Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cognitive Therapy and Research 6/2018

01-12-2018 | Original Article

Development of the Demotivating Beliefs Inventory and Test of the Cognitive Triad of Amotivation

Authors: Matthias Pillny, Katarina Krkovic, Tania M. Lincoln

Published in: Cognitive Therapy and Research | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Recent cognitive models of negative symptoms in psychosis posit that amotivation relevant beliefs are reflected in the cognitive triad of negative beliefs concerning the self, others and the future. The aim of this study was to test the proposed three-factor structure of putative ‘demotivating beliefs’ and to ascertain the strength of their association with self-reported amotivation. We combined existing scales assessing ‘demotivating beliefs’ to the Demotivating Beliefs Inventory. This scale was used for exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses as well as latent regression analyses with amotivation in two independent community (n1 = 98; n2 = 347) and one clinical sample (n = 36). We found a three-factor structure with satisfying model fit (‘selfdefeating beliefs’, ‘social indifference beliefs’ and ‘low-expectancy-of-pleasure beliefs’). Each factor showed moderate associations with amotivation (β-coefficients from 0.34 to 0.43; R2 = .30). Our results support the validity of the cognitive triad and its benefit as a framework to analyze demotivating beliefs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
We note that different terms such as “dysfunctional”, “irrational” or “maladaptive” have been used to describe people’s appraisals, thoughts, beliefs or attitudes in the field of psychopathology. However, classifying beliefs as dysfunctional may not meet the potential functional aspects of beliefs from a patient’s perspective (Westermann et al., in press). Here, we have decided to use the more neutral term “demotivating beliefs” (i.e. beliefs with negative content that are related to amotivation).
 
Literature
go back to reference Beck, A. T. (1987). Cognitive models of depression. In R. Leahy & T. Dowd (Eds.), Journal of cognitive psychotherapy (1st ed.). New York: Springer. Beck, A. T. (1987). Cognitive models of depression. In R. Leahy & T. Dowd (Eds.), Journal of cognitive psychotherapy (1st ed.). New York: Springer.
go back to reference Beck, A. T., Grant, P. M., Huh, G. A., Perivoliotis, D., & Chang, N. A. (2013). Dysfunctional attitudes and expectancies in deficit syndrome schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39, 43–51.CrossRef Beck, A. T., Grant, P. M., Huh, G. A., Perivoliotis, D., & Chang, N. A. (2013). Dysfunctional attitudes and expectancies in deficit syndrome schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39, 43–51.CrossRef
go back to reference Beck, A. T., Rector, N. A., Stolar, N., & Grant, P. (2009). A cognitive conceptualization of negative symptoms. In Schizophrenia: Cognitive theory research and therapy (pp. 142–159). New York: Guilford Press. Beck, A. T., Rector, N. A., Stolar, N., & Grant, P. (2009). A cognitive conceptualization of negative symptoms. In Schizophrenia: Cognitive theory research and therapy (pp. 142–159). New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Christensen, H., Jorm, A. F., Mackinnon, A. J., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A., Henderson, A. S., & Rodgers, B. (1999). Age differences in depression and anxiety symptoms: A structural equation modelling analysis of data from a general population sample. Psychological Medicine, 29, S0033291798008150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291798008150.CrossRef Christensen, H., Jorm, A. F., Mackinnon, A. J., Korten, A. E., Jacomb, P. A., Henderson, A. S., & Rodgers, B. (1999). Age differences in depression and anxiety symptoms: A structural equation modelling analysis of data from a general population sample. Psychological Medicine, 29, S0033291798008150. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1017/​S003329179800815​0.CrossRef
go back to reference Deusinger, I. M. (1986). Die Frankfurter Selbstkonzeptskalen: (FSKN). Göttingen: Hogrefe. Deusinger, I. M. (1986). Die Frankfurter Selbstkonzeptskalen: (FSKN). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
go back to reference Eckblad, M. L., Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Mishlove, M. (1982). The revised social anhedonia scale. Unpublished test. Eckblad, M. L., Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Mishlove, M. (1982). The revised social anhedonia scale. Unpublished test.
go back to reference Granholm, E., Holden, J., & Worley, M. (2017). Improvement in negative symptoms and functioning in cognitive-behavioral social skills training for schizophrenia: Mediation by defeatist performance attitudes and asocial beliefs. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 44, 653–661. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbx099.CrossRef Granholm, E., Holden, J., & Worley, M. (2017). Improvement in negative symptoms and functioning in cognitive-behavioral social skills training for schizophrenia: Mediation by defeatist performance attitudes and asocial beliefs. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 44, 653–661. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​schbul/​sbx099.CrossRef
go back to reference Linscott, R. J., & van Os, J. (2010). Systematic reviews of categorical versus continuum models in psychosis: Evidence for discontinuous subpopulations underlying a psychometric continuum. Implications for DSM-V, DSM-VI, and DSM-VII. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 391–419.CrossRef Linscott, R. J., & van Os, J. (2010). Systematic reviews of categorical versus continuum models in psychosis: Evidence for discontinuous subpopulations underlying a psychometric continuum. Implications for DSM-V, DSM-VI, and DSM-VII. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 391–419.CrossRef
go back to reference Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.CrossRef Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.CrossRef
go back to reference Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
go back to reference Riehle, M., Pillny, M., & Lincoln, T. M. (2017). Are the negative symptoms of schizophrenia treatable at all? A systematic review on efficacy studies for targeted psychological interventions for negative symptoms. Verhaltenstherapie, 27, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1159/000478534.CrossRef Riehle, M., Pillny, M., & Lincoln, T. M. (2017). Are the negative symptoms of schizophrenia treatable at all? A systematic review on efficacy studies for targeted psychological interventions for negative symptoms. Verhaltenstherapie, 27, 199–208. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1159/​000478534.CrossRef
go back to reference Rosenberg, M. (1965). Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE). Acceptance and commitment therapy. Measures Package, 61, 52. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE). Acceptance and commitment therapy. Measures Package, 61, 52.
go back to reference Turner, D. T., van der Gaag, M., Karyotaki, E., & Cuijpers, P. (2014). Psychological interventions for psychosis: A meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 1–16. https://doi.org/0.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13081159.CrossRef Turner, D. T., van der Gaag, M., Karyotaki, E., & Cuijpers, P. (2014). Psychological interventions for psychosis: A meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 1–16. https://​doi.​org/​0.​1176/​appi.​ajp.​2013.​13081159.​CrossRef
go back to reference Westermann, S., Gantenbein, V., Caspar, F., & Cavelti, M. (in press). Maintaining delusional beliefs as means for the satisfaction and protection of psychological needs. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 226(3). Westermann, S., Gantenbein, V., Caspar, F., & Cavelti, M. (in press). Maintaining delusional beliefs as means for the satisfaction and protection of psychological needs. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 226(3).
Metadata
Title
Development of the Demotivating Beliefs Inventory and Test of the Cognitive Triad of Amotivation
Authors
Matthias Pillny
Katarina Krkovic
Tania M. Lincoln
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Cognitive Therapy and Research / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0147-5916
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9940-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Cognitive Therapy and Research 6/2018 Go to the issue