Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2010

01-12-2010 | REVIEW ARTICLE

A primer on common statistical errors in clinical ophthalmology

Authors: Karen Holopigian, Michael Bach

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 3/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Although biomedical statistics is part of any scientific curriculum, a review of the current scientific literature indicates that statistical data analysis is an area that frequently needs improvement. To address this, we here cover some of the most common problems in statistical analysis, with an emphasis on an intuitive, tutorial approach rather than a rigorous, proof-based one. The topics covered in this manuscript are whether to enter eyes or patients into the analysis, issues related to multiple testing, pitfalls surrounding the correlation coefficient (causation, insensitivity to patterns, range confounding, unsuitability for method comparisons), and when to use standard deviation (SD) versus standard error of the mean (SEM) “antennas” on graphs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Strasak AM, Zaman Q, Pfeiffer KP, Gobel G, Ulmer H (2007) Statistical errors in medical research—a review of common pitfalls. Swiss Med Wkly 137:44–49PubMed Strasak AM, Zaman Q, Pfeiffer KP, Gobel G, Ulmer H (2007) Statistical errors in medical research—a review of common pitfalls. Swiss Med Wkly 137:44–49PubMed
2.
go back to reference Murdoch IE, Morris SS, Cousens SN (1998) People and eyes: statistical approaches in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol 82:971–973CrossRefPubMed Murdoch IE, Morris SS, Cousens SN (1998) People and eyes: statistical approaches in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol 82:971–973CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Newcombe RG, Duff GR (1987) Eyes or patients? Traps for the unwary in the statistical analysis of ophthalmological studies. Br J Ophthalmol 71:645–646CrossRefPubMed Newcombe RG, Duff GR (1987) Eyes or patients? Traps for the unwary in the statistical analysis of ophthalmological studies. Br J Ophthalmol 71:645–646CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rosner B (1984) Multivariate methods in opthalmology with application to other paired data situations. Biometrics 40:1025–1036CrossRefPubMed Rosner B (1984) Multivariate methods in opthalmology with application to other paired data situations. Biometrics 40:1025–1036CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Liang KY, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13–22CrossRef Liang KY, Zeger SL (1986) Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73:13–22CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Katz J, Zeger S, Liang KY (1994) Appropriate statistical methods to account for similarities in binary outcomes between fellow eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:2461–2465PubMed Katz J, Zeger S, Liang KY (1994) Appropriate statistical methods to account for similarities in binary outcomes between fellow eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:2461–2465PubMed
7.
go back to reference Glynn RJ, Rosner B (1992) Accounting for the correlation between fellow eyes in regression analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 110:381–387PubMed Glynn RJ, Rosner B (1992) Accounting for the correlation between fellow eyes in regression analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 110:381–387PubMed
8.
go back to reference Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70 Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70
9.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed
10.
go back to reference Cumming G, Finch S (2005) Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. Am Psychol 60:170–180CrossRefPubMed Cumming G, Finch S (2005) Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. Am Psychol 60:170–180CrossRefPubMed
11.
Metadata
Title
A primer on common statistical errors in clinical ophthalmology
Authors
Karen Holopigian
Michael Bach
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 3/2010
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-010-9249-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2010

Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2010 Go to the issue