Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2009

01-12-2009 | Original research article

Assessment of depth perception using psychophysical thresholds and stereoscopically evoked brain activity

Author: Wolfgang Skrandies

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Dynamic random-dot stereograms (dRDS) elicit brain activity generated exclusively by cortical neurons sensitive to binocular horizontal disparity. We studied 20 adults with stereovision deficiency but otherwise normal vision. Psychophysical thresholds were determined with static RDS and with the three-rod experiment. VEP was recorded from seven occipital channels. Stimuli were presented on a monitor by dRDS as stereoscopic checkerboard patterns that moved in depth with 8 depth reversals per second. Horizontal disparity ranged from 7 to 24.5 min of arc. Stimuli were displayed at the center, or in the left or right half field. We determined electrophysiological thresholds as well as the disparity where largest responses occurred. Subjective and electrophysiological thresholds showed a significant positive correlation. In addition, the right visual field was more sensitive to dRDS stimuli than other locations. Squint angle was related to the disparity thresholds. Our data illustrate correlations between clinical symptoms, perceptual deficiency, and VEP parameters.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bergua A, Skrandies W (2000) An early antecedent to modern random dot stereograms—“The Secret Stereoscopic Writing” of Ramón y Cajal. Int J Psychophysiol 36:69–72CrossRefPubMed Bergua A, Skrandies W (2000) An early antecedent to modern random dot stereograms—“The Secret Stereoscopic Writing” of Ramón y Cajal. Int J Psychophysiol 36:69–72CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bishop PO (1973) Neurophysiology of binocular single vision and stereopsis. In: Jung R (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol 7/3A. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 255–305 Bishop PO (1973) Neurophysiology of binocular single vision and stereopsis. In: Jung R (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol 7/3A. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 255–305
3.
go back to reference Julesz B (1971) Foundations of cyclopean perception. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago Julesz B (1971) Foundations of cyclopean perception. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
4.
5.
go back to reference Gonzalez F, Perez R (1998) Neural mechanisms underlying stereoscopic vision. Prog Neurobiol 55:191–224CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez F, Perez R (1998) Neural mechanisms underlying stereoscopic vision. Prog Neurobiol 55:191–224CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Poggio GF, Poggio T (1984) The analysis of stereopsis. Ann Rev Neurosci 7:397–412CrossRef Poggio GF, Poggio T (1984) The analysis of stereopsis. Ann Rev Neurosci 7:397–412CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Skrandies W, Vomberg HE (1985) Stereoscopic stimuli activate different cortical neurons in man: electrophysiological evidence. Int J Psychophysiol 2:293–296CrossRefPubMed Skrandies W, Vomberg HE (1985) Stereoscopic stimuli activate different cortical neurons in man: electrophysiological evidence. Int J Psychophysiol 2:293–296CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Skrandies W (1991) Contrast and stereoscopic visual stimuli yield lateralized scalp potential fields associated with different neural generators. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 78:274–283CrossRefPubMed Skrandies W (1991) Contrast and stereoscopic visual stimuli yield lateralized scalp potential fields associated with different neural generators. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 78:274–283CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Skrandies W (1997) Depth perception and evoked brain activity: the influence of horizontal disparity. Vis Neurosci 14:527–532CrossRefPubMed Skrandies W (1997) Depth perception and evoked brain activity: the influence of horizontal disparity. Vis Neurosci 14:527–532CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Skrandies W (1995) Visual information processing: topography of brain electrical activity. Biol Psychol 40:1–15CrossRefPubMed Skrandies W (1995) Visual information processing: topography of brain electrical activity. Biol Psychol 40:1–15CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Vomberg HE, Skrandies W (1985) Untersuchung des Stereosehens im Zufallspunktmuster-VECP: Normbefunde und klinische Anwendung. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 187:205–208CrossRefPubMed Vomberg HE, Skrandies W (1985) Untersuchung des Stereosehens im Zufallspunktmuster-VECP: Normbefunde und klinische Anwendung. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 187:205–208CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Julesz B, Kropfl W, Petrig B (1980) Large evoked potentials to dynamic random-dot correlograms and stereograms permit quick determination of stereopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:2348–2351CrossRefPubMed Julesz B, Kropfl W, Petrig B (1980) Large evoked potentials to dynamic random-dot correlograms and stereograms permit quick determination of stereopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:2348–2351CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wesemann W, Klingenberger H, Rassow B (1987) Electrophysiological assessment of the human depth-perception threshold. