Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 2/2014

01-04-2014 | Original Research Article

Visual evoked potential and psychophysical contrast thresholds in glaucoma

Authors: Siti Nurliyana Abdullah, Gordon F. Sanderson, Andrew C. James, Vaegan, Ted Maddess

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We compared the diagnostic power of electrophysiologically and psychophysically measured contrast thresholds for the diagnosis of glaucoma. Additionally, we investigated whether combining results from the two methods improved diagnostic power.

Methods

Seven-eight subjects between 40 and 88 years formed the main study group: 21 normal controls (9 males) and 57 glaucoma patients (30 males) were tested. Twenty-two younger control subjects were also tested. Contrast thresholds were determined for a 1 cpd sinusoidal grating, subtending 41° × 52° modulated at 14.3 rps. The thresholds were based on the same staircase method applied to visual evoked potential (VEP) and psychophysical responses (Psyc). Diagnostic power was assessed by the percent area under the curve (%AUC) of receiver operating characteristic plots.

Results

Psyc showed significant age dependence, −0.10 ± 0.02 dB, while VEPs did not. Diagnostic performance for moderate and severe eyes combined was modest: Psyc 74 ± 9.0 % and VEP 72 ± 9.1 %, but improved significantly (p < 0.05) for a simple combined method, up to 90 ± 6.0 % for moderate disease. The combined method improved %AUC for all severities on average (p < 0.03). Canonical correlation analysis indicated that the four threshold measures contained independent information and that these independent dimensions were each correlated with glaucoma severity (p < 0.0015).

