMed Roider J, Buesgen P, Hoerauf H, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Laqua H, Birngruber R (1999) Macular injury by a military range finder. Retina 19(6):531–535CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Maculopathy following exposure to visible and infrared radiation from a laser pointer: a clinical case study
Authors
James V. M. Hanson
Julian Sromicki
Mario Mangold
Matthias Golling
Christina Gerth-Kahlert
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-016-9530-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Documenta Ophthalmologica 2/2016 Go to the issue