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 225:429–436CrossRefPubMed Wesemann W, Klingenberger H, Rassow B (1987) Electrophysiological assessment of the human depth-perception threshold. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 225:429–436CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Miezin FM, Myerson J, Julesz B, Allman JM (1981) Evoked potentials to dynamic random-dot correlograms in monkey and man: a test for cyclopean perception. Vis Res 21:177–179CrossRefPubMed Miezin FM, Myerson J, Julesz B, Allman JM (1981) Evoked potentials to dynamic random-dot correlograms in monkey and man: a test for cyclopean perception. Vis Res 21:177–179CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Skrandies W (2001) The processing of stereoscopic information in human visual cortex: psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence. Clin EEG 32:152–159 Skrandies W (2001) The processing of stereoscopic information in human visual cortex: psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence. Clin EEG 32:152–159
16.
go back to reference TNO (1972) Test for stereoscopic vision, 5th edn. Laméris Instrumenten B V, Utrecht TNO (1972) Test for stereoscopic vision, 5th edn. Laméris Instrumenten B V, Utrecht
17.
18.
go back to reference Monjé M (1940) Über eine neue Methode zur Untersuchung der Tiefensehschärfe. Z Sinnesphysiol 69:73–90 Monjé M (1940) Über eine neue Methode zur Untersuchung der Tiefensehschärfe. Z Sinnesphysiol 69:73–90
19.
go back to reference Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113CrossRefPubMed Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Meigen T, Bach M (2000) On the statistical significance of electrophysiological steady-state responses. Doc Ophthalmol 98:207–232CrossRef Meigen T, Bach M (2000) On the statistical significance of electrophysiological steady-state responses. Doc Ophthalmol 98:207–232CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Coutant BE, Westheimer G (1993) Population distribution of stereoscopic ability. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 13:3–7CrossRefPubMed Coutant BE, Westheimer G (1993) Population distribution of stereoscopic ability. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 13:3–7CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Fukai S (1985) Topographic visually evoked potentials induced by stereoptic stimulus. Br J Ophthalmol 69:612–617CrossRefPubMed Fukai S (1985) Topographic visually evoked potentials induced by stereoptic stimulus. Br J Ophthalmol 69:612–617CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Dunlop DD, Dunlop P, Fenelon B, Neill RA (1983) Evoked responses to distinct and nebulous stereoscopic stimuli. Aust J Ophthalmol 11:295–301CrossRefPubMed Dunlop DD, Dunlop P, Fenelon B, Neill RA (1983) Evoked responses to distinct and nebulous stereoscopic stimuli. Aust J Ophthalmol 11:295–301CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Janssen P, Vogels R, Orban GA (1999) Assessment of stereopsis in rhesus monkeys using visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 95:247–255CrossRef Janssen P, Vogels R, Orban GA (1999) Assessment of stereopsis in rhesus monkeys using visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 95:247–255CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Erkelens CJ, Collewijn H (1985) Eye movements and stereopsis during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms. Vis Res 25:1689–1700CrossRefPubMed Erkelens CJ, Collewijn H (1985) Eye movements and stereopsis during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms. Vis Res 25:1689–1700CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Julesz B, Schumer RA (1981) Early visual perception. Ann Rev Psychol 32:575–627CrossRef Julesz B, Schumer RA (1981) Early visual perception. Ann Rev Psychol 32:575–627CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bergua A, Horn FK, Martus P, Jünemann AM, Korth M (2004) Stereoscopic visual evoked potentials in normal subjects and patients with open-angle glaucomas. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242:197–203CrossRef Bergua A, Horn FK, Martus P, Jünemann AM, Korth M (2004) Stereoscopic visual evoked potentials in normal subjects and patients with open-angle glaucomas. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 242:197–203CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Petrig B, Julesz B, Kropfl W, Baumgartner G, Anliker M (1981) Development of stereopsis and cortical binocularity in human infants: electrophysiological evidence. Science 213:1402–1405CrossRefPubMed Petrig B, Julesz B, Kropfl W, Baumgartner G, Anliker M (1981) Development of stereopsis and cortical binocularity in human infants: electrophysiological evidence. Science 213:1402–1405CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessment of depth perception using psychophysical thresholds and stereoscopically evoked brain activity
Author
Wolfgang Skrandies
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-009-9202-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2009 Go to the issue