Conclusion

Combining the VEP and Psyc thresholds appeared to improve diagnostic power. Canonical correlation analysis indicated that they measured statistically independent aspects of glaucoma possibly related to disease severity. Adding the 20-s psychophysical test to a VEP test produced a significant benefit for a small time cost.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Atkin A, Bodis-Wollner I, Wolkstein M, Moss A, Podos SM (1979) Abnormalities of central contrast sensitivity in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 88(2):205–211PubMed Atkin A, Bodis-Wollner I, Wolkstein M, Moss A, Podos SM (1979) Abnormalities of central contrast sensitivity in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 88(2):205–211PubMed
3.
go back to reference Johnson MA, Drum BA, Quigley HA, Sanchez RM, Dunkelberger GR (1989) Pattern-evoked potentials and optic nerve fiber loss in monocular laser-induced glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30(5):897–907PubMed Johnson MA, Drum BA, Quigley HA, Sanchez RM, Dunkelberger GR (1989) Pattern-evoked potentials and optic nerve fiber loss in monocular laser-induced glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30(5):897–907PubMed
4.
go back to reference Marx MS, Podos SM, Bodis-Wollner I, Lee PY, Wang RF, Severin C (1988) Signs of early damage in glaucomatous monkey eyes: low spatial frequency losses in the pattern ERG and VEP. Exp Eye Res 46(2):173–184PubMedCrossRef Marx MS, Podos SM, Bodis-Wollner I, Lee PY, Wang RF, Severin C (1988) Signs of early damage in glaucomatous monkey eyes: low spatial frequency losses in the pattern ERG and VEP. Exp Eye Res 46(2):173–184PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Maddess T, Henry GH (1992) Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vis Sci 7(5):371–383 Maddess T, Henry GH (1992) Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vis Sci 7(5):371–383
6.
go back to reference Johnson CA, Samuels SJ (1997) Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38(2):413–425PubMed Johnson CA, Samuels SJ (1997) Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38(2):413–425PubMed
7.
go back to reference Quigley H (1998) Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthal 125(6):819–829PubMedCrossRef Quigley H (1998) Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthal 125(6):819–829PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Maddess T, Goldberg I, Dobinson J, Wine S, Welsh AH, James AC (1999) Testing for glaucoma with the spatial frequency doubling illusion. Vis Res 39:4258–4273PubMedCrossRef Maddess T, Goldberg I, Dobinson J, Wine S, Welsh AH, James AC (1999) Testing for glaucoma with the spatial frequency doubling illusion. Vis Res 39:4258–4273PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Howe JW, Mitchell KW (1984) The objective assessment of contrast sensitivity function by electrophysiological means. Brh J Ophthalmol 68:626–638CrossRef Howe JW, Mitchell KW (1984) The objective assessment of contrast sensitivity function by electrophysiological means. Brh J Ophthalmol 68:626–638CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vaegan Hollows FC (2006) Visual-evoked response, pattern electroretinogram, and psychophysical magnocellular thresholds in glaucoma, optic atrophy, and dyslexia. Optom Vis Sci 83(7):486–498PubMedCrossRef Vaegan Hollows FC (2006) Visual-evoked response, pattern electroretinogram, and psychophysical magnocellular thresholds in glaucoma, optic atrophy, and dyslexia. Optom Vis Sci 83(7):486–498PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Vaegan Rahman AM, Sanderson GF (2008) Glaucoma affects steady state VEP contrast thresholds before psychophysics. Optom Vis Sci 85(7):547–558PubMedCrossRef Vaegan Rahman AM, Sanderson GF (2008) Glaucoma affects steady state VEP contrast thresholds before psychophysics. Optom Vis Sci 85(7):547–558PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Souza GS, Gomes BD, Saito CA, da Silva Filho M, Silveira LC (2007) Spatial luminance contrast sensitivity measured with transient VEP: comparison with psychophysics and evidence of multiple mechanisms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(7):3396–3404PubMedCrossRef Souza GS, Gomes BD, Saito CA, da Silva Filho M, Silveira LC (2007) Spatial luminance contrast sensitivity measured with transient VEP: comparison with psychophysics and evidence of multiple mechanisms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48(7):3396–3404PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yates JT, Leys MJ, Green M, Huang H, Charlton J, Reed J, Di B-Z, Odom JV (1999) Parallel pathways, noise masking and glaucoma detection: behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Doc Ophthalmol 95:283–299CrossRef Yates JT, Leys MJ, Green M, Huang H, Charlton J, Reed J, Di B-Z, Odom JV (1999) Parallel pathways, noise masking and glaucoma detection: behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Doc Ophthalmol 95:283–299CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Abdullah SN, Aldahlawi N, Rosli Y, Vaegan D, Boon MY, Maddess T (2012) Effect of contrast, stimulus density and viewing distance on multifocal steady-state visual evoked potentials (MSVs). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53(9):5527–5535PubMedCrossRef Abdullah SN, Aldahlawi N, Rosli Y, Vaegan D, Boon MY, Maddess T (2012) Effect of contrast, stimulus density and viewing distance on multifocal steady-state visual evoked potentials (MSVs). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53(9):5527–5535PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Abdullah SN, Vaegan, Boon MY, Maddess T (2012) Contrast-response functions of the multifocal steady-state VEP (MSV). Clin Neurophys 123:1865–1871CrossRef Abdullah SN, Vaegan, Boon MY, Maddess T (2012) Contrast-response functions of the multifocal steady-state VEP (MSV). Clin Neurophys 123:1865–1871CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mardin CY, Peters A, Horn F, Junemann AG, Lausen B (2006) Improving glaucoma diagnosis by the combination of perimetry and HRT measurements. J Glaucoma 15(4):299–305PubMedCrossRef Mardin CY, Peters A, Horn F, Junemann AG, Lausen B (2006) Improving glaucoma diagnosis by the combination of perimetry and HRT measurements. J Glaucoma 15(4):299–305PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Horn FK, Lammer R, Mardin CY, Junemann AG, Michelson G, Lausen B, Adler W (2012) Combined evaluation of frequency doubling technology perimetry and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for glaucoma detection using automated classification. J Glaucoma 21(1):27–34. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182027766 PubMedCrossRef Horn FK, Lammer R, Mardin CY, Junemann AG, Michelson G, Lausen B, Adler W (2012) Combined evaluation of frequency doubling technology perimetry and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for glaucoma detection using automated classification. J Glaucoma 21(1):27–34. doi:10.​1097/​IJG.​0b013e3182027766​ PubMedCrossRef
19.
20.
go back to reference Bell A, James AC, Kolic M, Essex RW, Maddess T (2010) Dichotic multifocal pupillography reveals afferent visual field defects in early type 2 diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(1):602–608PubMedCrossRef Bell A, James AC, Kolic M, Essex RW, Maddess T (2010) Dichotic multifocal pupillography reveals afferent visual field defects in early type 2 diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(1):602–608PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Maddess T, Bedford SM, Goh XL, James AC (2009) Multifocal pupillography visual field testing in glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 37(7):678–686CrossRef Maddess T, Bedford SM, Goh XL, James AC (2009) Multifocal pupillography visual field testing in glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 37(7):678–686CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wichura MJ (1988) Algorithm AS241: the percentage points of the normal distribution. Appl Stat 37(3):477–484CrossRef Wichura MJ (1988) Algorithm AS241: the percentage points of the normal distribution. Appl Stat 37(3):477–484CrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Sponsel WE, Satsangi N, Reilly M, Groth S, McKinnon S (2013) The jigsaw effect: clinical evidence for CNS control of visual field loss in chronic glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54: e-abstract 4939 Sponsel WE, Satsangi N, Reilly M, Groth S, McKinnon S (2013) The jigsaw effect: clinical evidence for CNS control of visual field loss in chronic glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54: e-abstract 4939
25.
go back to reference Shah NN, Bowd C, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, Sample PA, Hoffmann EM, Zangwill LM (2006) Combining structural and functional testing for detection of glaucoma. Ophthalmology 113(9):1593–1602PubMedCrossRef Shah NN, Bowd C, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, Sample PA, Hoffmann EM, Zangwill LM (2006) Combining structural and functional testing for detection of glaucoma. Ophthalmology 113(9):1593–1602PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hasegawa S, Abe H (2001) Mapping of glaucomatous visual field defects by multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42(13):3341–3348PubMed Hasegawa S, Abe H (2001) Mapping of glaucomatous visual field defects by multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42(13):3341–3348PubMed
27.
go back to reference Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Goldberg I (2005) Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice. Arch Ophthalmol 123:729–739PubMedCrossRef Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Goldberg I (2005) Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice. Arch Ophthalmol 123:729–739PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Hood DC, Ghadiali Q, Zhang JC, Graham NV, Wolfson SS, Zhang X (2006) Contrast response functions for multifocal visual evoked potentials: a test of a model relating V1 activity to multifocal visual evoked potentials activity. J Vision 6(5):580–593CrossRef Hood DC, Ghadiali Q, Zhang JC, Graham NV, Wolfson SS, Zhang X (2006) Contrast response functions for multifocal visual evoked potentials: a test of a model relating V1 activity to multifocal visual evoked potentials activity. J Vision 6(5):580–593CrossRef
30.
Metadata
Title
Visual evoked potential and psychophysical contrast thresholds in glaucoma
Authors
Siti Nurliyana Abdullah
Gordon F. Sanderson
Andrew C. James
Vaegan
Ted Maddess
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-014-9428-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Documenta Ophthalmologica 2/2014 Go to the issue

Review Article

Mouse b-wave mutants